AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Review Article
*Corresponding Author: Yuh-Shan Ho, Trend Research Centre, Asia University, Taichung County 41354, Taiwan.
Citation: Su-Y Wu, Wen-T Chiu, Yuh-S Ho. (2021) A Historical Review of Classic Publications in Web of Science Category of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Research. 3(4); DOI:10.31579/2768-0487/040
Copyright: © 2021 Yuh-Shan Ho. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 24 July 2021 | Accepted: 03 September 2021 | Published: 11 September 2021
Keywords: bibliometric; citation history; document type; web of science; sci-expanded
Classic publications in Web of Science Category of Obstetrics and Gynecology were identified by using bibliometric indicator, TCyear, total citations since publication to the end of the recent year from Web of Science Core Collection. Fourteen classic publications with TC2016 ≥ 1,000 times were analysied. We also applied a citation indicator, the Cyear, total citations in the most recent year only, to assess the recent impact of the classic publications. The results showed that the 14 classic publications were published between 1927 and 2004, and that the most productive journal were American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Citation histories were applied for impact of the classic publications after their publications. In addition, highlight of each classic articles were presented. A classic article by Sampson in 1927 was found to be the classic Sleeping Beauties in Web of Science category of obstetrics and gynecology.
It has been reported that due to the presence of many most cited papers, there have been influential subsequent advances in molecular biology resulting in helping a great number of people (Picknett and Davis 1999). Highly cited articles nevertheless provide an interesting and useful insight into which authors, articles, and topics are influencing the research profession over time (Smith 2008). The most notable studies can be usefulness as tools for teaching, advocating, and championing the contribution of research (Levitt et al. 2015). In 1970s, articles have been cited 100 or more times were called ‘classic articles’ (Garfield 1976). Garfield (1976) pointed that classic methods, the starting points of great scientific advances, and identified with eponymic terminology were normally presented in classic articles. In last two decades, number of journals in Science Citation Index Expanded increased from 4,962 journals in 1997 to 8,879 journals in 2016. Thus, higher citations at publication years were likely to be published in recent years (Ho 2014a). Articles with at least 1,000 citations from Web of Science Core Collection were also named classic articles in for example, Web of Science categories of surgery (Long et al. 2014), psychology (Ho and Hartley 2016a), and neurosciences (Yeung and Ho 2018), as well as in a country such as USA (Ho and Hartley 2016b) and Taiwan (Ho 2018).
In this study, we analysed classic articles in Web of Science category of obstetrics and gynecology by comparing their total citations from Web of Science Core Collection from 1900 to 2016. We report on (1) what are the characteristics of classic papers – including publication years, journals, and document types; (2) what are the classic articles about; and (3) the life citation cycles and attributes of the classic articles.
The data reported in this study were retrieved from the online version of Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) the Clarivate Analytics (formerly known as the Thomson Reuters and the Institute for Scientific Information) Web of Science Core Collection database. According to Journal Citation Reports (JCR) of 2016 (InCites Journal Citation Reports dataset updated September 09, 2017), it indexes 8,879 journals with citation references across 177 Web of Science categories in SCI-EXPANDED. In total 493,689 documents (including 309,377 articles) were found in Web of Science category of obstetrics and gynecology within the publication year from 1900 to 2016 based on SCI-EXPANDED (updated on April 23, 2018).
Two citation indicators TCyear and Cyear were employed to characterize the classic articles. TCyear is the total number citations from Web of Science Core Collection since publication to the end of the most recent year (Wang et al. 2011, Chuang et al. 2011). Cyear is the number of citations in the most recent year. C2016 means the number of citation in 2016 (Ho 2012). TCyear ≥ 1,000 was used to retrieve the classic articles (Long et al. 2014; Ho and Hartley 2016a,b; Ho 2018). We downloaded all records and number of citations for each article for each year into spreadsheet software, and manipulated them using Microsoft Excel 2016 (Li and Ho 2008; Ho and Fu 2016). In addition, all hard copies of the 14 classic publications were found to check analysis information.
Document types, languages of publication, and authors
Documnt types and languages of publication were basic analysis for publications in a research field (Hsieh et al. 2004). A total of 14 classic publications (0.0028% of 493,689 documents) with TC2016 ≥ 1,000 in Web of Science category of obstetrics and gynecology were found within three document types indexed in the Web of Science. All classic documents were published in English. Thirty classic publications were found to be document type of article including one of them was belong to both document types of article and proceedings paper. One was published as document type of review. A classic review entitled “Report of the National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Pregnancy” (Gifford et al. 2000) was the only one classic document published as document of review in obstetrics and gynecology field with TC2016 of 1,307. Only document type of article was used for further analysis because these classic articles included complete research ideas and results (Ho et al. 2010). As a result, we identified 13 classic articles (0.0042% of 309,377 articles) in category of obstetrics and gynecology. The percentage of classic articles in a research file was lower than medical related topics, for example 0.048% and 0.063% of all documents in Web of Science categories of neurosciences (Yeung and Ho 2018) and psychology (Ho and Hartley 2016a).
