AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Hemali B. Gunt, Burt’s Bees, 211 West Pettigrew St. Durham NC 27701, USA.
Citation: Hemali B. Gunt, Jeannette Jakus, Burt’s Bees, (2024), Natural Skin Care Regimen Improves Clinical Parameters and Quality of Life in Children with Atopic Dermatitis, Dermatology and Dermatitis, 9(6); DOI:10.31579/2578-8949/171
Copyright: © 2024, Hemali B. Gunt. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons. Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 07 August 2024 | Accepted: 23 September 2024 | Published: 30 September 2024
Keywords: alternative medicine; herbaceous pharmaceuticals; normal remedies; complete healthcare; plant-located therapies; pharmacological projects; dispassionate evidence; control of product quality; uniformity; drug interplays
Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a prevalent, chronic inflammatory skin disorder, characterized by xerosis, itching and recurrent eczematous lesions. The condition also has major psychosocial implications for patients and their families. A daily skincare regimen of gentle cleansing and moisturization is an important part of atopic dermatitis therapy.
Objective: This study evaluated the tolerability and efficacy of a nature-based shampoo/wash and moisturizer in children with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis
Methods: This open-label study involved 23 children (6 months – 13 years) with atopic dermatitis. A daily skin care regimen of nature-based shampoo/wash and moisturizer was used for 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was tolerability assessed through clinical grading of erythema, dryness and roughness. The study pediatrician graded the eczema condition using the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), and assessments of stratum corneum hydration and transepidermal water loss were performed before and after treatment. Parent/guardian completed two validated quality of life questionnaires.
Results: Twenty children completed the study. Clinical evaluations showed significant improvement in subjects’ atopic disease with daily use of nature-based regimen. Significant reduction in dryness and roughness was observed, indicating that both products were well-tolerated. Moisture content and transepidermal water loss measurements showed directional improvements in skin barrier function.
Parent/guardian reported significant improvements in quality-of-life assessments.
Conclusions: The study demonstrated that nature-based skin care regimen was well tolerated and improved quality of life and skin condition in children with atopic dermatitis and can be used either alone or in adjunction with traditional treatment for disease control.
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, relapsing skin condition characterized by pruritus, inflammation, and xerosis. The disease is common, affecting an estimated 15-30% of children and 2-10% of adults.1,2 The specific cause of AD is unknown, but the disease is often associated with elevated serum IgE levels and a personal or family history of type I allergies, allergic rhinitis, and asthma. AD often begins in infancy, with a high percentage of children experiencing their first episode before one year of age.1–4 The disease represents a significant burden not only for those afflicted, but for family members as well.1,5
Treatment AD often requires pharmacological intervention. However, AD is associated with an epidermal barrier defect and nonpharmacological topical interventions such as moisturizer or emollient application are a mainstay of therapy, since these products help hydrate the skin and may augment barrier function and repair.6,7 Avoidance of triggering factors is also recommended. Allergens and irritants can act as triggers, and in general, limited use of non-soap cleansers is preferred.6–8 Minimizing the presence of superfluous ingredients such as perfumes and dyes in skin care products is also desirable.
We conducted a 4-week clinical study to assess the suitability of a regimen comprising liquid shampoo/wash and lotion products based on natural ingredients for daily use by children with AD. Clinical grading and bioinstrumentation were key to judging the regimen’s safety and efficacy. However, the study also incorporated two validated quality of life instruments to assess the burden of disease on the subjects and on their caregivers.
Test Articles
Subjects or parents/guardians of enrolled subjects used a natural ingredient-based liquid shampoo/wash product to cleanse themselves/their child during the study. This product combined effective cleansing and convenience; the latter was considered important given the lower end of the age range under study.
Additionally, subjects/parents used a natural ingredient-based lotion to moisturize their/their child’s skin.
Ingredient listings for the natural ingredient-based shampoo/wash and moisturizer test articles are provided in Table 1.
| Test Article | Ingredient Listing |
| Shampoo and wash product | Water, decyl glucoside, coco-betaine, lauryl glucoside, isoamyl laurate, sucrose laurate, glycerin, natural fragrance, betaine, potassium cocoyl hydrolyzed soy protein, hydrogenated palm glycerides citrate, tocopherol, lecithin, xanthan gum, citric acid, sodium chloride, coco- glucoside, glyceryl oleate, potassium sorbate, sodium benzoate, ascorbyl palmitate, phenoxyethanol, limonene. |
| Lotion/moisturizer product | Water, helianthus annuus (sunflower) seed oil, glycerin, cetyl alcohol, zea mays (corn)starch, avena sativa(oat) kernel flour,aloe barbadensis leaf juice, butyrospermum parkii (shea) butter, hydrolyzed jojoba esters, jojoba esters, kaolin, lecithin, xanthan gum, citric acid, sucrose stearate, zinc oxide, sodium PCA, sucrose polystearate, glyceryl laurate, sodiumstearoyl lactylate, potassium sorbate, sodium benzoate, phenoxyethanol. |
Table 1: Ingredient listing for the test articles used in this study.
