AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Jason Silvers, Jersey Shore University Medical Center Department of Surgery 1945 NJ-33 Neptune, NJ,
Citation: Jason Silvers, Michelle Abramova DO, Jillian Cassidy PA-C, Mir Ali, Dena Arumugam, Seth Kipnis, (2024), A Short-Term Retrospective Analysis of the Titan SGS™ Stapler Versus Traditional Staplers in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomies, Journal of Clinical Obesity and Bariatric surgery, 4(1); DOI:10.31579/cobs.2024/010
Copyright: © 2024, Jason Silvers. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 21 December 2023 | Accepted: 09 January 2024 | Published: 15 January 2024
Keywords: sleeve gastrectomy; bariatric surgery; stapler; laparoscopy
Background/Aim
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is the most common bariatric operation performed in the United States. Recently, the choice of staplers for sleeve gastrectomies has grown with the release of Standard Bariatrics’ Titan SGS™ stapler. A previous study demonstrated no new or extraordinary adverse effects; however, research on the incidence of known adverse effects is limited. The only data in the literature is industry sponsored. In this study, we examined short term risks and benefits of using the Titan SGS™ stapler for sleeve gastrectomies. We have no conflicts of interest or industry sponsors.
Materials and Methods
We retrospectively identified patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic sleeve gastrectomy at a single institution by two surgeons, and analyzed two groups: one using the Titan SGS™ stapler, and one using traditional laparoscopic staplers. We examined 30-day postoperative complications, operative time, and cost of procedure. Variables examined were age, gender, BMI, length of stay, and procedure time.
Results
The Titan SGS™ provided a statistically significant reduction in operative time and cost. Average case time using Titan SGS™ was 01:03:42 (hr:min:sec) compared to 01:21:47 with traditional stapler (p=0.0008). The relative cost and charge to patients were, respectively, $317.10 and $713.48 less than the traditional stapler. There was no difference in complication rate. On average, the Titan stapler shortened our operative time by 18 minutes and saved over $300.
Conclusions
The Titan SGS™ stapler provided significant benefits in operative time and cost, without significant difference in complication rate. However, small sample size and low power may limit the study.
Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG) is the most common bariatric procedure performed globally to treat obesity in tandem with its associated chronic diseases and comorbidities (1). Advancements in surgical technologies are continuously providing new options with potential benefits compared to the current methods. Standard Bariatrics has recently developed a new stapler, called the Titan SGS™, which has the opportunity to provide some benefit over traditional staplers used in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomies. The aim of this study is to display the outcome of the first 63 sleeve gastrectomies using the novel Titan SGS™ single use stapler at our institution from October 2022 to January 2023.
This was a retrospective, two surgeon, single-center study of patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board. A total of 63 electronic medical records were reviewed of patients who underwent robotic or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with standard linear stapling methods between July 2022 and September 2022 and those who underwent robotic or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with the Titan SGS™ stapler between October 2022 and January 2023.
Our institution has an annual mean of 125 bariatric cases from 2020-2022. We are accredited as a Comprehensive Bariatric Center with accreditation in Adolescent Bariatrics and Obesity Medicine - we are the only such center in New Jersey.
This study included adult patients (>18 years old) with body mass index (BMI) >40 kg/m2, or BMI >35 kg/m2 and at least one significant medical comorbidity, who underwent sleeve gastrectomy at a single institution. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (i) patients with BMI >70 kg/m2; (ii) previous gastric surgery or gastric band placement; (iii) patients with greater than 1 hour lysis of adhesions intraoperatively; (iv) patients undergoing combined operations. After applying exclusion criteria, 36 patients using standard stapling methods were included while 21 patients using Titan SGS™ stapler were included in the analysis. The 6 exclusions consisted of three patients with BMI greater than 70 kg/m2, one patient who underwent combined sleeve gastrectomy and cholecystectomy, and two patients who had prior gastric surgery: one excision of gastric polyp and one gastric band.
Data was obtained through systematic electronic medical record review to include medical record number, date of birth, gender, date of surgery, preoperative BMI, procedure time, length of stay and complications or readmission data. An internal statistician team was utilized to perform statistical analysis to compare standard stapling methods to Titan SGS™ stapler for operative times, operative cost and post-operative complications.
For the traditional stapler group, the cost was determined using the stapler with 5-6 staple loads fired with staple line reinforcements and a single 12 mm trocar. For the Titan SGS™ group, cost was determined by the Titan SGS™ stapler and the Titan 19 mm trocar. Additionally, this group occasionally included a 5-mm clip applier when used for bleeding noted at the staple line intra-operatively, or a locking suture used to prophylactically buttress the staple line occasionally per surgeon preference.