Only document type of article was considered for further analysis because articles contain description of complete researches and results (Ho et al. 2010). The 13 classic articles were published by 75 authors including 12 first authors.
Effect of time on citation analysis
A relationship between number of classic articles in a decade (TP) and their citations per publication (CPPyear = TCyear/TP) as a figure was proposed to compare publications of classic articles (Ho 2014b). Figure shows the relationship of 13 classic articles in Web of Science category of obstetrics and gynecology. Two classic articles were published in the decades 1970s and 1980s while three were in the 1990s and the 2000s. Figure 1 also shows that the trend in CPP2016 is similar for the classic articles across the decades, but a much higher score occurring in the1950s. There was no any classic articles published during the World War I and II. In addition, the latest classic article was published in 2004. That means 13 years were needed to for an article to accumulate their citations to reach 1,000 in Web of Science category of obstetrics and gynecology.
Journals
A total of 81 journals were listed in the Web of Science category of obstetrics and gynecology in 2016. The 13 classic articles were published in six of these journals (7.4% of 81 journals) and British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology was no longer in Web of Science category of obstetrics and gynecology after 2001. The journal was changed to be BJOG-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology with IF2016 of 4.624 (rank 4th of 81 obstetrics and gynecology journals in 2016). American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology with IF2016 of 5.226 (rank 2nd of 81 obstetrics and gynecology journals), published the largest number of classic articles with five articles (38% of 13 classic articles), followed by Fertility and Sterility (IF2016 = 4.447; ranked 8th), Human Reproduction (IF2016 = 11.748; ranked 1st), and Obstetrics and Gynecology (IF2016 = 5.215; ranked 3rd), with two. Early Human Development (IF2016 = 2.169; ranked 37th) and British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology had only one classic article respectively.
Citation history of classic articles
Table 1 shows the 13 classic articles in Web of Science category of obstetrics and gynecology with both citation numbers and rankings for TC2016 and C2016. Total citations indicated high impact or visibility of an article in a research field. Due to the citations of publications in Web of Science Core Collection were updated weekly, the total number of times an article cited from its publication to the end of 2016 (TC2016) was used (Wang et al. 2011, Chuang et al. 2011). The advantage of using TC2016 is that they are invariable and ensure repeatability compared with the index of citation from Web of Science Core Collection (Ho and Hartley 2016a).
TC2016: total citations from Web of Science Core Collection since publication to the end of 2016; C2016: citations in 2016 only.
The history of a publication’s citations with time has long been studied (Avramescu 1979). Today, modern computing techniques have replaced hand-based ones. Thus big data analysis for papers’ citation history were presented (Ho 2008; Ho and Kahn 2014; Ho 2018). Citation history shows characteristics of an article impact after publication. The highly cited articles would not always have high impact or visibility in research society (Ho 2014a). Four of the 13 classic articles still have a high C2016 ≥ 100. Figures 2, 3, and 4 show the citation history of the classic articles that were ranked by TC2016. Although latterly published classic articles within the past decade had great potential, they did not have the top TC2016. Thus indicator of C2016 would be interesting to show their impact in 2016. A typical example is that article published by Fauser et al. (2004) in 2004 was the most impact classic article in 2016 with C2016 of 170. A sharply increasing trend of citations can be found after its publication. Similarly, article by Chang et al. (2004) had the same impact trend as article by Fauser et al. (2004) in last decade. Article by Gluck et al. (1971) had sharply increasing citations after publication and then had sharply decreasing citations. This classic had less impact in research world. Similarly, Noyes et al. (1950) published the most frequently cited classic article in Web of Science category of obstetrics and gynecology, which had 53 years increasing citations after its publication. However, a trend of decreasing citations was appeared in the last decade.
Highlight of the classic articles
Dating the endometrial biopsy (Noyes et al. 1950)
The classic author, R.W. Noyes from Free Hospital for Women and Harvard Medical School in USA as the first and also corresponding authors with the highest TC2016 of 2,553 in Web of Science category of obstetrics and gynecology.
