AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Thomas T.H. Wan, Professor emeritus of Health Management and Informatics at the University of Central Florida, USA.
Citation: Thomas T.H. Wan, V Gurupur, Bing L Wang, S Matthews. (2021) A Patient-Centric Care Approach to Facilitate the Design of an Artificial Intelligence Application in Geriatric Care Management of Heart Failure Readmissions. Biomedical Research and Clinical Reviews. 3(5); DOI: 10.31579/2692-9406/056
Copyright: © 2021 Thomas T.H. Wan, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 05 March 2021 | Accepted: 24 March 2021 | Published: 26 March 2021
Keywords: artificial intelligence research; human-factor principles; self-care management of chronic conditions; low case for geriatrics; Heart Failure; restfulness; healing environment; nutrition
The examination of human factors’ role in moderating medical interventions and hospitalizations and/or rehospitalization of heart failure (HF) patients.
Objectives: The primary purpose of this study is two-fold: 1) to show relevant human factors influencing the rehospitalization of persons with heart failure by developing a systematic algorithm generated from the cited randomized trials; and 2) to examine how the self-care principles, such as choice/efficacy, restfulness, healing environment, activity, trust, interpersonal relationships, outlook, and nutrition, may reduce heart failure readmissions.
Methods: The meta-analytic approach generated a theoretically relevant and empirically validated self-care management decision support protocol for HF. Statistical modeling of the effects of eight human factors for the reduction of HF readmissions was presented.
Findings: The systematic review and meta-analysis approach documents the results of randomized clinical trials that affect heart failure hospitalization by selected human factors. A patient-centered decision support system was developed to facilitate the self-care management of heart failure.
Discussion: Our research generates systematic knowledge about the importance of human-factor principles in the provision of geriatric care for heart failure. Using shared decision-making strategies under the population health management approach could enhance the quality of care and reduce costly readmissions of heart failure, particularly for elderly patients.
Avoidable hospitalization or readmissions emerged as a critical issue in achieving better quality and lower cost of care, particularly related to older patients with chronic conditions [1]. A concerted effort has been made by the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services in the United States to encourage the identification of differential risks in readmissions due to chronic conditions such as heart failure. Similarly, care management strategies have been implemented in acute care hospitals for enhancing the delivery of integrated care. Therefore, care management for chronic conditions can be extremely critical in shaping the process of disease management and outcome improvement activities for the elderly [1]. However, little empirical evidence exists in the scientific literature that shows what works and what does not work for patients with these conditions. Artificial intelligence applications with machine learning may be a source for identifying workable solutions, but its development is plagued by the critical issue of lack of theoretical guidance in framing pertinent research questions or testable hypotheses. Thus, the reliance on an inductive or problem-solving approach offers little generalizability or conclusive evidence to achieve sustainable solutions for chronic disease management. This study contributes to the body of knowledge-centered in patient-centric factors or human-factor principles within the Population Health Management Framework that may directly or indirectly affect hospitalization and rehospitalization of heart failure patients.
Objectives of the Study
The human factors may play a moderating or a mediating role influencing HF hospitalization or rehospitalization. However, no clinical trial studies for HF have examined the relevance of human factors as major effects or intervention factors that may be potential enhancers for better HF outcomes. The purpose of this study is two-fold: 1) to design the algorithm through performing regression analysis of both main effects and interaction effects of selected human-factor principles on the propensity for HF hospitalizations, and 2) to examine how the self-care principles, such as choice/efficacy, restfulness, healing environment, activity, trust, interpersonal relationships, outlook, and nutrition, may reduce heart failure (HF) readmissions. The systematic review and meta-analytic approach are used to generate a theoretically relevant and empirically validated self-care management decision support protocol for HF.
Related Research
Population Health Management Approaches
In an era of healthcare delivery value-based system is critical. Additionally, there is a greater need for containing avoidable hospitalization or readmission. Henceforth, as corroborated by Nielsen et al, [2] population health management emerges as a practical approach to improve quality and reduce costly hospitalization of the chronically ill patient population [2]. The general principles may include the following, as cited in the book entitled “Population Health Management for Poly Chronic Conditions: Evidence-Based Research Approaches [1]:
The relevance of Human-Factor Principles in Predicting HF Readmissions
Eight human factors principles are commonly believed to affect health care outcomes of heart failure patients. They are also considered as enhancers for better patient care outcomes. However, no randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies have considered the human factors as intervention factors in the investigation of clinical outcomes [6].
Research Questions
Three research questions formulated under the population health management framework with an emphasis on the human-factor principles are stated as follows:
Question 1. What is the specific human-factor principles observed in the literature to contribute to the variability in HF readmissions?
Question 2. What are the important main effects and interaction effects of these human-factor principles in the analysis of the readmission risk?
Question 3. What is the relative importance of each human-factor principle that could be incorporated into risk reduction strategies for enhancing self-care management of heart failure?
