AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Review Article
*Corresponding Author: Leonard B. Goldstein, Head and neck surgery resident, department of head and neck oncology, kidwai memorial institute of oncology.
Citation: Morgan Schermerhorn, James Keane, Leonard B. Goldstein (2023), A Review of Current Imaging Modalities In Detecting Bony Fractures In Young Children Suspected of Maltreatment, Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology, 5(7); DOI:10.31579/2692-9562/102
Copyright: © 2023, Leonard B. Goldstein. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
Received: 27 November 2023 | Accepted: 04 December 2023 | Published: 20 December 2023
Keywords: child abuse; imaging; bony fractures; review
Child abuse is a critical public health issue that can cause significant harm to the child’s physical and emotional well-being. Early detection of maltreatment can be challenging. A missed diagnosis of abuse could result in continued abuse and severe negative outcomes for the child. To ensure the optimal evaluation of suspected child abuse cases, a multidisciplinary team approach is necessary. Pediatricians lead the assessment, relying on radiologists to analyze the images of the suspected cases. Therefore, radiologists play a crucial role in detecting evidence of non-accidental injuries (NAI) and differentiating these findings from other causes. Fractures are the second most common NAI after cutaneous lesions such as bruises. Classic metaphyseal lesions (CMLs) and rib fractures are types of injuries that may indicate physical abuse in young children. Skeletal surveys are the standard screening tool for detecting CMLs, while ultrasound provides better visualization of the knee metaphysis. Chest X-rays are the primary modality for rib assessment, while CT scans are more effective in detecting rib fractures and costochondral junction fractures. An interdisciplinary team utilizing vigilant and systematic imaging techniques and evaluation is essential in identifying child abuse and protecting vulnerable children.
Child maltreatment is a critical public health issue that can cause significant harm to the child’s physical and emotional well-being. An estimation of 1 in 4 children in the United States are victims of child maltreatment. Many of them suffer from fractures that require medical evaluation.1 It is also noteworthy that child maltreatment can be a tremendous economic burden for society, which accounts for $124 billion in costs in the United States every year.1 According to World Health Organization (WHO), “child maltreatment is the abuse and neglect that occurs to children under 18 years of age. It includes all types of physical and/or emotional ill-treatment, sexual abuse, neglect, negligence, and commercial or other exploitation, which results in actual or potential harm to the child’s health, survival, development, or dignity in the context of a relationship of responsibility, trust or power.”2 Early detection of maltreatment can be challenging. A missed diagnosis of abuse could result in continued abuse and severe negative outcomes for the child.
Child abuse is often difficult to detect, despite its high prevalence. To ensure the optimal evaluation of suspected child abuse cases, a multidisciplinary team approach is necessary, where pediatricians lead the assessment, relying on radiologists to analyze the images of the suspected cases. One of the main challenges is to distinguish between accidental and non-accidental injuries (NAI). Therefore, radiologists play a crucial role in detecting evidence of NAI and differentiating these findings from other causes such as falls, and collisions. NAIs are intentionally inflicted by another person to harm the child. Fractures are the second most common NAI after cutaneous lesions such as bruises.3 Classic metaphyseal lesions (CMLs) and rib fractures are types of injuries that may indicate physical abuse in young children.
Radiological imaging is a vital tool for detecting NAI and diagnosing child abuse. Skeletal surveys are the standard screening tool for detecting CMLs, while ultrasound provides better visualization of the knee metaphysis. Chest X-rays are the primary modality for rib assessment, while CT scans are more effective in detecting rib fractures and costochondral junction fractures. An interdisciplinary team utilizing vigilant and systematic imaging techniques and evaluation is essential in identifying child abuse and protecting vulnerable children.
Despite the continuing research on child maltreatment, there is still a limitation in our current knowledge that needs to be addressed. The purpose of this article is to review the current literature about different imaging modalities to detect child maltreatment. Their roles and limitations in detecting fractures will also be discussed, providing an evidence-based approach for pediatricians, radiologists, and other healthcare professionals to evaluate suspected child abuse.
Diagnosis of physical abuse
Child abuse is a significant issue that can cause physical harm to children and unfortunately, is a common problem, especially involving fractures which is one of the most severe forms of child abuse. Upon inspection of a child who has experienced a fracture, it is essential for interprofessional teams to be capable of differentiating between fractures caused by violence and those that have occurred accidentally, as suitable mediation and legal action require correct identification.
