AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Clevio Desouza, D Y Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Pune.
Citation: A Kale, C Desouza, J Sharma. (2022). Are MRI Findings Different in HIV Positive Tuberculosis Spine Patients. Journal of Clinical Surgery and Research, 3(4); DOI:10.31579/2768-2757/046
Copyright: © 2022, Clevio Desouza. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 15 March 2022 | Accepted: 01 April 2022 | Published: 26 April 2022
Keywords: tuberculosis of spine; MRI; tubercular abscess; vertebral collapse; HIV; tuberculosis
Background: Tuberculosis of the spine is a serious manifestation of the disease that causes debilitating injury. In HIV positive patients the incidence of skeletal tuberculosis increases to 60%. The MRI has become the gold standard for diagnosis and preoperative planning in spinal TB. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of HIV status on MRI findings in spinal tuberculosis patients at a tertiary public hospital in Pune, India.
Methods: This was retrospective study of spinal TB patients admitted to a tertiary public hospital in Pune, India. Fifty patients with histopathological confirmation of spinal tuberculosis, HIV status and available MRI scans from 2017-2020 were identified. HIV status was positive in 16 and negative in 34. Males were predominant (27:23). Site, extent of disease, type of lesion, abscess volume, kyphotic deformity and skip lesions were reported.
Results: There is no statistical difference in age and sex of the patients. The average abscess size in HIV positive group is more (9.63 sq.cm) as compare to (2.29 sq. cm) non HIV group. Average numbers of vertebrae involved in both groups are almost same (2.4:2.26). Average kyphotic angle is significantly more in non HIV group as compare to HIV group (10.8:15.38). skip lesions were more common in HIV group (6 out of 10 as compare to 6 out of 20). There was a positive correlation between abscess size and CD4 count in HIV patients.
Conclusion: HIV negative patients have greater tubercular destruction as measured by resultant kyphosis. There is no difference in the incidence of location, type of vertebral involvement and number of vertebrae involved. Skip lesions were more common in HIV positive patients in our study. HIV positive patients show greater epidural abscess volume and are showing correlation with CD4 count.
Spinal tuberculosis is most common form of osseous extra pulmonary tuberculosis. With epidemic of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, there is resurgence in all forms of tuberculosis including spinal tuberculosis [1]. The risk of developing tuberculosis is estimated to be 20–37 times greater in people co-infected with HIV than among those without HIV infection [2].
Despite its common occurrence and the high frequency of long-term morbidity, there are no standard guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of spinal tuberculosis. Early diagnosis and prompt treatment is necessary to prevent permanent neurological disability and to minimize spinal deformity [3]. Surgical intervention in form of decompression and fusion is required in few of the cases depending on abscess size, vertebral body destruction and kyphotic angle. The clinical presentation of spinal tuberculosis in patients infected with the human Immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is similar to that of patients who are HIV negative [4].
Diagnosis of spinal tuberculosis mainly depend on characteristic clinical and Neuro-imaging findings. The MRI has become the gold standard for diagnosis and preoperative planning in spinal TB. MRI is more sensitive than x-ray and more specific than CT in the diagnosis of spinal tuberculosis [5]. MRI allows for the rapid determination of the mechanism for neurologic involvement [6].
The objective of this study was to assess the impact of HIV status on MRI findings in spinal tuberculosis patients at a tertiary public hospital in Pune, India. It will help in assessing the differences in radiological presentation of spinal tuberculosis in these patients.
This was a retrospective study of spinal TB patients admitted to tertiary public hospital in Pune,India. Fifty adult patients with histopathological confirmation of tuberculosis in thoraco- lumbar spine from 2017-2020 were included. While peadiatric patients (age less than 12 years), those patients having tuberculosis of cervical, sacral or coccyx region, those patients with unconfirmed histopathological reports were excluded from current study.
Data was collected from medical files regarding history, clinical examination and neurological examination and radiological examination by MRI and CD 4 count in HIV positive cases.
Data regarding 1.5 tesla MRI spine were collected from electronic data system. Site, extent of disease, type of lesion, abscess volume, kyphotic deformity and skip lesions were reported.
