Why not all people die from heat stress?

Short Communication | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-8794/339

Why not all people die from heat stress?

  • Abyt Ibraimov

International Higher School of Medicine, Intergelpo Str, 1F, Bishkek, 720 054, Kyrgyzstan.

*Corresponding Author: Abyt Ibraimov, International Higher School of Medicine, Intergelpo Str, 1F, Bishkek, 720 054, Kyrgyzstan.

Citation: Abyt Ibraimov, (2026), Short Communication: Why not all people die from heat stress?., Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports; 8(6):DOI: 10.31579/2690-8794/339

Copyright: © 2026 Abyt Ibraimov., this is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Received: 02 June 2026 | Accepted: 12 June 2026 | Published: 24 June 2026

Keywords: older adults; heat stress; human body heat conductivity; chromosomal Q-heterochromatin; cell thermoregulation; thermoregulation

Abstract

In recent years, the study of the effects of heat stress on human health become quite relevant due to abnormal temperature rises in the temperate and northern regions of Europe and North America, which were accompanied by higher mortality rates among older age groups. It was generally believed that the pathogenesis of human death from heat stress was well understood. Now it turned out that our knowledge had been overstated, because people started dying even among those who had access to highly qualified medical care. From our point of view, this includes the underestimated role of human body heat conductivity (BHC) and its wide variation in the population when it comes to thermoregulation. Maybe that is why older individuals in the population turned out to be the most vulnerable group, having the lowest BHC. 

Introduction

Until recently, the study of the effects of increased temperature on human life was mostly academic. However, in recent years, this issue has become quite relevant due to abnormal temperature rises in the temperate and northern regions of Europe and North America, which were accompanied by higher mortality rates among older age groups. It was generally believed that the pathogenesis of human death from heat stress was well understood, although this confidence was mainly based on data obtained from animals. Now, when the day of reckoning came, it turned out that our knowledge had been overstated, because people started dying even among those who had access to highly qualified medical care. According to preliminary calculations based on excess mortality, the number of victims has already exceeded 6,000 just in France alone. This is not just a statistic — it is a signal that we do not know everything about the biological factors that increase an individual’s vulnerability to high environmental temperatures. From our point of view, this includes the underestimated role of human body heat conductivity (BHC) and its wide variation in the population when it comes to thermoregulation.

The thing is individuals in a population differ from each other in the heat conductivity of their bodies [1,2]. It has been found that the level of a human’s BHC is linked to the number of one type of chromosomal heterochromatin regions (HRs) in their genome, specifically Q-HRs [3]. As shown in Tables 1 and 2, using the example of two racial-ethnic groups, individuals from older age groups in the population reliably show a lower number of chromosomal Q-HRs [4].

Number

of 

Q-HRs

Ages

Newborns

(n = 145)

I

17-19 years

(n = 317)

II

20-39 years

(n = 112)

III

40-59 years

(n = 67)

IV

>60 years

(n = 23)

V

0421783
1197020134
223105412011
3387119142
4373916103
516972 
6522  
73    

Total 

Q-HRs

 

458

 

706

 

270

 

145

 

44

Mean

Number

of 

Q-HRs

 

3.16 ± 0.13

 

2.23 ± 0.07

 

2.41 ± 0.13

 

2.16 ± 0.16

 

1.91 ± 0.24

 

 t I, II = 6.0

df = 232

P < 0>

t I, III = 4.01

df = 255

P < 0>

 I, IV = 4.54

df = 210

P < 0>

t I, V = 4.58

df = 38

P < 0>

t II, III =1.29

df = 427

P > 0.20

 

t II, IV = 0.42

df = 382

P >0.600

 

t II, V = 1.21

df = 338

P < 0>

tIII, IV=1.20

df = 177

P >0.200

tIII, V= 1.64

df = 133

P <0>

tIV, V = 0.81

df = 88

P <0>

Table 1. The distribution and mean numbers of chromosomal Q-HRs per individual in Kyrgyz samples (Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan)