Clinical In-Use Study
A single-center, clinical in-use study was conducted under the supervision of a board-certified pediatrician to assess the test articles’ skin tolerance and efficacy over four weeks of daily use. The target study population comprised otherwise healthy infants and children aged 6 months to 12 years with mild to moderate AD. The study protocol and all associated documents were reviewed and approved by an institutional review board. A parent or legal guardian provided informed consent for each prospective subject before they underwent any study-related procedures.
Prospective subjects acclimated under controlled environmental conditions (68-75 °F, 35-65% relative humidity) for at least 15 minutes upon arriving at the clinical testing facility. The study pediatrician then evaluated each individual’s skin using the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) to assure that enrolled subjects had mild (EASI score from 1.1-7.0) or moderate (EASI score from 7.1-20.0) AD.9 The demographics of the enrolled study population are summarized in Table 2. The study pediatrician also scored erythema, dryness, and roughness as tolerance parameters on a 4-point scale (0 = none to 3 = severe). Qualifying subjects then had stratum corneum hydration (Corneometer CM 825, Courage + Khazaka electronic GmbH, Köln, Germany) and transepidermal water loss (TEWL, Tewameter TM300, Courage + Khazaka) measurements taken from an uninvolved area on a randomly assigned leg. Hydration measurements were made in triplicate at apposed sites and averaged; a single TEWL measurement was made.
Atopic Dermatitis Severity (EASI) Mild, N (%) Moderate, N (%) |
16 (69.6) 7 (30.4) |
Age at Enrollment (Months) Mean (SD) Median Range |
57 (45.3) 54 6 - 148 |
Sex Female, N (%) Male,N (%) |
8 (34.8) 15 (65.2) |
Fitzpatrick Skin Phototype I II III IV V |
2 5 3 3 10 |
| Key: N = number, SD = standard deviation. |
Table2: Demographics of enrolledsubjects.
Subjects’ parents/guardians completed Patient Oriented Dermatitis Measure (POEM) for children and Family Dermatology Quality of Life Index (FDLQI) questionnaires to assess subjects’ perceived dermatitis severity and the impact of the subjects’ disease on other family members, respectively.10,11 Completing the POEM required parents/guardians to rate how frequently, within the previous week, seven specific events/behaviors related to their child’s disease had occurred. Responses
were scored from 0 to 4, corresponding to ‘no days’ and ‘every day’. The maximum POEM score is 28. Similarly, the FDLQI required parents/guardians to respond to a series of 10 questions to assess the impact of their child’s disease on them during the past month. Responses are scored from 0 to 3, corresponding to ‘not relevant/not at all’ and ‘very much’. The maximum FDLQI score is 30.
Parents or guardians of qualifying subjects were provided with the test articles along with instructions for use. The liquid shampoo/wash product was to be used at least once but not more than twice daily for cleansing the body and hair. The moisturizer was to be applied twice daily; immediately after cleansing and 10-12 hours later. An additional daily application of the test moisturizer to dry skin areas was allowed, if necessary. Parents or guardians recorded each use of the test articles in a supplied study diary.
Subjects returned to the clinical testing facility after four weeks for final evaluation. Completed study diaries were collected and checked to assure compliance. After subjects acclimated, the study pediatrician evaluated EASI and scored tolerance parameters. Stratum corneum hydration and barrier function were measured as at baseline then subjects’ parents/guardian completed POEM and FDLQI questionnaires to assess perceived changes in their child’s dermatitis severity and the disease’s impact on other family members.
Only data for subjects who completed the study were included in the statistical analysis. Demographic data collected at the baseline visit were tabulated, and summary statistics were calculated for graded parameters, instrumental measurements, and questionnaire responses. The change-from-baseline values for each endpoint at each evaluation were calculated on a per subject basis, then mean values were tested for difference from zero using non-parametric statistical tests for grades and questionnaire data, and parametric tests for instrumental data. A two-tailed significance level of α = 0.05 was used for all statistical analyses.
Children with mild to moderate AD were the target population for this clinical study. Consistent with this, subjects’ incoming EASI scores ranged from 1.2 to 12.0, with an average baseline EASI score of 4.1 (Table 3). This reflects that the majority of enrolled subjects (~70%) had mild AD. Graded erythema was absent at baseline, but graded dryness and roughness scores were also in the ‘mild’ range. Twenty-three subjects qualified to enter treatment. One subject was dropped for noncompliance and one subject was lost to follow-up. There was one adverse event reported (erythema), which was mild in severity and judged possibly related to test article use. This adverse event resolved without further intervention. Thus, data from twenty subjects who completed the study were analyzed.
