AUCTORES
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Carolina Alfonso, Resident of the Chair of Urology: Dr. Levin Martínez, Hospital de Clínicas, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Citation: Carolina Alfonso, Santiago Navarro, Levin Martínez, (2024), Artificial Intelligence, how does this discipline impact the different generations of urology?, Clinical Research and Clinical Trials, 11(3); DOI:10.31579/2693-4779/219
Copyright: © 2024, Carolina Alfonso. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 17 July 2024 | Accepted: 02 August 2024 | Published: 05 December 2024
Keywords: artificial intelligence; urology; medical training; learning; technological advances
Introduction: artificial intelligence, like human intelligence, is a complex concept to define. There is still no formal and universally accepted definition. The European Commission defines it as software systems and possibly also hardware systems designed by humans who, when faced with a complex objective, act in the physical or digital dimension, either by perceiving their environment or reasoning about knowledge. It is in full development, and its implementation in medicine has led to an improvement in clinical and surgical practice.
Objective: The objective of this article is to analyze the impact of this discipline on the different generations of urology residents and graduates in their daily practice.
Methodology: A descriptive study was carried out and the main variable of interest was to assess the use of this discipline in clinical and surgical practice in the population described. The data were collected through surveys of this population and compared with the current bibliographic evidence.
Results: The average age of the respondents was 40 years and they were mostly men, graduates. The use of this discipline was reflected in approximately 72% of the population. Its application in surgical training represents 30% and the lack of knowledge of this discipline was present in a large percentage of the study population when the comments were known.
Conclusions: most of the respondents are unaware of or do not apply the discipline of artificial intelligence in their daily practice. Those who perform it are just beginning surgical and clinical training in it.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is defined by the European Commission as a system of software and hardware designed by humans, which, when faced with a complex object, act in the physical or digital dimension, either by perceiving its environment, through the acquisition and interpretation of structured or unstructured data and reasoning about knowledge, processing the information derived from this data and deciding on the best actions to achieve the given objective. They can use symbolic rules or learn a numerical model. That said, it's a field of computer science that focuses on creating systems that can perform tasks that normally require human intelligence, such as learning, reasoning, and perception. [1].
In the field of surgery, artificial intelligence began with the incorporation of robots, specifically the Da Vinci system. This system was approved by the FDA in 2000 to facilitate minimally invasive surgery, a robot controlled by a human from a console. These technological advances have allowed digital platforms to become part of educational programs, thus helping surgical training.
Traditionally, surgical learning was carried out in the operating room by observing the procedure and its subsequent implementation through trial and error. Later, with the arrival of laparoscopy, the first training boxes for laparoscopic skills appeared and thanks to technological advances, virtual simulators have emerged. These virtual reality surgical simulators are excellent tools for surgeon-in-training training. They provide both psychomotor skills training and an objective assessment of technique providing a clear benefit to the patient.
AI systems discover patterns by understanding both the technique and the surgical error. Therefore, the system groups participants according to their technical capacity with an educational purpose.
The system is able to improve safety and results by reducing human error, reducing the variability of surgeries.
Beyond the use of AI and machine learning, the doctor-patient relationship will continue to be irreplaceable, particularly in surgical specialties. [2-8].
The different generations of doctors have preconceptions of artificial intelligence.
It is evident that the advances of AI do not restrict any reality, it is the things that some commentators say about it that insinuate a mediated, restricted, absurdly dispossessed reality of something that anyone without too much understanding or reading would see as something absolutely obvious, that consciousness exists, which is a very singular and peculiar property of life, and that obviously, it does not seem reasonable to suppose that machines have consciousness, no matter how sophisticated they are and how many successes they achieve.
Confusing intelligence and consciousness is not recommended, all consciousness must have some form of intelligence, but not all forms of intellection must necessarily be, at all times, conscious, something that is easily admitted to anything that we notice that many times we find the true solution to a problem without knowing how exactly we have come to find it. Our brain has acted intelligently, but we have not been aware of what it has done. [9].
