AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Case Report
*Corresponding Author: Vinay H G., Department GI Surgery,Vamshodaya Hospital, Kolar, India.
Citation: Vinay H G., (2024), Giant Hydronephrosis Due to Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in A 53-Year-Old Male: A Case Report., Journal of Clinical Surgery and Research., 5(9); DOI:10.31579/2768-2757/150
Copyright: © 2024, Vinay H G., This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 07 November 2024 | Accepted: 13 November 2024 | Published: 13 December 2024
Keywords: giant hydronephrosis; uretero-pelvic junction obstruction; abdomen; kidney
The hydronephrotic kidney, resulting from an uretero-pelvic junction obstruction (UPJO), presents commonly as a clinical condition, with the presence of usually no more than 1‑2 liters in the collecting system, but a very small number of cases of giant hydronephrosis (GHs) has been reported in adults. In this case report a 53-year-old male was admitted to the Vamshodaya Hospital Kolar, Karnataka, India in November 2023 with an abdominal pain since 15 days and abdominal distention since 6-months. Computed tomography was performed, finding large thin walled cystic mass in right side of abdominopelvic region (40x32x27cm) showing few incomplete septations, fluid density within lesion and causing significant mass effect and displacing the rest of the abdominal contents. Such cases are rarely presented; therefore the aim of the present case study was to document a clear case of GH resulting from UPJO.
The overall definition of hydronephrosis is dilatation of the renal pelvis and calyces as a result of partial and sporadic restriction of the urine's flow [1].Hydronephrosis can be unilateral or bilateral, depending on where the urine flow restriction occurs. A unilateral hydronephrosis happens when the blockage is higher than the bladder's level. Between the ages of one and eighty, the incidence of unilateral hydronephrosis was determined to be 1:100. The right side is more frequently afflicted by unilateral hydronephrosis, which is most frequently caused by idiopathic pelvi-ureteric junction (PUJ) blockage or calculus. The female to male ratio of this condition is 2:1. It might be the consequence of aberrant smooth muscle growth at PUJ [2, 3].With a range of treatment programs, it is now possible to detect the etiology of stone illness in over 95% of patients, and most individuals with recurrent calculi can have their stone production stopped or delayed. The advent of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and percutaneous lithotripsy has led to a most remarkable and amazing accomplishment [4].
The symptoms of GH can vary from vague symptoms like nausea, constipation, dyspepsia, fever, asthenia, mild diffuse abdominal pain or flank discomfort, chronic low back pain, recurrent urinary tract infections, and hematuria to asymptomatic abdominal distension until the late stages of the disease [5]. Most cases of this illness will be identified in the early stages of childhood and infancy. Prolonged irritation can lead to progressive and gradual consequences such hypertension, renal failure, ruptured kidneys, and malignant transformation if left untreated [6]. Although the clinical signs of these patients are not particular, they frequently involve a bloated abdomen and an elevated belly circumference. Hematuria, persistent stomach pain, flank pain, and recurrent UTIs are some other symptoms. Despite having ambiguous and broad clinical signs, massive hydronephrosis has only ever been properly diagnosed in 50% of cases [7]. Our objective is to report a case ofrare entity as the giant hydronephrosis.
Case Report:
A 53-year-old male was admitted to the Vamshodaya Hospital Kolar, Karnataka, India in November 2023 with an abdominal pain since 15 days and abdominal distention since 6 months. Patient was apparently normal 6 months back, later he developed abdominal distention associated with minimal pain, then gradually abdomen uniformly distended. Hence came to hospital for further evaluation and management. Patient had no complaints of dysuria, discoloration of urine or any other irritative urinary symptoms. There was negative history of nausea, vomiting, constipation, fever, weight loss, and anorexia. Also he had no history of stone disease and, or any other urologic problem.
In physical examination there was no positive finding except gross abdominal distention.
On Ultrasound of Abdomen showed huge cystic lesion with thick internal echoes and septations in abdomino pelvic region measuring (37 X 33 X 27 cm) and it is causing significant mass effect and displacement of all the abdominal organs. No sonological evidence of solid component/ calcification/ internal vascularity. No free fluid in pleural spaces. Visualized bowel loops show normal peristalsis.
On Renal cortical scan was performed by injecting 5mci 99m TC- DMSA intravenously and delayed static planer images were acquired in posterior projections using High Definition detectors with low energy high-resolution collimation (Dual head SPECT system).There was significant SOL occupying most of the anterior abdomen, especially in the right side that is observed to push the left kidney more laterally to the left.
Computed tomography was performed, finding large thin walled cystic mass in right side of abdominopelvic region (40x32x27cm) showing few incomplete septations, fluid density within lesion and causing significant mass effect and displacing the rest of the abdominal contents (intra and retroperitoneal contents), Figure 1.The lesion is causing significant mass effect and displacing the rest of the abdominal contents. The entire bowel loops are displaced to left side of abdomen.It is also displacing the retroperitoneal structures like aorta and IVC. Right kidney is not visualized separately from the mass lesion. Right lower ureter is seen and upper ureter blending with the lesion Features likely suggestive of right non-functioning kidney with gross hydronephrosis occupying entire right side of abdomen and pelvis probably due to PUJ obstruction. Enlarged prostate with back pressure changes in bladder, Figure 2. Using technique suspended respiration 2 mm contrast enhanced (with oral & IV contrast) sections of the pelvis and abdomen were obtained.
