AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research
*Corresponding Author: Richmond Ronald Gomes, Associate Professor, Medicine, Ad-din Women's Medical College Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Citation: S Islam, R RGomes, FM M Hasan. (2021). Evaluation of Clinical Presentation and Associated Comorbid Conditions in Patients with Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Bangladesh. Clinical Research and Clinical Trials. 4(1); DOI: 10.31579/2693-4779/051
Copyright: © 2021 Richmond Ronald Gomes. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 14 June 2021 | Accepted: 25 June 2021 | Published: 19 July 2021
Keywords: spontaneous, intracerebral hemorrhage, osmotherapy,seizure,glasgow coma scale
Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) has remained the least treatable form of stroke despite recent improvements in medical treatment. Treatment usually supportive and medical such as ventilatory support, blood pressure reduction, osmotherapy, fever control, seizure control and nutritional support and treatment of co morbidconditions. This study was carried out to see demographic variability, clinical presentation, causes and outcome of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.
Methods and materials: This was a cross sectional observational prospective in study on 50 spontaneous ICH patients admitted in Medicine department of Khulna Medical College Hospital from November 2020 to April, 2021.
Result: The study showed that spontaneous ICH was most common in between 41-70 years. Their age frequency were 14 (28%) in 41-50 years, 15 (30%)in 51- 60 years, 12 (24%) in 61-70 years, 5 (10%) in 71- 80 years and 4 (8%) in more than 81 years age group. Among the patients, 64% (32) were male and 36% (18) were female. No of smoker male was 25(50%) and female was 1(2%) and no of nonsmoker male was 7(14%) and female was 17(34%). Headache was present in 56% (28) and absent in 44% (22) of patients. Vomiting was present in 54% (27) and was absent in 46% (23)of patients.Seizure was present in 16% (8) and was absent in 54% (42) of patients. Diabetes mellitus was present in 22% (11) of patients and absent in 78% (39) patients. Range of blood pressure –<140/90 in 24%(12), Systolic BP:140-159/Diastolic BP:90-99 (mm Hg) in 10%(5), Systolic BP:160-179/Diastolic BP:100-109 (mm Hg) in 22%(11),Systolic BP:180 or more/Diastolic BP:110 or more (mm Hg) in 44%(22) patients. Dyslipidemia was present in 30% (15) & absent in 70% (35) patients. Glasgow Coma Scale Score was 8 or less in 42% (21) and 9 or more in 58% (29) patients. Conclusion: Spontaneous ICH is common in Indian subcontinent. As death occur due to ICH itself, associated co morbidities or due to complications, management in stroke care unit, High dependency unit and Intensive care unit is required.
Cerebrovascular diseases are the third leading cause of death after heart disease and cancer in developed countries. They also come first in terms of causing death and disability in neurologic diseases in adults [1]. Nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage is bleeding into the parenchyma of the brain that may extendinto the ventricles and, in rare cases, the subarachnoid space. Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage is second most common causes of stroke following ischemic stroke.Depending on the underlying cause of bleeding; intracerebral hemorrhage is classified as either primary or secondary. Primary intracerebral hemorrhage accounting for 78%-88% of all cases, originates from the spontaneous rupture of small vessels damaged by chronic hypertension or amyloid angiopathy [2]. The worldwide incidence of intracerebral hemorrhage from 10-20 cases per 100000 population, [3, 4] and increases with age [3,5]. Intracerebral hemorrhage is more common in men than women, particularly those older than 55 years of age, [5, 6] and in certain populations, including blacks and Japanese [3, 7].
Hypertension is the most important risk factor for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.[8] Intracerebral hemorrhage commonly affects cerebral lobes, basal ganglia, the thalamus, the brain stem (predominantly the pons), and the cerebellum [9] as a result of ruptured vessels. Extension into the ventricles occurs in association with deep, large hematomas.The classic presentation of intracerebral hemorrhage is sudden onset of a focal neurological deficit that progress over minutes to hours with accompanying headache, nausea, vomiting, decreased consciousness and elevated blood pressure. Computed tomography is the key part of the initial diagnostic evaluation. First, it clearly differentiates hemorrhage from ischemic strokes. In addition computed tomography demonstrates the side and location of the hemorrhage and may reveal structural abnormality as well as structural complications such as herniation, intraventricular hemorrhage or hydrocephalus.[10] Initial management should first be directed toward the basics of air way, breathing, and circulation, and detection of focal neurologicaldeficits [10].