After a retrospective review, we found 63 patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic sleeve gastrectomy during the period July 2022 and January 2023. Of those, 57 met inclusion criteria and were analyzed in this study. We divided them into two groups based on which stapler was used: one comprising 36 patients treated with the Titan SGS™ stapler, and the other comprising 21 patients treated with traditional stapler for sleeve gastrectomy.
The first endpoint we examined was operative time. The traditional stapler group had an average operative time of 01:21:47 (h:m:s), versus the Titan SGS™ group which had an average of 01:03:42. The average change in time in minutes from the traditional stapler group to the Titan SGS™ stapler group was -18.0833 (95% confidence interval -28.3067 to -7.8933, standard error = 5.091). Using an alpha of 0.05, this was a statistically significant difference (p=0.0008).
The second endpoint we looked at was operative cost. The average cost of using the traditional stapler for sleeve gastrectomy was $2,362.10. This number included the cost of the stapler and at least 5 staple loads with staple line reinforcements. The average charge to the patient was $5,314.73. The average cost of the Titan SGS™ stapler group was $2,045.00, which included the Titan SGS™ stapler and 19mm trocar, a 5-mm clip applier or a locking suture, which was occasionally used to reinforce the staple line per surgeon preference. Average charge to the patient was $4,601.25. The average cost savings seen with the Titan SGS stapler group was $317.10, and the average difference in charge to the patient was $713.48.
The third endpoint of the study examined postoperative complications within 30 days, primarily staple line leaks and bleeding. There were zero staple line leaks in either group. In the traditional stapler group, there was only 1 patient (1/36, 2.78%) who returned to the hospital with bleeding, which was found to be from a liver laceration and not from the staple line and was managed conservatively and discharged home without any intervention. In the Titan SGS™ stapler group, 4 patients returned to the hospital within 30 days of surgery; however 2 of those were for unrelated reasons. The other 2 patients (2/21, 9.52%) did come back with bleeding, though neither required operative intervention. One bleed was from a 5mm trocar site and the other was from the most distal portion of the staple line. This appeared to be from a vessel on the greater curve of the stomach that was included in the staple line localized via CT. Again, none of the patients required intervention. They were admitted for observation and ultimately discharged home without any further events or readmission.
According to the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery there was an estimated 122,065 laparoscopic SG performed in the US in 2020 (1). It is favored in bariatrics due to its simplicity, decreased long-term complications, and being comparable in weight loss and resolution of comorbidities compared to gastric bypass (2-4). Despite the success of SG, it is not without its complications. Traditionally, SG is performed with multiple, varying staple firings along the greater curvature.
The junctions and angulations in the staple line between firings are considered to be lead points of mechanical failure or ischemia which can lead to development of a staple line leak. Irregular staple lines may also add to long term issues with reflux and strictures (2-7).
In our practice a laparoscopic 60mm stapler is used with 3 rows and a close staple height of 2mm. The novel Titan SGS™ stapler, cleared by FDA for use in April 2021, was developed to produce a more consistent and symmetrical sleeve pouch anatomy. The Titan SGS™ is a powered linear cutting stapler, used with a standard 19mm trocar. It is 230mm in length, contains 342 staples that are organized in 6 staggered rows - 3 on each side of the cut line. The stapler is graded, from 2.2 to 1.2 mm to match the anatomic gastric mucosa along the greater curvature (8-9).
The anatomic landmarks: gastroesophageal junction, pylorus, and the incisura angularis are used to create an anatomic sleeve gastrectomy with a gentle curve - with ideal tubularization of the pouch remnant, which is achieved is less than 40% of radiologically captured sleeves (10). The variability of pouch anatomy can result in variable weight loss outcomes.
Limitations of this study include small sample size with low power. It is possible that differences in outcomes were not able to be detected, and that further study with larger sample sizes will be beneficial.
As this is new technology in the bariatric industry, the Titan SGS™ stapler is a recent addition to the practice of both surgeons and they are currently still within their learning curves of using it. In contrast, they have both used the traditional staplers for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomies a combined 22 years of practice. On average, by using the Titan SGS™ stapler, we shortened our operative time by 20 minutes. Time was saved by avoiding reloading the stapler each time, checking the staple load, and specimen extraction was easier with the 19 mm trocar. Operating room staff also preferred using the Titan SGS™. They had less instruments to pick and open for each case. They did not need to know how to load the stapler. They required no training. Changes in operating room staff did not affect our operative time, as the Titan SGS™ stapler comes preloaded and ready for use.
Our institution’s value analysis committee approved the stapler for use due to the cost savings that are seen per case. Our collected data confirms the cost saving for a typical 5 staple load sleeve gastrectomy.
In conclusion, the reduction in operative time with the new device was significant, and it will be interesting to continue to analyze these cases to see if an even greater reduction in operative time will be seen.
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
