AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Jose Miguel Contreras, Otolaryngology Department, Hospital San Juan de Dios, Otolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Chile.
Citation: Jose M. Contreras, Sebastián Castro M., Patricia Roessler V., Alejandro Paredes W, Jeannie Slater, (2024), An Unusual Cause Of Laryngotracheal Airway Narrowing, Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology, 6(2); DOI:10.31579/2692-9562/111
Copyright: © 2024, Jose Miguel Contreras. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
Received: 30 January 2024 | Accepted: 13 February 2024 | Published: 19 February 2024
Keywords: IgG4-related disease; head and neck; larynx; subglottic; head and neck; larynx; subglottic
Immunoglobulin (Ig) G4-related disease is a medical condition of recent knowledge that can compromise any organ, having preferences for certain regions of the body, where the head and neck region is one of the main affected points, being able to affect orbit, salivary glands, lacrimal glands, thyroid gland, paranasal cavities, temporal bone, pharynx, and larynx. The latter is infrequently compromised, with only 12 cases registered in the literature before the publication of this writing. We present a case of a 49-year-old woman with a history of exertional dyspnea, diagnosed with a sub-glottic stenosis which was managed surgically with laryngotracheal reconstruction. The histopathological study revealed histology compatible with IgG4-related disease, so medical treatment with oral corticosteroid therapy was started for 2 months in conjunction with immunology. After 4 years of follow-up, the patient has not presented relapses, maintaining an adequate subglottic lumen.
The authors declare that they do not have conflicts of interest.
Immunoglobulin-G4-related disease is an immune-mediated, inflammatory, fibrosclerotic, systemic disease, which is characterized by the formation of masses causing permanent organic damage and eventually death if it does not receive adequate treatment1,2.
The global incidence and prevalence of this disease are unknown and probably underestimated. It affects middle-aged and elderly people, with a male-to-female ratio of 1.6:1 in the head and neck region (4:1 in other regions). Currently, there are no recognized risk factors1.
Its clinical presentation can be classified into four phenotypes3: pancreatic-hepatobiliary disease (31%), retroperitoneal fibrosis with or without aortitis (24%), disease limited to the head and neck (24%), and Mikulicz syndrome with systemic disease (22%). Each of these groups presents distinctive clinical, epidemiological, and serological characteristics that can guide both diagnosis and therapy in the future2,3.
Here, we report a clinical case of laryngeal involvement associated with IgG4-related disease. This work was carried out with the patient's informed consent for publication of her story and photographs
49 years-old, female, with a history of asthma was treated with salbutamol SOS, without a history of trauma to the neck or recent surgery and arrived at the consultation in March 2017 due to a two-year history of slowly progressive respiratory obstruction, with dyspnea on exertion and a functional capacity grade II-III.
Flexible laryngoscopy revealed normal vocal folds with preserved mobility. Immediately below them, an oval-shaped narrowness with a smaller diameter laterally, without apparent inflammation or ulceration. She presented with two computed tomography (CT) scans of the neck from 2015 to 2016, in which progressive airway stenosis at the subglottic level, immediately under the vocal folds, was observed. The airway stenosis progressed from 9 mm to 8,5 mm on the anteroposterior (AP) diameter and from 4 to 3 mm on the lateral diameter (Figure 1 and 2).
Figure 1and 2: Photographs obtained from the first airway revision (Pre-Operative).
Airway evaluation under general anesthesia was performed on May 3, 2017, where subglottic stenosis was confirmed with a diameter of 4 × 8 mm in the lateral and AP diameters, respectively. The measured longitude was 10 mm from the cranial to the caudal limits. The patient was diagnosed with suspected idiopathic subglottic stenosis. After team consultation, laryngo-tracheoplasty with anterior and posterior costal cartilage grafts supported by a Montgomery T tube was performed during the same procedure.
The definitive pathology of the diseased laryngeal tissue reported laryngeal mucosa with marked interstitial inflammatory infiltrates of predominantly lymphoplasmacytic infiltration with isolated foci of leukocyte exacerbation, edema, and interstitial fibrosis. The lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate was polytypic for Lambda and Kappa light chains without angiitis or granulomas. Immunohistochemistry revealed 86 IgG4-positive plasmacytes per high-power field (Figures 3, 4, and 5).
Figure 3 and 4: Microscopic images of histology obtained from the tissue biopsy, stained with hematoxylin-eosin at a magnification of 10x and 20x Images show fibrosis of the lamina propria and predominantly plasmacytic inflammatory infiltrate.
Figure 5: Microscopic histology image obtained from the tissue biopsy, stained with IgG4 at 20x magnification.
In these images, one month after the removal of the Montgomery T-tube, an adequate subglottic lumen is observed, thickening of the anterior commissure, an area of yellowish appearance in the anterior region corresponding to the integrated cartilage.
