AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Ajagu Nnenna. Deportment. Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Biopharmaceutics, Enugu State University of Science and Technology, Enugu.
Citation: Ogbonna Brian O, Ubah Onyinye L, Pete Princess, Anetoh Maureen U, Adaora Eze, et. al, (2024), Pharmaceutical Care Education in A Nigerian University: A Cross-Sectional Study on Students’ Attitude and Perception, J New Medical Innovations and Research, 5(6); DOI:10.31579/2767-7370/110
Copyright: © 2024, Ajagu Nnenna. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 10 July 2024 | Accepted: 18 July 2024 | Published: 25 July 2024
Keywords: pharmaceutical care; pharmacy education; pharmacy; perception
Background: Pharmaceutical care is the responsible provision of medication therapy to achieve definite outcomes that improve patients’ quality of life. Generally, students in pharmacy training take pharmaceutical care as part of their course in the five to six years pharmacy program and this form of education equips the students with the knowledge, skills, and attitudes they need to practice when they become pharmacists.
Objective: The study assessed pharmacy students’ attitude and perception of pharmaceutical care education in a university in southeast Nigeria.
Methods: The study is a descriptive, cross-sectional survey of pharmacy students in Agulu campus, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka using a self-administered questionnaire. The questionnaire was pre-tested for comprehension and reliability on 15 pharmacy students that are not part of the study, and necessary modifications were made. The study started from March to October 2019. A convenience sampling method was adopted in this study. Data was collected via a pre-tested 34-item self-administered questionnaire. SPSS (IBM, Corp.) version 25 was used for analysis. Descriptive statistics including percentages, mean, standard deviation, medians, and Likert scale rating (SD) were calculated and chi-square was used to determine association between categorical variables.
Result: A total of 299 of students participated in the study (130 males and 169 females). The response rate was 99.6%. Most of the students in the study showed positive attitude towards pharmaceutical care, as majority (73.6%) of them agreed that the practice of pharmaceutical care is valuable. Meanwhile, there is a significant association between the educational year of students and how they perceive their preparedness on their skill to administer drugs (X2 (23.03); p=0.03). Also, a significant association exists in the students’ educational year and their perceived ability to monitor therapeutic plan for a patient (X2 (28.08); p=0.005).
Conclusion: The pharmacy students’ attitude towards pharmaceutical care was good. Their preparedness to practice pharmaceutical care was average. The pharmacy students’ perception of the importance of the various pharmaceutical care activities was good. There was a significant association between students’ educational year and preparedness on the technical aspects of competency such as ability to recommend appropriate drug therapy, evaluate patient pharmacotherapeutic regimes, monitor therapeutic plan for a patient and identify information to prevent or resolve drug therapy problem.
Pharmaceutical care is a multi-disciplinary, organized, and standard practice, that is focused on the detection, prevention, and resolution of drug-related problems [1]. This has been the gradual paradigm in the modern-day pharmacy practice [2–4]. It has transitioned the training of pharmacists from product orientation to patient orientation [4–7] i.e. there is a gradual shift in the specialized responsibilities from transactional tasks such as drug compounding and dispensing to providing a more comprehensive patient-centered model of care [8]. This role is more important than ever, as the environment is demanding this new practice [8,9] and the current training has positioned pharmacists to be the most accessible health professionals [10,11].
Over the years, pharmacy education has gradually evolved to effectively nurture pharmaceutical care philosophy and integrate all aspects of the services that responsibly provide patients with the most effective medication therapy to achieve definite outcomes that improve their quality of life [12–14]. Hepler and Strand, in 1990, defined pharmaceutical care as the responsible provision of drug therapy to achieve definite outcomes that improve a patient's quality of life [15]. In line with the Helper and Strands definition of Pharmaceutical care, the American Society for Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) defined Pharmaceutical care as the direct, responsible provision of medication-related care to achieve definite outcomes that improve a patient’s quality of life [6]. In 1998, the International Federation of Pharmacists [FIP) also adopted the Hepler and Strand definition with a little modification i.e. “Pharmaceutical care is the responsible provision of drug therapy to achieve definite outcomes that improve or maintain a patient’s quality of life” [16,17] and, since then, pharmaceutical care has evolved and is currently being applied in pharmacy practice in many countries around the world [18,19].
