AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Charl H. Woo, 82nd Airborne Division, Fort Bragg, NC, USA.
Citation: Nida R. Augustine, Charl H. Woo, Driscoll H. Augustine, Cristóbal S. Berry-Cabán (2018) Efficacy Of Vaping As A Nicotine Replacement Therapy For Smoking Cessation Among Adults: A Review Of The Literature. J. Addiction Research and Adolescent Behavior 1(1), Doi: 10.31579/2688-7517/002
Copyright: © 2018 Charl H. Woo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 17 May 2018 | Accepted: 19 July 2018 | Published: 26 July 2018
Keywords: tobacco addiction, nicotine e-cigarettes,toxin profiles
Evidence shows that successful treatment of nicotine addiction improves mortality, despite age at cessation . The extreme hazards of smoking stress the importance of patient-physician discussion that is a significant factor in tobacco cessation. Discussion alone and other methods such as “cold turkey” have proven to have low efficacy at cessation which has led to the development nicotine replacement therapy to help augment cessation.
Since the 1960s great effort has been made to inform the public about the harmful health effects of cigarette smoking in an attempt to promote cessation and prevent new users [1]. Despite gaining ground with these efforts, cigarette smoking remains the leading cause of preventable mortality worldwide and produces substantial morbidity costs [2, 3]. A lifelong smoker has a 50% chance of dying prematurely from smoking complications and it is the exposure to toxins in tobacco smoke that directly contributes to smoking related diseases [4, 5].
Evidence shows that successful treatment of nicotine addiction improves mortality, despite age at cessation [2, 5-7]. The extreme hazards of smoking stress the importance of patient-physician discussion that is a significant factor in tobacco cessation [8, 9]. Discussion alone and other methods such as “cold turkey” have proven to have low efficacy at cessation which has led to the development nicotine replacement therapy to help augment cessation [8].
Nicotine, one of the more well-known harmful chemicals in cigarettes, provides the main addictive characteristic of cigarettes [7]. This is why some form of nicotine replacement is often needed for cessation. Nicotine replacement therapies (NRTs) have been on the market for several years in the form of patches and gums [10, 11]. Each has proven to be safe modalities, however, their efficacy resulting in cessation is modestly effective with long term quit rates around 20%. Since quitting smoking is difficult, some smokers have turned to e-cigarettes [12].
In the United States, the use of e-cigarettes has increased since 2010, corresponding to an increase in marketing for the products [13, 14]. Web-based consumer surveys of adults reported that between 2010 and 2013, ever use of e-cigarettes increased from 3.3% to 8.5% of all adults, while current use (use in the past 30 days) increased from 1.3% to 1.9% [15].
E-cigarettes provide the patient with the continued social aspect of smoking but with less nicotine and carcinogen exposure. This allowance of the continued habit combined with a safer metabolite profile, in conjunction with behavior therapy, makes the argument that e-cigarettes are a better tool for cessation [14, 16-18].
The following paper examines the use of e-cigarettes as an efficient method to quit smoking.
An extensive search of literature between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2017 was conducted to identify scientific literature that referenced vaping, electronic cigarettes, and nicotine replacement. A literature search was conducted using several online databases: PubMed, Google Scholar, and Science Direct. These databases were selected to capture potential literature from many sources. For example, PubMed is a national Library of Medicine’s database that has literature from the life and behavioral sciences. Google Scholar captured the behavioral and mental health sciences. Science Direct provided broad coverage of both the biological and social sciences.
Various keyword searches were conducted that searched PubMed and Google Scholar. Boolean operators were included to ensure that the searches were precise and that all relevant information was collected.
The initial keyword searches yielded 211 citations. Hand-search and initial screening was conducted under the direction of the primary investigator. Topical journals and books were examined as well as a review of the final selection reference lists. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews also was searched with no date limit and that search yielded 1 new result. After screening for eligibility and removing duplicate citations, we were left with 206 unique citations. Three investigators independently reviewed the list of titles and abstracts for relevance.
The following discusses relevant evidence that electronic cigarettes may be an aid to smokers in stopping their smoking.