Immunology was consulted in May of 2017. Chest and abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans were performed, but no other alterations due to IgG4 were observed. In addition, levels of ANCA C and P, IgG, IgM, IgE, IgA, C3, and C4, IgG subclasses 1,2,3,4 in plasma were within normal limits.
A stenosis secondary to a lymphoplasmacytic lesion due to IgG4 was the definitive diagnosis, and treatment with prednisone was started for 2 months until July 2017 in conjunction with immunology.
The T tube was removed on June 13, 2017, in the operating room, observing good post-operative lumen. At follow-up 3 months after surgery, she had a normal voice, no dyspnea on exertion, and no stridor. Endoscopic examination revealed thick vocal folds, a slight whitish subglottic bulk located in the stenotic area repaired with cartilage, and a good diameter of > 1 cm (Figure 6 and 7).
Lymphocytes stained with marker for IgG4 in the tissue obtained.
Figure 6 and 7: Images obtained after removal of the Montgomery T-Tube after laryngotracheal reconstruction.
After one year of follow-up, she presented with immunoglobulin tests within normal limits and was discharged from the immunology department. Currently, in March 2023, she has remained without dyspnea, dysphonia, stridor, or neck pain.
The classic presentation of IgG4-related disease in the head and neck is characterized by a painless mass of progressive growth, with the main locations at the orbital level (>50%), salivary glands (20%), and thyroid (4%). This disease can be multifocal and involves virtually any organ in this region, with reported cases at the level of the paranasal sinuses, temporal bone, pharynx, and larynx. Over 90% of patients do not present with systemic symptoms, but up to 10% may present with an acute-onset disease associated with weight loss or fever7.
With respect to laryngeal involvement, it is very rare, and its incidence is unknown. Currently, only 12 cases have been reported in the literature, which are described in Table 1 8-17.
| Author and Year of Publication | Patients | Age | Gender | Symptoms | Clinical Findings | IgG4 serum levels | Treatment | Follow-up |
| Volker et al. 2009 | 1 | 56 | Male | 6 months of dysphonia | Increased supraglottic volume in the left ventricular band with destruction of ipsilateral thyroid cartilage and cervical lymphadenopathy | N/E | Steroids therapy for 24 months | - |
| Shaib et al. 2013 | 2 | 56
57 | Male
Male | 12 years of evolution of dysphonia associated with dyspnea on exertion 16 years of evolution of chronic laryngitis and aphthous stomatitis, along with genital ulcers | Stenosis in the anterior subglottic region and bilateral vocal fold immobility. Lung and prostate involvement.
Signs of chronic laryngitis | Increased IgG4 serum levels
Increased IgG4 serum levels
| Tracheostomy + Steroids therapy (Prednisone)
Steroids therapy (Prednisone) | |
| Khoo et al. 2014 | 1 | 62 | Male | Chronic cough with brownish sputum, associated with odynophagia and sensation of pharyngeal globus | Papillomatous tumor that involved both aryepiglottic folds, with involvement of the left piriformis sinus | Normal serum levels | High-dose steroid therapy (Prednisone) for 12 weeks. Low dose prednisone (5mg) for 2 years. | |
Reder et al. 2015
| 2 | 58
62 | Male
Male | 4 years of pharyngeal globus sensation on the right side and dysphonia Chronic cough associated with throat clearing, dysphagia and dysphonia | Increase in granular volume at the base of the tongue and left aryepiglottic fold, left piriformis sinus and exophytic tumor in the right vocal process Granular edema at the base of the tongue and epiglottis, with keratosis at the level of the ventricular bands and vocal cords. | Increased IgG4 serum levels Increased IgG4 serum levels
| Steroid therapy (intravenous methylprednisolone 100 mg/day) + Rituximab (2 doses of 1 gram separated by 15 days) Steroid therapy (intravenous methylprednisolone 100 mg/day) + Rituximab (2 doses of 1 gram separated by 15 days) | 2 years, without relapse. 1 year, with a relapse managed with Rituximab |
| Hamadani 2018 | 1 | 54 | Female | 6 months of evolution of dysphagia, weight loss, odynophagia and dysphonia | Signs of chronic laryngitis at the supraglottic level, along with an ulcerated lesion at the retrocricoid level | Increased IgG4 serum levels
| N/E | N/E |
| Hill et al 2020 | 1 | 29 | Male | Dysphonia, odynophagia and dysphagia to solids and liquids of 6 months of evolution | Supraglottic edema especially in the right arytenoids | Increased IgG4 serum levels
| Oral corticosteroid therapy (Prednisone) + Mycophenolate Mofetil | |
| Matsushima et al. 2020 | 1 | 50 | Male | Dyspnea | Supraglottic mass dependent on the left arytenoid region | Surgical debulking + Steroid therapy | ||
| Syed et al. 2020 | 1 | 64 | Male | Dysphonia, dyspnea and persistent non-productive cough | Signs of chronic laryngitis | Rituximab | ||