Other supportive medical care includes reduction of the intracranial pressure by diuretics (Mannitol 20% and furosemide, use of anticonvulsants (Diazepam, Midazolam or Phenobarbital) and control of hyperthermia (In order to decrease the neural metabolism) achieved by: external refrigeration, cold saline, sedation, and mechanical ventilation [11]. The optimal level of patients’ blood pressure should be based on individual factors such as chronic hypertension, elevated intracranial pressure, age, presumed cause of hemorrhage, and interval since onset [12]. In general recommendation for treatment of elevated blood pressure in patients with ICH are more aggressive than those for patients with ischemic stroke [19]. Antihypertensive agents recommended for treatment of blood pressure in ICH: nitroprusside, labetalol, enalapril, esmolol, hydralazine [10]. In one fourth of patients with intracerebral hemorrhage who are initially alert, a deterioration in the level of consciousness occurs within first 24 hours after onset of hemorrhage [13,14]. Expansion of the hematoma is the most common cause of underlying neurologic deterioration within the first three hours the onset of hemorrhage. Worsening cerebral edema is also implicated in neurologic deterioration that occurs within 24-48 hours after the onset of hemorrhage [14].
This cross sectional, observational, prospective study was carried out in Medicine department of Khulna Medical College Hospital from November, 2020 to April 2021. Total 50 cases of spontaneous ICH were selected. Diagnosis was made by CT scan of brain. Data were processed and analyzed using SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Science) 17.0.
Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
Table-1 showing age distribution of patients with spontaneous ICH. It was most common in between 41-70 years. Their age frequency 14 (28%) were in 41-50 years, 15 (30%) were in 51- 60 years, 12 (24%) were in 61-70 years, 5 (10%) were in 71- 80 years, 4 (8%) were more than 81 years old.
Figure-1 showing spontaneous ICH is more common in male than female. Among 50 cases, 64%(32) were male whereas 36%(18) were female.
Figure-2 demonstrates that spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage was found in farmer/ day labor 26% (13), businessman 24% (12), housemaker 36% (18), and service holder14% (7).
Table-2 demonstrates that spontaneous ICH is common in poor and middle class family. Among the patients, poor (monthly income less than 10000 taka) is 40% (20), middle class (monthly income 10000-50000 taka) is 58% (29), high class((monthly income more than 50000 taka)is 2% (1).
Figure-3 represents spontaneous ICH more common in smoker. Among 50 cases male smoker 25 (50%) and female 1 (2%) and nonsmoker male 7 (14%) and female 17 (34%).
Figure-4 showing many patients with spontaneous ICH presented with headache. Headache was present in 56% (28) and was absent in 44% (22) patients.
Figure-5 showing many patients with spontaneous ICH presented with vomiting. Vomiting was present in 54% (27) and was absent in 46% (23) patients.
Figure-6 showing many patients with spontaneous ICH presented with seizure. Seizure was present in 8 (16%) and was absent in 42 (84%) patients.
Table-3 shows GCS Score distribution. GCS Score was 8 or less in 42% (21), 9 or more in 58% (29) cases.
*GCS-Glasgow coma scale
Table -4 presents that number of disorientated patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Among the cases orientation absent in 76% (38) and orientation present in 24% (12).
Table-5 showing that sensory deficit was present in 46% (23) and absent in 54% (27) patients.
Table-6 presents diabetes mellitus among 50 cases. Diabetes mellitus was present in 22% (11), absent in 78% (39) cases.
Table-7 presents blood pressure distribution: SBP: Less than 140/DBP: Less than 90 (mm Hg) in 24%(12),SBP:140-159/DBP:90-99 (mm Hg) in 10%(5),SBP:160-179/DBP:100-109 (mm Hg) in 22%(11),SBP:180 or more/DBP:110 or more (mm Hg) in44%(22)
*SBP- Systolic blood pressure.
^DBP- Diastolic blood pressure.