There are several advances made in pharmaceutical care, examples are clinical pharmacy services, cognitive services, medication management, and medication review and they all share the same philosophy and objectives [14]. Furthermore, implementation of pharmaceutical care involves six [6] basic steps which include the establishment of a professional/therapeutic relationship, collection of patient-specific data, evaluation of data to identify health and drug-related problems, development and implementation of the pharmaceutical care plan [20]. Nevertheless, to adequately apply pharmaceutical care in practice, a pharmacist must be equipped with adequate and relevant knowledge and skills for this important venture [14,21].
In this vein, Pharmacy educators around the world have consistently trained and prepared student pharmacists to be competent in the implementation of pharmaceutical care for their future practice [14]. Students have been provided with ample opportunity to develop the clinical knowledge foundation as well as effective communication skills needed to serve the needs of patients [22–24]. The training has also imbibed in students’ positive attitudes and possible ways of motivation in the provision of pharmaceutical care [24]. This combination of knowledge, skills, and attitudes is required for widespread acceptance and implementation of the concept of pharmaceutical care [7,23,25].
In Nigeria, most pharmacy schools have tailored their current curriculum in such a way that it nurtures student’s skills to provide effective pharmaceutical care [5,20]. The skills developed in the course of training are: communication skills; making rational and independent judgments based on sound scientific reasoning and providing a caring attitude in their professional interaction with patients [5,16,21,25]. Furthermore, the concept of pharmaceutical care is first introduced to students in their second year (depending on the school) in which the concept and a description of basic pharmaceutical care principles are introduced to them [5,20,26].
In Anambra State, the attitude of pharmacy students towards pharmaceutical care has not been investigated. However, there are previous studies in Nigeria and other developing countries [4,7,8,21,24,27]. Assessing pharmacy students’ attitudes towards pharmaceutical care and perceptions of their preparedness to perform pharmaceutical care can provide useful information to guide curricular change and improvement [17]. Therefore, this study is designed to describe the attitudes of pharmacy students towards pharmaceutical care, perceptions of their preparedness to perform pharmaceutical care competencies, their perceived importance of the various pharmaceutical care activities, and their opinions about the importance of pharmacists in the provision of pharmaceutical care in Anambra, State Nigeria.
Study Design
The study is a descriptive, cross-sectional survey of pharmacy students conducted at the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Akwa, Agulu campus during their 2018/2019 academic session. The study employed the use of pre-validated questionnaire to measure the study outcomes. The self-administered questionnaire used was adapted from survey instruments designed and used in previous studies [28, 3, 4, 7]. It was pre-tested for comprehension and reliability on 15 pharmacy students that are not part of the study, and necessary modifications were made.
Study Population
The study population consisted of four different student levels from the second year to the Fifth year, each representing a professional class at a different stage of the school's core curriculum. The students were surveyed in the 2018/2019 academic session, toward the end of the second semester (from June 2019 to September 2019).
At the time of the commencement of this study, the population of pharmacy students in the faculty was four hundred and fifty-three (453). An eligibility criterion for students to be included in this study was that they gave consent to participate. A convenience sampling method was adopted in this study. To obtain a high response rate, the students were approached after major lectures for a particular level and the survey instrument was distributed in class and retrieved on the spot. The purpose of the study was briefly explained to students, and verbal consent was obtained before the administration of the survey instrument. Participants were assured of confidentiality.
Study Instrument
The final version of the 34-item questionnaire had four sections. The first section contained items seeking details on the students’ socio-demographic characteristics such as gender, marital status, nationality, and educational level. The second section was used to assess the attitudes of students towards pharmaceutical care and consisted of the Standard Pharmaceutical Care Attitude Survey (PCAS) tool [29] i.e., it consists of items that assessed pharmacy student attitudes towards pharmaceutical care and the responses to the item below is distributed on a five Likert scale, ranging from, “strongly agreed” to “strongly disagree”. (1=strongly disagree, 5=strongly agree). The third section was used to assess the perceptions of students regarding their ability to perform various pharmaceutical care competencies. It consisted of the Perceptions of Preparedness to Provide Pharmaceutical Care (PREP) survey tool [30] rate on a 5-point Likert scale (1=poor, 5=excellent). In the last section, the responses of students on the importance of pharmaceutical care activities using a 4-point Likert scale (1=unimportant, 4=very important) were evaluated.
