AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Marília Batista Costa, Federal University of São Paulo, Paulista School of Medicine. Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Discipline of Otology and Otoneurology, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Citation: Marília Batista Costa, Beatriz Santos Botelho, Adriana Perez Ferreira Neto, Norma de Oliveira Penido, Ektor Tsuneo Onish (2022) A Systematic Review of the Auditory and Vestibular Effects of Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology 4(2); DOI: 10.31579/2692-9562/042
Copyright: © 2022, Marília Batista Costa. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 19 November 2021 | Accepted: 07 December 2021 | Published: 21 May 2022
Keywords: chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, ototoxicity, hearing Loss, COVID-19
Introduction: chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine are antimalarial drugs that, although normally well tolerated, have side effects, such as gastrointestinal intolerance, retinopathy and arrhythmias. There are reports of sensorineural hearing loss, tinnitus and vertigo related to the two drugs. However, the ototoxic potential of these medications is routinely not researched. With the significant increase in the use of these drugs in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic, the study of their ototoxic effects becomes even more important.
Objective: to evaluate the ototoxic potential of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine through a systematic review of the articles available in the literature.
Method: a search for articles published until April 2020 was carried out in the PubMed, Web of Science, SciELO and Lilacs databases, with descriptors registered in MeSH. Articles that associated the use of chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine with auditory and / or vestibular effects were included.
Result: the search resulted in 161 articles, of which 18 met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 16 demonstrated ototoxic effects of chloroquine and / or hydroxychloroquine. Chloroquine was considered the second main drug involved in ototoxicity in 2 studies. A 5-fold higher risk of hearing loss has also been reported in neonates whose mothers used chloroquine during pregnancy.
Conclusion: studies have shown that chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine have ototoxic action, which may initially go unnoticed if there is no active investigation. The significant increase in the use of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic may represent an escalation in ototoxicity, which should not be neglected.
Chloroquine is an antimalarial drug synthetically derived from quinolone and developed more than 80 years ago, during World War II. Due to its side effects, in 1945 a new equally effective and less toxic drug was synthesized: hydroxychloroquine. In the late 1950s, these drugs were gradually added in the treatment of autoimmune diseases [1-2].
Generally, these drugs are well tolerated and rarely need to be discontinued due to systemic adverse effects. However, they can be irreversibly toxic and severe for the visual, cardiovascular, neuromuscular, and auditory systems, as well as causing gastrointestinal intolerance and skin reactions when taken in higher doses. These last two can be easily resolved by reducing the dose or discontinuing the medication [3-5]. The pharmacokinetics of chloroquine, with a long plasma half-life, leads to its accumulation in the plasma when taken in higher dosages, especially in patients with renal or hepatic impairment, facilitating the appearance of more serious side effects [6]. Hydroxychloroquine toxicity is known for being significantly lower, but there are concerns about its cardiotoxicity (cardiomyopathies and prolongation of the QT interval), which can be lethal [7].
The ototoxicity caused by medications is defined by the temporary or permanent decline in auditory and/or vestibular functions induced by their use [8]. Auditory and vestibular disorders were described as chloroquine side effects, being widely observed in patients being treated for malaria and systemic lupus erythematosus. It has been shown that this medication induces oxidative stress in Schwann cells, vascular injury and degenerative lesions in the inner ear [4, 9]. Regarding hydroxychloroquine, there are reports of its ototoxicity, but with no exact elucidation of its injury mechanism [10, 11].
Tinnitus, sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), and vertigo are the most common symptoms resulting from ototoxicity caused by antimalarial drugs. Brainstem Evoked Response Audiometry (BERA) appears to be the most sensitive test to detect early cochlear injury due to the use of these medications. The ototoxicity of these drugs is believed to be reversible, as would appear some studies have shown that the cochlear-vestibular system can recover if medication is discontinued and adequate corticosteroids treatment and plasma expansion are applied [12]. The reversibility of dysacusis resulting from the use of these medications depends on the length of administration and the management after its interruption [13, 14].
Currently, amid the pandemic caused by the new coronavirus (Sars-CoV-2) and the difficulty in finding an effective treatment for the disease of the new coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19), in the course of a public health emergency, the Ministry of Health authorized, through official note number 5/2020-DAF/SCTIE/MS, published in March 2020, such drugs to be used as a therapeutic alternative in severe cases of hospitalised patients [15]. In May 2020, the Ministry of Health published new guidelines for the early treatment of patients diagnosed with COVID-19, authorizing the use of chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine on outpatients with mild signs and symptoms of the disease [16]. Thus, the criteria for indicating these medications have been expanded, significantly increasing the number of patients exposed to their potential ototoxic effects.
