AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Review Article
*Corresponding Author: Hasibe Vural, Department of Medical Biology, Meram Faculty of Medicine, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey.
Citation: H Vural. (2022). Are anti-CTL4 and anti-PD-1 an effective biomarker in immunotherapy?. Clinical Oncology Research and Reports. 3(1); Doi:10.31579/2693-4787/030
Copyright: © 2022 Hasibe Vural, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 12 October 2021 | Accepted: 29 December 2021 | Published: 06 January 2022
Keywords: cancer; immunotherapy; CTLA-4; PD-1
The task of the immune system is to prevent foreign organisms from entering the body, if microbes have entered the body, to destroy them, to prevent or delay their spread. One of the most important features of the immune system is that it has the ability to recognize and distinguish millions of different microbes that are foreign to it. The immune system, like the brain, evaluates and synthesizes the situation, which is this breeding organ, and produces different training and special responses to microbes, cancer. This is a feature that does not exist in any system or organ except the brain and immune system. In summary, the task of the immune system is to protect the essence of the individual. For this reason, he knows himself first and does not harm the essence. In this context, it can be said that the immune system spends as much effort on self-knowledge as it does on fighting the enemy.
This rewiev article is intended to provide an overview of the CTLA-4 and PD-1 pathways and the description of their efficacy in cancer therapy or immunotherapy.
Immunotherapy, which started with the treatment of melanoma, a type of skin cancer, after years of chemotherapy and targeted smart drugs, is currently being used as a treatment method in more than 20 cancer types abroad. With immunotherapy, the person's immune system is activated and the person's own immune system cells are provided to fight cancer cells more effectively. The aim of cancer immunotherapy is to create an effective anticancer response by increasing the activity of the immune system. Although there are many different types of immunotherapies such as cell and vaccine treatments, in our country, when it comes to immunotherapy, it is perceived as "Check Point Inhibitors". In our country, there are repayments of immunotherapies in three types of cancer called kidney cancer, melanoma and hodgkin lymphoma.
Macro applications, which are among the elements of the immune system, are produced by NK and active uses such as T are used for their own possibilities. Some of the commonly used treatment methods can be listed as follows:
Immune Checkpoint inhibitors (Checkpoint inhibitor)
Today, they are drugs that provide dramatic improvement in many cancers and their use is becoming increasingly common. These special molecules eliminate the natural brake mechanism in the immune system, enabling the activation of T cells that recognize and attack the cancerous cell. In other words, these molecules act by blocking 'checkpoint proteins' that stop the immune system from attacking the cancerous cell. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) offer effective treatments for an ever-growing array of advanced malignancies. The mechanism of action of ICIs is the coordination of innate and adaptive immune systems, including the blockade of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD-1), and PD ligand-1 (PD-L1) reflects. The researchers noted that this blockade increases the activity of T cell lymphocytes to attack cancer cells.Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are effective on cancer as a result of the elimination of pressures on the immune system, however, overactivity of the immune system is one of the main causes of many autoimmune diseases. Today, reducing the side effects of ICIs or developing antibodies that will cause less side effects is an active research topic. Compared to conventional cancer treatments, immunotherapy can help the patient lead a cancer-free life for many years, but according to clinical studies, ICIs are not effective in all patients who use them. Knowing which users will benefit from it will be used in CTLA-4 to benefit from a project like the PD-1. These checkpoints, in particular, are critical for the environment. Immunotherapy plans to combat this immune control score by restoring and improving reevaluability for blocking. Particularly prominent checkpoints are CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1, against which monoclonal antibodies have been developed. Inhibition or suppression of these targets leads to increased activation of the immune system. PD-1 and CTLA-4 differ greatly in inhibiting immune responses, including antitumor responses. For example, CTLA-4 is known to regulate T cell proliferation.Immunotherapies with antibodies targeting immune checkpoints, such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) or programmed death-1 (PD-1)/PD-1 ligand (PD-L1), did not respond well in the majority of cancers. Cancers express transforming growth factor beta (TGFbeta), which often drives immune dysfunction in the tumor microenvironment by stimulating regulatory T cells and inhibiting CD8+ and TH1 cells.Immune checkpoint is a kind of signal to regulate antigen recognition of T cell receptor (TCR) in the immune response process. The immune checkpoint contains two types of signals:• Co-stimulatory immune checkpoint: stimulating immune progression such as CD28, ICOS and CD137,• Co-inhibitory immune checkpoint: inhibiting immune progression such as PD1, CTLA-4 and VISTA.As the immune system attacks pathogens, these immune checkpoint molecules can protect normal tissues from damage.