When determining child abuse as a main source of fractures, medical care teams must consider several influential causes such as the mechanism that produced the fracture, the type and location, the age of the child, the history of the injury, and the existence of other injuries while contemplating feasible causes4. Trepidations of potential abuse should be contemplated when there are inconsistencies between the history given and the description of the fracture6. To illustrate, if the type of fracture is uncommon for the history given and the nature of the fracture, healthcare providers must contemplate the probability of abuse.
Specific varieties of fractures such as fractures in infants and toddlers, multiple fractures at different stages of healing, or fractures that are bilateral or in unusual locations are more likely to occur due to child abuse5. When compared with other age groups, children under 36 months have a higher hospitalization frequency for abusive fractures3. Furthermore, when spiral or metaphyseal fractures are seen, the mechanism for the damage may point to abuse due to the nature of these injuries4.
There are additional physical and psychological signs of abuse that healthcare providers should be attentive to when examining a child with a suspected abusive fracture. Bruising in uncommon areas, burn and bite marks are all possible signs of abuse4. Children who have experienced and been a victim of abuse may also display emotional and behavioral changes, such as depression, anxiety, and aggression6.
Furthermore, there are careful considerations to be determined when identifying child abuse as the cause of fractures and there are several factors to look for, involving, the location and type of fracture, the mechanism of injury, the age of the child, the history of the injury, and the presence of other physical or psychological signs of abuse. When there are discrepancies in the history provided and the nature of the fracture there should always be a high level of suspicion, or when other signs of abuse are present. Interdisciplinary teams can help protect vulnerable children from the harmful effects of child abuse by using vigilant and systematic imaging techniques and evaluation.
Role of radiology in the evaluation of occult bony fractures
Occult bony fractures are fractures that are not visible on conventional radiographs, either due to lack of displacement or limitations of the imaging technique. They typically occur as a result of high-energy trauma or insufficiency of the bone.7 Occult bony fractures are a challenge and may have serious implications, especially in cases of suspected child abuse. Radiology plays an important role in the detection and characterization of these types of fractures.
Various imaging modalities can be used to evaluate occult bony fractures in pediatric patients, depending on the clinical scenario and the availability of resources. According to the American College of Radiology (ACR) and the Society for Pediatric Radiology (SPR), skeletal surveys are recommended for children who are suspected of NAI.8 Skeletal surveys are a series of plain radiographs covering the entire skeleton that aims to accurately identify focal and diffuse abnormalities, including acute and healing fractures, differentiating them from normal anatomical variants.
There remain challenges to diagnose occult fractures in children with plain radiographs. CT, MRI, and ultrasound, on the other hand, are more sensitive in detecting occult bony fractures in pediatric patients. Despite the high costs, limited availability, and long duration of the exam, MRI has a 99% sensitivity in detecting occult fractures on account of its high resolution.9 CT, as a more readily available imaging modality, compared to MRI, can generate an accurate description of subtle fracture lines and articulations and evaluation of bone loss.10 Ultrasound is also an effective tool for detecting occult fractures in children that is readily available, radiation-free, and inexpensive.11
Detection of fractures
Often, the site of injury can provide substantial evidence for the mechanism through which it occurs. Long bones are highly prone to fracture when a child’s arms or legs are twisted or pulled, which creates inertial forces as a result of the shearing forces. This is referred to as a classic metaphyseal lesion (CML) and is highly indicative of physical abuse.12 These bones typically include the distal or proximal tibia, proximal humerus, and distal femur.13 A rib fracture due to accidental causes is uncommon, since young children have highly cartilaginous rib cages that usually do not break unless an intentional external force has been applied to the chest.14 On the other hand, injuries to the vertebrae (especially spinous processes), scapula, and sternum are unlikely to be caused by physical abuse and are rather more suggestive of motor vehicle accidents (MVAs).14 A skull fracture can indicate an accidental fall or a form of physical abuse, which requires further investigation to determine the cause.