Structure of an Electronic Cigarette. E-cigarettes include a diverse group of devices that allow users to inhale an aerosol that typically contains nicotine, flavorings, and other additives. E-cigarettes vary widely in design and appearance, but generally operate in a similar manner and are composed of similar components (Figure 1). A key challenge for surveillance of the products and understanding their patterns of use is the diverse and nonstandard nomenclature for the devices [13]. These devices are referred to, by the companies themselves, and by consumers, as “e-cigarettes,” “e-cigs,” “cigalikes,” “e-hookahs,” “mods,” “vape pens,” “vapes,” and “tank systems, among others [13, 14].”
Reproduced from U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Surgeon General. E-cigarette use among youth and young adults: A report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2016.
The electronic cigarette is a battery powered device that aerosolizes nicotine with no combustion involved as in a traditional tobacco cigarette. Instead of combustion, a battery powered heating element vaporizes the liquid followed by an immediate cooling to form an aerosol or mist that is inhaled by the user. At this stage, a light-emitting diode (LED) turns on to signify mist formation and the passage of air through the chamber [19]. There are over 7,000 different e-liquids and they come in a variety of flavors containing a carrier substance, most commonly propylene glycol, and nicotine (Figure 2) [20, 21].
Reproduced with permission from: http://ecigarettereviewed.com/about-e-cigs
Nicotine Content. The nicotine content in the liquid varies and is therefore not consistent in the doses aerosolized upon use. The amount of aerosol is directly proportional to the voltage leading some users to modify their experience by increasing voltage in order to attain a stronger nicotine hit [22].
Nicotine exposure from e-cigarette use, as from cigarette smoking, increases heart rate and produces measurable levels of blood cotinine, a nicotine metabolite [22-24]. The amount of nicotine delivered and the level of nicotine in the blood varies depending on nicotine concentration in the e-cigarette liquid, other components in the e-cigarette liquid, user experience, puffing intensity, device characteristics, and vaping technique [24]. Experienced e-cigarette users tend to take longer puffs and use the device more intensively compared with novice users [25]. Consequently, they have higher blood nicotine levels that more closely resemble the levels achieved by smoking conventional cigarettes. In less-experienced users, however, the nicotine delivered by e-cigarettes is consistently lower than nicotine delivered by conventional cigarettes [12].
One study analyzed 16 different e-cigarettes for their nicotine levels on use and 15 puffs of vapor were found to have a range of 0.5-15.4 mg nicotine. The traditional combustible tobacco cigarette contains 1.54-2.60 mg nicotine [6, 26, 27]. While, this variation makes e-cigarettes an inconsistent tool for cessation, if used carefully and correctly, it has the potential to be used as an effective NRT. Moreover, this mechanism of nicotine delivery provides the user with the oral stimulus similar to traditional tobacco smoking making it a better tool for cessation by the providing the habitual/behavioral need [10, 16, 28].
Toxin Profiles. Unfortunately, not just the positive similarities of combustible cigarettes are shared with e-cigarettes. As with cigarettes some degree of thermal degradation byproducts can form even though direct combustion does not occur [29, 30]. In both e-cigarettes and combustible cigarettes, toxicants and carcinogens found include tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines (TSNAs) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) also known as carbonyl compounds. Volatile organic compounds include, but are not limited to, acrolein, acrylonitrile, 1,3 butadiene and ethylene oxide. Tobacco specific nitrosamines, acrylonitrile and 1,3 butadiene are potent lung carcinogens and major contributors to lung cancer risk while acrolein is a major contributor to harmful respiratory effects [23].
Traditional combustible tobacco cigarettes contain about 7,000 compounds with at least 70 carcinogens; among these carcinogens are formaldehyde, benzene, nitrosamines, free radicals, toxic gases and heavy metals [1, 2, 7, 26]. Volatile organic compounds are not only carcinogenic but have also been implicated to play a role in the development of cardiovascular disease [31]. In 2009, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) detected low levels of the same nitrosamines and diethylene glycol in two brands of e-cigarettes [6]. Carbonyl compound acrolein has a concentration of 8.3-7.0 ug/cigarette in the combustible cigarette as compared to a concentration of 0.02-0.63 ug/cigarette in 15 puffs of an e-cigarette. Nitrosamine concentrations in a combustible cigarette range 0.005-0.19 ug/cigarette as compared to 0.00008-0.00043 ug in 15 puffs of an e-cigarette [6]. In general, the range of toxin exposure was 9-fold to 450 times higher in conventional cigarette smoke than in the vape of e-cigarettes [27].
