AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Giovanny Rios Dueñas, MD, Cardiovascular Surgeon, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio. Assistant Professor, Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Candidate for Clinical Epidemiology Magister, Carrera 7 #40-62 Bogotá, Colombia.
Citation: Giovanny Rios-Dueñas, Juan Rafael Correa-Ortiz, Juliana Villanueva-Congote, Emilio Chala-Saad, Marian Rincon-Montaña, Camila Pantoja-Ruiz, Diego Rosselli, (2020) Non-Cardiac Thoracic Surgical and Endovascular Perioperative Major Adverse Cardiac Events: Quick and Easy Prediction and Proposed Mitigation Strategies. J Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery, 1(2); DOI:10.31579/2693-2156/008
Copyright: © 2020 Giovanny Rios, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 05 June 2020 | Accepted: 26 June 2020 | Published: 09 July 2020
Keywords: cardiac surgical procedures; open heart surgery; minimally invasive cardiovascular surgical procedures; costs and cost analysis
Background: The aim of this study was to describe the experience with minimally invasive cardiovascular surgery (MICS) by evaluating the costs and clinical outcomes in a university hospital in Bogotá, Colombia. As a comparison, a series of patients submitted to open heart surgery (OHS) was used.
Methods: Through a retrospective analysis of clinical records, from January 2014 to September 2018, data from 56 patients submitted to either MICS or OHS were collected. A comparison between these two types of approaches evaluating relevant clinical outcomes and demographic differences was performed. Direct costs for each hospitalization were analyzed and discriminated by categories. Costs are presented in 2018 US dollars (USD).
Results: Thirty-four patients were included in the MICS group, with ages ranging from 17 to 63 years; 22 patients were included in the OHS group, with ages from one to 74. The mean length of stay was 6.9 days (SD 3.4) in the MICS group and 10.3 (SD 6.5) in the OHS (p = 0.046). The average cost for MICS was $8 345 ± 2 522 and for OHS was $9 422 ± 3 090 (p=0.08). Higher costs in procedures in MICS where compensated by lower costs in hospital stay, laboratory tests, medications and transfusions.
Conclusion: MICS can be performed safely in a middle-income country like Colombia, at a fraction of the costs incurred in developed countries, while improving hospital bed turnover rate.
In 1952, the first open-heart surgery (OHS) was successfully performed in a 5-year-old girl for the reparation of an atrial septal defect. Previously, major vascular surgery was limited to extracardiac procedures, such as aortic coarctation repair or ductus arteriosus ligation. In 1953 Gibbon performed an atrial septum defect repair using a cardiopulmonary bypass system for 26 minutes but could not repeat this surgery successfully. Modern cardiac surgery had started [1,2]
The first minimally invasive cardiovascular surgery (MICS) took place in 1948 when Harken and Ellis described a mitral valvotomy using an intercostal approach [3]. In 1994, Benetti and Ballester, two Argentinean surgeons, described the anastomosis of the internal mammary artery with the anterior descending artery, through a small anterolateral thoracotomy [4]. Two years later, in the Cleveland Clinic, Cosgrove and Sabik described MICS for aortic valve replacement using a parasternal and transsternal incision, Carpentier performed the first video-assisted mitral repair, and Leipzig worked with the first three-dimensional videoscope in Germany [5]. MICS for correction of auricular septal defects has been reported with good clinical results, and low frequency of adverse events [6].
Despite being safe, MICS has disadvantages, related to the need for femoral cannulation, for ligation of the right internal mammary artery, thoracic instability and, in case of any complications, difficulty for conversion to a full sternotomy [7]. MICS should be understood as part of the trend towards less invasive and less traumatic procedures [8,9]. Appropriate surgical technique, proper selection of patients and an experienced surgeon should be associated with mortality close to 0%. In addition, these types of approaches leave less visible defects, which are the expected result for patients [4]
Advantages of MICS for mitral valve replacement were described by Carpentier in 1996. And have been proven in other studies [10]. Given the requirements of specialized equipment, longer surgical time [11], use of cardiopulmonary bypass and clamping times, this procedure has higher costs compared to OHS [7], despite decreasing both length of stay and need for blood transfusion [11]. One of the disadvantages of MICS for aortic valve replacement is limitation in visibility during the procedure, which can complicate cannulation, ventilation of the heart and placement of the epicardial wires. Despite this, it is less traumatic, improves ventilatory mechanisms, and reduces postoperative pain, infection rate, bleeding volume and transfusion requirements. All this allows patients to return to their daily activities sooner [12].
