AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
case report
*Corresponding Author: Kiran Dudhat, School of Pharmacy, RK University, Kasturbadham, Rajkot, Gujarat- 360020, India.
Citation: Pinal Viradiya, Tisha Lathia, Kushal Parekh, Kiran Dudhat, (2024), A Rare Case Report Presentation on Guillain-Barré Syndrome in Young Male, J, Surgical Case Reports and Images, 7(9); DOI:10.31579/2690-1897/218
Copyright: © 2024, Kiran Dudhat. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 17 September 2024 | Accepted: 30 September 2024 | Published: 09 October 2024
Keywords: gbs; immunoglobulin therapy; emg/ncs; inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy
Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) is an immune-mediated illness, can result in motor disability and even death. Muscle weakness is one of its symptoms, which calls for an immediate diagnosis and course of treatment. Treatment options include plasma exchange and IV immunoglobulin therapy, both of which work best when started early. Increasing knowledge about GBS is essential for better patient outcomes and early diagnosis. To ensure that those who are impacted receive the best care possible, further research is required to improve therapeutic approaches and deepen understanding. In this case report, we have discussed the case of a 16-year-old male patient who had Guillain-Barré Syndrome and was given IV immunoglobulin therapy.
GBS is thought to be an immune-mediated illness that targets the peripheral nerve system, which are the nerves that are not part of the brain or spinal cord. It can take days or weeks for symptoms to appear. Varied geographic regions experience the condition in varied proportions for its demyelinating and axonal manifestations, and there are easily distinguishable clinical variations such as Miller Fisher syndrome. GBS can result in severe muscular weakness, and 5% of patients pass away. Acute motor axonal neuropathy (AMAN) and acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (AIDP) are the two most prevalent subtypes. The first presenting symptom in the majority of individuals with typical Guillain-Barré syndrome is rapidly progressing bilateral weakness. weakness is traditionally defined upward, typically beginning in the distal lower extremities, however it may begin closer to the body, in the legs or arms. The later pattern may provide a misleading clinical a pyramidal lesion's impression, or at the level of the spinal cord or higher), however this is readily accounted for by focused conduction block at the cervical and lumbar levels nerve roots as opposed to the entire length of the nerve fibre. [1]. GBS is a global disease that affects men more often than women, with a median yearly incidence of 1.3 cases per 100,000 people. It is believed that GBS is an autoimmune illness brought on by a previous viral or bacterial infection. Commonly recognized antecedent pathogens include Campylobacter jejuni, cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, and Mycoplasma pneumoniae. It is obvious that a fundamental factor in the development of the disorder—at least in the case of Campylobacter jejuni infection—is the molecular mimicry between microbial and neuronal antigens. It is still unclear, though, how and when the immune response is changed toward undesirable autoreactivity due to the interaction of microbial and host components. Moreover, it is unknown whether hereditary and environmental variables influence a person's propensity to get the illness. Most people (>99%) who are exposed to an immunological stimulation as a result of infections linked to Guillain-Barré syndrome, including C jejuni, do not develop unwanted autoimmunity. [1,2]. Different cultures have developed GBS at different genetic loci, especially those pertaining to immune response control. Research on GBS has revealed aberrant expression of cytokine-coding genes, and investigations utilizing an animal model of autoimmune neuritis have confirmed that Th1/Th2/Th17/Treg cytokines are regulated. Although HLA alleles have been linked to GBS risk, opinions among populations about their significance are divided. Certain GBS subtypes have been linked to SNPs in cytokine-coding genes, namely IL-17 and TNF-α, suggesting that these subtypes may have distinct processes. A substantial percentage of the gene abnormalities in GBS cases could be explained by epigenetic processes. Studies conducted in vitro have revealed that GBS patients' peripheral blood cells and immune cells respond differently. [11]. Patients with GBS have complement, immunoglobulin, and macrophage infiltration peripheral nerve deposits. GBS patients' blood also contains activated T cells, inflammatory cytokines, and anti-ganglioside antibodies. Neuronal membranes contain large amounts of gangliosides, sialylated glycosphingolipids that may be involved in signal recognition mechanisms. Numerous autoimmune disorders have been linked to the idea of molecular mimicry, with the function of molecular mimicry being established at several stages. Two key conditions must be met for a cross-reactive immune response to be triggered against autologous antigens: the antigens must be sufficiently dissimilar from the microbial to cause the immune system to break tolerance to self, and the antigens must be similar for immune responses to cross-react. In certain cases, lipopolysaccharide (LPS), which is present in the cell walls of C jejuni strains, has been shown to trigger anti-ganglioside antibodies. Through complement-dependent activity, anti-ganglioside antibodies mediate the illness course and contribute to the pathogenesis of GBS. IgG