Following finding were considered for study in MRI
The statistical analysis was done in SPSS - 20 software. The comparison between radiological parameters of HIV positive and HIV negative patients with spinal tuberculosis was done.
Fifty adult patients with histopathologically confirmed Thoracolumbar spinal TB admitted to tertiary public hospital in Pune, India were included in the study. All these patients were evaluated by clinical, neurological assessment and radiological by MRI. The data was evaluated for age and sex distribution, number of vertebral body involved, type of pattern of vertebral involvement, angle of kyphosis (amount of vertebral body destruction), amount of anterior epidural space abscess formation, and presence of skip lesions.
HIV status was positive in sixteen (32%) and negative in thirty-four patients. Twenty-seven were males (64%). There was no statistical difference in age and sex of the patients. Mean anterior epidural abscess size was greater in HIV-infected vs uninfected patients (9.6cm vs. 2.3cm, p=0.0001). HIV-infected patients with higher CD4 counts had smaller abscesses than those with lower CD4 counts. Lumbar spine involvement was more common in HIV-infected patients (31% vs 3%, p=0.004). Kobb's angle, which reflects vertebral destruction and deformity, was actually lower in HIV-infected patients (1O.20 vs. 15.50, p=0.0032). Average numbers of vertebrae involved in both groups are almost same (2.4:2.26). skip lesions were more common in HIV group (7 out of 16 as compare to 6 out of 26).
We conducted this study mainly to assess the differences in radiological parameter between sero positive and sero negative spinal tuberculosis patients. There was no significant difference in the distribution of male and female in two groups hence distribution in two groups was uniform. Although some series have found that spinal tuberculosis does not have a sexual predilection there are some studies showing that the disease is more common in males. (male-to-female ratio of 1.5-2:1). The study conducted by Robert anley and dunn in which it was concluded that female preponderance of spinal tuberculosis is present [7].
In our study the median age of sero positive patient was 47yrs and median age for sero negative patient was 35 years. There was no significant difference in age distribution of patient in two group and hence distribution is uniform. This is in accordance with study conducted In the United States and other developed countries which stated that Pott's disease occurs primarily in adults. In countries with higher rates of Pott disease, involvement in young adults and older children predominates [8, 9].
There was no significant difference in number of vertebra involve of patient in two group and hence distribution is uniform.This is in accordance with The Study conducted by Hodgson and stock and Mishra and Mukopadhyaya suggestive of average involvement of 3.4 vertebrae which was reported by Hodgson and Stock [10]. A figure of 3.8 was given by Mukopadhyaya and Mishra in their study [11]. The average number reported in children was 3.4 by Martin (1970) [12]. The average number of vertebrae involved in each adult is 2.5.
In our study, GROUP 1 had 11 (73.3%) patients having paradiscal type of vertebral involvement, 4(26.7%) patients having central type of vertebral involvement. In GROUP 2 12 (80%) patients having paradiscal type of vertebral involvement, 3 (20%) patients having central type of vertebral involvement. There was no significant difference in the pattern of vertebra involve of patient in two group and hence distribution was uniform. Pott disease most commonly involves the thoracic and lumbosacral spine. However, published series have shown some variation [13,14]. The lower thoracic vertebrae makes up the most common area of involvement (40-50%), followed closely by the lumbar spine (35-45%). In other series, proportions are similar but favor lumbar spine involvement [13-15]
In our study in GROUP 1 the median K angle was 10 and mean was 10.27. In GROUP 2 the median K angle was 20 and mean was 17.33. On applying the chi square test the value of p was 0.015 which shows that there was statistically significant difference in degree of kyphosis in terms of k angle in patients of the two groups. Hence amount of vertebral body destruction and degree of kyphosis is more in GROUP 2(sero negative) as compared with GROUP 1 (sero positive). This was in accordance with the study conducted by Anley and Dunn [7].
The total percentage collapse in HIV negative patients was significantly higher (P=0.036) at 107% (0-235±56.3) compared to 75.3% (0-235±64.2) in HIV positive patients. This shows that on an average there is more destruction of the vertebral bodies in HIV negative patients when compared with HIV positive patients. As this was assessed on the MRI in the supine position, it should be seen as a residual local kyphosis and probably less appreciated than in the standard erect X-ray. The average kyphotic deformity in HIV positive patients was 9.5° (0-42±11.8), while the average for HIV negative patients was 19.2° (12-40±10.2) (P=0.002).