Ethical Approval
The study was approved by the Research and Ethics Committee of the Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital (NAUTH). Also, verbal consent of the participating pharmacy student was obtained before the commencement of the study.
Data analysis
The reliability of the research instrument was verified with Cronbach's alpha. The coded data from the questionnaire were entered into the SPSS (IBM, Corp.) version 25, and descriptive analysis and univariate comparisons were conducted to produce study outcomes. Descriptive statistics such as means, standard deviation, frequency, and percentages were carried out on the retrieved data. The three constructs were also classified and a chi-square distribution test was conducted to show the association between categorical variables. For all analysis, p ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.
Table 1 shows that, of the 300-questionnaire distributed, two hundred and ninety-nine (299) were returned as validly completed, giving a response rate of 99.6%. There were 130 (43.5 %) males and 169 (56.5 %) females among the pharmacy students. Majority of the respondents 274 (91.7 %) are single while 24 (8.0 %) are married. At the time of conducting this study most of the respondents were seen to be in 300 level of pharmacy education.
| Variables | Frequency (n) | Percentage (%) |
| Gender | ||
| Male | 130 | 43.5 |
| Female | 169 | 56.5 |
| Marital status | ||
| Married | 24 | 8.0 |
| Single | 274 | 91.7 |
| Divorced | 1 | 0.3 |
| Nationality | ||
| Nigerian | 297 | 99.3 |
| Non-Nigerian | 2 | 0.7 |
| Level | ||
| 200 | 56 | 18.7 |
| 300 | 92 | 24.1 |
| 400 | 91 | 30.4 |
| 500 | 80 | 26.8 |
Table 1: Socio-demographic characteristics of the students (N=299)
In table 2, it was observed that most of the respondents strongly agreed with most of the statements in the attitude section these responses; this indicates favourable attitudes toward pharmaceutical care (Table 2). That is, 200 (66.9%) of the students agreed that all pharmacists should perform pharmaceutical care at a mean and standard deviation of 4.2 (1.0). Also,
220 (73.6%) of them strongly agreed the practice of pharmaceutical care is valuable this is at a mean of 4.2 and a Standard deviation of 0.8. However, a smaller number of students (98 (32.8%)) strongly agreed that pharmaceutical care takes too much time and effort at a mean of 3.2 with a Standard deviation of 1.1.
Items |
Mean (SD) |
Median | |||||
| Strongly Disagree | Disagree | Neutral
| Agree | Strongly Agree | |||
| 1. All Pharmacists should perform pharmaceutical care. | 2(0.7) | 3(1.0) | 1 (0.3) | 93(31.1) | 200(66.9) | 4.2(1.0) | 4.6 |
| 2. The primary responsibility of Pharmacists in all health care settings should be to prevent and solve medication-related problems. | 0(0.0) | 7(2.3) | 9 (3.0) | 97(32.4) | 186(62.2) | 4.1(0.8) | 4.6 |
| 3. Pharmacists' primary responsibility should be to practice Pharmaceutical care | 4(1.3) | 8(2.7) | 12 (4.0) | 99(33.1) | 176(58.9) | 4.0(0.8) | 4.6 |
| 4. Pharmacy students can perform Pharmaceutical care during their experiential training (placements). | 3(1.0) | 5(1.7) | 19 (6.4) | 115(38.5) | 157(52.5) | 4.0(1.0) | 4.6 |
| 5. The practice of pharmaceutical care is valuable. | 3(1.0) | 2(0.7) | 1 (0.3) | 73(24.4) | 220(73.6) | 4.2(0.8) | 4.6 |
| 6. Providing pharmaceutical care takes too much time and effort. | 19(6.4) | 53(17.7) | 48(16.1) | 81(27.1) | 98(32.8) | 3.2(1.1) | 3.6 |
| 7. I would like to perform pharmaceutical care as a Pharmacist practitioner. | 7(2.3) | 1(0.3) | 10 (3.3) | 85(28.8) | 196(66.6) | 4.1(0.8) | 4.6 |
| 8. Providing pharmaceutical care is professionally rewarding. | 5(1.7) | 5(1.7) | 9 (3.0) | 86(28.8) | 194(64.9) | 4.1(0.8) | 4.6 |