The protocol for the use of antimalarials involves periodic ophthalmological, electrocardiographic, and liver enzyme dosage, in order to detect early toxicity in these organs. Cochlear vestibular impairment, however, has been ignored and rarely investigated [9]. Therefore, the most in-depth knowledge about the auditory and vestibular effects become necessary given the unbridled use of this medication in the current health scenario.
The objective of this paper is to evaluate the scientific evidence of the auditory and vestibular effects in patients using chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine, comparing randomized controlled trials and other studies available in current literature, through a systematic review.
A systematic review was performed of the published articles on the use of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine and hearing loss/vertigo until April 30, 2020 in the databases of PubMed, Web of Science, SciELO and Lilacs. The following descriptors registered in the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) were used: chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, ototoxicity, hearing loss, vertigo and vestibulopathy, according to strategies shown in Table 1.
The articles were accessed online, through the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior- CAPES [Coordination of Superior Level Staff Improvement] website, using the Regional Library of Medicine (BIREME), in order to obtain copies of published journals.
Inclusion criteria were articles that associated the use of chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine to auditory and or vestibular effects. However, studies that were not in English, Spanish or Portuguese, as well as letters to the editor and systematic reviews were excluded. Two independent reviewers made the initial selection of articles by reading the title and abstract, and only the studies that met the inclusion criteria were read in full. Discrepancies were resolved by mutual consent. From the selected articles, the following data was extracted: authors, year of publication, study design and its level of evidence, sample size, and main results of association between the use of these medications and hearing loss or vestibular complaints. The classification of the scientific evidence level of each article was carried out following the study design, according to guidelines adapted from The Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine [17].
The search resulted in 161 articles, 70 of which were found in PubMed, 61 in the Web of Science, 17 in Scielo and 13 in Lilacs. The articles were published between 1963 and March 2020. Out of the 161 studies, 18 were included in our systematic review after eliminating duplicate studies that did not meet the inclusion criteria, as shown in the flowchart (Figure1). The eighteen articles that met the inclusion criteria did not present the necessary data, from a statistical point of view, for the conduct of meta-analysis.
Among the 18 articles, 3 were cross-sectional studies, 1 was prospective, 3 were retrospective, 1 case series and 10 case reports. Regarding the classification by levels of scientific evidence of the selected articles, 3 articles are level II and 15 are level IV. Table 2 shows the studies that evaluated the prevalence of ototoxicity by use of chloroquine. The main interest parameters of the selected articles are in Tables 3 to 5, which were separated, respectively, in: use of chloroquine during pregnancy; ototoxicity caused by chloroquine and ototoxicity secondary to the use of hydroxychloroquine
*CQ: chloroquine; BERA: brainstem evoked response audiometry; TEOAE: transient evoked Otoacoustic emissions; SNHL: sensorineural hearing loss
*CQ: chloroquine; BERA: brainstem evoked response audiometry; SNHL: sensorineural hearing loss.
HCQ: hydroxychloroquine; SNHL: sensorineural hearing loss; -: not informed; HIV: human immunodeficiency virus.
Chloroquine is an antimalarial drug with immunomodulatory action in the treatment of rheumatological and dermatological diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus systemic erythematosus, Sjogren's syndrome and scleroderma [18]. The hidroxychloroquine has the same clinical efficacy, but with less potential for toxicity, a fact that justifies its more common use [9].
Chloroquine is completely absorbed by the gastrointestinal tract. A small part is excreted, and the rest is widely distributed to the tissues. Residues of the drug can last for months in the body, which means its effects continue even after suspension. The most common adverse side events of antimalarial drugs include skin hyperpigmentation and changes in the gastrointestinal tract, such as abdominal discomfort, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting. Long-term effects, on the other hand, include mainly retinopathy and cardiovascular disorders, such as increased QT interval, cardiac arrhythmias and myocarditis [14].
Ototoxicity is defined as a temporary or permanent loss of auditory and/or vestibular function induced by medication [9]. In studies by [19, 20], chloroquine was the second most commonly known drug responsible for ototoxicity, demonstrating that its potential to damage the inner ear is proven, but it is insufficiently studied and reported. Patients who make chronic use of these medications usually undergo periodic ophthalmological evaluation; however, auditory analysis is often neglected [21].
Chloroquine is accumulated and fixed in the melanocytes. Specifically, in relation to the inner ear, the areas that have melanin are stria vascularis, modiolus, planum semilunatum, saccular and utricular walls and semicircular canals. Most studies suggest that stria vascularis is the most affected, acquiring an atrophic and vacuolated aspect, later affecting the cochlear neurons and the organ of Corti, with destruction of the ciliated and supporting cells [21, 23]. However, Matz and Naunton in the histopathological examination of a teratogenicity case due to the use of chloroquine, did not demonstrate changes in the stria vascularis [24].