Cancer cells cleverly evade immune attack by dysregulating immune checkpoint-related proteins. Immune checkpoint therapy relies on the functioning of the immune system with agonists of co-stimulatory signals or antagonists of inhibitory signals.
There are two immune checkpoint receptors that have been actively studied over these years: Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (also known as CTLA4; CD152) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1; also known as CD279). Corresponding antibodies can inhibit the functioning of receptors and increase antitumor immunity.
Also, a large number of additional immune checkpoints that represent promising targets for anti-cancer therapy are under active development, with more immune checkpoint-based treatments coming to market for more cancers.
Immune Checkpoint Therapy in Cancer Patients;
Immune checkpoints are a key target of cancer immunotherapy. In cancer cells, these checkpoints can be up- or down-regulated depending on their role in activating or inhibiting the immune response.
CTLA-4 is an immune checkpoint that is upregulated in many cancers. It is present in regulatory T cells after activation and plays a role in the inhibition of the immune response. Immune system checkpoints, which include the signaling pathway, are very important in preventing tissue damage that may develop due to the natural immune response to pathogenic infection and in the development of self-tolerance of the body that is, in controling or regulating the development of autoimmunity. The first clinically targeted immune checkpoint is CTLA4.
Inhibitory stimuli from immune checkpoints are a homeostasis mechanism. Currently, studies have focused on the CTLA-4 (Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated Antigen 4) and Programmed Death-1 (PD-1) pathway. Programmed cell death (PD)-1 and programmed cell death ligand (PDL-1) pathway are checkpoint PD1/PDL-1 pathway; It inhibits proliferation, survival and effector function, including cytokine production of T cells, and plays a role in the escape of tumor cells from the immune system.
PD-1 has two ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2. In order for PD-1 to inhibit T lymphocyte functions, it must be combined with PD-L1 and PD-L2 ligands. The ligand mostly found in tumor cells is PD-L1. PD-L1 expressed in the tumor microenvironment suppresses the immune response to the tumor.
In mouse models, it has been shown that increased expression of PD-L1 on the tumor cell surface inhibits the immune response against the tumor in the tumor microenvironment, so that tumor cells can escape from the immune system and proliferate. PD-1 ligand distribution on cell surfaces of different tumors shows heterogeneity.
One of the main interaction points between cancer cells and the immune system is PD-1/PD-L1. Programmed death protein 1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PDL-1) have been recognized as inhibitory molecules that cause disruption of the immune response against cancer cells
[1, 2, 3]. The PD-1 (Programmed cell death-1) receptor is located on the surface of active T and B lymphocytes. Studies have shown that PD-L1 (Programmed cell death ligand-1) is found in many different tumor types [4, 5].