Material and Methods
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Procedures
The literature review coupled with meta-analysis is a powerful and efficient approach to summarize the results. This is also called the approach of employing the epidemiology of results for determining the relevance of predictor variables for readmissions. By following the report procedures specified by Moher et al. [12], a systematic review and meta-analysis of HF hospitalizations were performed. The study team selected appropriate keywords relevant to the 1) independent variable of hospitalization and treatment, 2) the moderating variable of care management principles, 3) the dependent variable of readmission, and 4) the disease of HF to conduct searches in nine databases. Databases searched included CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, ERIC, MedLine, PubMed, PsycInfo, Science Direct, and Web of Science. Only prospective studies associated with HF hospitalization and readmissions, published in English, Chinese, Spanish, and German journals between January 1, 1990, and August 31, 2015, were included in the systematic review. Data were extracted from the studies by use of a machine learning algorithm. In the meta-analysis, data were collected from studies that measured HF readmission for individual patients.
Statistical Analysis and Modeling
Figure 1 presents a logistic regression model with eight specific human-factors or principles as predictor variables or major effects for HF hospitalization (dependent or outcome variable).
Interaction effects of these eight factors are also empirically examined in the analysis. Detailed regression parameter estimates are openly available upon request from the corresponding authors.
Decision Support System Design and Validation
Given the present scenario of data acquisition and its transformation into information, knowledge, and wisdom; it is important to note that care management can be considerably improved using electronic data collection implemented using different methods. One of the key challenges here will decipher the most needed critical information from different data sources available on the cloud and through other means. It is important to note that this data will be available in different formats such as natural language text, relational database records, semi-structured data available as XML and JSON, and many other such formats. This implies that any research conducted must identify the nature of information along with the associated variables needed for research [13]. Here it is important to mention that this is the first key challenge in the design and validation of the required intervention.
The 2nd key challenge will be the development or synthesis of required decision support algorithms that will use the data gained. It is important to note that the application of ontologies might be critical in representing information that presents a myriad of complexities. In this strategy, we follow the rule stated by Herbert Simon [14] that complexity takes the form of hierarchy. While using an algorithm for decision support the stakeholders must also consider the inherent bias that can result from original sources as described by Gurupur and Wan [15]. Using appropriate knowledge structures to represent the recommendations made by the decision support system is also a necessary matter that needs thorough assessment. When using machine learning methods, the stakeholders must take into consideration the fact that knowledge structures can be constantly improved with the emergence of newer forms of knowledge.
Results
What are the specific human-factor principles as observed by care management enhancers in the available literature to contribute to the variability in HF readmissions?
A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trial studies on heart failure hospitalization have yielded positive proof of the beneficial effect of specific care management strategies that may alter patients’ knowledge, motivation, attitude, preventive practice, and outcomes. Figure 2 summarizes the numbers of selected review articles that identify important contributing human-factor principles to explain the variability in HF rehospitalization.
The relevance of human-factor principles (i.e., the eight factors such as choice, restfulness, healing environment, activity, trust, interpersonal relation, outlook, and nutrition) influencing HF readmissions has been examined by a systematic review of clinical trial studies that appeared in scientific journals. Of the total of 259 RCT studies reviewed, the frequency of human-factor principles cited is presented in Figure 2. The largest number (102) of RCT heart studies is involved with choice or self-efficacy, followed by nutrition (68) and activity (44). Two principles such as outlook and healing environment are not found from the review of RCT studies. The possible reasons for the lack of citations for these two factors are related to 1) a limited attention to outlook and healing environment as enhancers in care management or clinical studies; and 2) clinical studies centered in medical procedures or therapeutics, not on health educational interventions in earlier RCT studies.
What are the important main effects and interaction effects of these human factor principles in the analysis of readmission risks?
The regression analysis results indicate that an intervention involving six of the eight human factor principles may lower an individual HF patient’s probability of not being readmitted. Participants in interventions involved with human factors that incorporated single or combined principles were 1.4 to 6.8 times less likely to be readmitted. Interpersonal Relationships and Outlook Interventions have no statistically significant effect on the reduction of HF readmission. Furthermore, an additive model with the application of choice, interpersonal relationship, and nutrition together would yield a regression coefficient of 0.442, with an odds ratio of 1.566 (Figure 3).
Interaction effects are also examined in the analysis. Statistically significant interaction terms include 1) choice* interpersonal relationships*nutrition, and 2) choice*outlook*nutrition can significantly reduce the risk for HF readmission.
What is the relative importance of each human-factor principle that could be incorporated into risk reduction strategies for enhancing self-care management for heart failure?
The logistic regression analysis of the risk of being readmitted for heart failure to a hospital reveals that not all care management or self-care enhancers have an equal amount of influence on readmissions. For instance, rest intervention can significantly reduce HF readmission. The odds of reducing HF readmission with rest intervention is about 13 times more than that without rest intervention. Detailed statistical estimation results and algorithms could be obtained from authors at the request.
