AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
case report
*Corresponding Author: Leonard Ranasinghe, Ph.D., MD. Professor and Clerkship Director of Emergency Medicine, California Northstate University College of Medicine, 9700 W. Taron Dr., Elk Grove, California 95757.
Citation: Patel Amy, Hyer Matthew, Heydarlou Dorsa, Thiemann, Anna, Kayali Mohammad. et all (2022) An Unusual Case of Osteomyelitis in a Pediatric Patient. J. Biomedical Research and Clinical Reviews. 7(2); DOI:10.31579/2692-9406/131
Copyright: © 2022 Leonard Ranasinghe, this is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 24 August 2022 | Accepted: 31 August 2022 | Published: 07 September 2022
Keywords: osteomyelitis; pediatric; methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus; case report; myositis; cellulitis
Background: In children, Staphylococcus aureus infects growing, long bones causing osteomyelitis. While the symptoms are recognizable, its occurrence in children is quite rare.
Purpose: To highlight a novel case of pediatric osteomyelitis with delirium.
Presentation: A 10-year old male presented to the emergency room with a fever and limited range of motion, swelling, and pain in the right clavicular region. His condition declined over two days, developing tachycardia and delirium. Laboratory and imaging studies revealed an abscess in the chest wall as well as severe myositis and cellulitis. The patient was treated with surgical drainage and IV antibiotics, leading to resolution of the patient’s condition.
Conclusion: This case report will help physicians in the pediatric or emergency department settings consider, identify, and accurately assess patients for osteomyelitis in developing treatment plans to resolve their patients’ conditions.
OM :Osteomyelitis
CRP :C-reactive Protein
HR : Heart Rate
BP :Blood Pressure
TM :Temperature
RR :Respiratory Rate
RA :Room Air
BMI :Body-Mass Index
ED :Emergency Department
ROM : Range of Motion
WBC :White Blood Cell
RBC :Red Blood Cell
Hgb :Hemoglobin
Hct :Hematocrit
BUN :Blood Urea Nitrogen
ALT :Alanine Transaminase
AST :Aspartate Transferase
CK :Creatine Kinase
CT :Computerized Tomography
UCD :University of California, Davis
ESR :Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
DFU :Diabetic Foot Ulcer
COVID-19 :Corona Virus Disease 2019
RSV :Respiratory Syncytial Virus
Osteomyelitis is an infection of the bone that is commonly caused by Staphylococcus aureus which causes infection through spread among people, animals, and shared objects. [1,2] In children, it commonly occurs at the metaphysis of long, growing bones which contain venous sinusoids that promote blood stasis that can promote bacterial growth. [3] Increased risks of trauma, malnutrition, and poor hygiene lead to greater incidence of osteomyelitis in developing countries. [4] The common symptoms of osteomyelitis include pain, swelling, and fever. [5] Although not always present, elevated white blood cell count and elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) can also be seen in patients with osteomyelitis. [7] While rare, osteomyelitis has been found in the ribs in about 1% of hematogenous cases and should be treated with a targeted antibiotic regimen. [4,8] Osteomyelitis is a disease where early diagnosis and treatment is critical to minimizing the risk of developing severe complications, such as permanent bone damage. In the pediatric population, osteomyelitis may show a multifarious clinical presentation, which ultimately makes diagnosis difficult. Alongside gathering a comprehensive history and performing a thorough physical exam, it is imperative to be aware of the evolving epidemiology and presentation of osteomyelitis to aid in an early diagnosis. Therefore, we present a novel case of an ten-year-old male patient with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis of the rib and a chest wall abscess that initially presented as right clavicular pain. Our case report will investigate the uniqueness of a presentation of osteomyelitis of the chest wall in a pediatric patient. We will be evaluating the patient’s symptoms, diagnosis and progression and compare it to findings in literature regarding similar presentations. The ultimate goal is to highlight the novelty of the patient’s case and its relevance to evaluate and manage patients who may display a similar clinical presentation.
We present a case of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis in the rib and chest wall of an ten-year-old male who was initially seen for right clavicular pain. On day one, the patient’s pain was reported as 10/10 starting 4 days prior to arriving at the emergency department and was exacerbated by elevating the right arm or by pressing the affected area over the collarbone. There was no history of shoulder injuries or pain and the patient had otherwise been healthy. Physical exam revealed HR: 118 bpm, BP: 127/90 mmHg, Tm: 36.5 oC at temporal artery, RR: 20 breaths/minute, O2 Sat: 100% on RA, BMI: 29.09kg/m^2, Height: 151.5cm. Significant lab results were high absolute neutrophils (9.7 K/uL), low sodium levels (135 mmol/L), high glucose levels (120 mg/dL), and high total protein levels (8.7 gm/dL) and elevated ESR (82 mm/hour) (Table 1). An x-ray of the complete right clavicle was also ordered but no fracture, dislocation, or bony erosions were found. The soft tissue appeared normal. The patient was treated for contusion/sprain and dismissed as not having an infectious etiology given that laboratory/imaging work-up did not suggest an inflammatory condition or infection. He was given ibuprofen and discharged with educational materials on musculoskeletal pain and a follow-up appointment within 3-5 days.