The majority of e-cigarette users are current or former smokers that fall into two broad categories: those using them recreationally and those using them with the intention to quit [12, 31]. Both groups share a belief that e-cigarettes are a less harmful and less addictive alternative to traditional cigarettes; indeed, surveys have shown an increase in use among adult smokers from 10% in 2010 to 21% in 2011. Other surveys noted an increase in use from 1.8% of adult smokers in 2010 to 13% in 2013; a more dramatic increase yet [32]. E-cigarette use is more common among persons 30 to 60 years old [17]. This age range is also more likely to use of e-cigarettes as a dual use method in conjunction with traditional combustible cigarettes or use with other forms of NRT (i.e., patches or gum) [23].
Comparing the toxin profile of traditional NRTs and e-cigarettes with traditional cigarettes is important factor when examining tools for cessation. Shahab analyzed the presence of nicotine metabolites, tobacco-related carcinogens and toxicants among cigarette-only smokers and smokers and ex-smokers with long term e-cigarette use of NRT. They reported dual combustible cigarette-NRT users had low nicotine and cotinine levels (a nicotine metabolite) and that e-cigarette only users had nicotine levels around half that of combustible cigarette smokers. NRT only and e-cigarette only users had comparable TSNAs levels and each were significantly lower than users in the dual use groups and traditional combustible smoker only group. Of note from this analysis, e-cigarette only users had lower TSNA levels than all other groups and a 97% equivalent reduction when compared to combustible cigarette users [23].
While Shahab confirmed the known low toxin profile of traditional NRTs the study further highlighted that in some cases long-term NRT-only and e-cigarette-only use, was associated with substantially reduced levels of measured carcinogens and toxicants relative to cigarette-only smoking. Given this validation of a low risk metabolite profile in e-cigarettes their use in cessation therapy appears to make for a stronger alternative to patches and gum [23].
Nicotine replacement therapies and e-cigarettes are similar in their toxin profiles. NRTs have a better known safety profile given their longevity on the consumer market. However, e-cigarettes could be more useful as a cessation aid because they continue to provide the oral sensation of smoking thereby satisfying the already instilled biofeedback response of a long term smoker. In addition, being able to continue the social aspect of smoking as users can still partake with other smokers. This psychological dependency can be used as a tool to wean smokers from combustible tobacco use. Shahab et al concluded that long term NRT only use or e-cigarette only use, among former smokers, exposed them to substantially lower levels of carcinogens as compared to traditional cigarettes [23].
Role in Cessation. The FDA has approved the use of nicotine as a cessation tool in the oral form, the transdermal form and inhaled form (nasal spray or oral inhaler) but not in the e-cigarette form [32]. Initially, the FDA attempted to regulate e-cigarettes as drug delivery devices however this was blocked by lawmakers as it was more appropriate to regulate them as tobacco related products and this could potentially hold e-cigarettes to the same regulations as combustible tobacco cigarettes in terms of sales and monitoring [31, 33, 34]. In 2014, the FDA reported that they would begin to regulate e-cigarettes however there is still a degree of variation among the contents of the vaporizing liquid [4]. In the future, standardizing and regulating e-cigarettes will also allow for robust longitudinal evaluations of their safety and efficacy [6]. Complete cessation of use of all tobacco products is still the best option to avoid harm [23].
There are currently only 2 randomized control trials published on the efficacy of e-cigarettes in smoking cessation. Bullen et al randomized 657 smokers to measure cessation rates among users of traditional NRTs versus e-cigarette smokers. Participants were given a 21mg nicotine patch, a placebo e-cigarette and a 16mg nicotine e-cigarette. After 6 months, self-reported cessation rates were comparable in placebo e-cigarette users and nicotine containing e-cigarette users. Although these rates were not statistically significant, cessation was reported in 7.3% of users of nicotine e-cigarettes, 4.1% in placebo e-cigarettes and 5.8% in nicotine patch users [12].
