AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Ziemlé Clément Méda, Institut supérieur des sciences de la santé (INSSA), Université Nazi Boni, Bobo Dioulasso, Burkina Faso;
Citation: Méda ZC, Dembélé A, Savadogo GBL, Somé DA, Ouattara S, et al. (2019) Assessing the satisfaction of women inpatients from the services of the Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine of the National teaching hospital Souro Sanou, Burkina Faso. J Women Health Care Issues 2(2): Doi/10.31579/2642-9756/010
Copyright: © da ZC. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 20 June 2019 | Accepted: 10 July 2019 | Published: 15 July 2019
Keywords: satisfaction; quality; care; women; africa; inpatients; hospital; maternity
Introduction
The satisfaction of users of the health facilities is common used in order to appreciate quality of care. The objective of the present research was to study satisfaction of women inpatients from the care units of the Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine of the National teaching hospital Souro Sanou, in Bobo Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Methods
A cross-sectional analytical study conducted in 8 months. The areas of satisfaction were calculated according to the SAPHORA model (version 7).
Results
Two hundred (200) clients were eligible and were all interviewed, with the participation rate of 100.0%. The mean age of clients was 28.4 (95% CI: 27.3-29.5) years-old with extremes ranged from 15 to 56 years-old. The low score domains of satisfaction were: reception, catering and staff organization.
The scores per domain of satisfaction and per service and the overall satisfaction score were less than 50%. The differences between the services were related to: Hospitality score and Organization of the outing score. There were a difference between the services and the following variables: hospitality domain of satisfaction, the organization of the outing domain of satisfaction, and the cost of care.
Conclusion
The improvement of the satisfaction of women inpatients requires the respect of the patients' basic needs and a reorganization of health services with committed staff in order to provide quality health care and services.
The assessment of the satisfaction of users of health facilities is now undeniably part of the assessment of the quality of care. The quality, in general, and the evaluation of patient satisfaction in particular, is a transversal action that involves all actors in the hospital, not only health professionals but also users of the public health service. It is a multidimensional concept, requiring multiple criteria of judgment: quality of the human contacts, quality of the "itinerary" of the patient in facility, quality of the medical reasoning before a diagnostic examination [1].
Already established in the 1970s in some countries such as the United States of America (USA) and the United Kingdom [2], the evaluation of patient satisfaction is became a requirement for health care institutions, with a dual interest. Indeed, the analysis of results when evaluating patient satisfaction firstly makes it possible to provide indicators of effectiveness, and secondly, been data for an observation system which aims aimed for improving the quality of care and detecting their dysfunction [3]. From this perspective, the assessment of satisfaction is part of the systematic and annual requirements in France (by the High Authority for Health, in French called Haute Autorité de Santé -HAS). These requirements have also to be applied into developing countries, where in recent years through many studies, there are showing increasing interest in evaluating the quality of care provided by their health system. In a context of limited resources, these countries are continually aware of the need to adapt their health system in order to meet the real health needs of the population [4].
Despite several studies in Africa [5-8] and some of them from Burkina Faso [9-11], we have not identified a study on the perceived satisfaction of inpatients from health services, especially from of the Department of obstetrics and gynecology (DOG) in Burkina Faso. The objective of the present research is to study the satisfaction of women inpatients from services of the Department of gynecology, obstetrics, and reproductive medicine (DGORM) of the National teaching Souro Sanou (NTHSS) in Bobo Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
This study was conducted in the DOGRM, one of six (06) departments of the National teaching hospital Souro Sanou (NTHSS) in Bobo Dioulasso, Burkina Faso. The DOGRM is composed by three (03) main services: ground floor service, post-operative service, gynecology and recent childbirth service.
A cross-sectional study, double-pass (collected entry data and outing data), was conducted in eight (08) months from October 2016 to May 2017, with a data collection phase of two (02) months.
The women inpatients from the DGORM services were included according to the following criteria: having at least 15 years-old, having stayed at least 24 hours in the care unit, been able and accepted to answer questions (free consent) without intermediaries and free from any psychiatric condition. Excluded women inpatients were those who died and those who were transferred to other health services or facilities during the study. The expected sample size was 200 women inpatients.