and complement deposits are observed on the axolemma at the nodes of Ranvier motor fibers in autopsy studies of AMAN, accompanied with little demyelination and lymphatic infiltration. In AMAN and Miller Fischer syndrome, C jejuni attached to motor nerve terminals destroy neuromuscular junctions in a complement-dependent manner, resulting in damage to neuronal and perisynaptic Schwann cells. Therapeutic applications of complement inhibitors are being investigated. [3,12]. Early diagnosis of Generalized Brain Syndrome (GBS) is important since it helps identify subgroups, shortens the disease's length and severity, and decreases the number of patients who need mechanical breathing. Different neurophysiological diagnostic criteria have been presented, and the diagnosis is made using Nerve Conduction Studies (NCS) and electromyography (EMG). By detecting anomalies in motor nerves to describe demyelination and categorizing axonal GBS into AMAN and AMSAN, NCS aids in differential diagnosis. Studying at least three sensory and four motor nerves, F-waves, and H reflexes improves NCS's diagnostic capacity. [3]. More than two-thirds of patients had increased concentrations of CSF protein, which is non-specific. Since axonal GBS is pathophysiologically characterized by axonal degeneration and reversible conduction failure at the axolemma of the node of Ranvier, Uncini et al. identify a trap when diagnosing GBS with regard to electrodiagnosis. Reversible conduction failure patterns should be taken into account as reliable electrodiagnostic standards change. [13]. As supplemental testing for GBS, CSF and serum analysis are also performed. CSF protein rises in nearly three-fourths of patients, with mononuclear cell count staying normal in the initial days of illness setting. [14]. PE and IVIg are examples of traditional therapy for GBS patients. IVIg, obtained from healthy donor blood, neutralizes pathogenic antibodies and inhibits complement system activation. It is recommended to take it within two weeks of becoming weak, at a dose of 0.4 g kg−1 day−1 for five days. IVIg or PE alone is more effective than their combination, according to a significant clinical investigation. Due to its effectiveness, safety, and accessibility, IVIg is used extensively across the world; but, in the future, its dosage and cost may need to be adjusted. [4,15]. There are ten main kinds of inhibitory glycoproteins known as interferons (IFNs). IFN-β, which is present in humans in natural forms as IFN-β, IFN-β-1b, and IFN-β-1a, is thought to be involved in GBS because of its possible advantages as a cellular immunomodulator. It could lower the incidence of GBS by blocking antigen presentation, T cell proliferation, adhesions, producing more anti-inflammatory cytokines, and altering macrophage characteristics. [16]. Patients with severe autoimmune illnesses can benefit from high-dose cyclophosphamide since it has a strong immunosuppressive effect and can improve their quality of life. Prophylactic CY treatment, however, can improve the clinical and histological aspects of GBS, as demonstrated by three case reports of patients with simultaneous GBS and systemic lupus erythematosus. However, extended treatment is linked to infections and neoplastic disorders.[17].
A 16-year-old man from Rajkot, Gujarat presented with bilateral lower limbs weakness for 4 days and upper limbs weakness, diarrhoea and vomiting for 2 days. He was on a mixed diet and had no significant family or personal history. He has no social history. On examination, he was found to be conscious and well-oriented. Initial vitals, Biochemical parameters and Abdominal USG Report was normal. C-Reactive Protein (CRP) was found to be normal. CSF Sugar was found to be 94 mg/dl which was higher (40-80 mg/dl), while Protein-CSF was 29 mg/dl which was normal (8-43 mg/dl). There was abnormal RBC level 5.59* 10^6/ cumm was noted. Power and tone of muscle of upper and lower limbs were normal. Level of MCV and MCH were lower than normal value, while RDW was higher than normal. On next day MRI brain and whole spine screening, EMG/NCS Report (upper and lower limbs) was recommended along with vitamin B12 serum. In MRI brain and Whole spine screening there was no evidence of acute infarct, haemorrhage or space occupying lesion, while sacralisation of L5 vertebra is noted and no significant disc herniation of nerve root compression is seen also visualised spine cord appears normal in signal intensity. vitamin B12 (Cyanocobalamin) serum level >2000 pg/ml which was higher than normal levels (197-771 pg/ml). EMG/NCS Report of upper and lower limbs showed, BIL median and ulnar nerve was normal DL with normal CMAPS and normal CV. BIL radial nerve shows normal DL with normal CMAPS, left peroneal nerve shows normal DL with normal CMAPS and normal CV while right peroneal nerve shows normal DL with normal CMAPS and decreased CV. One other hand left tibial nerve shows increased DL with normal CMAPS and decreased CV while right tibial nerve shows increased DL with normal CMAPS and normal CV. Sensory nerve conduction shows right median sensory nerve increased DL with normal snaps and decreased CV while left median and ulnar sensory nerve shows normal DL with normal snaps and normal CV. From this NCS findings of both upper limbs are within normal limits while for lower limbs are so distal, symmetrical, predominantly demyelinating variant of pure motor poly neuropathy was found. Treatment plan for curing the patient include; inj. IvIg (20mg) IV(OD), Inj.Pantoprazole (40mg) iv (12hrly), Inj.Ondansetron (8mg) iv (8hrly), tab. Calcium (500mg) (OD), Tab. Folic acid (5mg) (OD).
