AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Thaddaeus C. Dachille, D.Ed., Curriculum and Instruction Indiana University of Pennsylvania M.A., Adult Education and Communications Technology B.A., Fine Art, Cum Laude graduate Indiana University of Pennsylvania.
Citation: Thaddaeus C. Dachille, (2024), The Broken Canvas: Theorized Implications of the Neuralink Invasive Brain-Machine Interface Technology on Artists and Art Production Methods, J. Brain and Neurological Disorders, 7(3): DOI:10.31579/ 2642-973X/104
Copyright: © 2024, Thaddaeus C. Dachille. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 15 April 2024 | Accepted: 01 May 2024 | Published: 24 May 2024
Keywords: artists; neuralink; invasive brain-computer interface applications; neurological technology; dystopian future scenarios
This article describes several scenarios involving professional artists and how they would respond to the mass adoption of Neuralink's novel invasive brain-machine interface application. However, before discussing these scenarios about artists, the author introduces the topic by discussing the general phenomena of the novel Neuralink technology and its recent implantation into the first human subject. Then, the author refocuses the article to discuss how this technology could affect artists, particularly their production methods and the creative mindset used to approach artwork development. In the paper's conclusion, the authors witches between artists and general humanity to suggest that the quest for deeper sources of knowledge is not new but has been an ongoing pursuit since the dawn of time. The author suggests we use caution and discretion when approaching brain-machine interface technology based on history.
What was once considered science fiction has become a reality, with the first human patient to receive an invasive brain-machine interface implanted by Neuralink in 2024 (Wood, 2024, March 29). The patient is a young male in his late 20s who is paralyzed from the neck down and is the first technologically evolved human being. He has a customized device in his brain that boasts "on-board signal compression, reduced power consumption, wireless power transmission, and data telemetry through the skin without percutaneous leads" (Musk, 2019, p. 10). This advanced technology allows the implant candidate to operate his laptop computer with his thoughts. The recipient said he is "thankful" and "blessed" to have the ability to control his computer from his mind (Farzad, 2024, March 23). As a spokesperson for this project, he is well- organized, charming, and enthusiastic. Notably, the patient said the neurological device has improved his life and given him more freedom.
From watching the video posted on the social media platform X (formerly known as Twitter) and seeing first-hand what the patient can do, this device changes everything from this day forward. The patient is now the first technologically evolved human. He could probably change his name to Human 2.0, presumably. With this brain chip, he can connect to any Wi-Fi signal or Internet of Things (IoT) device. Imagine the patient turning on all the lights in his house only with his thoughts or transcribing a document on his computer as he thinks of each word. As strange as this sounds, the utility of this technology could make the present physical manipulation of everyday objects, like putting a key into a lock, turning on a light switch, or pressing the power button on a remote control for a television, an outdated mode of life. On the surface, this technology appears to benefit all mankind. Even someone without unique physical or mental difficulties could use this brain enhancement technology to streamline their workflow, watch Netflix, check their bank account, or order a pizza.
The invention of an invasive brain-machine interface is an example of the Cyclic Innovation Model (CIM), which emphasizes a feedback circle, often described as a loop, involving a continuous conversation between all the stakeholders while the product is being innovated (Berkhout et al., 2006). This involves live data and continuous development, spearheaded by an interdisciplinary team of researchers, engineers, and medical doctors who will continue to develop the product through its lifespan. With CIM, the researchers can better calibrate their design using a dynamic and ongoing interaction process. This will inevitably speed up the design and manufacture of this commercially viable technology, leading to a mass production scenario. It is presumable that in a short timeframe, more advancements will occur, and additional patients will be implanted with this brain enhancement device.
Prior to human subject selection, Musk (2019) said that "our approach to brain-machine interfaces is highly extensible and scalable" (p, 11). Musk's desire to make this technology "scalable" identifies one of the primary premises for writing this document: theorizing the possible large- scale adoption of this technology. The Neuralink technology is "customizable depending on the task requirements"; therefore, it could be available to more patients in just a few months (p. 11). Most ominously, the time of the technologically evolved human is upon us. With this tempting digital mind augmentation technology on the horizon, it is vital to ponder the newfound spectrum of possibilities and how one should approach this topic. From an artist's perspective and the lens used in this article, this subject considers current and future artists and how digital/personal brain augmentation would provide these professionals with new opportunities, cognitive enhancements, and visual possibilities. With this consideration, modifying a unique human mind to improve an artist's career appears quite enticing, and this mind-altering technology's opportunities appear as limitless as science fiction.