Cardiovascular surgery is expensive, according to Iribarne et al. direct costs for both MICS or OHS cost $20,000-30,000 USD [13]. The aim of this study was to describe the experience of MICS by evaluating costs and clinical outcomes in a cardiovascular surgery unit of a university hospital in Bogotá, Colombia. As a comparison, a series of patients submitted to OHS was used.
A retrospective analysis of the cardiovascular surgery database of the university hospital was conducted and the clinical data were collected from January 2014 to September 2018 since MICS was introduced in the hospital in 2014. Patients who underwent MICS were included, and patients operated for OHS were chosen for comparison.
Patients required some other additional cardiovascular procedure in the same period were excluded. Multiple parameters were compared between the two types of approaches, including evaluating the surgical times, the time stayed in the hospital and the intensive care unit (ICU), bleeding volume during surgery, blood transfusion requirement, intubation, or hemodynamic support; as well as the direct medical costs for each hospitalization. The costs were discriminated among procedures, medicines, laboratories, images and hospital stay.
GraphPad Prism 6 software was used for statistical analysis. The demographic differences, ICU and hospital stay, intra-surgical bleeding volume, time of surgery, cardiopulmonary bypass and clamping, and hemodynamic support requirement were initially analyzed by the D'Agostino-Pearson Normality Test. For the variables that did not pass the normality test, U Mann Whitney test was used. When the results were not statistically significant, median and interquartile ranges were reported.
All costs in Colombian pesos (COP) were adjusted from pesos of 2018 using the health price index (IPC) specifically estimated by the national statistics agency DANE. Afterward, costs were converted to US dollars (USD) with the official average exchange rate of the Central Bank of Colombia (Banco de la República) $1USD = $2956 COP. Then the Shapiro Wilk normality test was applied and the U Mann Whitney test with continuity correction if the normality test was not fulfilled.
This study complies with international and local ethical regulation and was approved by the University Hospital research and ethics committee.
Thirty-four patients were included in the MICS group, with ages ranging from 17 to 63 years; 22 patients were included in the OHS group, with ages from 1 to 74 (Table 1).
The proportion of females was similar in both groups, and although mean age was higher in the OHS, the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.06). Patients were mostly adults, but in the group of OHS, there were 5 children aged between 7 months and 9 years. Despite the 5 pediatric cases, the average age in the OHS group was 5 years higher than the MICS group. Atrial septum defect repair was the most common procedure, particularly in the MICS group, followed in frequency by mitral valve replacement. Only one aortic valve replacement was performed by MICS while 8 of these were performed by OHS. In the OHS group, the less common procedure was mitral valve replacement.
Although all patients were taken to the ICU in the postoperative period and required ventilation, 5 patients were admitted to the ICU with orotracheal intubation in the MICS group and 1 in the OHS group. However, 29 of the 34 MICS patients were extubated in the operating room, and only 3 required positive pressure ventilation. Of those from OHS, 21 out of 22 patients were extubated, but 11 needed positive pressure assistance after surgery. Table 2 summarizes data about length of stay and surgical times.
The need for hemodynamic support was similar, 10 patients required support in MICS and 10 in OHS (p = 0.262). Although there was no difference in the bleeding volume (mean 135 ±106 (cc) in MICS, 268 ±125 (cc) in OHS; p =0.12), there was a difference in the requirement for blood transfusion. In the MICS group, two patients required it (1 and 2 pRBC.), while in the OHS group 8 patients required transfusion (4 required 1 unit of pRBC, 3 required 2 and 1 required 3 units). Total costs are summarized in Table 3.