Endometrial biopsy criteria and usefulness are reviewed in this article. This study aims tolimit the criteria used in dating endometrial biopsies, as current components used are not sufficient enough to provide information on ovulation cycles. Overall, the new criteria, examining the endometrial during the secretory phase in greater detail that dated 300 biopsies correlated with the onset of subsequent menstruation. Of the 300 cases, 40 were correlated with ovulation based by basal body temperature. It also correlated the endometrial biopsy with basal body temperature changes to promote better accurate information of ovulation time, progesterone change during ovulation, and the endometrial biopsy effect on the length of secretory period and menses.
The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction (Bump et al. 1996)
The classic author, R.C. Bump from Duke University Medical Center in USA published the classic article as the first and also the corresponding authors with TC2016 of 2,135 and C2016 of 163.
Standardized terminologies on describing female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction were approved by the following authority organizations: The International Continence Society, The American Urogynecologic Society, and The Society of Gynecologic Surgeons. The standardized terminologies have promoted the effective communication among caregivers, patients, and academic parties, while performing research interpretation improves care giver quality.
Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) (Fauser et al. 2004)
The most impact classic article in 2016 published by B.C.J.M. Fauser from Center of Reproductive Medicine in Netherlands as the first and also the corresponding authors with the highest C2016 of 170.
Based on the 1990 NIH-sponsored conference encompasses broader diagnostic criteria for polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) in the 2003 Rotterdam workshop, the article specified that PCOS is an ovarian dysfunction with multiple diagnoses and clinical symptoms. The diagnoses include hyperandrogenism, anovulation, polycystic ovary morphology whose symptoms are menstrual irregularities and insulin resistance. Its long-term health risks include Type II diabetes and cardiovascular disease, etc.; therefore, a single diagnosis is sufficient for clinical diagnosis.
Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence (Olsen et al. 1997)
The classic article was published by A.L. Olsen from University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics in USA as the first and also the corresponding authors.
The study was held at Kaiser Permanente Northwest, which involved 149,554 women, aged 20 or older. The study analyzed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence incidences related to age-specific and weight of primary versus repeat surgical procedures for pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. The result determined 11.1% lifetime risk for a woman to experience at least one operation related to pelvic floor dysfunction.
Comparative aspects of the brain growth spurt (Dobbing and Sands 1979)
The classic article was published by J. Dobbing from University of Manchester in the UK as the first and also the corresponding authors.
Different time periods of brain growth spurts for different species. The different species have different lifetime spans, as well as different growth rates. Species were categorized as prenatal, perinatal, and postnatal periods for the brain growth spurt study. Different time period studies have focused on different aspects that affect brain growth spurts, including species, timing in relation to birth, severity, and proportional duration.
Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome (Fauser et al. 2004)
The classic article was published by B.C.J.M. Fauser from Center of Reproductive Medicine in Netherlands as first author and also the corresponding author. Fauser was the only one who published two classic articles. This classic article was published by the same team as the classic article “Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS)” (Fauser et al. 2004).
Preeclampsia: An endothelial-cell disorder (Roberts et al. 1989)
The classic article was published by J.M. Roberts from University of California, San Francisco in USA as the first and also the corresponding authors.
Preeclampsia was proposed to be more than a clinical evidence of hypertension. There are other characters while preeclampsia occurs: cascade of coagulation, intravascular fluid redistribution, and vasoconstriction. Poor placenta tissue perfusion causes damage to the endothelial cell.
A United States national reference for FETAL growth (Alexander et al. 1996)
The classic article was published by G.R. Alexander from University Alabama in USA as the first and also the corresponding authors.
The research has developed a national fetal growth curve by using birth weight and a completed gestational age. This fetal growth curve will be able to serve as a common reference to predict the consequences of small and large gestational age delivery. A total of 3,88,689 mothers in the U.S. with singleton live births were involved in this study. The data was obtained from the U.S. Live Birth File in 1991, created by the National Center for Health Statistics.
Peritoneal endometriosis due to the menstrual dissemination of endometrial tissue into the peritoneal cavity (Sampson 1927)
This is the only one single author classic article, was published by J.A. Sampson from the Albany Hospital and the Albany Medical College in USA.
It was suggested that possible reasons of peritoneal endometriosis from menstrual blood escape into the peritoneal cavity included the rupture of the endometrial cyst, implantation of endometrial tissue disseminated by menstruation grown on the surface of the ovary and other pelvic structures, back flow from fallopian tube into the uterine cavity, and menstruation of tubal mucosa. This information has clinical benefits—predicting and finding the causes of peritoneal endometriosis to better treat patients.