Caponnetto et al performed a 12 month prospective study among smokers who did not want to stop smoking. These participants were given e-cigarettes with 3 different doses of nicotine and while there was no significant difference in cessation among the groups, 8.7% reported abstaining completely from traditional cigarettes by the conclusion of the study [35].
All studies exploring use of e-cigarette for cessation have demonstrated efficacy in this capacity, even if it is by slowly decreasing the number of cigarettes smoked [16, 17]. Rahman et al reviewed 6 studies in a meta-analysis and found that among 1,242 smokers, 224 reported cessation after using nicotine enriched e-cigarettes for 6 months and use of e-cigarettes was also associated with a reduction in the number of cigarettes used. The users most successful at cessation with e-cigarettes were those who had used some concentration of nicotine [17].
Studies that examine cessation trends conclude that those persons most successful in quitting entered the studies with the intention to stop using traditional combustible tobacco [6, 18]. This indicates that behavioral support is a strong component no matter what the cessation modality. For long term smokers who are unprepared to give up combustible tobacco use, it is speculated that use of e-cigarettes might be associated with better long term and short term health outcomes [32]. Because lower levels of serum nicotine are detected in e-cigarette users as compared to combustible cigarette smokers, the addiction potential of e-cigarettes and other NRTs is very low. Similarly, the harmful second hand effects of e-cigarette vapor is several magnitudes less than exposure to second hand smoke of traditional cigarettes [18].
Multiple studies and analysis note that use of e-cigarettes is associated with smoking cessation and reduction however all analysis agree that more randomized control trials are needed to determine effectiveness in the long term and explore safety for use [23, 29, 30, 36]. Although we currently have limited long-term studies that prove e-cigarettes are effective as cessation tools, we know that e-cigarettes have similar or less harmful toxin profiles as compared to traditional NRTs [6, 17].
When patients ask about e-cigarettes as cessation tools, the primary care provider should use evidence based medicine to guide their suggestions and while e-cigarettes are likely as safe as nicotine patches and certainly safer than continuing to smoke traditional cigarettes, cessation is most successful alongside behavioral therapy and the intention to quit [12].
In the absence of clear data on the health consequences of e-cigarette use and their efficacy for smoking cessation the goal for patients should be to avoid dual use of e-cigarettes and combustible tobacco use as that could prolong harmful exposure to tobacco smoke. The high degree of modifiable settings makes some of the harmful variables difficult to not only control but also difficult to study. Therefore, based on our review the most effective potential e-cigarette used as a smoking cessation tool would be the use of one with the lowest non-modifiable voltage that with no or very low nicotine combined with a nicotine patch. This would reduce the thermal degradation products from the solvent and other components as well as the known carcinogenic degradation products of nicotine while still providing the habitual benefit that e-cigarettes provide.
While this still has the potential for long term effects that will need to be further examined with RCTs, it would likely be the best option for those who wish to use e-cigarettes as their cessation modality.Most studies continue to show that some level of continued nicotine exposure (whether in e-cigarettes or patches) is effective in aiding in cessation. Overall a good cessation program will require primary providers to be mindful of their patients as individuals and weigh the risk versus benefit in each case with respect to patient autonomy.
Trends to follow in the future will be the use of e-cigarettes by youth, particularly middle and high school age children as use in this population already appears to be on the rise [14]. The advertising of various flavors of tobacco makes e-cigarettes an attractive option for adolescents, especially as first time users. For now, there is limited evidence to support that e-cigarettes are being used by youth as a “gateway” to other tobacco products.
Information to counsel patients on what is known related to e-cigarettes is available from some medical societies’ documents on e-cigarettes and from the American Heart Association policy statement that provides guidance on addressing e-cigarette use in clinical practice [37]. A report by the Surgeon General, “Know the risks, e-cigarettes and young people,” includes information sheets that clinicians may use to educate adolescent and young adult patients as well as a tip sheet for parents [14].
The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy of the Department of the Army, Department of Defense, or the U.S. government.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