Shapiro Wilks normality test for the costs of the MICS group rejected the hypothesis of normality (p<0>Figure 1.
On the other hand, the OHS group did not have a statistically significant value for this same test (p=0.12). Mann Whitney test with continuity correction did not show a difference for the average costs in the MICS and OHS groups (p = 0.08).
Despite having similar costs, the analysis of cost components differs between both groups. The cost of medical supplies (excluding medication and blood components) were higher in the MICS group, representing 51.5% of total costs ($4 296 of the total of $8 345) than in the OHS group (38.3% of total cost; $3 608 of $9 422). There were reductions in the relative costs of medications (which represented 11.2% of total costs in MICS and 15.5% in OHS); length of stay (which represented 10.4% of total costs in MICS and 14.9% in OHS); laboratory tests (3.6% in MICS and 4.2% in OHS); and blood bank costs (1.2% in MICS and 4.0% in OHS).
This study has several limitations. The sample size is relatively small compared with those from large academic centers in the United States, which relates to the relatively recent implementation of MICS in a middle-income country like Colombia. Moreover, the comparisons of these two groups would have been more appropriate with a randomized allocation of study subjects. The OHS group was more heterogeneous in age, with young children and more elder subjects; surgical procedures in both groups are not necessarily comparable.
In our MICS group the most common procedure was the correction of the atrial septum defect, followed by mitral valve replacement, unlike other series, like the one described by Iribarne et al. [14] at the Columbia University Medical Center in New York, of 910 patients submitted to MICS, where mitral surgery predominates (507 patients) over correction of septal defects (103 patients). In our study all patients in the MICS group were adults (17 or older), while the OHS group included several children. The mean and median length of stay of our MICS sample were identical to this larger sample. Our mean clamping time (64.1 ± 26.6 m) was also similar to theirs (58.1 ± 44.9) but cardiopulmonary bypass was shorter in our patients (77.1 ± 25.8 m vs. 101.9 ± 66.8).
Another Indian study by Chigarapalli et al. [15] with a sample of 70 patients submitted to MICS, showed that the most common procedure was correction of atrial septal defect (30 patients), followed by mitral valve replacement (25 patients), similar to the findings in our study. This study did not include children, same as ours. The mean length of stay (6 days) reported in this study was identical to ours, but our ICU stay was a day longer. The mean clamping time and cardiopulmonary bypass were shorter for the patients in this study (26.16± 5.48 and 51.28± 11.13 m respectively).
As has been described elsewhere [13,14], MICS was associated with a shorter length of stay in our institution. This 3-day reduction is particularly significant in a hospital like ours, and very probably in most low and middle-income countries where hospital beds, operating rooms and ICU availability constitutes yet another access barrier to high complexity procedures [16]. Even if there were no savings for the health system with MICS, increasing bed availability would be an advantage by itself. Future studies, from the patient perspective, could analyze the influence on quality of life not only in the mid-term [17,18] but also in the immediate postoperative period, as has been suggested elsewhere [19–21].
With regard to costs, several findings are interesting when placed in the context of other similar studies. While in Colombia this high complexity procedure costs between $5 000 and $14 000 for 2018, in Columbia University Medical Center costs $20 000 to $30 000 for 2011 (9). The distribution of costs in our MICS group, with two peaks (Figure 1), one around $6 000 and the other around $11 000 was an unexpected finding and deserves further analysis. Despite ending up with similar costs in both groups, the component of these reflect an increase in procedural costs, compensated with a reduction related to shorter length of stay, medications, lab tests and blood bank costs.
In summary, MICS is a viable option in a middle-income country like Colombia, reaching similar clinical and safety outcomes as those described in more developed countries, at a fraction of the cost. Shorter length of stay could be an added advantage where hospital has limited available beds.
We thank Julie Johana Rojas Villamil for her assistance with data collection.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