| 9. I feel that Pharmaceutical care is the right direction for the profession to be headed. | 3(1.0) | 2(0.7) | 11 (3.7) | 87(29.1) | 196(65.6) | 4.1(0.8) | 4.6 |
| 10. I feel that the pharmaceutical care movement will benefit Pharmacists. | 2(0.7) | 1(0.3) | 25 (8.4) | 107(35.8) | 164(54.8) | 4.0(1.0) | 4.6 |
| 11. I feel that the pharmaceutical care movement will improve patients’ health. | 1(0.3) | 0(0.0) | 17 (5.7) | 59(19.7) | 222(74.2) | 4.2(0.8) | 4.6 |
| 12. I feel that practicing pharmaceutical care would benefit my professional career as a pharmacy practitioner. | 1(0.3) | 2(0.7) | 15 (5.0) | 106(35.5) | 175(58.3) | 4.1(0.8) | 4.6 |
| 13. Providing pharmaceutical care is not worth the additional workload that it places on the pharmacist. | 66(22.1) | 72(24.1) | 30(10.0) | 47(15.7) | 84(28.1) | 2.6(1.3) | 2.6 |
Table 2. Pharmacy students’ Attitudes towards Pharmaceutical care (N=299)
Table 3 shows that on using the Likert scale rating, the level of preparedness to provide pharmaceutical care was seen to be high in most of the student's responses, as most of them responded that they are “very good” in pharmaceutical care. Also, 104 (34.8%) of the perceived students response is that they have the ability to provide excellent counselling to patients at a mean 3.3 and Standard Deviation of 1.2. Of all the competencies responses, the highest competencies recorded was about 91(30.4%) of which students reported that they have a good ability to calculate/evaluate pharmacokinetic properties in professional practice followed by the perceived ability to identify the appropriate information to decide a course of action for a problem (30.1%).
In all,the competencies attributes measured, the students rated themselves above average (3.4) in the psychological aspect (on a specific skill of providing counselling to patients) with a standard deviation of 1.2 and lowest ( SD, 2.7) in the communication aspect of competency with a standard deviation of 1.1 (on a specific skill or ability to communicate medical records information to health professionals).
| S/N | Items on the technical aspect of competency | Poor | Average | Good | Very good | Excellent | Mean (SD) | Median |
| 1 | Recommend appropriate drug therapy. | 13 (4.3) | 51 (17.1) | 82 (27.4) | 67 (22.4) | 86 (28.8) | 3.1(1.2) | 3.6 |
| 2 | Evaluate patient pharmacotherapeutic regimens to prevent or resolve medication-related problems | 16 (5.4) | 50 (16.7) | 89 (29.8) | 65 (21.7) | 79 (26.4) | 3.0(1.2) | 2.62.6 |
| 3 | Determine drug delivery system | 13 (4.3) | 54 (18.1) | 96 (32.1) | 69 (23.1) | 67 (22.4) | 3.0(1.1) | 2.6 |
| 4 | Recommend medication doses /dose schedules | 10 (3.4) | 41 (13.7) | 82 (27.4) | 86 (28.8) | 80 (26.8) | 3.2(1.2) | 3.6 |
| 5 | Identify/collect information to prevent or resolve a drug therapy Problem | 14 (4.6) | 49 (16.4) | 101 (33.8) | 61 (20.4) | 74 (24.7) | 3.0(1.1) | 2.6 |
| 6 | Evaluate laboratory tests for a specific patient. | 29 (9.7) | 53 (17.7) | 73 (24.4) | 68 (22.7) | 76 (25.4) | 2.9(1.3) | 2.6 |
| 7 | Calculate/evaluate pharmacokinetic properties | 21 (7.0) | 67 (22.4) | 91 (30.4) | 51 (17.1) | 69 (23.1) | 2.8(1.2) | 2.6 |
| 8 | Evaluate information from the patient’s history and assessment | 10 (3.3) | 62 (20.7) | 87 (29.1) | 74 (24.7) | 66 (22.1) | 3.0(1.2) | 2.6 |
| 9 | Make reasonable conclusions when data is incomplete. | 29 (9.7) | 62 (20.7) | 91 (30.4) | 61 (20.4) | 56 (18.7) | 2.7(1.3) | 2.6 |
| 10 | Provide counselling to patients. | 9 (3.0) | 38 (12.7) | 77 (25.80 | 71 (23.7) | 104 (34.8) | 3.3(1.2) | 3.6 |
| 11 | Recommend methods to seek patient compliance | 22 (7.4) | 45 (15.1) | 80 (26.8) | 66 (22.1) | 86 (28.8) | 3.0(1.1) | 3.6 |
| 12 | Monitor therapeutic plan for a patient. | 27 (9.0) | 44 (14.7) | 81 (27.1) | 63 (21.1) | 84 (28.1) | 3.0(1.1) | 2.6 |