| Suárez-Diaz et al. 2020 | 1 | 37 | Female | Dysphonia of 3 years of evolution, associated with outbreaks of recurrent painful ulcers | Signs of chronic laryngitis | Increased IgG4 serum levels | Corticosteroid therapy (IV induction Methylprednisolone and then maintenance Prednisone) + Azathioprine | |
| Atienza-Mateo et al. 2021 | 1 | 30 | Female | 4 months of evolution of dyspnea during exercise | Subglottic stenosis involving 50% of the lumen, membranous | Normal IgG4 serum levels
| Surgical management: Endoscopic + Cricotracheal resection. Medical management: Steroid therapy + Rituximab | No relapse at 4 years of follow-up |
| Contreras et al. 2023 | 1 | 49 | Female | 2 years of evolution of progressive exertional dyspnea | Subglottic stenosis of 8.5 x 3 mm in diameter | Normal IgG4 serum levels
| Surgical management: Laryngotracheal reconstruction with anterior and posterior graft Medical management: Oral corticosteroid therapy | No relapse after 3 years of follow-up |
Table 1: Cases reported in the literature of laryngeal involvement due to IgG4-related disease.
Although this disease does not present a defined pattern in the larynx, one of the most frequent manifestations is laryngitis, characterized by edema and erythema at the supraglottic level, whether generalized or localized, along with fibrotic lesions at the supraglottic, glottic, or subglottic level. We recommend having this diagnosis in our differentials when faced with a lesion or an inflammatory mass of the larynx with a non-specific appearance.
Complementary and Diagnostic Studies
Laboratory tests were nonspecific. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein level may be slightly elevated or normal2. These patients frequently present with elevation of the different IgG subclasses (IgG1, 2, and 3), but not in the same proportion as IgG4. Furthermore, plasma levels of complement molecules (C4-C3) may decrease, reflecting probable kidney disease18.
IgG4 immunoglobulin levels are elevated in 55 – 97% of cases, correlating with the number of organs involved. Considering a cut-off value of 1.35 to 1.44 g/L, the sensitivity and specificity for this test were 87.2 and 82.6%,
respectively. Currently, this test is considered as a screening tool, with poor diagnostic utility, because up to 30 - 50% of patients with this disease have normal serum levels2,5,19.
Regarding the imaging study, both CT and MRI are used to rule out systemic involvement of the disease. On the other hand, it was proposed that PET-CT can help both identify asymptomatic disseminated disease, allow directed histological study, and monitor the response to treatment; however, more studies are needed2.
Currently, histological examination is the gold standard for the diagnosis of this disease18. Nonetheless, the diagnosis is currently based on the classification criteria published in 2019 by the American College of Rheumatologist/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (ACR/EULAR), described in Table 2 20.
| Steps | Categorical evaluation or numerical assessment |
Step 1: Inclusion Criteria Characteristic* clinical or radiological involvement of a typical organ (e.g., pancreas, salivary glands, bile ducts, orbits, kidney, lung, aorta, retroperitoneum, pachymeninges, or thyroid gland [Riedel thyroiditis]) Or pathological evidence of an inflammatory process accompanied by a lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate of uncertain etiology in one of these same organs | Yes or No |
Step 2: Exclusion Criteria Clinical Fever No objective response to glucocorticoids
Serological Unexplained leukopenia and thrombocytopenia Peripheral eosinophilia Positive antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (specifically against proteinase 3 or myeloperoxidase) Positive SSA/Ro or SSB/La antibody Positive double-stranded DNA, RNP or Sm antibody Another disease-specific autoantibody Cryoglobulinemia
Radiologic Known radiological findings suspected of malignancy or infection that have not been sufficiently investigated Rapid radiological progression Long bone anomalies consistent with Erdheim-Chester disease Splenomegaly
Pathological Cellular infiltrates suggestive of malignancy that have not been sufficiently evaluated Markers compatible with inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor Prominent neutrophilic inflammation Necrotizing vasculitis Prominent necrosis Mainly granulomatous inflammation Pathological features of macrophage/histiocytic disorder
Known diagnosis of the following: Multicentric Castleman disease Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis (only if pancreatobiliary disease is present) Hashimoto's thyroiditis (only if the thyroid is affected) | Yes or No |
If the case meets the inclusion criteria and does not meet any exclusion criteria, continue with step 3 | |
Step 3: Inclusion Criteria: Domains and Items