Clinical evaluation showed that subjects’ atopic disease improved with treatment (Table 3). The average EASI score decreased significantly from 4.1 to 3.5. Erythema graded as a tolerance parameter remained absent at study end; however, the other graded parameters, dryness and roughness, both decreased significantly from baseline. These clinical results support that the regimen comprising natural-based liquid shampoo/wash and lotion products was well-tolerated, and in fact improved subjects’ skin condition over 4 weeks of daily use.
| Graded Endpoint | Baseline | Week 4 | P-valuea |
| EASI score,mean (SD) | 4.1 (3.00) | 3.6 (3.04) | 0.004 |
| Tolerance parameters | |||
| Erythema, mean(SD) | 0.0 (0.00) | 0.0 (0.11) | 1.000 |
| Dryness, mean(SD) | 0.6 (0.54) | 0.5 (0.43) | 0.025 |
| Roughness, mean (SD) | 0.7 (0.38) | 0.6 (0.37) | 0.025 |
aWicoxon signedrank test. Key: SD = standard deviation. |
Table 3: Average graded endpointvalues at baselineand study end.
AD is associated with skin dryness and barrier compromise. Values for these parameters tend be lower and higher, respectively, than in healthy individuals, even on uninvolved skin sites.12–14 Stratum corneum hydration values measured on uninvolved leg skin at baseline averaged about 23 AU, placing them in the range associated with ‘very dry skin’ (Table 4).15 Baseline TEWL values measured with the Tewameter®
on uninvolved leg skin averaged 11.3 gm·m-2·hr-1, somewhat higher than the value measured with this instrument on the legs of healthy individuals.16 Thus, baseline instrumental measurements made on enrolled subjects’ legs are consistent with the expectations for AD.
| Instrumental Endpointa | Baseline | Week 4 | P-valueb |
| Corneometer, mean(SD) | 23.2 (7.42) | 26.6 (8.65) | 0.259 |
| TEWL, mean(SD) | 11.3 (3.39) | 10.4 (3.08) | 0.311 |
aCorneometer unitsare AU; TEWLunits are gm·m-2·hr-1. bPaired t-test. Key: SD = standard deviation; TEWL = transepidermal water loss. | |||
Table 4: Average instrumental endpoint values measuredat baseline and study end.
Stratum corneum hydration values measured on subjects’ legs increased by about 2.6 AU (about 11%) from baseline to study end, suggesting that the treatment increased moisture in the stratum corneum. However, the increase was not statistically significant. TEWL values decreased by about 0.9 gm·m-2·hr-1 (about 8%) over treatment, indicating improvement in the stratum corneum barrier. But again, this change was not statistically significant. The instrumental data are consistent with directional improved skin condition as a result of using the natural-based liquid shampoo/wash and moisturizer products.
AD creates a burden not only for those afflicted, but also on those around them.1,5 In the case of children, parents or guardians are most affected. This study used two validated instruments to assess the burden of disease on the child from the parents’/guardians’ standpoint (POEM), and the impact of the disease on the child’s family (FDLQI). Baseline responses to the POEM showed that itching, sleep disturbances, and cracked, flaking, and dry/rough skin were the symptoms most frequently affecting subjects (Table 5). The average POEM Total Score was 12.5, which is consistent with ‘moderate dermatitis’.10 Thus, disease severity was greater based on parents’/guardians’ POEM ratings of their child’s disease status than on clinical assessment. In terms of effect on family, time spent looking after the child and emotional distress experienced due to their atopic disease were the attributes that most affected parents’/caregivers’ quality of life (Table 6). However, overall, the FDQLI responses were relatively low, with only the mean for time spent caring for the child exceeding 1.0, i.e. this attribute was rated as having ‘a little’ impact on the caregivers’ quality of life. The relatively low baseline scores generated in the FDLQI might reflect the disease severity or the young age of the enrolled subjects, or the special bond between child and parent/guardian.
Over the lastweek, on how many days/nights... | Baseline mean (SD) | Week 4 mean (SD) |
P-valuea |
| has your child’sskin been itchybecause of their dermatitis? | 3.5 (1.32) | 2.2 (1.76) | 0.016 |
| has your child’ssleep been disturbed because of theirdermatitis? | 1.5 (1.67) | 0.7 (1.13) | 0.023 |
| has your child’sskin been bleeding because of their dermatitis? | 0.6 (0.94) | 0.4 (0.99) | 0.406 |
has your child’sskin been weeping or oozing clear fluid because of their dermatitis? | 0.4 (0.81) | 0.2 (0.49) | 0.500 |
| has your child’sskin been cracked because of their dermatitis? | 1.9 (1.66) | 1.2 (1.51) | 0.078 |
| has yourchild’s skin beenflaking off because of their dermatitis? | 2.0 (1.49) | 1.0 (1.59) | 0.011 |
| has your child’s skinfelt dry or rough because of their dermatitis? | 3.6 (0.82) | 2.5 (1.64) | 0.008 |
| POEM TotalScore | 12.5 (6.19) | 8.1 (7.08) | 0.003 |
aWilcoxon signedrank test. Key: SD = standard deviation. |
Table 5: Average parent/guardian responses to the Patient OrientedDermatitis Measure questionnaire.