| 13 | Document information on drug-related problems. | 30 (10.0) | 47 (15.7) | 87 (29.1) | 71 (23.7) | 64 (21.4) | 2.9(1.1) | 2.6 |
| Items on psychological aspect of competency | Poor | Average | Good | Very Good | Excellent | Mean (SD) | Median | |
| 1 | Identify the appropriate information to decide a course of action for a problem | 22 (7.3) | 46 (15.4) | 90 (30.1) | 70 (23.4) | 71 (23.7) | 3.0(1.0) | 2.6 |
| 2 | Contribute opinions/insights to health care team | 10 (3.3) | 48 (16.1) | 67 (22.4) | 89 (29.8) | 85 (28.4) | 3.2(.0.8) | 3.6 |
| 3 | Promote public awareness of health. | 5 (1.70 | 42 (14.0) | 65 (21.7) | 79 (26.4) | 108 (26.1) | 3.4(1.2) | 3.6 |
| 4 | Data/computer use in professional practice. | 17 (5.7) | 40 (13.4) | 68 (22.7) | 76 (25.4) | 98 (32.8) | 3.2(1.3) | 3.6 |
| Items on Communication Aspect of competency | Poor | Average | Good | Very Good | Excellent | Mean (SD) | Median | |
| 1 | Communicate medical records information to health professionals | 22 (7.3) | 75 (25.1) | 85 (28.4) | 61 (20.4) | 56 (18.7) | 2.7(1.1) | 2.6 |
| 2 | Communicate medical records information to patient. | 22 (7.3) | 62 (20.7) | 85 (28.4) | 74 (24.7) | 56 (18.7) | 2.9(1.3) | 2.6 |
| 3 | Identify/collect information to respond to health professional drug information request | 14 (4.6) | 67 (22.4) | 74 (24.7) | 79 (26.4) | 65 (21.7) | 2.9(1.2) | 2.6 |
| 4 | Respond to information request from a patient. | 12 (4.0) | 58 (19.4) | 86 (28.8) | 79 (26.4) | 64 (21.4) | 2.9(1.2) | 2.6 |
| Administrative/Management aspects | Poor | Average | Good | Very Good | Excellent | Mean (SD) | Median | |
| 1 | Evaluate, select, and purchase pharmaceuticals. | 30 (10.0) | 53 (17.7) | 75 (25.1) | 64 (21.4) | 77 (25.8) | 2.9(1.2) | 2.6 |
| 2 | Develop/implement a pharmacy inventory system. | 27 (9.1) | 65 (21.7) | 74 (24.7) | 58 (19.40 | 75 (15.1) | 2.9(1.1) | 2.6 |
| 3 | Manage fiscal and human resources. | 20 (6.7) | 66 (22.1) | 73 (24.4) | 71 (23.7) | 69 (23.1) | 2.9(1.2) | 2.6 |
| 4 | Develop/implement drug formulary service. | 30 (10.0) | 67 (22.4) | 62 (20.7) | 59 (19.7) | 81 (27.1) | 2.9(1.1) | 2.6 |
Table 3. Pharmacy students’ perceptions of their preparedness to provide pharmaceutical care (N=299)
Table 4 shows an association between the students’ academic year and different aspects of Pharmaceutical care. There was no significant difference between the four levels of student classes in their attitudes toward pharmaceutical care (p > 0.05), with most of the students in the four education levels showing positive attitudes toward pharmaceutical care. Nonetheless, it was also observed there is a significant difference between the four levels of student classes and their preparedness on the technical aspects of competency. This difference in the association was majorly seen in their response to their ability to recommend appropriate drug therapy with most of the student in the 500 level of pharmacy education scoring above average (p=0.028). There was also a significant difference in the responses of the students, ability to evaluate patient pharmacotherapeutic regimens to prevent or resolve medication-related problems at p=0.027. Likewise, a significant difference was seen in their responses on their ability to monitor therapeutic plans for patients at p=0.001. It was also observed that there was no significant difference between the four levels of student classes and their preparedness on the psychosocial aspects of competency (p>0.05). Likewise, it was observed that there was no significant difference between levels of students’ characteristics and preparedness on the communication aspects of competency. Finally, it was also observed that there was no significant difference between the four levels of student class and their preparedness on the administrative aspects of competency (p>0.05).