Table-8 showing dyslipidemia was present in 30% (15) & absent in 70% (35) patients.
Spontaneous ICH is a third leading cause of death worldwide. It also common in developing country like Bangladesh.In our study, age of the patients with spontaneous ICH was above 40 years. It most commonly occurred in 40-70 years age group with 82% (41) and number of patients above 70 years of age with spontaneous ICH was 18% (9). Doctor M et al (2013) [15] in their study found the maximum number of cases i.e. 38 (76%) were between the age groups 45 to 74 years and age ranged from 35 to 74 years. A.k.Thacker et al reported, out of 50 cases of ICH, 39 (78%) were in the age group of 41-70 years and age ranged from 16-85 years. KafleR [16], Age distribution of patient’s presentation with spontaneous intracerebral bleeding was as follows. Less than 20 years of age: 1 patient. 20-29: 1 patient .30-39: 2 patients. 40-49: 11 patients. 50-59:19 patients. 60-69: 29 patients. 70-79: 20 patients. Above 80 years: 17 patients. In study by Bhatia R et al (2013) [17]. The mean age was 57.32 ± 12.84 years and 140 (65.4%) were males. Hsiang et al. (2009) [18] in a study of 60 consecutive Chinese patients showed that unlike the western studies, the majority of their patients were about a decade younger. Ong and Raymond, (2002) [19] in a study found the median age was 65 years. Juvela et al (1995) [20] conducted a prospective study of 156 consecutive patient with an age range of 16 to 60 years. Study by Adnan et al. (1997) [21] showed that compared with woman, men had a younger age of onset. All studies have shown a steep rise in incidence with increasing age.
In this study, spontaneous ICH is more common in male 64% (32) than female 36% (18). In study by Ong and Raymond, (2002) [19] showed that male to female ratio was 1:0.77. Adnan et al. (1997) [21] in a study showed that compared with woman, men had a younger age of onset (54 versus 60 years; p<0>
In the study regarding the occupation of the patients having Spontaneous ICH, farmer/day labour was 26% (13), businessman was 24% (12), and house- wife was 36% (18), and service holder was14% (7). Giulia et al. (2009) [23] found men with low SEP(socioeconomic position) with an ischemic event were more likely to be hospitalized for a new stroke than men with high SEP. Women with low SEP with hemorrhagic stroke were more likely to be hospitalized for cardiovascular disease compared with women with high SEP.
In our study, we found that spontaneous ICH was common in poor and middle class family. Among the patients, poor was 40% (20), solvent 58% (29), very good 2% (1). In a study by Giulia et al. (2009) [22] showed that stroke incidence strongly differs between socioeconomic groups reflecting a heterogeneous distribution of lifestyle and clinical risk factors. Strategies for primary prevention should target less affluent people.
In this study, we found that spontaneous ICH was more common in smoker. Among 50 cases, male smoker were 25(50%) and female 1(2%) and nonsmoker male was 7(14%) and female was17 (34%).Kafle R D [16], showed that 21 percent of patients were smoker. In study by Zaharia et al (2005) [11] found that, cigarette smoker (13.1%). Doctor et al (2013) [15], showed in their study, history of smoking was present in 24 cases (48%), all were male and 17 patients (34%) were currently smoking. Craig S. Anderson reported history of smoking in 29% of patients and ex-smoking in 19% of patients out of 60
Spontaneous ICH is a major cause of morbidity and mortality among stroke patients. Hypertension is the most common cause of spontaneous ICH;others are smoking, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus and family history of stroke. Mainstay of treatment is supportive, including airway maintenance, diabetes control, blood pressure control, treatment and prophylaxis of convulsion, temperature control, nutritional support, careful fluid therapy and rehabilitation is also needed for improved mortality and morbidity.
Limitation of Study: The present study did not represent the actual scenario of spontaneous ICH in Bangladesh because the study was conducted in one tertiary level hospital (Khulna Medical College and Hospital (KMCH). Sample size and duration of the study was short. Actual measurement of intracranial pressure was not possible. Advanced investigation facilities (Cerebral angiogram, MRI of brain) were limited. There was no advanced life support available.
There were no conflicts of interests
Ethical Clearance Appropriately taken
Funding Self-funded
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