Figure 1: Abdominal computed tomography.
Figure 2: Gross appearance of right Kidney after nephrectomy,
shows large kidney with huge pelvis.
On histopathology report showed right nephrectomy specimen measuring 27 x 15 x 6 cm. Ureter measures 12 cm in length. External surface of kidney is enlarged and cystic. Capsule is adherent at places and areas of congestion noted. Cut section - Entire kidney is cystically dilated. Cortico-medullary junction and pelvi calyceal system cannot be made out. Cortical thickness measures 0.1 cm to 0.5 cm. No stones noted. Cut section of ureter is unremarkable. No stricture is seen.
Microscopic study:
Sections studied from kidney show atrophic glomeruli and atrophic tubules lined by attenuated epithelium and lumen filled with eosinophilic material (thyroidisation), Figure 3. Few of the tubules were cystically dilated. Many congested blood vessels and areas of hemorrhage noted. Stroma show mixed inflammatory infiltrate comprised of neutrophils,lymphocytes and plasma cells. Focal area showed hemosiderin laden macrophages. Lymphoid follicles were also noted. Section studied from pelvi calyceal region showed urothelial lining and underlying stroma showing dense mixedinflammatory infiltrate rich in neutrophils. Section studied from ureter appears unremarkable.Sections were negative for granulomas or malignancy.
Figure 3: Features are of Acute on chronic pyelonephritis with hydronephrosis - Right kidney.
Post-operative period was uneventful. Patient was shifted to wards in view of symptomatic improvement. Drain removed on pod 4. Patient was improved clinically during the course of stay in the hospital. Hence patient was being discharged.
Since abdominal CT lowers the risk of needless surgery and treatment expenses, it is a gold standard diagnostic technique for patients experiencing lower back discomfort [8]. While USG is the preferred procedure for treating patients with radiation exposure, pregnant patients, and children despite CT's superior accuracy, USG is also more affordable, easier to administer, and doesn't use ionizing radiation [9]. Congenital hydronephrosis is most commonly caused by occlusion of the ureteropelvic junction. A dilated renal pelvis and calyces devoid of ureteral dilatation will be shown on a USG or IVP. Prolonged washout half time, or an obstructive pattern, will be shown on diuretic renography or renal scan. Some children with UPJ blockage may also have vesicoureteral reflux. Congenital hydronephrosis has ureteropelvic junction blockage as its second most common etiology. On renal USG and/or IVP, hydronephrosis is observed together with concomitant ureteral dilatation. There may be an obstructive pattern on a renal scan. Three main categories of dilated ureters (megaureters) exist: non-obstructed, non-refluxing megaureters, refluxing megaureters, and obstructed megaureters [10]. The multicystic, dysplastic kidney, ectopic ureter, megacalycosis, simple renal cyst, urachal cyst, ovarian cyst, hydrocolops, sacrococcygeal teratoma, bowel duplication, duodenal atresia, anterior meningocele, and prune belly syndrome are additional causes of hydronephrosis or apparent hydronephrosis [11]. The percentage of cases with bilateral hydronephrosis varies quite a bit, while it is just 3% in the study of Haralambous et al [12]. The study by Hawthorne et al. still shows a greater male predominance, 76:24 [13]. According to research by Johnston et al., the left side has about 70% of the patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction that are discovered antenatally [14]. The study by Kass et al. indicates that approximately 55% of the cases were resolved postnatally [15]. This is a quite significant rate. On the other hand, only a relatively small percentage of instances were documented in a study done by Keller and colleagues. In addition to identifying hydronephrosis, the antenatal Ultrasonography should record the amount of amniotic fluid, the degree of bladder distension, the ureter's wall thickness and emptying, the presence of any abnormalities in the opposing kidney, and the kidneys' echogenicity [16].
| Author | Age/gender | Size of mass (cm)/ quantity of fluid (ml) | Initial symptoms | Treatment | Cause of GH |
| Schrader AJ, et al, [17] | 78/F | 35x30x25/30,000 | Nausea, vomit, fatigue, fever, weight loss | Puncture/drainage, Nephrectomy | Tumor |
| Vishwanath M et al. [18] | 65/F | 30x20x25/15,000 | Fatigue, fever | Nephrectomy | Obstruction |
| Wu CC and Sun GH [19] | 45/M | 30x20x20/15,000 | Anemia, liver dysfunction | Nephrectomy | Stone |
| Tazi MF et al. [20] | 42/M | 44x32x30/20,000 | Weight loss | Nephrectomy | Bladder neck obstruction |
| Mediavilla E et al. [21] | 82/M | 30x21x10/4,500 | Fever | Nephrectomy | Tumor |
| Golcuk Y et al. [22] | 83/M | 20x16x22/4,000 | Nausea, vomit, fatigue, fever, weight loss | Puncture/drain nephrectomy | Ureteral stone |
Table 1: Following cases of GHs reported in the study.
The primary modality for diagnosis was USG abdomen. Surgical intervention is used to treat hydronephrosis, depending on its etiology and grade. The most appropriate surgical procedure for treating GH, a rare illness linked to the development of cystic abdominal masses, is a nephrectomy.
No funding sources
None declared
The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