The study method was the survey method using face-to-face individual interview. A semi-structured questionnaire based on the patient satisfaction questionnaire (SAPHORA, version 2007) adapted to our context and the services of gynecology obstetrics and reproductive medicine was used. Data collected were related to the socio-economic characteristics of the patients and to the satisfaction, the general opinion on the hospital stay, the types of the service in the DOGRM, and the point of view about the costs.
The data was analyzed using the SPSS software, version 23. The satisfaction score was calculated by domain of satisfaction consisting of the sum of the responses by domain (Tables II and III): Reception (ranging from questions 2-10), Staff organization (ranging from questions 2-10), Communication (ranging from questions 5-25), Human staff quality (ranging from questions 3-16), Medical care (ranging from questions 8-40), Hospitality (ranging from questions 8-49), Catering ( ranging from question 3-16), Organization of the outing (ranging from questions 8-42). Then, the overall satisfaction score was calculated by summing the scores (Reception + Staff Organization + Communication + Human staff quality + Medical care + Hospitality + Catering + Organization of the Outing) for a minimum expected of 43 and a maximum expected of 208). Then, the mean (with 95% confidence interval) and the median for each score were calculated; the results by category of the percentage of satisfaction by score of the different domains of satisfaction by taking the median as the threshold value. The score was satisfied when it was greater than or equal to 80%.
Concerning the ethical considerations, we obtained the agreement of the Chief executive of the NTHSS and of the chief of the DGORM. Informed consent was gathered for all participants in the study. After data collection, the confidentiality of the data was ensured. The participation in this study posed no risk for the patients.
The number of inpatients in the care units of DGORM during the data collection period was 3135 of which 200 were eligible and all interviewed (100% of participation rate).
Socioeconomic characteristics of women inpatients
The average age of the clients surveyed was 28.4 (95 % CI: 27.3-29.5) years-old with extremes ranging from 15.0 to 56.0 years-old.
The table I shows the distribution of the patients surveyed according to their socioeconomic characteristics. Female farmers were the most represented with 22.5% of the participants. The level of education was relatively low with 40.0% of participants out of school. Monogamous status accounted for 73.0% of the participants. The monthly income was less than 40,000 CFA Francs (72.7 USD) for 152 participants. One hundred and ten participants lived in rural areas and very few of them had a health care insurance.
Level of satisfaction and its components perceived by the participants
The tables II and III show the scores of satisfaction domains according to their means (with its 95% confident interval), their medians, their minimums and maximums. Thus, the mean score "Reception" was 5.6 (5.4 - 5.8) with a satisfaction score percentage of 19.5%. Regarding the score "staff organization of the care units", its mean score was 3 (2.8 - 3.3) and 35.0% of clients said they were satisfied. For 45% of the participants, the "communication with the staff" score was satisfactory with a mean score of 14.3 (13.0 – 15.0). Also, 43.0% of the workforce rated the human staff quality score as satisfactory with a mean score of 12.7 (12.4 - 13). About the mean score of "quality of care offered", it was 23 (22.5 - 23.5) with a satisfaction score percentage of 48.0%. The mean score of "hospitality" 28.8 (28.3 - 29.3) with a satisfaction percentage of 44.5%. Related to the mean score of "catering", it was 2.8 (2.6 – 3.0) with a satisfaction percentage of 32.5%. Finally, the mean score of "organization of the outing" was 27.7 (27.2 - 28.2) with a satisfaction percentage of 47.5%.
The overall mean score of satisfaction for women inpatients was 118.1 (116.4 - 119.8) with extremes of 87 and 150 (Table II).
The median overall score was 117.0. And 48.5% of participants said they were generally satisfied (Table III).
General opinion on the hospital stay and point of view about the costs
With a mean of 3.8 (3.7 - 3.9) for a scale of from 2 to 7, the general opinion score on hospital stay was 14.5%.