On day three, the patient returned to the ED with swelling over the right clavicular and chest area with increased pain, as well as fever, chills, hallucinations, and altered level of consciousness. Physical exam findings revealed HR: 177 bpm, BP: 99/65 mmHg, Tm: 40 oC, RR: 28 breaths/minute, O2 Sat: 99% on RA. Further examination identified skin that was “warm to the touch”; “dry mucous membranes” over the ears, nose, mouth, and throat; tachycardia; and a “well-defined area of swelling and induration in the right upper chest area with mild tenderness but no overlying skin erythema that felt slightly warm compared to the left chest wall”. Examination also revealed limited ROM in his right arm and neurological deficits in that the patient was “not answering questions appropriately”. Laboratory tests were significant for high WBC count (19.7 K/uL), low hematocrit (34.5%), high absolute neutrophils (15.6 K/uL), low sodium levels (134 mmol/L), low CO2 (21 mmol/L), and high total protein (8.2 gm/dL) (Table 1).
| Lab Finding | Value on Day 1 | Value on Day 3 | Reference Range |
| WBC (x 103 /μL) | 12.5 | 19.7 | 4.5-13.5 |
| RBC (x 106 /μL) | 4.69 | 4.32 | 4.20-5.50 |
| Hgb (g/dL) | 12.7 | 11.8 | 11.5-15.5 |
| Hct (%) | 37.6% | 34.5 | 35.0-45.0 |
| Absolute Neutrophils (x 103 /μL) | 9.7 | 15.6 | 1.0-7.3 |
| Sodium (mmol/L) | 135 | 134 | 136-146 |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 120 | 164 | 70-99 |
| BUN (mg/dL) | 10 | 8 | 8-25 |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 0.64 | 0.63 | 0.50-1.50 |
| Protein, Total (g/dL) | 8.7 | 8.2 | 6.0-8.0 |
| Procalcitonin (ng/mL) | Not reported | 0.38 | 0.02-0.15 |
| ALT (units/L) | 32 | 26 | 0-55 |
| AST (units/L) | 20 | 19 | 5-34 |
| CK (units/L) | Not reported | 70 | 30-200 |
| CRP (mg/L) | 10.59 | 28.63 | 0.10-0.90 |
| Lactic Acid (mg/dL) | N/A | 0.9 | 0.6-2.3 |
| ESR (mm/hour) | 82 | Not reported | < 15> |
Table 1: Patient’s lab findings on days one and three, 02 December and 04 December respectively. Reference ranges are specific to the presenting emergency department.
Microbiology tests for COVID-19, Influenza A, Influenza B, RSV, and COVID-19 were negative. Chest CT with contrast, returned with extensive severe myositis/cellulitis in the right chest wall, right axilla and anterior to the sternum to the anterior mediastinum, which occluded the right subclavian vein (Figures 1 and 2). Patient was treated with Tylenol and Motrin for the fever as well as broad-spectrum IV antibiotics (Rocephin, vancomycin, and clindamycin, which was added after CT results arrived) to treat infection.
Figure 1: Transverse CT with contrast
Figure 2: Transverse CT with contrast showing cellulitis/myositis in right chest wall.
The patient was diagnosed with a methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus infection causing osteomyelitis of the rib and chest wall. Subsequent history taking prompted a discussion whether this infection may have resulted from S. aureus colonization of mosquito bites. Patient was given 650 mg of Tylenol which improved their perceived health and stabilized them for transport to University of California, Davis (UCD) where they were admitted. Patient underwent surgical drainage at UCD and was discharged on day nine on oral clindamycin.
On day thirteen the patient attended the recommended hospital follow-up appointment. Physical exam findings included HR: 84bpm, BP: 107/67 mmHg, Tm: 35.9 oC, O2 Sat: 97% on RA. The exam also found the patient to be in no acute distress and alert and oriented; moist mucous membranes in the ears, nose, mouth, and throat; regular heart rate and rhythm, no tachycardia; slight tenderness to the right clavicular region; and no neurological deficits. The patient was prescribed topical mupirocin (2% 3x/day). The patient and their mother were counseled on the natural history of colonization of the skin and potential for cutaneous infections as well as routine care for future small skin infections that may appear.
On day sixteen the patient attended the recommended follow-up appointment. Physical exam findings included HR: 98bpm, BP: 113/72 mmHg, Tm: 35.5 oC, O2 Sat: 98% on RA. Other physical exam findings were consistent with the patient’s physical on day thirteen, except, at this visit, the patient did not report any actual or suspected pain of the right clavicular region. The patient had no further symptoms and their wound was improving. Weekly ESR and CRP laboratory tests were ordered for the foreseeable future to track possible methicillin-resistant S. aureus remission.