Initially identified as an acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an acute self-limited polyneuropathy which was first described in 1916. It has developed into other subgroups, such as Miller Fisher syndrome and acute motor axonal neuropathy. Since the 1980s, acute-phase sera have included antibodies against glycolipids, indicating that GBS is an immune-mediated illness.5 Globally, GBS is a common disease with a median incidence of 1.3 cases per 100,000 people (range: 0.4–4.0). The condition affects men more frequently than women, with peaks in young people and the elderly. In Western countries, there is no obvious seasonal correlation; this could be because the two common antecedent events—respiratory and enteric infections—have opposing seasonality. Campylobacter jejuni infection is the most commonly found cause of GBS, accounting for up to 41% of cases and linked to more severe illness and extended impairment.6 It is frequently linked to parturition, vaccination, and surgery. Patients progress quickly; 50% reach their clinical nadir in two weeks, and 90% do so in four. Between 80 and 90 percent of patients become immobile during the illness, and 50 percent of patients report significant pain. While sensory evaluation is normal in the early period, neurological exams frequently reveal proximal and distal weakness. The predominant condition is widespread areflexia or hyporeflexia, and cranial nerve weakening is frequent. Mechanical ventilation is necessary for approximately one-third of hospitalized GBS patients because of respiratory muscle or oropharyngeal weakness. Over 50% of individuals experience autonomic abnormalities, which can manifest as tachycardia or more severe dysfunction.7 Supportive ancillary testing, such as CSF analysis and electrodiagnostic testing, is necessary for GBS. Although these tests are necessary due to their limits and the need for fast treatment, they may be normal in the early stages. Merely 50% of patients exhibit elevated CSF protein content, with over 90% exhibiting it at the clinical nadir. The absence of CSF pleocytosis in GBS raises concerns regarding lymphomatous, carcinomatous, or infectious polyradiculoneuropathy. The clinical impression that peripheral neuropathy is the cause of sudden motor paralysis is supported by electrodiagnostic testing. Technology is used in nerve conduction studies (NCS) to assist in differentiating between axonal and demyelinating forms of neuropathy. The acuity of a patient's symptoms may be determined with the use of needle electromyography. [8,9]. Two treatment modalities are available for Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS): intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and plasma exchange. Given over the course of five days, IVIG at a rate of two grams per kilogram is intended to eliminate pathogenic antibodies, humoral mediators, and complement proteins implicated in the pathophysiology of GBS. Both therapies work just as well, but their effects are amplified if they are given within two weeks. No evidence of benefit with corticosteroids has been shown, either alone or in conjunction with IVIG and plasma exchange. Treatment for GBS is typically seen to hasten recovery; compared to untreated patients, treated individuals achieve independent ambulation 32 days sooner. [10].
The case of the 16-year-old boy emphasizes the significance of early identification and treatment for acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathies such as Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). Due to its varied clinical presentations and quick course, GBS requires urgent care in order to minimize complications and improve prognoses. The prognosis of patients can be improved by prompting the delivery of therapies like intravenous immunoglobulin, and healthcare providers need to be mindful of issues like infections and vaccines. To improve patient care and therapeutic approaches, more research is required. To minimize the effects of the syndrome and maximize recovery, medical experts and patient education must work together.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