Over the last month how much... | Baseline mean(SD) | Week 4 mean(SD) |
P-valuea |
| emotional distress haveyou experienced due to your relative/partner’s skindisease (e.g. worry, depression, embarrassment, frustration)? | 0.9 (0.67) | 0.4 (0.49) | 0.027 |
has yourrelative/partner’s skin disease affected your physical well-being (e.g. tiredness, exhaustion, contribution to poor health, sleep/rest disturbance)? | 0.6 (0.75) | 0.2 (0.37) | 0.016 |
| has your relative/partner’s skindisease affected yourpersonal relationships with him/her or with otherpeople? | 0.2 (0.41) | 0.1 (0.22) | 0.375 |
| have you been having problems with other peoples’ reactions due to your relative/partner’s skindisease (e.g. bullying, staring, need to explain to others about his/her skin problem)? | 0.1 (0.31) | 0.1 (0.22) | 1.000 |
| has your relative/partner’s skindisease affected your social life(e.g. going out, visiting or inviting people,attending social gatherings)? | 0.1 (0.22) | 0.1 (0.31) | 1.000 |
| has your relative/partner’s skindisease affected yourrecreation/leisure activities (e.g. holidays, personal hobbies, gym,sports, swimming, watching TV)? | 0.2 (0.52) | 0.2 (0.37) | 1.000 |
| time have youspent on looking after your relative/partner (e.g. putting on creams, giving medicines or looking aftertheir skin)? | 1.3 (0.98) | 1.2 (0.93) | 0.753 |
| extra housework haveyou had to do because of your relative/partner’s skindisease (e.g. cleaning, vacuuming, washing, cooking)? | 0.5 (0.95) | 0.2 (0.41) | 0.250 |
| has yourrelative/partner’s skin disease affected your job/study (e.g. need to take time off, not able to work, decrease in the numberof hours worked, having problems with peopleat work)? | 0.2 (0.41) | 0.1 (0.22) | 0.375 |
has your relative/partner’s skindisease increased yourroutine household expenditure (e.g. travel costs,buying special products, creams, cosmetics)? | 0.6 (0.75) | 0.2 (0.52) | 0.031 |
| FDQLI TotalScore | 4.6 (3.56) | 2.5 (1.54) | 0.035 |
aWilcoxon signedrank test. Key: SD = standard deviation. |
Table 6: Average parent/guardian responses to the Family Dermatology Quality of Life Index questionnaire.
Consistent with the clinically observed improvement in subjects’ atopic disease, the caregiver-assessed change in subjects’ skin condition shown by the POEM also improved. Ratings for all seven questions improved from baseline and significant changes were observed for several symptoms that received high frequency ratings at baseline, i.e. the frequencies of itching, sleep disturbances, and flaking and dry/rough skin were significantly reduced. The change in frequency rating for cracked skin was nearly significant (P = 0.078). The POEM Total Score decreased significantly from 12.5 to 8.1, although this score remained in the ‘moderate dermatitis’ range.10 The improvement in subjects’ atopic disease also lessened the burden on their caregivers, as reflected in the FDQLI. Of the ten parameters probed by this instrument, three remained the same and seven improved at study end. Respondents’ emotional distress, physical well-being, and household expenditure responses were significantly improved, as was the average FLQLI Total Score, which decreased from 4.6 to 2.5.
A four-week clinical in-use study was conducted among children with atopic dermatitis using a regimen comprising liquid shampoo/wash and lotion products that are based on natural ingredients. Treatment effects were judged using a 3-pronged approach that included clinical grading, bioengineering measurements, and validated life-quality questionnaires. These measures consistently showed that the regimen was well-tolerated and improved subjects’ skin condition and quality of life, as well as the quality of life of their caregivers. Taken together, these results show that the tested shampoo/wash and lotion products are appropriate for use as part of daily skin care in the management of atopic dermatitis.
This study was 100% funded by Burt’s Bees, Inc. The authors would like to thank Keith Ertel, KDE Scientific Consulting, LLC for the preparation of this manuscript. Final editing was executed by the authors.
Disclosures
Hemali B. Gunt is an employee of Burt’s Bees, Inc (Durham, NC, USA). Jeanette Jakus is a consultant to Burt’s Bees, Inc.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