Diagnosis of respiratory distress syndrome by amniocentesis (Gluck et al. 1971)
The classic article was published by L. Gluck from University of California, San Diego School of Medicine as the first author. The article had much less impact in the recent years.
The most reliable procedure to diagnose fetal lung maturity: the ratio of lecithin/sphingomyelin in amniotic fluid, was concluded. This procedure has become a major clinical method used to identify the readiness of fetus lung maturity. At 35 weeks gestational age, the fetal lecithin concentration will suddenly increase, signing a mature pulmonary alveolar lining; therefore, if the fetus is delivered the chances respiratory distress are kept to a minimum.
Amenorrhea associated with bilateral polycystic ovaries (Stein and Leventhai 1935)
The classic article was published by I.F. Stein from Michael Reese Hospital as the first author.
Bilateral polycystic ovaries were reportedly connected to seven cases of amenorrhea. It was suggested that bilateral polycystic ovaries were not caused by inflammatory changes, but by hormonal factors. Using an estrogenic hormone as a means of treating amenorrhea was not effective. Physiological function was fully restored through surgical treatment, specifically wedge resection of the cystic cortex of the ovaries. After surgery, normal menstruation returned and remained for all subjects. In two cases, pregnancy followed after treatment.
Testicular dysgenesis syndrome: an increasingly common developmental disorder with environmental aspects (Skakkebæk et al. 2001)
The classic article was published by N.E. Skakkebæk from Copenhagen University Hospital in Denmark as the first author and also the corresponding authors. This classic article is also belong to document type of proceedings paper.
Due to the increasing demand of assisted reproduction and growing evidence of adverse trends from male reproduction, this article has reviewed hypotheses supporting the new concept of Testicular Dysgenesis Syndrome (TDS). By reviewing multiple evidence studies from different specialities such as evidence from animal and wildlife studies and human experience, it is shown that TDS has become more prevalent—possibly due to environmental or lifestyle influences. The symptoms of TDS includes poor semen quality, testis cancer, undescended testis, and hypospadias. When the syndrome occurs, there is often a combination of these problems seen in one individual.
Inadequate maternal vascular-response to placentation in pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia and by small-for-gestational-age infants (Khong et al. 1986)
The classic article was published by T.Y. Khong from St George’s Hospital Medical School in the UK as the first author and also the corresponding authors.
This research examined physiological changes of the placental bed in pre-eclampsia and small-for-gestational age infants (SGA). Based on an observation in a study of basal plates of placentas, findings pointed to a defect in placental bed spiral arteries and the interaction between migratory trophoblasts and maternal uterine tissues. The study has also confirmed possible reasons of inadequate maternal vascular response to placentation in pregnancies.
3.6. Classic Sleeping Beauties in Web of Science category of obstetrics and gynecology
A ‘sleeping beauty’ is a term that is often used to describe a research article that remains relatively uncited for several years and then suddenly blossoms forward (Ho and Hartley 2016a). van Raan (2004) defined the three characteristics of “sleeping beauties” to be depth of sleep, length of sleep, and awakening intensity.
1. the depth of sleep, where an article receives at most one citation on average per year (deep sleep), or between one to two citations per year during a specific period (less deep sleep);
2. the length of sleep—the duration of the above period; and
3. the intensity of the wakeup period: the number of citations per year for four years following the sleeping period. Furthermore, long sleep and high impact sleeping beauties were also discussed (Ho and Hartley 2017).
Figure 3 shows typical citation curves for the classic Sleeping Beauty in Web of Science category of obstetrics and gynecology. The Sleeping Beauty “Peritoneal endometriosis due to the menstrual dissemination of endometrial tissue into the peritoneal cavity” (Sampson 1927) had an average citation per year of 1.0 in the 18 years as deep sleep and an average citation per year of 2.0 in the 67 years as less deep sleep. After such sleep (67 years) however, the annual citations increased slightly for another decade and reached a plateau in the last ten years (Fig. 3).
According to citations from Web of Science Core Collection, 14 classic publications including one review, with TC2016 ≥ 1,000 were found in Web of Science category of obstetrics and gynecology from 1927 to 2004. The largest number of classic articles was published in the last two decades, while the highest citations per publication was found in the 1950s. Five of 13 classic articles were published in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. The most frequently cited article was published by authors in USA while the most high impact article in 2016 was published by authors in Netherlands. Results from citation histories and citation indicator C2016 pointed that four of 13 classic articles are continuing to influence related research in recent years with C2016 > 100. A classic Sleeping Beauties in Web of Science category of obstetrics and gynecology was found with a long less sleep for about seven decades. In addition, the highlight of these classic articles might be usefulness as information for researchers.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