Discussion
The systematic review-meta-analysis approach to HF readmissions has helped identify the relevance of six out of eight human-factor principles as enhancers for reducing the risk of HF readmissions. In descending frequency order, choice or self-efficacy, nutrition, activity, interpersonal relationships, outlook, and restfulness are among the self-care principles identified while healing environment and trust were not identified in any of the 259 studies reviewed. A regression analysis of the human factors singly and in combination supported a 1.4 to 6.8 reduction in risk of HF readmission and revealed that not all self-care principles are of equal influence.
These results could be used to develop focused shared decision-making strategies to enhance the quality of care and reduce costly readmission of HF. As such, based on the odds ratio computation in logistic regression results, we may design a clinical decision-support system to guide the implementation of human-factor principles. Evaluation research is then designed coupled with the cloud-based data collection system to enhancing clinical practices for reducing HF readmissions.
Implications, Limitations, and Future Research
Implications and Contributions
Specific contributions of this study include the following:
Limitations
It is important to note that there are three specific limitations of the patient-centric strategy employing only human-factor principles in the population health management approach. First, potential biases may be generated by a disciplinary focused investigator who will solely rely on personal determinants of healthcare for artificial intelligence and research [15]. Alternatively, a transdisciplinary approach that incorporated both micro-and macro-level predictors in the design of predictive analytics may help to identify synergistic effects of personal, organizational, and ecological factors on care management improvement in the future. Second, a healing environment and design in healthcare may be an essential part of the care plan and assessment development. Thus, heart failure readmissions as a global health problem can be better examined and understood from an integrated perspective to guide the design and evaluation of artificial intelligence applications for chronic care. Third, the current measure of each human-factor principle is based on a binary or dummy variable. Thus, the intensity of the human-factor principle cannot be ascertained. Thus, the variability in employing a human-factor principle cannot be demonstrated by a dichotomized predictor variable.
Future Research
For solidifying the theoretical import of the eight human-factor principles, we need to develop more precise and quantitative measurements for these principles. Ideally, the adoption of an analog scale with a potential range from 1 to 100 points for each theoretical construct is imperative for measuring the degree or intensity of a human factor's influence on the variability in care management. Furthermore, it is desirable to form multiple indicators to reflect their relevance to a latent variable.
In the future, a practical patient decision support system could be redesigned and improved that is based on important human-factor principles, as part of patient-centric care, coupled with a cloud-data system to capture future observations of the effects of intensity and dosage of each self-care management intervention for HF patients (Figure 4). Furthermore, the research has uncovered how the risk-reduction approach is feasible and sustainable for artificial intelligence-based applications that will incorporate a shared decision-making approach. Furthermore, new data collected could be used to validate the risk reduction estimates generated from the prior investigation. By employing variant multivariate modeling techniques (e.g., artificial neural-network analysis, support vector regression, and other deep learning methods), the clinical decision support system could be further evaluated and amended (16).
Conclusion
Based on the principles of population health management for chronic conditions [1], clinical interventions with human-factor principles are suggested that may reduce readmissions among HF patients. The risk-reduction strategies for readmissions could be formulated and empirically validated in regression analysis. For the future investigation of HF hospitalization or rehospitalization, an integrated perspective, encompassing micro-and macro-determinants of healthcare outcomes for heart failure as noted in previous research [1], is a promising theoretical framework to guide the development of predictive analytics and the implementation of a viable and practical decision support system for enhancing care management for HF. Ideally, a comprehensive system framework, encompassing factors such as the governmental readmission policy [17], use of health information exchange [18], organization change strategies [19], implementation of practice guidelines [20] and application of behavior change interventions [21], could be used to conduct predictive modelling of determinants of hospital readmissions. Furthermore, the design and evaluation of patient-centric care coupled with a cloud-based data collection mechanism may enable us to conduct a large-scale prospective study on human factors influencing care management and outcomes. Furthermore, multivariate modeling techniques, such as multi-level analysis, could help delineate the relative effects of personal and contextual predictors on the rehospitalization of HF patients. By identifying a high-risk patient group and applying relevant human-factor principles as care management enhancers for heart failure or other targeted chronic conditions, the population health management and research could generate systematic information and knowledge about important determinants of health [23] and healthcare differentials [24]. The shared decision-making strategies [25] coupled with the use of artificial intelligence research [26] under the population health management approach could then be developed and implemented to enhance the quality of care and reduce costly readmissions of heart failure.
Author Notes: Conceptualization, T.W. and V.G.; methodology, T.W., B-L.W; software, V.G.; data processing and modeling, B-L.W and S.M.; systematic review, T.W., V.G., B-L.W; writing, T.W., V.G.; editing and proofreading, T.W., V.G., B-L.W., S.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Acknowledgments: The authors sincerely thank the editor and reviewers who have contributed to the fruition of this article.
Declaration of conflict interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Funding: None.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