There are some hypotheses to explain the mechanism of injury caused by chloroquine in the inner ear. Oliveira et al4 suggested, through glial cells culture of organs of Corti in the mice, the occurrence of neuronal excitotoxicity due to the increase in glutamate in the extracellular environment. This occurs due to the deleterious action of chloroquine on glial cells, which are responsible for the uptake of glutamate into the intracellular environment. Another fact pointed out by the same study is the increase in the production of reactive oxygen species, resulting in local oxidative damage. This explains the use of antioxidant substances, such as ascorbic acid or vitamin E, in the treatment of ototoxicity [4].
Another hypothesis consists of the ischemic mechanism of the ototoxic action of chloroquine, which causes spasms of the cochlear arteries, reducing blood supply to the stria vascularis and the outer ciliated cells [23, 24]. It is believed that the vasoconstriction in the inner ear results from a hypersensitivity reaction to the drug, a fact that justifies the use of corticosteroids in the treatment and the possible reversibility of the condition [14., 19]. The vascular lesion promotes changes in the composition of the endolymph and consequently lesions in the receptor cells. The most exuberant damage occurs in the basal gyrus, responsible for the high frequencies [9]. The hydroxychloroquine mechanism of injury in the inner ear is believed to be similar to that of chloroquine, however there are no studies on the subject.
The symptoms related to ototoxicity are mainly SNHL, tinnitus and instability [25]. The time between the use of antimalarial drugs and the development of cochlear-vestibular complaints is variable and individual. Some reports outline the development of symptoms a few hours after a single dose of the medication, others after the fourth dose or even after chronic use [22, 14, 26]. Hadi et al suggest the possibility of idiosyncratic effects of these drugs.
In audiometry, there is usually a mild to moderate symmetric bilateral SNHL, with a flat or descending configuration [9, 28]. The typical bilateral and symmetrical involvement is easily explained, since chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine have systemic action. However, there are reports of unilateral involvement, as well as reports of asymmetric losses, without other possible justifiable causes, demonstrates that these audiometric findings, although rare, are possible [14, 28].
Bernard12 found alteration in the BERA in 17.5% of cases in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in chronic use of chloroquine. However, only 2.7% reported sporadic symptoms of tinnitus and instability, with normal audiometry and ophthalmic examination. This suggests that the audiological investigation with BERA of patients using antimalarial drugs would be more appropriate, in order to detect early hearing disorders, not yet clinically perceptible, for possible reversibility of the condition.
Hydroxychloroquine is believed to be less toxic and, consequently, safer and less likely to present side effects. Nevertheless, a total of 7 cases of ototoxicity have been reported as a consequence of its use. This demonstrates that hydroxychloroquine has the ability to trigger hearing loss - often irreversible - and vestibular symptoms. Therefore, patients using hydroxychloroquine should also undergo routine audiological investigations for early diagnosis and intervention [10, 11, 21, 23, 26, 28].
The cochlear-vestibular alteration caused by the use of antimalarial drugs can be transient. It is believed that reversibility can occur with early intervention. Mukherjee [14] reported a case of cochlear-vestibular injury caused by chloroquine treated with prednisolone and vitamins A and E, beginning 10 days after the first symptoms, with complete resolution of the vestibular condition and important hearing recovery. Seçkin et al [26], in turn, described a case of SNHL by hydroxychloroquine treated by the suspension of the medication and indomethacin 150mg/day from the first symptoms, with a return to normal thresholds in a period of two months. However, in the case report presented by Hadi et al27, there was no improvement of instability or hearing loss right after the use of corticosteroid therapy and plasma expansion, performed from the tenth day after the beginning of symptoms; after 9 months, the gait normalized, but the SNHL remained profound.
Also, when administered during pregnancy, chloroquine is capable of crossing the placental barrier causing lesions in the inner ear of the fetuses. In Aurelio et al [29] and Silva et al [30] studies, the prevalence of hearing loss in children whose mothers used chloroquine during pregnancy ranged from 3% to 6.7%, with a 5 times higher risk of developing SNHL. However, Patatt et al [31] and Borba et al [18] have not shown this relationship in their studies. It is worth mentioning that hydroxychloroquine is not able to cross the placental barrier, and its use is safe for pregnant women.
In view of our systematic review and considering that chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine are ototoxic and that the time for the development of their cochlear-vestibular effects is variable, it is important to discuss the precautions given the significant increase in the use of these medications in the pandemic scenario of COVID-19. Attention should be paid to the possibility of these patients developing hearing loss and/or vestibular symptoms, in addition to the other possible side effects.
A limitation aspect of this study is the fact that many articles are case reports (with low scientific evidence), sample size and the lack of prospective studies that follow a larger number of patients since the beginning of medication intake, with periodic ototoxicity examinations.
In the light of the objective of discussing the ototoxicity of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine, the following is highlighted:
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