There was no significant difference skip lesion of patient in two group and hence distribution is uniform. Multiple level spinal TB may occur as continuous involvement of two to four contiguous vertebrae, or may affect different levels in different parts of the spine. The lesion in continuity typically is seen in immunodeficient patients and in patients with hemoglobinopathies.
In our study, Mean abscess size in anterior epidural space in GROUP 1 was 7.95 +4.34 and Mean abscess size in anterior epidural space in GROUP 2 was 1.8+1.27. On applying independent samples t test p value was 0.0001 which is highly significant .so amount of abscess formation is more in GROUP 1 (sero positive) patient due decreased cell mediated immunity of patient and induction of inflammatory response by tuberculos infection. Despite less bony destruction in the HIV positive group, the abscess formation is no different. The total abscess volumes and sites were the same in both groups with only a trend towards greater epidural pus formation in the positive group.
Type IV hypersensitivity (delayed type) reaction to destroy the TB bacilli following antigen presentation to the CD4+ lymphocytes by macrophages. This reaction develops within 2-4 weeks after exposure and is controlled by various the chemo- and cytokines such as Interleukin (IL)-12, Interleukin (IL)-8, interferon (IFN)-γ and Tissue necrosis factor (TNF)-α. This interaction results in the formation of a granuloma, which creates an environment in which the TB bacilli can be destroyed. Although the absolute number of macrophages is not decreased in HIV positive patients, their function and interaction with the CD4+ cells is negatively influenced. This coupled with the decrease in CD4+ cells lead to an impaired immune response, and thus local tissue inflammatory response to the TB bacilli in HIV positive patients. TB also has an effect on the HIV state by increasing activation of the immune system. This results in an increased secretion of pro-inflammatory mediators which in turn increase HIV replication with CD4cell loss and have a negative effect on the monocytes and lymphocytes with accelerated HIV-related disease process. In study conducted by Anley and Dunn suggestive of [7], HIV positive patients show a trend to a greater epidural abscess volume. This difference may be explained by the reduced autoimmune response of the type 4 hypersensitivity reaction caused by the HIV infection. Overall there is no significant difference in abscess size between the two groups, although there was a trend towards increased abscess size in the epidural space in HIV positive patients.
In conclusion data collected and analyzed in current study by clinical, neurological and radiographical parameter demonstrate that there was no significant difference age, gender, pattern of vertebral body involvement, number of vertebra involve, skip lesion and neurological outcome. However, HIV negative patients demonstrate greater tuberculous destruction of their vertebrae in terms of total percentage body collapse and resultant kyphosis. This difference may be explained by the reduced autoimmune response of the type 4 hypersensitivity reaction caused by the HIV infection.
In our current study, we found that patients with spinal TB who are HIV positive had significantly less vertebral body collapse than HIV negative patients, despite the number of bodies involved being the same. At first this may seem counter-intuitive, but this can be explained by the altered local inflammatory response, i.e., ameliorated type 4 hypersensitivity reaction. The typical granulomatous destruction of TB is less likely to occur in HIV positive patients. Thus, the mechanical consequences of destruction and kyphosis are less in them. There was less bony destruction in the HIV positive group, the abscess formation is no different. The total abscess volumes and sites were the same in both groups with only a trend towards greater epidural pus formation in the positive group.
TB also has an effect on the HIV state by increasing activation of the immune system. This results in an increased secretion of pro-inflammatory mediators which in turn increase HIV replication with CD4 cell loss and have a negative effect on the monocytes and lymphocytes with accelerated HIV-related disease process and this lead to excessive abscess formation in anterior epidural space. As in HIV positive patient abscess formation was greater which was mainly responsible for neurological involvement so simple surgery costotransversctomy and drainage of abscess may provide good relief in such patient.
As we have not studied correlation between CD4 count, status of immunity of patient and amount of vertebral body involvement and neurology of patient there is a scope for further study to be carried out in this regard.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
