AUCTORES
Case Report
*Corresponding Author: Aydin Atis Alev, Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Health Sciences, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Obstetrics & Gynecology, Istanbul, Turkey.
Citation: Aydin A Alev, A Zuhat, Topbas S Fitnat, G Sümeyye, E Ermin, A Hicran. (2022) Barriers to Tracheostomy Weaning: A Case Report of Sialorrhea in a Patient with Persistent Seizure Activity and Head Injury. International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. 10(4); DOI: 10.31579/2690-4861/198
Copyright: © 2022 Aydin Atis Alev, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attributiosn License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 18 December 2021 | Accepted: 28 January 2022 | Published: 03 February 2022
Keywords: amniotic band syndrome; amniotic band sequens; encephalocel; schizencephaly; limb defect
Amniotic band sequence (ABS) results from in utero entrapment of fetal parts by fibrous bands, which leads to malformations that can affect multiple organ systems including the limbs, craniofacial regions and trunk, and central nervous system. These bands can adhere to anatomical structures of the fetus and cause vascular disruption which results in the amputation of the involved anatomic part. We present two cases of ABS both of which presented with craniofacial defects associated with ABS; one with apical encephalocel and extremity defects, the other one with schizencephaly with extremity defects and cleft lip & palate. ABS may represent itself not only with extremity defects but atypical forms in cranial vault. ABS must be kept in mind and sonography must be detailed when rare deformities like schizencephaly and extremity defects identified.
Amniotic band sequence (ABS) is a congenital disorder presenting with fetal anomalies associated with fetal placental fibrous bands that may cause disruptions, deformations or malformations without a consistent anatomical pattern Amniotic band syndrome (ABS) is a prenatal complication with an incidence ranging from 1/1000 to 1/15000 in live births and 1/70 in stillbirths [1]. However, no known inheritance pattern has been reported. Although its etiology is not known, it is presumed that amniotic rupture during early pregnancy weeks lead to the development of multiple amniotic strands also called amniotic bands [2]. These bands can adhere to anatomical structures of the fetus and cause vascular disruption which results in the amputation of the involved anatomic part. Known Risk factors are Smoking (> 15 cigarettes/day) Exposure to cocaine and alcohol abuse, High glycemic index in the diet, Living in an attitudinal zone > 2000 meters above sea level, Obstetric factors, Attempted abortion, Uterine or abdominal trauma, Bicornuate uterus, Uterine fibroids, Ectopic pregnancy, hemorrhage during the first trimester of gestation, Intrauterine infection, Oligohydramnios, Intrauterine device removal, Chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis. The cause of the amniotic rupture is mostly not clear. Constrictive rings, limb defects, neural or spine defects and craniofacial defects are the major classifications of ABS .Encephalocele, facial clefts and cleft lip and/or palate that are located non-midline atypical locations are among the craniofacial defects associated with ABS [3,4].
Prenatal diagnosis of ABS can be challenging because of the variety of clinical presentations and the unclear etiology. Edema detected at the distal limbs with ultrasonography can indicate the presence of ABS. Prenatal detection can be as early as the first trimester if a major deformation or amputation is present [2,3]. However, the bands themselves can only be seen in few cases.
Here we present two cases of ABS detected at our tertiary maternal-fetal obstetrics clinic. Both cases presented with craniofacial defects associated with ABS and in both cases parents chose termination of pregnancy due to the severity of the anatomical defects. Informed consent were taken and approved in Local Ethics Committe accordingly.
A 35 years old, g3 p2 pregnant patient at 22 weeks of gestation visited the perinatology outpatient clinic for a routine second trimester scan. Patient’s medical anamnesis revealed no comorbidities. Her previous pregnancies were without any complications, where she delivered vaginally two healthy female newborns. During the current pregnancy she opted not to do the first and second trimester genetic screenings. Ultrasound scan was performed by an experienced perinatologist, who reported a single intrauterine fetus with biometric measurements in accordance with 22 weeks of gestation. An abnormal cranial anatomy with left ventriculomegaly was observed. Lateral ventricles were connected at subarachnoid space posteriorly, which was interpreted as schizencephaly. Anatomical scan of the fetal face revealed abnormalities with the absence of nasal bone and cleft lip and palate. Amniotic band syndrome with extremity defects were diagnosed. Fetal cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed cranial cleft in the left occipital region was reaching from the left ventricle to the subarachnoid space confirming the ultrasound diagnosis of schizencephaly. Cortex in this region was hypoplasic, bilateral occipital horns were dilated, cerebellum and vermis was hypoplasic related with dilated posterior fossa and partial corpus callosum agenesis was reported. Following the confirmation of diagnosis with MRI, parents opted for termination of the pregnancy. Medical fetocide was performed and labor was induced. A 555gr female fetus was delivered with limb defects (Figure 1,2,3).
A 35 years old, gravidity 1 parity 0 pregnant patient at 14 weeks of gestation was referred with a suspected encephalocele. Patient had no history of any chronic disorders or operations and no known genetic disorders in her or her partner’s family. First trimester ultrasound scan at 14th weeks of gestation revealed encephalocele which is originating from 14mm midline vertex defect deviated to left side 12 mm in length and left hand ulnar deviation and left foot pes equinavarus and left distal tubuler bone defect and accompanying left ulnar deviation were seen . There were lineer echogenic bands extending from cranium to extremities confirming amniotic band sequence was detected. Parents opted for termination of pregnancy. Labor was induced medically and patient aborted without any complications (Figure 4, 5).