Classic Metaphyseal Lesion (CML)
A standard modality for detecting CMLs is radiographic imaging. A skeletal survey (SS) is the standard screening tool recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics to see all forms of child abuse, including CMLs.15 It involves a series of radiographs, usually 20, that allows for a comprehensive assessment of the axial and appendicular skeleton. According to a retrospective study conducted on children < 24>
On the other hand, CT imaging requires about 100 times the radiation dose of a skull radiograph for children under 2 years of age.18 For this reason, it has rarely been used in the detection of CMLs in children. Nevertheless, technological advancements and better protocol implementation have taken place in order to utilize this form of imaging in child abuse detection.19
Although considered a standard mode of imaging, radiographic detection of CML can be occult or subtle. Additionally, a skeletal survey can only show subperiosteal new bone growth in only a minority of distal tibia CMLs.20 Ultrasound can provide better visualization of the knee metaphysis, detecting fine details of the new bone growth of the metaphysis.20
Rib Fractures
As briefly mentioned above, rib fractures are uncommon in infants and toddlers due to the highly cartilaginous nature of the bones that exhibit great elasticity. Given this fact, signs of anterior or posterior rib fractures, with varying states of healing process, may be indicative of abuse. It is important to consider other potential causes of rib fractures, such as genetic abnormalities in bone formation (e.g., osteogenesis imperfecta), accidental blunt force injuries as occur during motor vehicle collisions, and previous application of cardio-pulmonary resuscitation on the child.21
In children, chest X-Rays are the primary modality for rib assessment, which is used a lot more frequently than CT scans. However, obtaining signs of rib fractures on radiographs poses an image classification challenge, as it requires a much higher spatial resolution for fractures.21 This is consistent with the results of another study, which found that chest CT outperforms the conventional X-ray in most aspects of rib fracture detection.22 Specifically, a substantial improvement in sensitivity was observed when using CT as opposed to radiography, with a minor decrease in specificity.
While a fracture due to blunt force trauma can occur at any segment of the rib arch, it is worth paying special attention to a type of fracture unique to the rib, known as the costochondral junction (CCJ) fracture. This junction connects the bone to the cartilage, serving as an important site for the growth and development of the rib during childhood and early adulthood.23 As the rib grows, the cartilage at the costochondral junction also expands and helps to maintain the connection between the rib and the sternum. Viewed under histopathologic imaging, healing injuries on the rib typically exhibit an outgrowth of the proliferating chondrocytes from the growth plate into the end of the rib (primary spongiosa). This, along with the fact that most of the CCJ fractures identified on X-Ray are in the healing phase, raises concerns about the visibility of CCJ fractures on radiographic imaging, including SS. Because of this, other imaging modalities to identify CCJ fractures may lead to a better diagnosis of non-accidental trauma.23
Skull Fractures
Differentiating skull fractures from natural sutures and vascular grooves can be challenging on plain radiographs.24 Compared to the autopsy, 63% of single skull fractures were successfully identified on radiographs, while only 50% of fractures with two or more lesions on the same bone were successfully identified in one study.25 Moreover, brain CTs are recommended for the diagnosis of trauma to the brain,26 which have been shown to increase the detection of skull fractures, with 10-30% more identification than plain radiographs.27
Furthermore, black bone MRI imaging is a new imaging technique that uses a partial flip angle to obtain a uniform background by suppressing fat and water to increase the contrast between bone and soft tissue.28 Despite this sequence, about 25% of skull fractures are still overlooked in children around 4 years of age compared to CT.29 Moreover, one study found that ultrasound had a sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 85% in assessing pediatric patients under 2 years of age with NTI.30 However, due to the nature of ultrasound, it will be limited to regions of swelling of soft tissues. The gold standard in diagnosing skull fractures is a CT scan.30
Other Fractures
Other fractures such as spinal and scapular fractures are highly specific for abuse, while they are relatively rare in young children.31 Plain radiographs may not be sensitive enough to detect these types of fractures due to the complexity of the anatomy. Some studies have shown that CT and bone scans may have a higher sensitivity.32 33 Pelvic fracture is also uncommon in NAI and data is limited and with varying results.34 Clavicle fractures are common in NAI as it is the most common fracture during vaginal delivery.35 Both radiographs and ultrasound are sensitive enough for diagnosis.34 35
Pediatric fractures are common and can be indicative of child maltreatment. Diagnostic imaging can be used to accurately assess the bony structures in children of suspected abuse. CT could be a better modality in the cases of rib and skull fractures, while skeletal survey could be better in detecting CML. Radiation-free MRI and ultrasound can be used to confirm the diagnosis. On the other hand, CT would expose children to a higher dose of radiation. The best practice in cases of suspected child abuse is to accurately identify the NAI. It is essential to select the appropriate modality base on the history, physical examination, and radiation dose. Further research investigating strategies to improve prediction in diagnosing child maltreatment is warranted.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
