AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Review Article
*Corresponding Author: S Munshi, Consultant Physician, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Citation: HS Gendeh, AR Chaudhary, S Kamath, A Shetty, Z Javed, S Munshi. (2019) A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management. J. Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. 5(1); Doi: 10.31579/2578-8868/094
Copyright: © 2019 S Munshi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 20 September 2019 | Accepted: 15 October 2019 | Published: 16 October 2019
Keywords: cerebrovascular disease; drugs; intoxication; ischaemia; haemorrhage; cocaine; management
Cocaine misuse has been in the news recently with the Department of Health in the UK, recognising the seriousness of its epidemic
Cocaine misuse has been in the news recently with the Department of Health in the UK, recognising the seriousness of its epidemic. It is the most recurrent agent in drug-related strokes. [1,2] It has been linked to a poorer prognosis, with increased mortality and morbidity in young patients in comparison to other age-matched, drug-free stroke victims. [1, 3]The emergence of cocaine abuse as a major risk factor for stroke in young patients2 is linked to its consumption reaching worldwide epidemic proportions in the last two decades. In our own practice we have recognised it increasingly as a causative factor in young stroke patients. Its role in provoking stroke should be the subject of greater public awareness. Patients and health care professionals should be educated about the hazards and complications of cocaine use. This perspective contemplates the cerebrovascular effects of cocaine and their management.
Some facts and figures : The United States of America is reported to have 1.9 million current cocaine users in 2008 with adults aged 18 to 25 being the most prominent age group [4]. Recent data from the United Kingdom reported that approximately 2.2% (or 0.7 million) aged between 16 to 59 abused cocaine in the year 2011 and 2012 rendering it the second most commonly used drug after cannabis [5]. In Australia the 20- 29 year age group is the highest abuser of the drug [6]. There are a growing number of cocaine users in Asian countries such as India, Malaysia and Singapore; however detection is difficult as many abusers in these regions are from the higher socio-economic class [7].
Some historical facts: The natural alkaloid is extracted from the leaves of an Andean shrub, Erythroxylon coca or E. novgranatense. The leaves were chewed by indigenous populations of north-western South America to counter fatigue and hunger and also used to prepare a tea to treat mountain sickness. [8]
In Europe the first appearance of cocaine was in the form of extracts from the coca leaf. Vin Mariani, a coca wine was produced in France before 1870 and advocated for lassitude, melancholy and as a general tonic for the body and the mind. Another The coca drink, coca cola, contained 2.5 mg of cocaine per 100 ml in 1900, the last year of its presence in this product. Cocaine extracts were also available as pastilles, elixirs and chocolate bars prepared by pharmacists [9].
In 1880’s it was reported as a cure for alcoholism and morphine addiction. The general enthusiasm for cocaine and its actual euphoriant properties together with the absence of a legal frame regulating its marketing in the United States paved the way for the first cocaine epidemic in 1910. In the UK, cocaine fell under the Pharmacy Act of 1868, which limited its availability to pharmacists and physicicians [9].
After an almost complete eradication of the cocaine epidemic by the 1930s, the drug started to reappear in the US in the 1960s and reached epidemic proportions in the 1980s with the appearance of cocaine free base or “crack”.
Pharmacokinetics: Cocaine is absorbable from all body mucous membranes. [10] It is metabolised into inactive water-soluble ecgonine methyl ester by liver esterases and serum pseudocholineseterase. Spontaneous non-enzymatic plasmatic hydrolysis leads to the formation of benzoylecgonine, then ecgonine. These hydrolytic processes account for 80-90% of urinary cocaine metabolites.11 Its metabolites remain detectable in blood or urine for 24 to 36 hours after ingestion.[12,13]
Cocaine and its metabolites can also be detected in human hair, using gas chromatography and mass spectrography. Hair analysis tests are described as highly sensitive and specific in detecting cocaine use even after disappearance of urinary metabolites. [14]
Mechanism of action: Cocaine has local anaesthetic properties and when given systemically, acts as a powerful sympathomimetic agent by blocking the presynaptic reuptake of norepinephrine (NE) and dopamine. [10,13] The rise in synaptic NE was traditionally held responsible for the sharp rise in blood pressure following cocaine use, [13]. We now have a better understanding of this mechanism. The baroreceptor reflexes in healthy individuals indirectly regulate the degree of peripheral vasoconstriction by determining the level of central sympathetic outflow. Excessive adrenergic vasoconstriction is due to an inhibition of peripheral NE reuptake coupled with an unrestrained central sympathetic outflow due to absent altered baroreceptor reflexes. It has been speculated that the blood pressure-raising effect of cocaine is excessive in patients with long-standing hypertension, heart failure or other conditions due to impaired baroreceptor reflexes [15].
The anti-muscarinic properties of cocaine on myocytes, explains the suppression of vagal reflexes that should accompany the sympathomimetic effect of cocaine. This also explains why the cocaine-related rise in blood pressure is accompanied by tachycardia instead of a compensatory bradycardia. [16]
Moreover, repeated episodes of vasoconstriction and subsequent ischaemia due to frequent cocaine snorting may cause nasal septal perforation. Our team has previously described several cases with septal perforation due to intra-nasal cocaine abuse [17] . Similarly, several cases of cocaine induced ischaemic myelopathy and spinal cord infarction have been reported.