How an artist could benefit from this neurological technology
From an artist's standpoint, it is clear how this technology would benefit people in the creative disciplines of graphic design, interior design, or architecture. As a representative of other artists, the author presumes that an artist's thoughts and feelings could be amplified or even stimulated with this technology, based on research by Jose Delgado (Schleim, 2021). The late Jose Delgado prophetically suggested the origins of this modern neurological device in his 1969 book, the Physical Control of the Mind. In this book, Delgado found that he could manufacture or minimize various feelings in the mind that could be very valuable to someone in a creative field. Similarly, artists could use this Neuralink technology to provide a deepened sense of command over themselves. If applied to the visual arts, this technology could improve an artist's control and focus and the ability to manipulate the fine motor skills utilized in fine art.
One 21st-century artist, the late Chuck Close, could have significantly benefited from this technology. He suffered from a spinalartery collapse that challenged him so profusely that he changed his style from hyper- realistic to more abstract (Chuck Close, 2024, April 10). In this life- altering transition, Close could no longer manipulate his artmaking tools in the same manner he could before his injury. As an example of an adaptive and creative individual, Close never complained about his disability and only cited it as a means of inspiration; however, he more than likely could have utilized mental technology in his career if it were available in his lifetime (Rojas, 2023). Perhaps, if he were alive today, Close could wirelessly connect to a robotic arm that manipulates paintbrushes and articulates them simultaneously with his thinking (Pisarchik et al., 2019). Mental technology would have enabled Close to continue in his former style, which first brought him fame and success.
The lengthy personal commitment to art making, which often took people like Albrecht Dürer or Rembrandt van Rijn a lifetime to develop, could be uploaded to a person within minutes with a hybrid digital and human mind. This idea of the possibility of uploading new information to a human mind with mental technology is from the 1999 movie Matrix. In this movie, the protagonist uploads the comprehension of how to fly a sophisticated aircraft into his mind and then takes the helicopter on a death-defying flight to save a peer from near death (Wachowski et al., 1999). With a hybrid digital and human mind, what once took years to learn could be fortuitously gained with little or no personal challenge. This theorized ability to upload information is based on the current technology and descriptions from engineers who can now download data from the patient’s mind using a data port in his human brain interface (Farzad, 2024, March 23).
A final possible improvement to the artist includes the prospect of an internal heads-up display (HUD). In the mind, the internal screen could give artists enhanced visualizations that assist them with pertinent information. Like an information kiosk at a crossroads thoroughfare, the overlaying information could provide the artist with additional means to see images on top of a physical canvas through the vast imagination of the brain. Another emerging advancement that could potentially arise with this neurological device is the ability to visualize several outcomes of an in-progress artwork, especially if the invasive brain-machine interface has artificial intelligence (Cetinic & She, 2022).
With an internal HUD, art history would also be more readily available inside the mind of an artist. For instance, mental technology could help creative people visualize and recall every painting in an entire museum collection at a moment's notice just by thinking about these images. Entire cultural summaries could then be thumbed over. A person cannot comprehend the value of seeing all the famous artworks of ancient Greece in one viewing (Cetinic & She, 2022). Then, the utility of asking the mental device to showcase all these images but with enhanced AI to see how they would look in their original condition. For instance, how did the Parthenon look before it collapsed? Or was the Parthenon painted with bright colors? One can only guess that these hypothetical situations are just around the corner of tomorrow. Other enhancements with visualization and a HUD could include telepathically working with peers from geographically different places to develop work together collaboratively. The possibilities of design and collaboration for an artist seem endless with invasive brain enhancement technology.
Figure 1: Visualization of the Theoretical Future Benefits to Artists with Mental Technology
Note. This visualization includes the perceived attributes that artists could expect in future human-brain interface technology once this technology becomes more sophisticated.
How this neurological technology could disadvantage artists
With the many positive things to consider about this technology, there are also pessimistic scenarios for an artist to consider. As this technology advances, more people will install it into their bodies. With this belief, expressed by Silva (2018), artificial intelligence (AI) will eventually make its way into these invasive neurological devices [10]. Beyond Silva (2018), Neuralink also has plans to include AI in the human mind; Neuralink has stated that they plan to "achieve symbiosis with AI" (Kulshreshth & Lakanpal, 2019, October, p, 4). When that inevitable day occurs, an AI-infused mental chip will radically change the landscape of metacognition, the art world, and the artist's mind. To place AI in an artist's mind may not be an advancement for the better.
With AI, the task of developing an original image, the ability to complete a large painting, and summoning the focus necessary to consider the complexities of color theory or composition could be operationalized in only a few minutes (Cetinic & She, 2022). If a future invasive brain- machine interface is embedded with artificial intelligence technology, then the art form of developing visual information in the mind could be exclusively completed in nanoseconds by an internal AI system. This would eliminate individual thinking, the visualizations generated in our minds, and the reinforcement and development of our creative imagination.