| 200L | 300L | 400L | 500L | X2 | P | |
| Pharmacy students can perform pharmaceutical care during their experiential training (placements) | 9.033 | 0.700 | ||||
| Strongly Agree | 20 | 29 | 35 | 31 | ||
| Agree | 30 | 35 | 51 | 41 | ||
| Neutral | 4 | 7 | 3 | 5 | ||
| Disagree | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | ||
| Strongly Disagree | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | ||
| I would like to perform pharmaceutical care as a pharmacist practitioner | 10.42 | 0.578 | ||||
| Strongly Agree | 14 | 21 | 21 | 29 | ||
| Agree | 39 | 47 | 62 | 48 | ||
| Neutral | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | ||
| Disagree | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
| Strongly Disagree | 1 | 2 | 4 | 0 | ||
| All pharmacists should perform pharmaceutical care | 14.389 | 0.277 | ||||
| Strongly Agree | 17 | 29 | 23 | 24 | ||
| Agree | 39 | 42 | 64 | 33 | ||
| Neutral | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Disagree | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | ||
| Strongly Disagree | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | ||
| I feel that the pharmaceutical care movement will improve patients’ health | 4.518 | 0.874 | ||||
| Strongly Agree | 11 | 14 | 16 | 18 | ||
| Agree | 43 | 53 | 70 | 56 | ||
| Neutral | 2 | 5 | 4 | 6 | ||
| Disagree | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Strongly Disagree | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
| Association between students’ characteristics and their preparedness on the technical aspects of competency | ||||||
| Recommend appropriate drug therapy | 23.026 | 0.028 | ||||
| Poor | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | ||
| Average | 7 | 16 | 14 | 14 | ||
| Good | 7 | 16 | 14 | 14 | ||
| Very good | 13 | 11 | 14 | 29 | ||
| Excellent | 22 | 20 | 29 | 15 | ||
| Evaluate patient pharmacotherapeutic regimens to prevent or resolve medication-related problems | 23.140 | 0.027 | ||||
| Poor | 2 | 4 | 4 | 6 | ||
| Average | 7 | 21 | 10 | 12 | ||
| Good | 15 | 16 | 36 | 22 | ||
| Very good | 11 | 11 | 19 | 24 | ||
| Excellent | 21 | 20 | 22 | 16 | ||
| Recommend medication doses /dose schedules | 20.367 | 0.158 | ||||
| Poor | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | ||
| Average | 5 | 12 | 10 | 14 | ||
| Good | 12 | 20 | 31 | 19 | ||
| Very good | 16 | 18 | 26 | 26 | ||
| Excellent | 20 | 18 | 23 | 19 | ||
| Identify/collect information to prevent or resolve a drug therapy problem | 26.477 | 0.033 | ||||
| Poor | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | ||
| Average | 3 | 17 | 12 | 17 | ||
| Good | 15 | 24 | 40 | 22 | ||
| Very good | 18 | 8 | 15 | 20 | ||
| Excellent | 16 | 20 | 20 | 18 | ||
| Evaluate information from the patient’s history and assessment | 13.832 | 0.538 | ||||
| Poor | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Average | 10 | 14 | 18 | 20 | ||
| Good | 13 | 23 | 31 | 20 | ||
| Very good | 18 | 16 | 18 | 22 | ||
| Excellent | 14 | 15 | 21 | 16 | ||
| Monitor therapeutic plan for a patient | 28.079 | 0.005 | ||||
| Poor | 2 | 1 | 11 | 13 | ||
| Average | 9 | 17 | 9 | 9 | ||
| Good | 15 | 18 | 29 | 19 | ||
| Very good | 7 | 17 | 17 | 22 | ||
| Excellent | 23 | 19 | 25 | 17 | ||
| Association between students’ educational level and their preparedness on the psychosocial aspects of competency | ||||||
| Identify the appropriate information to decide a course of action for a problem | 14.145 | 0.515 | ||||
| Poor | 4 | 6 | 7 | 5 | ||
| Average | 6 | 10 | 14 | 16 | ||