Cocaine as a risk factor for stroke: Drug abuse is one of the most common conditions predisposing to stroke in young adults; [2,18] The first report of a stroke associated with cocaine abuse was published in 1977 [19]. The risk for stroke is significantly high during the first 6 hours after drug abuse, with a relative risk of 46.5%. The risk subsequently decreases with time. In one study cocaine was the most frequently used drug (57%) [2]. In one sample study, the sex ratio for cocaine-related strokes was 20:7 (male to female) and the mean age was 38 (+/- 8.5 SD) years [3]. However, cocaine-related stroke might be more prevalent in people of a higher age, than traditionally taught [20].
Pathophysiology of cocaine-related stroke: Cocaine has been linked to both ischaemic and haemorrhagic strokes. Alkaloidal cocaine has been associated to both types of stroke in equal proportions, whereas cocaine hydrochloride was associated with haemorrhagic stroke in approximately 80% of cases [18]. Overall cerebral haemorrhages are more frequent than cerebral infarctions independent of the type of cocaine or its route of administration [21]. Various mechanisms are outlined in Table 1..
Thrombosis, whether linked to vasospasm, was proposed as a mechanism of cocaine related stroke [18,22]. Cocaine can increase platelet aggregation via an enhanced response to arachidonic acid [23]. Three cases of cocaine-related stroke associated with positive anti-cardiolipin antibodies have been described in two reports [24,25].
Embolism is mentioned as a possible mechanism [26], either following endocarditis2 or cocaine-induced cardiomyopathy [27]. Hypotension with cerebral ischaemia [28] following myocardial infarction [29] or ventricular fibrillation [30] caused by cocaine consumption has been incriminated.
There are some reports of cerebral vasculitis associated with cocaine abuse [21,31,34]. Both angiography and brain biopsy were used to demonstrate vasculitis, although angiography does not seem to be very reliable [32]. Small vessels vasculitis has been described in very few cases of cocaine related strokes and it is difficult to separate its role in the event from that of cerebral vasospasm. The causes of cocaine associated vasculitis are not well understood but it has been associated with a progressive symptoms over weeks and an elevated Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) [31,33].
Cerebral vasospasm is thought one of the most likely mechanisms of cocaine-related ischaemic strokes [18,35]. A study utilised Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) imaging to demonstrate that cocaine was actually responsible for the induction of cerebral vasoconstriction. This effect was dose-related. Repeated exposures result in a higher incidence of cerebral vasoconstriction [36]. Cerebral vasospasm has been suggested as an incriminating factor in cocaine-associated intra-cranial haemorrhage (ICH) with absent vascular pathology at autopsy [37].
Among designer drugs, cocaine is believed to be the one of the largest causes of ICH in young adults [1]. Bleeds were thought to be a consequence of an outburst in blood pressure following the ingestion of the drugs. However cocaine-related ICH is more likely to occur in patients with underlying cerebral vascular abnormalities [1,22] . It is suggested that cocaine predisposes to aneurysmal rupture in smaller aneurysms and at a younger age [38]. In a small study of 13 patients with drug-related ICH, seven were found to have intracranial aneurysms and 3 had arteriovenous malformations. Cerebral angiography should be part of the evaluation of most young patients with ICH”1. Moreover, cocaine induced ICH frequently results in intraventricular extensions [39].
Other contributing risk factors predisposing to stroke are platelet activation via CD40L (sCD40L), Neutrophil-Activating Peptide-2 (NAP-2) and ‘regulated on activation, normal T cells expressed and secreted’ (RANTES) resulting in higher intravascular thrombus formation and early onset atherosclerotic changes [40]. RANTES (CCL5 or Chemokine ligand 5) is a ligand expressed on many haematopoietic and non-hamematopoietic cell types and plays an important part in homing and migration of memory T-cells.
Vascular changes include abnormalities of the infolding of the tunica interna and disruption of the tunica externa in ischaemic strokes. Several colleagues have reported the presence of inflammatory mononuclear cells cuffing in cortical and meningeal venules with transmural lympho-monocytic infiltration in a 21-year old stroke patient with cocaine abuse: suggesting vessel inflammation secondary to ischaemic changes with no definitive evidence of vasculitis. Table 1:
Mechanisms of ischaemic stroke in Cocaine users:
Vasospasm – Disorder of Calcium-Magnesium homeostasis
Sympathomimetic effect of cocaine
Platelet activation
Apoptosis of cerebral vascular smooth muscle cells
Cardio-embolism ( endocarditis, arrhythmia, cardio-myopathy)
Disorder of cerebral auto-regulation
PRES ( Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome)
RCVS ( Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome)
Vasculitis
Premature atherosclerosis
Dysfunction of vascular endothelial cells
Management: All physicians need to be aware of the need to recognise and treat cocaine induced stroke. We categorise this into the general management of an ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke and additional management in cocaine abusers (Table 2).