In line with these data, various agents have been developed that inhibit the PD-1/PD-L1 interaction in cancer cells. These agents, which have strong effects such as long-term survival with minimal toxicity, have been a hope for many cancer patients and researchers. Accordingly, there are currently 11 PD-1 or PD-L1 antibodies, 5 of which are FDA approved. When it binds to the Programmed Cell Death-1 (PD-1) receptor specific ligand, Programmed Cell Death-1 (PD-L1), it causes predominantly negative regulation of the effector function of T cells. This also occurs in tumor cells [6, 7, 8, 9, 10]. The PD-1 receptor has two ligands. PD-1L is also known as CD274 or B7-H1 and is expressed by somatic cells exposed to pro-inflammatory cytokines. PD-L2, also known as CD273 or B7-DC, has a more limited expression on antigen presenting cells [11, 12, 13]. Increased PD-L1 expression due to inflammation in the tumor microenvironment causes depletion of PD-1-mediated T cells, preventing the formation of the antitumor T cell response [13, 14]. Antitumor T cells repeatedly recognize congnate tumor antigens during the progression of cancer from primary to metastatic lesions. Triggering T cell receptors (TCR) results in the production of proinflammatory cytokines, including interferon G, the most potent stimulator of PD-L1 expression [15, 16 17].
Immune checkpoint regulation has been heavily researched over the past decade. However, the underlying mechanisms regulating PD1 and PD-L1 expression are not fully understood. However, several oncogenic signaling pathways, epigenetic alterations, and genetic variations have been proposed for this regulation [1, 2]. Immunotherapy, which has been proven to be effective in many types of cancer in recent years and has started to be used in the treatment, is also a promising example for the treatment of glioblastoma.The PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint, which is one of the current immunotherapeutic targets, has been blocked with monoclonal antibodies in many cancer types, and successful results have been obtained in making cancer cells the target of T cells.Especially when there is resistance to PD-1 or PD-L1 targeted drugs, using these drugs together with anti-CTLA4 agents or some cancer vaccines that will increase PD-1, PD-L1 sensitivity or with messengers that stimulate cells (IFN-gamma) such as GM-CSF; or as a different strategy, there are many studies in progress on treatments with genetically engineered T cell sensors (TCR or CAR) against cancer cells [18, 19, 20].
Immunotherapy, which has developed with the field of immunogenetics, aims to detect and find solutions in cases where genetic mutations cause the immune system to be functionally defective.
Immunogenetics refers to the scientific discipline that studies the molecular and genetic basis of the immune response. Genetic conditions that affect the development or function of components of the immune system lead to uncontrollability of infectious pathogens or susceptibility to autoimmunity or cancer.
Immune checkpoints are very promising and are a recently developed cancer treatment. Here, I tried to describe the PD-1/PD-L1 and CLTA-4 immune checkpoints and their effectiveness in monoclonal antibody detection and the importance of immunotherapy. Given the interaction of the tumor microenvironment with normal cells and the increasing incidence of cancer, there is an urgent need to improve existing therapies and develop new alternatives worldwide. Current immune checkpoint blocking therapies target receptor-ligand interaction. This approaches show that modulation of intracellular and cell surface receptor-ligand signaling stimulates antitumor immunity.In this sense, immunotherapy is the most effective way. Ongoing OMIC technologies and epigenetic analyzes are expected to provide invaluable new insights on this topic.
Hıghlıghts
Immunotherapy, a new way to treat cancer groundbreaking to detect tumor types and reduce the patient rate. Biological mechanisms need to be investigated. In this context known anti-CTLA4 mechanisms and it is necessary to know anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitors very well. Because there is a close relationship between tumor development, differentiation and proliferation of cancer cells, necrotic formation and immunogenetics.
We researchers recognize that the field of immuno-oncology is complex. In particular, I would like to emphasize that the field of immunogenetics is extremely important for the whole scientific world to better understand the relationship between the immune system, tumor biology and tumor microenvironment.
Regulatory mechanisms of PD-L1 are generally effective at the PD-L1 expression, RNA level (inflammatory signaling, abnormal oncogenic signaling, miRNA regulation, epigenetic regulation, mRNA stabilization), while at the DNA level (genomic modification, epigenetic regulation) and protein level (each localization, phosphorylation, glycosylation etc.) are effective.
The suppressive functions of immune checkpoints are generally provided by ligand-induced signaling. Here, I have tried to briefly describe the ligand interaction and signaling mechanism of two well-studied immune checkpoints.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