With the advancement of this technology, there is also a concern about the loss of boredom. Many people, including this author, have personally benefited from being bored and noticed its many creative advantages from being bored. Certain moments of boredom can impel people to create new ideas. Mann and Cadman (2014) postulate that when someone becomes bored, they "lose interest in it (a presumed object of focus)and turn (their) attention to other stimuli," this is an inter-shift the mind takes to occupy itself (p.5). This process stimulates the development of new and inventive ideas. A bored person moves the "inner focus," which "allows a way of gaining the stimulation that is being craved and that is missing from the boring task" (p. 6). To put it another way, being bored is not such a bad thing. To stifle boredom with a constant buzz of mental stimulation might deplete idea production in the visual arts.
Perhaps of most concern to any artist is the fear that the very act of thinking could change with this technology. As described by Jordan B. Peterson in his book 12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos, thinking is a back-and-forth collaboration between two viewpoints in the human mind (Peterson, 2018). Like Peterson's description, having a rich and meaningful discussion between these two avatars within the mind takes time. Profoundly, it is only with this process that one develops new found viewpoints. The deep contemplative thinking necessary to create any emotionally rich art piece occurs when one (a) takes the time to look at the artwork one is making and (b) diligently converses internally about this in progress imagery. In this process, an artist consider many factors. These elements may include but are not limited to the warmth or coldness of the colors in the painting, the viewer's perspective, and the focal point or lack thereof. Again, it takes time to enter the mind, make these considerations, and have these conversations within yourself. Without these inner discussions and the reflexive cognition, one needs for this inner discussion, artwork and the depth needed for its development could be inhibited by this technology.
With this technology, there is also a concern about the digital conformity of the human mind. This notion is an extension of the concept known as benchmarking, derived from the corporate world. With benchmarking, comparisons are continuous and critical for a company's growth (Lankford, 2002). When used in a corporate setting, every team member works towards the same goal with maximum efficiency in mind. Ponder the notion of an extensive network of minds, grouped with invasive digital technology, wired to each other. The telepathic interconnectedness would provide a newfound Wikipedia-like databank of knowledge (de Peyer, 2014). Stolen ideas, or intellectual theft, would be immediately absorbed into the collective hive of indistinguishable thinking. Largescale interconnection of this nature and the grouped mindset centered around absolute focus on collective goals would distill meaningful, diverse thinking. More importantly, there is the potential for losing personal drive because of the overt collaborative spirit. Less personal drive could result in less personal competition and ambition and, therefore, less innovation.
Figure 2: Visualization of the Theoretical Disadvantages to Artists Who Utilize Mental Technology in the Future
Note. This visualization contains only the perceived negative attributes of future human-brain interface technology and how this hypothetical neurological technology could harm visual artists.
People have always wanted to enhance their knowledge to a godlike status. In one of the oldest known texts, the Bible, in the book of Genesis, Adam and Eve were tempted by a snake to eat the forbidden fruit in the middle of their garden. In the story, they were told explicitly by God Himself not to eat this fruit. They rebelliously ate the fruit anyway because they believed they would be like a god and know both good and evil. According to the Bible, their desire to be like a god, with profound wisdom, was the very reason that a curse was placed on humanity. The lesson learned from this early act of disobedience includes a looming profound negative consequence attached to any desire to become godlike with our mental aptitude.
Taking it upon ourselves to upgrade our knowledge base introduces ethical implications about the essence of our humanity. The mind, each set of unique circumstances surrounding the diversity of each individual, and the thought patterns therein make us distinctively human and separate us from other mammals. To change the mind with an implanted microchip on an imperial scale with worldwide implications would forever alter humanity. To this point, Heraclitus said it best in his ancient proverb that warns, "No man ever steps in the same river twice, for it's not the same river and he's not the same man" (Goodreads, n.d.). Fundamentally, the swiftly moving river of the mind should not have new purpose-built channels. The banks of the river would flood with neurological indulgence, and the implications are not fortuitous for the artist and individual freedom of thought.
To infringe upon the human mind and reshape everyone with similar augmented thinking capabilities would undoubtedly hamper the biology and natural functioning of each human being. It would reduce everyone down to the same baseline intelligence. With this postulation, if everyone has a nearly equal intelligence quotient (IQ), the development of unique visual ideas could be diminished or almost disappear entirely. After the collapse of human individuality, the entire structure of human expression in the art world would soon suffer formidable damage.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