Histopathology Non-informative biopsy Dense lymphocytic infiltrate Dense lymphocytic infiltrate and obliterative phlebitis Dense lymphocytic infiltrate and storiform fibrosis with or without obliterans phlebitis
Immunohistochemistry
Serum IgG4 concentration Normal or unmarked 0 > Normal but <2> 2-5 × upper limit of normal > 5 × upper limit of normal
Bilateral lacrimal, parotid, sublingual and submandibular glands No set of glands involved A set of glands involved Two or more sets of glands involved
Chest None of the items listed are present Peribronchovascular and septal thickening Band-shaped vertebral soft tissue in the chest
Pancreas and biliary tree None of the items listed are present Diffuse enlargement of the pancreas (loss of lobulations) Diffuse enlargement of the pancreas, with a capsule-shaped border and decreased contrast. Involvement of the pancreas (any of the above) and the biliary tree
Kidney None of the items listed are present Hypocomplementemia Renal pelvis/soft tissue thickening Low density areas in bilateral renal cortex
Retroperitoneum None of the items listed are present Diffuse thickening of the abdominal aortic wall Circumferential or anterolateral soft tissue around infrarenal aorta or iliac arteries |
0 + 4 + 6
+ 13
0-16, as follows: - The score assigned is 0 if the IgG4+:IgG+ ratio is 0-40% or indeterminate and the number of IgG4+ cells/highest power field (cma) is 0 to 9. - The assigned weight is 7 if 1) the IgG4+:IgG+ ratio is ≥41% and the number of IgG4+ cells/cma is 0-9 or indeterminate; or 2) the IgG4+:IgG+ ratio is 0-40% or indeterminate and the number of IgG4+ cells/cma is ≥10 or indeterminate. - The assigned weight is 14 if 1) the IgG4+:IgG+ ratio is 41-70% and the number of IgG4+ cells/cma is ≥10; or 2) the IgG4+:IgG+ ratio is ≥71% and the number of IgG4+ cells/cma is 10–50. - The assigned weight is 16 if the IgG4+:IgG+ ratio is ≥71% and the number of IgG4+ cells/cma is ≥51.
0 + 4 + 6 + 11
0 + 6 + 14
0 + 4 + 10
0
+ 8
+ 11
+ 19
0 + 6 + 8 + 10 0 + 4 + 8 |
Step 4: Total inclusion points
A case meets the classification criteria for IgG4-RD if the inclusion criteria are met, the exclusion criteria do not apply, and the total points are ≥20. | |
Table 2: Classification criteria for IgG4-related disease by ACR/EULAR 2019.
Treatment
The treatment of IgG4-related diseases limited to the head and neck, based on expert opinion and retrospective studies, is based on three strategies:
1. Conservative management: Clinical observation is recommended in cases of increased growth of the submandibular gland and/or an asymptomatic increase in the size of neck lymphadenopathy, without evidence of progression or associated organ dysfunction [1].
2. Surgical management: This plays a key role in obtaining biopsies for histological diagnosis. However, it may be an option for the management of patients in the “fibrotic phase” of the disease [1,6].
3. Medical management: management of choice for all patients with this disease. It is divided into two parts: induction and maintenance therapies. This treatment is most effective during the “inflammatory phase” of the disease; therefore, early diagnosis and management are essential to achieve the best outcomes1.
Induction therapy, the use of systemic steroids, is recommended as first-line therapy, at a dose of 0.6-1 mg/kg/day of prednisone or another equivalent dose for 2-4 weeks and with gradual tapering over a period of time between 3 and 6 months, reporting a response rate of up to 93%[2,21]. The use of biological therapy, specifically rituximab (anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody), to achieve remission of this disease is in development, with a remission rate of 67–83% of cases, allowing steroids to be discontinued early [2,21]. However, 46–90% of patients treated with steroids relapse within the first 3
years from diagnosis, either in the same affected organ or at a different site[2].
Maintenance therapy is recommended for patients who present a high risk of relapses, including multi-organ disease, elevated IgG4 and IgE levels, and/or peripheral eosinophilia, and in patients with presentations with severe organ damage. This therapy is based on low-dose corticosteroids or any disease-modifying or biological drugs. In general, therapy is maintained for an average of 3 years with clinical, biochemical, and radiological follow-up until complete remission of the pathological findings[2,21].
IgG4 related disease is an emerging disease, and disease limited to the head and neck is the second most frequent manifestation.
There are few reports of laryngeal involvement, with only 2 cases of subglottic stenosis published prior to our study. Although medical management is the cornerstone for definitive treatment of the disease, surgical management can be an alternative to the “fibrotic” phase of this disease. However, more studies are needed to determine the most appropriate behavior in these situations.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