Amniotic band sequence (ABS) results from in utero entrapment of fetal parts by fibrous bands, which leads to a collection of malformations that can affect multiple organ systems.
One of ABS etiologies defined by Romero et al. is early rupture of amniotic and chorionic membranes and the epithelial-mesenchymal transition was a factor that could contribute to ABS pathogenesis [6], second theory is by Van Allen et al. that internal or external events caused vascular accidents or had a negative impact on blood flow to the embryo because they interrupted the morphogenesis or destructed structures, whereas amniotic bands were a form of superficial necrosis [7] There is typically an asymmetric distribution of these defects; the most common manifestations involve limb deformities. Constriction ring defects of the extremities typically are present. These usually involve fingers or toes with or without edema of a distal extremity. These constriction rings can lead to amputation of limbs or digits and the appearance of syndactyly on ultrasound imaging (pseudosyndactyly) [4,5]. Craniofacial deformities can include single orbital involvement, severe clefts that do not conform to a pattern of developmental clefts, severe nasal deformity, or asymmetric encephaloceles. This case report also reports amniotic band sequence associated with cranial anomalies one with an encephalocel and limb anomalies and the other with a schizencephaly with limb anomalies rather rare form.
All organ systems must be evaluated because there can be limb, craniofacial, or body wall abnormalities as ectopia cordis, gastroschisis-like bowel herniation, omphalocele-like liver herniation, and bladder exstrophy [5].
Genetic evaluation in the setting of amniotic band sequence is not typically recommended. These cases are generally sporadic with no family history and no increased risk or incidence based on race or sex. Although a few familial cases have been reported, almost all cases are sporadic with no identified underlying genetic cause. If the diagnosis of amniotic band sequence is uncertain, chromosomal microarray analysis may be considered. A detailed ultrasound examination is recommended to identify the extent of the abnormalities.
There no guidelines for the management of ABS if detected during the prenatal period. Decision regarding the pregnancy and its management is taken based on the severity of the anatomical abnormality and the decision of the parents.Pregnancy termination is an option that should be discussed with all patients in whom a fetal anomaly is detected. Fetoscopic in utero lysis of bands is an investigational approach that has been reported [4,5,8].
Diffrential diagnosis must be made with Body stalk anomaly that is characteristic with Fetal abdominal wall adherent to placenta, short umbilical cord, no cranial or limb defects, no evidence of fibrous bands or Specific craniofacial defects or abdominal wall defects: or with Amniotic sheets: Amnion wrapped around synechiae and a structurally normal, mobile fetus; importantly, amniotic band sequence should not be diagnosed in the absence of fetal abnormalities [3-5].
Craniofacial defects & clefts are usually asymmetric and do not follow the anatomy of facial clefts; they extend from the lip and/or palate towards the skull and may or may not be connected to the brain malformation caused by the amniotic bands, although “normal” cleft lip and palate cases have also been reported like our first case having apical encephalocel and limb defects without cleft lip . Our case is characteristic with schizencephaly which is described a cleft extending from left ventricle in occipital region to subarachnoid space at the same side .There was also paranchimal loss and dysplasia nearby. Amniotic band sequens may present rarely with schizencephaly which must be kept in mind .Reported Head and neck lesions are encephalocele, exencefalia, acephaly, anencephaly/acrania, holoprosencephaly, microcephalus, ventriculomegaly and/or system hydrocephalus, septo-optic dysplasia, periventricular nodular heterotopia, polymicrogyria, cortical dysplasia with pachygyria, hypoplasia of the corpus callosum, craniosynostosis, myelomeningocele; in Face Asymmetry, agnathia, clefts Eyes, Orbital hypertelorism, eyelid coloboma, ectropion anophthalmia/microphthalmia ;in Nose Choanal atresia, Mouth Microstomia, high-arched palate, aglossia/microglossia, cleft lip and/or palate; ın ears low ear implantation or rotation, poorly-differentiated pinna, melotia [8]
The antenatal diagnosis of amniotic adhesions has been associated with an adverse prognosis. Most craniofacial and body wall defects are incompatible with extrauterine life. In relation to amniotic bands, the most important fetal prognostic factor is perfusion of the distal portion of the affected limb. There have been reports of fetal death caused by umbilical cord strangulation by an amniotic band, although spontaneous resolution of constriction bands has also been reported and there is a chance of fetoscopic lysis by laser in mild forms [5,8].
Schizensefaly which is a rare congenital brain defect characterized by gray matter lined clefts of the cerebral mantle, has heterogeneous etiologies many of which are vascular disruptive in origin, they accompany non‐CNS abnormality, over half of which could be classified as secondary to vascular disruption, including gastroschisis, bowel atresias, and amniotic band disruption sequence [5,9,10] schizencephaly in this case report also presented with amniotic band sequens as reported above. The causes of schizencephaly are heterogeneous but remain rather poorly understood. Established etiologies include the teratogens, warfarin, alcohol, and cocaine; the in-utero infections, cytomegalovirus, and herpes virus; maternal trauma of several types and monozygotic twin interactions All of these agents have as an underlying pathogenic mechanism, hypoxic ischemic vascular injury at critical times in neuronal development [9,10]
Amniotic band syndrome can vary in severity, depending on the organ systems that are affected; findings are typically asymmetric in distribution. The limbs are affected most commonly,. Patients can be reassured that recurrence is rare. Prognosis depends on the time of diagnosis (most cases are diagnosed post-natally), type and location of anomalies, and may vary from cosmetic to life-threatening consequences.
Declaration of interest: the authors have nothing to declare.
Funding: none
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.