Related to care costs, 133 (66.5%) of participants found that care was cheap. The areas of expensive costs were the "drugs" domain for 57.0% of respondents.
Level of satisfaction and the opinion about the health care services perceived by the women inpatients and the services of the DGOMR
It is noted that no satisfaction level per service had its superior modality above 50.0%. It was the same for the overall score of satisfaction with 48.5% satisfaction (table IV).
In addition, it was found that the services had satisfaction score per domain and overall satisfaction score that differed from one service to another (table IV): these included the hospitality score (p = 0.054) and the score organization of the output (p <0.0001).
The objective of this research was to study the level of satisfaction of women inpatients in the sevices of the DGORM in the NTHSS, Bobo Dioulasso. As a result, the overall level of satisfaction was 48.5%. Related to the services, the scores of the satisfaction domains and the overall satisfaction score were all less than 50.0%. Differences between services were related to Hospitality, organization of outing, and cost of care.
The present study has a major limitation that of any cross-sectional study (temporal inference). Also, the method used is the individual interview face to face and within the hospital. Although this method reduces the rate of non-responses and missing data, it has the disadvantage of not respecting the anonymity of the patient and thus expose to a risk of social desirability, the patient expressing less easily dissatisfaction. In addition, some no less important data such as the diagnosis and the type of pathologies (acute or chronic), the notion of hospitalization experience (especially at the NTHSS), the number of total days of hospitalization of patients, did not collected in the present study. Taking these variables into account would have made it possible to evaluate their influence on patient satisfaction.
Socio-economic Characteristics
The mean age of the patients in our study was identical to that found by France-Colmant who noted a mean age of 28.7 years-old in an obstetric gynecology center in France [12]. In Burkina Faso, the age groups 20 to 24 years-old and 25 to 29 years-old were the age group where the fertility rate is the highest [13].
Whether uneducated participants were the most represented in the present study, they were 15.5% of the participants in the study conducted by Bougmiza et al related to the satisfaction of inpatients in the Department of gynecology and obstetrics of Sousse in Tunisia [5]. But our results were similar to the results by Hien [11], in the same context of Burkina Faso.
With 76% of the participants reported receiving less than 72.7 USD per month, our results were closed to the results from the study of Bougmiza et al. in Tunisia where 70% of the participants said having less than 200 Tunisian Dinars corresponding to 87.4 USD [5]. The result of our study is explained by the fact that the burkinabè population in general is poor. Indeed, 40.1% of Burkinabè live below the poverty line, with less than 500 F CFA francs per day corresponding to 0.9 USD per day [14].
As in the present study, about 94.0% of the participants did not have affiliation to a health insurance scheme in the study conducted by Hien [11]. As well, Nguyen Thi et al only noted that 7.1% of the patients surveyed benefited from the health insurance card in Vietnam [15]. However, they results differed from the results found by Bougmiza et al in Tunisia where 77.1% of patients were covered by health insurance [5]. Our results justified by the lack of social security for all at the national level and confirms the low financial income of populations that do not allow them to subscribe to health insurance. It also calls, once again, for the need for universal health coverage for the population.
Reception domain: In our study, 19.5% of women inpatients reported being satisfied about reception domain. This result was far from the results from study conducted by Hien who found 40.0% of satisfied patients on the reception at the department of medicine [11], and the one conducted by Yameogo who found a satisfaction score of 68.1% in the department of cardiology [16]. As found by Amazian et al, the satisfaction according to reception domain was 71.0% about cancer patients [17]. In our hospital, the dissatisfaction of the patients surveyed in our study could be explained by the very long waiting time in the emergency room. Many factors such as the insufficient number of gynecological examination tables and a very insufficient number of the medical staff with a huge workload are the main causes.
Staff organization domain: Regarding the organization of the staff in the service, our results were similar to the results found by Hien in Burkina Faso with 48.8% [11], and Jaâfar in Morocco with 29.0% [7].
In our context, the high diversity of actors (students in health schools, medical school students, and the usual medical staff) with no identifiers would explain this low score for the organization.