Demographics of OM
One of the interesting factors of this particular case was the patient’s age. While OM can affect individuals of all ages, a population-based study analyzing the prevalence of this disease in the United States found that the incidence rate of OM in males under 18 years old per 100,000 person-years is 10.9. In adults, the incidence rate of OM rises precipitously, with the highest incidence after the age of 80 years old where the rate is 128.4, making OM likely be diagnosed more frequently among the elderly population than in the pediatric population. [9] Significantly, the patient in this case was only ten years old, making the contraction of OM extremely rare for their age group. Also of note is that these trend of OM occurring more in the elderly population has been proposed to result from the relative frequency at which adults are exposed to infection compared to children. [10] Significantly, the incidence rate of OM in patients under 18 years old has not significantly changed over the last 30 years in the population studied. [9] Aside from age, diabetes has been identified as a major factor for OM in addition to age. It has been reported that diabetic patients’ foot ulcers (DFU) are a frequent source for invasion of the pathogen. DFUs occur in 7.02% of patients with Type 2 Diabetes, with amputation leading to 68% of that cohort later developing OM. [11,12] While the patient in this case has not been diagnosed with diabetes or developed DFUs, their BMI, blood glucose levels, and lifestyle are indicative of entering a pre-diabetic state. While this pre-diabetic state could lead a clinician to consider OM as a diagnosis, it must be noted that the physical examination did not observe any DFUs. Their absence would direct a clinician away from an infectious diagnosis such as OM as the site of entry is not present. However, this patient uniquely had OM despite not having the key risk factor of diabetes or DFUs, making this case even more significant for physicians of all specialties to be aware of.
Common and novel symptoms of OM
The clinical presentation of osteomyelitis may vary depending on a myriad of components. This inflammatory process caused by pyogenic organisms may be acute or chronic and differs in presentation between adults and children. [13] Although each clinical pattern may have its own unique presentation, general symptoms include pain, fever, malaise, and possible erythema near the affected region. [14] The pain is generally noted near the site of infection, however, in rare cases such as osteomyelitis of the ribs, chest, back, and abdominal pain have been previously noted. [15,16]
Pathogens of OM
The pathogenic cause of osteomyelitis is a result from pyogenic organisms including bacteria, mycobacteria, and fungi. Both gram positive and gram negative bacteria have been identified, however, Staphylococcus aureus is a frequent causative agent. Other bacterial agents include Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Kingella kingae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacter cloacae, Escherichia coli, Bartonella henselae, and Clostridium species. [17-20] Although not as common, fungal agents such as Aspergillus and cryptococcus have also been observed. [21,22] In addition, cases on osteomyelitis resulting from Mycobacterium tuberculosis have further been reported. [23,24]
Insects Bites and Soft Tissue/Skin Infections
In the current case, the mention of the patient’s frequent infection of mosquito bites prompted discussions of infection caused by staph colonization of the bites. Aside from anaphylaxis, life threatening conditions from insect bites are usually rare. Although rare, there have been cases skin and soft tissue infections from insect bites. There was a report of upper extremity Volkmann’s contracture, a form of compartment syndrome, from a flying insect bite, in a 20 year old woman. [26] A case of compartment syndrome in the calf was also reported in a 29 year old woman. [27] Similar to the patient in the current case, these patients initially presented with pain and swelling in the affected area. In the case of the 29 year old woman, upon admission, she developed signs of septic shock including decreases consciousness, elevated WBC count, and elevated neutrophil count. The current case also described the patients altered level of consciousness and increased WBC and neutrophil counts. While both of these cases of compartment syndrome required surgical intervention, the patients recovered and were able to resume daily life. In other cases, infection from an insect bite had less successful outcomes. An otherwise healthy man developed necrotizing fasciitis following a tick bite. [28] As with the patient in the current case, this man presented with pain and swelling and eventually showed signs of septic shock. However, that patient died 48 hours after presenting to the hospital.
Treatment of OM
Osteomyelitis is frequently treated with antibiotics and surgery, if necessary. With oral and IV antibiotics available, there may be considerations of efficacy and practicality when choosing a route of administration. A study conducted in Italy found that oral antibiotics in the treatment of osteomyelitis in adults was non-inferior to IV therapy. [29] In cases of hand osteomyelitis in pediatric patients, most cases were managed with oral antibiotics as the primary treatment or secondary to surgery. There was one patient, reported in the literature, however, that needed to be treated with IV antibiotics due to concurrent cellulitis. [30] The patient in the current case was initially treated with IV antibiotics to manage the infection, but eventually needed surgery, which was followed up with postoperative oral antibiotics. It is possible that IV antibiotics were deemed necessary due to the novelty and severity of the patient’s case. However, it is interesting to consider if oral antibiotics could have been as equally successful in initially managing the infection.
This case report presents a rare occurrence of osteomyelitis infection of the rib in a pediatric patient. The patient’s status declined rapidly after an initial presentation to the emergency room, exhibiting signs of tachycardia and delirium. Through this report, providers can be better informed to identify presentations of osteomyelitis in children in a timely manner.
Acknowledgements
None to State
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
