AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Case Report
*Corresponding Author: Sara Al Awad, Department of General Surgery and Trauma, Fellow in Trauma, Acute care surgery and General Surgery, Hôpital Edouard Herriot/Hospices Civils de Lyon, University of Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 5 Place D’Arsonval, Lyon 69003, France.
Citation: Sara Al Awad, Romain l’Huillier, Mr. Hugo Achaintre, Cedric Scheiwe, Olivier Monneuse (2024), A Silent Journey: Uncovering Congenital Tracheo-Oesophageal Fistula in Adults, J Clinical Research and Reports, 17(1); DOI:10.31579/2690-1919/413
Copyright: © 2024, Sara Al Awad. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 20 September 2024 | Accepted: 27 September 2024 | Published: 05 November 2024
Keywords: : thoracic surgery; extra corporeal circulation; esophagus; tracheo-oesophageal fistula
Tracheo-Oesophageal fistula (TOF) is a widely known congenital anomaly, frequently associated with oesophageal atresia, which requires an urgent surgical correction during infancy. Congenital TOF rarely presents in adults. However, this diagnosis has been observed recently in certain patients as described in the literature explained in this article. Adults suffering from it experience chronic chest infections and chronic cough, usually attributed to other pathologies rather than the persistence of a TOF. This article reports the case of a young 22-year-old lady who since the age of five has been diagnosed with a psychogenic cough and was given anxiolytics and inhalers without any amelioration of her clinical state. An acute pneumopathy leads to a Computed tomographie, which allow us to suspect a TOF. A multidisciplinary approach and a thorough surgical plan are of great importance after confirming such diagnosis to solve this anatomic anomaly.
TOF : Tracheo-oesophageal fistula
CT : Computed tomography
A 22-year-old lady not known to have any medical comorbidities presented to our tertiary hospital of trauma and acute care surgery after being referred from a local secondary facility with a suspicion of a TOF. The patient explained that at the young age of five she started to develop a cough which is not associated with food or has any specific triggering factors. At the age of five, she lost her grandmother, and physicians theoretically diagnosed her cough to be psychological due to sadness.
Initially, she consulted a secondary healthcare facility because her cough became forceful and associated with important bouts of hypoxia. According to their clinical investigations, she was found to have hypoxemic pneumopathy along with an oxygen saturation of 94% under 5 Liters of oxygen via facemask. She had an injected Computed Tomography (CT) revealing a large slit-like communication between the base of the trachea and the oesophagus with a diameter of 1 cm at the level of the 3rd thoracic vertebra (Figure 1). CT also showed aspiration pneumonia in the left lower lobe. The Virtual endoscopic reconstruction of the CT (Philips IntelliSpace Portal®, Philips Eindhoven, The Nederlands) is shown in Figure 2
Figure 1 : Axial and Sagittal CT scan view of the Tracheoesophageal Fistula
The patient was immediately referred to our tertiary centre intensive care unit where she was kept nil orally and given parenteral nutrition, corticosteroids, nebulisers, antibiotics, anxiolytics, fluoxetine chloride and amitriptyline.
Figure 2: Virtual endoscopic reconstruction: Oesophagus, RMB: Right Main Bronchus, C: Corina, LMB: Left Main Bronchus
A multidisciplinary discussion with complete transparency was conducted, inclusive of General surgeons, Anesthetists, Ear nose and throat specialists, Gastroenterologists, Dietitians, Respiratory physiotherapists, psychologists and Cardiothoracic surgeons
The patient also underwent an oeso-gastrosduodenoscopy (OGD) and a bronchoscopy portraying a large voluminous loss of substance between
the oesophageal and the tracheal wall of around 16 cm to 20 cm from the oesophageal mouth with a wide length of approximately 4 cm. The endoscopic examination was poorly tolerated, with a very low oxygen saturation of less of 50%. Endoscopic management was excluded due to the large fistulous tract (Figure 3).
Figure 3: Tracheoesophageal Fistula viewed by the Oeso-gastroduodenoscopy. O: Oesophagus, T: Trachea
The patient was optimised in terms of her nutritional status and her respiratory symptoms, then transferred to our neighbouring Cardiothoracic Center for a combined surgical repair by our General surgeons and Cardiothoracic Surgeon colleagues with an extracorporeal circulation on standby.
The patient underwent a right postero-lateral thoracotomy and a large important fistula was identified with its distal end found at 2 cm above the carina and its proximal limit at the thoracic outlet
The thoracic surgeons faced difficulty accessing their work field with the presence of the intubation tube, so they opted to extubate the patient and they selectively intubate the left bronchus through the fistula with a Montandon tube. It was a successful initiative that allowed complete repair of the trachea and withdrawal of the broncheal intubation into the trachea.
Closure of the esophagus was done with interrupted sutures; closure of the trachea with a heterologous pericardium patch, the third rib was excised, followed by the interposition of a latissimus dorsi flap between the esophagus and trachea, finishing off the surgery with thoracic drainage kept on continuous suction.
The post-operative period was marked by an inflammatory process due to a deep-seated thoracic abscess and a small oesophageal fistula which was drained by interventional radiologists. Her evolution was remarkable and she tolerated fractionated soft diet really well. After a reassuring thoracic CT scan, her pleural drains were removed with multiple assessments carried out by radiographical images and she was discharged home with a satisfying follow-up including another CT scan a month later.
Tracheo-oesophageal fistula is a rare disease in adulthood and patients usually live a normal life with the history of multiple aspiration pneumonias, respiratory infections throughout their lives, which goes misdiagnosed or missed due to the lack of vigilance and further investigative methods.