Communication domain: As in the present study, the participants were satisfied according to the results notified by Hien [11], with 42.8% of satisfaction about communication domain. These results were superior to those published by the Ministry of Health of Burkina Faso in which patients were more dissatisfied with the lack of information on the adverse / secondary effects of examinations and certain treatments with a score of 37.3% [9].
However in France, Canouï-Poitrine et al noted 89.6% of satisfied patients about communication domain [17]. As well in Morocco, Jaâfar found that 50.0% of patients were satisfied [7]. Finally, Nguyen Thi et al in Vietnam reported 98.0% of the satisfaction about the medical information score [15].
In our context, linguistic diversity would be a barrier when transmitting of medical information. Indeed, faced with a largely uneducated population where the official language is very little mastered, the communication and transmission of medical information to the patient are not easy, many health workers being not able to translate certain medical terms in local dialects. These factors partly could explained the dissatisfaction about the communication domain in our health centers.
Human quality of staff: In this study, 43.0% of patients rated the human quality of staff as satisfactory. Although 87.5% of the participants found the caregivers friendly. Only 2% of them said that they were helped for performing certain tasks such as getting up, getting dressed, and doing their own thing. About the nursing care, it must integrate the support to patients for their performance of certain activities of daily life as stipulated in the basic needs according to Virginia Henderson.
Quality of care offered: In our study, 60.0% of the patients said they had not been involved in the decisions taken concerning their care and 40% complained of the waiting time more or less long before the completion of the complementary examinations (ultrasound, radiography, …...). This result is similar to the one found by Hien [11], who noted a dissatisfaction with the care offered because of the exclusion of patients concerning decisions that count for their care.
Hospitality: About hospitality domain, our result closed to the one found by Hien, who found that 46.0% of patients said they were satisfied with the hospitality conditions offered [11]. These results are also similar to the one published by the Ministry of Health au Burkina Faso [9]. Contrary to these results, Nguyen noted a rate much higher than ours where the mean satisfaction score for the hotel industry was 86.3% in Vietnam [15].
The low hospitality rate could largely be explained in our study by the lack of a telephone and television available for the inpatients. In addition, the access and cleanliness of sanitation facilities for the inpatients recorded the highest rate of dissatisfaction. Indeed in our study, 73.0% of the inpatients declared the absence of toilets and 99.5% of patients said they had never received a bed sheet offered by the hospital.
Catering: Regarding the catering, our results were similar to the results from Bougmiza et al [5], where 50.6% of the patients were dissatisfied concerning the temperature, the taste of the food as well as the schedule of the meal service in the Department of obstetrics and gynecology of the Sousse Hospital, Tunisia. This result is also similar to the one found by Hien [11], who reported that 42.4% of patients were satisfied with the catering.
In our study, the patients' dissatisfaction about the catering domain could be explained by the fact that the catering in the hospital does not take into account the diets observed by certain patients before and during their hospitalization. As well, it was noted a lack of dietary advices about the feeding of patients. Indeed amongst the 200 participants in our study, only 45 of them reported having had advice about their diet.
Organization of the outing: As in the present study, the dissatisfaction was found in the department of medicine in the study conducted by Hien [11], in which 59.6% of patients were dissatisfied with the organization of the outing. This dissatisfaction of the patients would be related to the absence of medical assistance at home and for some care such as the physiotherapy. Indeed, when the patients leave the hospital, home care is an aspect left to the discretion of patients and their families.
Overall satisfaction: The overall satisfaction score was 48.5%. This result is similar to that found by Bougmiza et al with 51.0% in Tunisia [5] and by Hien with 48.8% [11]. However, it remains low compared to the results other authors, ranging from 72.7% to 88.0% [13, 18-19].
Satisfaction scores in the Department of gynecology, obstetrics and reproductive medicine are all less than 50.0%. The improvement of the satisfaction of women inpatients requires the respect of the patients' basic needs and a reorganization of health services with committed staff in order to provide quality health care and services.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