| Good | 19 | 19 | 31 | 21 | ||
| Very good | 12 | 13 | 21 | 24 | ||
| Excellent | 15 | 24 | 18 | 14 | ||
| Contribute opinions/insights to the health care team | 9.128 | 0.692 | ||||
| Poor | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5 | ||
| Average | 6 | 9 | 15 | 16 | ||
| Good | 15 | 18 | 20 | 21 | ||
| Very good | 17 | 20 | 25 | 24 | ||
| Excellent | 16 | 23 | 29 | 14 | ||
| Promote public awareness of health | 7.651 | 0.812 | ||||
| Poor | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | ||
| Average | 6 | 9 | 14 | 13 | ||
| Good | 13 | 18 | 17 | 17 | ||
| Very good | 11 | 18 | 23 | 27 | ||
| Excellent | 25 | 26 | 35 | 22 | ||
| Data/computer use in professional practice | 17.208 | 0.142 | ||||
| Poor | 2 | 5 | 4 | 8 | ||
| Average | 7 | 13 | 6 | 14 | ||
| Good | 13 | 11 | 26 | 17 | ||
| Very good | 9 | 18 | 26 | 23 | ||
| Excellent | 25 | 25 | 28 | 20 | ||
| Association between students’ educational level and their preparedness on the communication aspects of competency | ||||||
| Communicate medical records information to health professionals | 17.591 | 0.285 | ||||
| Poor | 3 | 2 | 7 | 22 | ||
| Average | 14 | 23 | 18 | 20 | ||
| Good | 13 | 17 | 35 | 20 | ||
| Very good | 12 | 15 | 16 | 18 | ||
| Excellent | 14 | 15 | 15 | 12 | ||
| Communicate medical records information to the patient | 10.72 | 0.772 | ||||
| Poor | 4 | 3 | 6 | 9 | ||
| Average | 9 | 17 | 18 | 18 | ||
| Good | 21 | 21 | 24 | 19 | ||
| Very good | 13 | 15 | 25 | 21 | ||
| Excellent | 9 | 16 | 18 | 13 | ||
| Identify/collect information to respond to health professional drug information request | 16.146 | 0.372 | ||||
| Poor | 2 | 2 | 5 | 5 | ||
| Average | 11 | 23 | 16 | 17 | ||
| Good | 17 | 11 | 25 | 21 | ||
| Very good | 11 | 20 | 30 | 18 | ||
| Excellent | 15 | 16 | 15 | 19 | ||
| Respond to information requests from a patient | 12.19 | 0.664 | ||||
| Poor | 1 | 3 | 4 | 12 | ||
| Average | 11 | 18 | 14 | 15 | ||
| Good | 16 | 16 | 32 | 22 | ||
| Very good | 14 | 16 | 28 | 21 | ||
| Excellent | 14 | 19 | 13 | 18 | ||
| Association between students’ educational level and preparedness on the administrative aspects of competency | ||||||
| Evaluate, select, and purchase pharmaceuticals | 14.459 | 0.491 | ||||
| Poor | 3 | 10 | 9 | 7 | ||
| Average | 10 | 15 | 17 | 11 | ||
| Good | 12 | 15 | 26 | 22 | ||
| Very good | 14 | 9 | 19 | 22 | ||
| Excellent | 17 | 23 | 19 | 18 | ||
| Develop/implement a pharmacy inventory system | 7.942 | 0.926 | ||||
| Poor | 4 | 9 | 8 | 6 | ||
| Average | 12 | 15 | 20 | 18 | ||
| Good | 14 | 14 | 27 | 19 | ||
| Very good | 13 | 14 | 14 | 17 | ||
| Excellent | 13 | 20 | 22 | 20 | ||
| Develop/implement drug formulary service | 7.759 | 0.925 | ||||
| Poor | 6 | 7 | 10 | 7 | ||
| Average | 11 | 19 | 20 | 17 | ||
| Good | 8 | 12 | 21 | 21 | ||
| Very good | 12 | 15 | 16 | 16 | ||
| Excellent | 19 | 19 | 24 | 19 | ||
| Manage fiscal and human resources | 14.189 | 0.511 | ||||
| Poor | 5 | 4 | 9 | 2 | ||
| Average | 10 | 22 | 15 | 19 | ||
| Good | 12 | 15 | 24 | 22 | ||
| Very good | 15 | 12 | 22 | 22 | ||
| Excellent | 14 | 19 | 21 | 15 |
Table 4: Association between the students’ educational level and different aspect of Pharmaceutical care (N=299)
This study evaluated the attitude and perception of a Nigerian University students towards pharmaceutical care in a three-month study period. At the end of the study most of the them showed a positive attitude towards pharmaceutical care but their perceived preparedness to practice pharmaceutical care was seen to be average.