A descriptive study was conducted. The population was made up of 75 students and graduates of the urology specialty from all over the country of Uruguay, since it included doctors from the capital, Montevideo, and from the interior of the country. 60% of them were women and 40% men. The minimum age described was 25 years.
For the collection of data to be described, a survey was carried out using online forms of the google forms platform. [10] It then provides graphs in which the data of the responses are updated in real form.
In addition, they could add comments on each question.
The questionnaire contained the following questions:
¿Do you know about artificial intelligence? Have you used any tools related to artificial intelligence in recent years? ¿Do you think the use of artificial intelligence is ethical? ¿Do you routinely use artificial intelligence for research in your clinical practice? ¿Do you know about surgical simulators linked to artificial intelligence? ¿Do you use the same ones? If you use them, do you consider the learning curve to be complex? ¿Do you consider this learning technique safe?
¿Do you think that the study of these new technologies should still continue? [11]
The main variable of interest was to assess the use of this discipline in clinical and surgical practice in the population described.
The data obtained from the population described were complemented with the international bibliography described in different bibliographic search engines such as Pubmed, Science Direct, Medline, Embase, Cochrane.
The population was made up of 75 students and graduates of the urology specialty from all over the country, Uruguay.
22 were students and 53 graduates. 60% of them were women and 40% men. The minimum age described was 25 years.
Regarding the items questioned in the questionnaire (Figure 1) that was used as the basis for a descriptive study of this population, the results obtained were as follows: 100% knew the term artificial intelligence (Figure 2), 60% had used tools linked to the concept of artificial intelligence in recent years. (Figure 3) 78% answered affirmatively to the question regarding whether the use of AI is considered medically ethical. (Figure 4) 72% said they use AI for medical research in their clinical practice. (Figure 5) 95% responded affirmatively to the knowledge of AI-related surgical simulators (Figure 6), only 30
AI is seen in our environment as an innovative and popular tool, but evidently knowledge about it is still precarious in the urological field. We consider that the implementation of it, as well as the knowledge of its edges, is not widely developed in our environment due to the number of elderly urologists and outside the line of research.
As we have previously demonstrated, many are still governed by ancient learning techniques based on observing the procedure and its subsequent implementation through trial and error exercises. [12-14]
We also highlight that the availability in the country of AI-based surgical simulators are not widely available and accessible to the entire urological population. Those who reside and practice their profession in the interior of the country do not have access to these technologies, and it is these who are mostly limited in surgical skills linked to AI as well as to continue the line of research with other tools also available for AI. Recently, in 2023, surgery using a robot technique was incorporated into the Urology Chair, Dr Levin Martinez, Hospital de Clínicas Dr Manuel Quintela, Montevideo, Uruguay, the only chair of the specialty of said university hospital. [15-17]
This has implied a break in the Uruguayan history of urology and the method of teaching and learning residents. Thus, the generations of residents in progress and those who are starting initially have AI tools from the beginning of their training. That is why the young participants of this descriptive study are the ones who know and handle these new technologies for the most part.
The learning curve is just in full swing at the center given the recent incorporation of the robot. In any case, those who are in training are residents and teachers with different academic degrees, who for several years have been using AI tools in lines of research, having benefited in recent years from these new technologies both in clinical practice and in surgical skills.
There is another center in Montevideo, Uruguay, for private health, not linked to the academic field, which also has this technology for years. Graduated urologists who still participate in academic activities in the single urological chair also participate in this service, so, with their learning curve already completed, they share knowledge with those who are starting it. [18].
We conclude that the greatest impact of this new discipline is on the younger generations, mainly residents and university professors, who have easy access to surgical simulators and are on their learning curve. In addition, it is these who, turned to research, use AI not only with simulator models, but also through GPT chat computing.
Regarding the older generations who are reluctant to change and who do not have easy access to the centers where the surgical simulators are located, we detect greater ignorance of this discipline.
Through the interrogation carried out digitally, and as a database of this descriptive study, we can affirm that 100% of the participants
They agreed that this new booming discipline must continue to expand widely.
There has been no funding.
he authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
The authors worked together throughout the development of the article, search and organization of information, synthesis and writing of it.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.