TOF without esophageal atresia exists in 4% of all congenital anomalies. In recent years, it has been observed and properly diagnosed in adulthood with the evolution and low threshold of carrying out CT scans, especially in centers of high expertise. Most patients present the Ono sign, an uncontrollable cough after deglutition. Many will complain of recurrent chest infections, and some will have easier swallowing with postural change.
Saxena and Tam described the reasons for which patients present with late manifestations and a delayed diagnosis. Firstly, the fistula having an oblique path (starting higher up in the trachea with a downwards path into the oesophagus. Secondly, the presence of a membrane blocking the lumen of the fistula. Thirdly, the presence of a valve mechanism and lastly due to spasms of the fistulous tract [1].
The diagnosis is based on bronchoscopy, esophagoscopy or barium swallow and it needs a strong suspicion of tracheoesophageal fistula. Sometimes, it is an incidental finding during intubation [1].
Congenital TOF are usually short and small in caliber unlike our patient who presented a long and very wide fistula.
Management of a fistula should be discussed with all the concerned specialists and care should be taken while planning out the intervention as we are working with two of the largest systems in the body.
TOF can also be acquired. In acquired they can be due to malignant tumors or benign illnesses. There is also a group of iatrogenic TOF which manifest post traumatic intubation and prolonged tracheostomies.
Its diagnosis remains the worst prognostic factor due to many physicians rarely considering it and there is no reliable index of suspicion for adults with chronic cough. The eldest to have been diagnosed with persisting TOF is 79 years of age [2].
Hon Chi Suen [2] has reported 3 cases of persisting TOF in adults over the last 16 years. All 3 cases were misdiagnosed initially, and one case has a concomitant Esophageal Cancer associated with congenital TOF.
Another case is a 4-year-old patient who has been misdiagnosed as severe reflux requiring Nissen fundoplication and gastrostomy. He persisted to have the severe respiratory symptoms and despite CTs and OGD the TOF has been missed leading doctors to undo the ‘tight’ Nissen fundoplication and discuss a possible esophagectomy. As the patient consulted a specialized center, the radiologists and doctors immediately picked up the presence of a congenital H Type TOF confirmed furthermore with an esophagoscopy and bronchoscopy. They stated that the Fistula was very large that the bronchoscope can pass from the trachea to the esophagus easily [2].
The diagnosis of TOF can be achieved on a simple noninvasive chest CT by highly experienced radiologists, particularly when there is a high index of suspicion in the clinical examination of patients. However, the gold standard is a laryngotracheal endoscopy, in the operating room, under general anesthesia with spontaneous breathing [3]. The discovery of an adult congenital TOF is very rare and it is more often made on young people. Two other similar cases report mentioned a 15-year-old boy [4] and 22-year-old woman [1]. But there are also similar cases of older people of 59-year-old woman [5], 54-year-old man [6] and 67-year-old man [7].
Luscan R. et al proposed endoscopic guidelines for diagnosis of TOF. They mentioned the importance of assessing the recurrent laryngeal nerves (RLN) before the patient is completely sedated as there is a high risk of RLN paralysis with the surgical repair of this fistula. They present three different permeability assessment techniques: a methylene blue test, the introduction of a ureteral catheter (3 Fr) and the use of a surgical probe [3].
The treatment of TOF is based on the ablation of this communication between those two tubes. Highlighted by Chauhan SS and KIM HS, the endoscopic treatments involve fibrin glue, septal occluders and stents. Stenting is more viable and well established in patients with malignant TOF requiring a palliative approach [8,9].
Other treatments are based on a more aggressive intervention requiring a lateral thoracotomy with ablation of the fistula and application of a muscular patch like a split of the latissimus muscle between the two repaired orifices [10].
After all the involved specialists validate the surgical intervention, it is of great importance to carry it out in a highly specialized center as the patient will most likely require an intra-operative extubation with selective bronchial intubation for the trachea-oesophageal repair as it was the case with our patient and sometimes patients may require an extra-corporeal circulation.
Knowing the origin and nature of the fistula is the first and most important step in order to proceed with a successful treatment plan. Some patients may be eligible for stents and others requiring a more aggressive approach such as surgery with a muscle patch between the esophagus and the trachea. The position of the fistula is highly important in deciding between a cervicotomy or a thoracotomy, as well as in determining the most suitable muscular patch.
The choice of repair can be adapted if the region has the pectoral muscles anteriorly and the latissimus dorsi muscles posteriorly [11]. Higher fistulas can be patched using neck or cervical muscles such as the sternocleidomastoid muscle [11], the sternohyoid muscle [12] or a posterior tracheal flap.
Congenital Tracheo-oesphageal fistulas are common in newborns and is often associated with oesophageal atresia, which is surgically corrected in infancy. However, it can present without oesophageal atresia bypassing the infancy period and discovered later in adulthood as we have shown in this case report.
The use of a muscle flap when possible has been demarcated in the literature to reduce the chances of recurrence of large fistulas significantly even though the two repaired regions are at different levels. Follow up of such patients should be close and any arising respiratory symptoms should be treated with care and vigilance.
We conclude that, it is of great importance that the approach of such patients is to be taken with great vigilance and the suspicion of such diagnosis is to be confirmed meticulously. Addressing similar cases requires a multidisciplinary approach, multiple confirmatory investigations, access to extra-circulatory circulation, the ability to selectively intubate perioperatively and a well- tailored and planned surgical intervention.
Author Contributions: S. A. Literature Review, Writing, and Editing; R. L Virtual endoscopic reconstruction of radiological images and Editing; H. C. Writing and Literature review; C. S. Surgical management; O.M. Supervision, Surgical management, Editing and Mentoring.
This research received no external funding.
Informed Consent Statement: A written informed consent has been obtained from the patient to publish this paper.
Acknowledgments: We thank all volunteers who took the time to contribute to this excellent article.
None.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