The positive attitude seen amongst the students towards pharmaceutical care is comparable to result seen in a similar study carried out in different universities around the globe. Such studies were conducted in Qatar, United States, Saudi Arabia and, Kuwait pharmacy student[2,21,31], but unlike the result seen in these studies a study carried out in University of Benin in Nigeria also showed that most students indicated moderately positive attitudes toward pharmaceutical care[5]. In this study, most of the student in the lower level of pharmacy education (200 level and 300 level) had a less positive attitude than their seniors in the higher level (400level and 500level). This is so because the students were still undergoing training, even though the year two class have not commenced pharmaceutical care courses. It might be important to pay particular attention to this issue because of the current take off of the Nigerian pharmacy school to start the Pharm. D program. So, this special group of students need to start at least a minimum form of pharmaceuticals for them to appreciate the aspects of pharmaceutical care better. Most of the pharmacy students can perform Pharmaceutical care during their experiential training (placements/clerkship). Hence, the positive attitudes seen in this group of students. This is so because the higher level of education in the pharmacy school had more students that participated in the study and pharmaceutical carefully taught in the higher levels. This serves as a paradigm for a need to introduce pharmaceutical care courses in lower levels as well[5]. It may also be necessary for Pharmacist Council of Nigeria to review practice experience sites were young graduate of pharmacy schools in Nigeria undertake their one year internship programmes [5].
Perception on pharmaceutical care among the students was explored by using 5-point Likert scale responses and the study revealed that the majority of the students strongly perceived that they have the skill to recommend appropriate drug therapy for patients. This result is also seen in a study conducted in Kuwait that evaluated the level of Pharmaceutical care education amongst pharmacy student in Kuwait[7]. The perceived student competencies were measured in four aspects namely, technical aspect, psychological aspect, Communication aspect and, Administrative/Management aspects of competency. The study revealed that most of the students exhibited an excellent skill in the technical aspect of providing counselling to patients. Also a majority of the student reported that they can recommend appropriate drug therapy for patients but it was observed that the association between levels of education and the students’ preparedness on the technical aspects of competency was seen to differ significantly, due the fact that the 400 and 500 levels have had a practical/ hands on experience on pharmaceutical care.
The items on psychological aspect of competency showed that most of the students have a high level of skill on how to promote public awareness of health amongst patient but they also showed a low level of skill on identifying the appropriate information to decide a course of action for a problem. On communication aspect of competency, most of the student exhibited a good skill on how to communicate medical records information to health professionals and how to respond to information request from a patient. This is so due to the fact that students have an earlier exposure to courses covering the aspects of pharmaceutical care.
The pharmacy students’ attitude towards pharmaceutical care was good. Their preparedness to practice pharmaceutical care was average. The pharmacy student’s perception of the importance of the various pharmaceutical care activities was good. There was a significant association between students’ educational year and preparedness on the technical aspects of competency such as ability to recommend appropriate drug therapy, evaluate patient pharmacotherapeutic regimes, monitor therapeutic plan for a patient and identify information to prevent or resolve drug therapy problem.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
