Editorial | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2641-0419/042
1* Department of Cardiology, Servergazi State Hospital, Denizli, Turkey
*Corresponding Author: Sara Cetin Sanlialp, Department of Cardiology, Servergazi State Hospital, Denizli, Turkey
Citation: Sara C. Sanlialp., (2020) Will The Innovations in Diabetes and Dyslipidemia Affect Our Practice in 2020?, 3(1); Doi:10.31579/2641-0419/042
Copyright: © 2020 Sara Cetin Sanlialp, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 19 December 2019 | Accepted: 31 December 2019 | Published: 03 January 2020
Keywords: Cardiac regeneration ;Cardio surgery ;Cardiomyopathies ;Cardiovascular computed tomography
In 2019, new guidelines on arrhythmia, coronary syndrome, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia and pulmonary embolism were published. Innovations and changes in these areas will already affect the practice of cardiologists in 2020. In this article we aimed to focus on these changes and innovations with main lines in diabetes mellitus and hiperlipidemia.
In 2019, new guidelines on arrhythmia, coronary syndrome, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia and pulmonary embolism were published. Innovations and changes in these areas will already affect the practice of cardiologists in 2020. In this article we aimed to focus on these changes and innovations with main lines in diabetes mellitus and hiperlipidemia.
While the miracle drug of diabetes mellitus was the first drug of choice for metformin years, it was emphasized that the use of SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP1-RAs agents should be the first choice because it reduces adverse cardiovascular events. It has not been recommended for the first time to measure carotid intima-media thickness, which we have been using for years to estimate cardiovascular risk. Microalbuminuria, a cardiovascular risk marker and renal dysfunction marker, has been recommended to be routinely evaluated in diabetic patients. Reducing HbA1c to less than 7% to prevent microvascular complicationsand this target value should be individualized. It has been proposed to focus on the more flexible HbA1c target in the elderly and the lower HbA1c targets in the young. It was stated that SGTL2 inhibitors should be the first choice drugs in patients with heart failure because they reduce the risk of heart failure and reduce hospitalization in patients with heart failure. however, saxagliptin, a DPP4 inhibitor, has not been recommended for use in patients with heart failure. Since atrial fibrillation is common in diabetic patients, screening of diabetic patients over 65 years of age for atrial fibrillation has been recommended. Mediterranean diet and exercise were recommended in diabetic patients, and the discontinuation of micronutrient use frequently consumed by diabetic patients was emphasized.
The SCORE method for estimating total cardiovascular risk is presented in two different ways for low and high risk regions in the European population. Targeted LDL-C levels in the very high and high risk groups were further lowered. With the prolongation of life expectancy, the age limit of 65 on SCORE cards has been increased to 70. The cholesterol band of 8 mmol / L was removed. HDL-C measurements were added to SCORE conditions and SCORE cards have been modified for young individuals.LDL-C target of 70 mg / dl in the very high risk group was reduced to 55 mg / dl and LDL-C target of 100 mg / dl in the high risk group was reduced to 70 mg / dl. It has been advocated that the target LDL-C level may be below 40 mg / dl in patients with recurrent cardiovascular events within 2 years despite receiving maximum statin therapy. The use of ezetimibe and PCSK-9 inhibitors was recommended in patients whose target value could not be achieved despite maximum statin therapy. Diet and exercise have also been an important cornerstone of treatment in both diabetes and hyperlipidemia guidelines. Particular emphasis was given to smoking cessation and alcohol restriction.
Although new agents for diabetes control seem to facilitate the work of cardiologists, unfortunately lowering target cholesterol levels will make physicians difficult. Although new diabetic agents are more expensive, they may reduce the financial burden of countries on diabetic patients in the future. Applying tighter lipid-lowering therapy in patients at a time of deterioration of antihyperlipidemic agents of the media and social networks will be quite a challenge for cardiologists. Increasing the number of drugs to achieve the targets during a period of low compliance with polypharmacy may further reduce patient compliance. Therefore, a more integrated relationship should be established between the patient and physician. The family of the patient should be included in this relationship if necessary.
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,