The general management of stroke can be further subcategorised into an acute/hyper-acute phase and long term management of stroke for the purposes of simplicity. Obtaining a history of drug abuse in an acute stroke patient is challenging, especially if the patient presents with confusion or dysphasia, or if no collateral history is available. Therefore, a quick glance of previous medical records and a collateral history from family or healthcare/social assistants is often helpful. As a general rule of thumb, the gold standard management of an acute stroke/suspected stroke either in a stroke or non-stroke specialist centre among patient should include an urgent head imaging (either a computed tomography, CT head or MR imaging/MRI) to rule out a haemorrhagic stroke. If a bleed is seen, a neurosurgical opinion should be sought urgently.
In an absence of a bleed, we thrombolyse patients within 4.5 hours (as supported by ECASS-3trial [41] and the IST-3 trial [42]) from a definite time of onset. A small scale study on the use of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) showed similar safety outcomes on twenty nine (n=29) cocaine positive strokes as compared to seventy five (n=75) cocaine negative strokes [43]. However, cocaine-induced hypertension should be identified and corrected prior to thrombolysis. In most cases, patients with severe uncontrolled hypertension or Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)>185, we prefer to correct any severe hypertension via the administration of intravenous antihypertensives prior to thrombolysis. Intravenous Labetalol is the drug of choice in our centre and throughout the UK. In addition, cocaine-induced agitation can be managed with intravenous diazepam and hypothermia should be corrected to maximise reperfusion in an ischaemic setting.
The long term management of a stroke involves rehabilitation provided by a multidisciplinary team(MDT) of physicians, physiotherapists, speech and language therapists, occupational therapists and psychologists with set and optimistic recovery plans with goal-setting. However, not all regions in Asia have the facilities of an MDT or of the diversity of care professionals and a lot will depend on the healthcare setting of the given region. Studies have shown that stroke patients have a more favourable recovery in a stroke centre/ institute with the provision of a specific stroke related care [44]. A full cardiovascular and neurological workout should include an electrocardiogram (ECG) and Echocardiogram (ECHO), carotid doppler for ischaemic stroke involving the anterior and middle cerebral arteries and an MR Angiogram for better visualisation of the cerebral blood vessels if deemed necessary. Cocaine induced stroke patients tend to have poorer functional recovery and prognosis as compared to the non-cocaine group [39].
Recent evidence suggests that cocaine induced vasospasm related ischaemia, detected early via the use of CT Angiogram/Perfusion allows its differentiation from thromboembolic induced ischaemia, therefore allowing for a more specific management [45]. In animal experiments, the administration of intravenous magnesium has an inhibitory effect on vascular spasms secondary to cocaine [46]. However, a randomised controlled trial by Muir et al in 2004 showed no significant improvement in mortality or morbidity after 90 days of an acute onset of stroke. [47] Corticosteroids and immunosuppressive drugs have been used for cocaine induced vasculitis; however there is still a need for more clinical data about its efficacy.
A large number of cocaine abusers do also suffer from a plethora of co-morbidities i.e. hypertension, ischaemic heart disease, diabetes and psychological issues; these should be managed by their healthcare physicians appropriately to reduce the risks of the recurrence of a repeated stroke. This highlights the need for effective education regarding the intracranial effects of cocaine abuse among healthcare professionals who will be the first point of contact among cocaine abusers presenting with a stroke. Moreover, healthcare providers are often in a better position to educate and advise these patients accordingly. The ‘Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs report [48] and recommendations on Powder Cocaine’ published by the Department of Health in the UK, advocated various measures to counter this menace by various measures, namely:
The UK government’s current approach, which builds on the commitments made under the 2010 Drug Strategy, balances co-ordinated action to restrict the supply of cocaine, activity to reduce the demand and treatment which allows anyone to recover and free themselves from dependency and minimise harm.
Conclusion
There is a great need to highlight cocaine as an incriminatory factor in the modern era in susceptible individuals. Cocaine-induced stroke is common in young people and increasingly recognised in middle-aged individuals as well. Although much is known about cocaine-induced stroke and its pathophysiology, there is still a great need for further research. There is a great need for specific pharmacological interventions at a molecular level to counter the cerebrovascular and other effects of cocaine and reduce the risks of strokes among cocaine abusers. Inevitably, healthcare physicians should encourage abstinence from cocaine abuse to prevent the widespread side-effects of this drug and recurrences of future intracranial events.
DISCLOSURES
The authors have no conflict of interest(s) or financial interest(s) to declare.
FUNDING AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors have not received any funding for the writing and publication of this manuscript. The authors would like to the Department of Stroke Medicine, Nottingham City Hospital for their experience in managing cocaine related stroke.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
HS Gendeh was involved in design, data analysis, drafting of article and critical revision of article. S Kamath was involved in data analysis, drafting of article and approval of article. SK Munshi and Abdul Rehman Chaudhary were involved in data analysis, drafting of article, critical revision and approval of article. All authors have access to manuscripts that support the publication.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