Number

of 

Q-HRs

Ages

Newborns

(n = 37)

I

17-19 years

(n = 67)

II

20-39 years

(n = 115)

III

40-59 years

(n = 230)

IV

>60 years

(n = 211)

V

00461426
139185051
2721397481
3519295835
4129172713
574664
631 11
 

Total 

Q-HRs

 

133

 

170

 

281

 

516

 

396

Mean

Number

of 

Q-HRs

 

3.59 ± 0.23

 

2.54 ± 0.16

 

2.44 ± 0.11

 

2.24 ± 0.08

 

1.88 ± 0.08

 

 t I, II = 3.8

df = 102

P <0>

t I, III = 4.7

df = 150

P <0>

t I, IV = 6.1

df = 265

P <0>

t I, V = 7.8

df = 246

P <0>

 t II, III = 0.5

df = 180

P >0.50

 

 t II, IV = 1.7

df = 295

P >0.70

 t II, V = 3.8

df = 276

P <0>

 t III, IV = 1.4

df = 343

P >0.10

 t III, V = 4.9

df = 439

P <0>

 t IV, V = 3.1

df = 439

P <0>

Table 2. The distribution and mean numbers of chromosomal Q-HRs per individual in Russian samples (Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan).

As can be seen from these Tables, in all cases, individuals from the older adults have the lowest values and a narrow range of variability in the distribution of the numbers of Q-HRs compared to the younger age groups. These differences are statistically significant.

Several reviews have analyzed the effects of heat stress on mortality or morbidity in general populations [5-7]. However, few have specifically addressed thermoregulatory responses and frailty in older adults. Population-based studies demonstrate that exposure to high temperatures is significantly associated with increased mortality and hospitalizations in older adults. The risk is greater in advanced age groups (≥75 or ≥85 years) and, in many cases, in women.

Excessive heat represents a significant physiological stress or capable of disrupting multiple body systems [8]. When ambient temperature exceeds the body’s capacity for heat dissipation the temperature rises, initiating a cascade of cardiovascular and metabolic responses aimed at maintaining thermal homeostasis. If these responses are insufficient or impaired, thermal imbalance ensues, potentially resulting in hyperthermia, multi-organ dysfunction, and, in extreme cases, death [9].

The mechanism of the harmful effects of heat on the human body is generally well understood [17,18]. First, heat accumulated because the body cannot get rid of the heat energy produced during metabolic processes and from external heat exposure (like high temperatures, high humidity, low wind, or the presence of heat sources). Second, when exposed to heat, the human body, in addition to adaptive physiological responses (like skin blood vessel dilation and increased sweating) [10,11], starts producing a huge amount of proteins, such as antidiuretic hormone, aldosterone, and cortisol [12,13], pro-inflammatory cytokines (interleukin 1β, interleukin 6, interferon-γ, C-reactive protein [14]), and heat shock proteins, which preserve protein integrity, prevent cell death, and increase heat tolerance [15,16]. Obviously, these metabolic processes will come with the release of extra heat in the cell and will inevitably create a problem for cell thermoregulation (see below). In addition, it has been shown that there is a connection between the level of human BHC and its ability to adapt to different climatic and geographical conditions. In particular, it has been shown that individuals with low BHC are better suited to the cold, while those with high BHC are better off in a hot climate [1].

Here it is necessary to briefly outline the essence of the concepts of cell thermoregulation (CT) and human BHC, that is, to clarify the concept of human BHC and where it came from. BHC is the physical manifestation of CT at the organism level. The essence of the CT is the elimination of the temperature difference between the nucleus and cytoplasm with the help of a dense layer of condensed chromatin (CC). The CC, the densest structure in an interphase cell, localized between the nucleus and cytoplasm, is made of chromosomal HRs. The density of CC packing, accordingly, its heat conductivity, depends on the quantity of chromosomal Q-HRs in its structure, which can affect its heat-conducting ability [1,3].

The transfer of thermal energy from the nucleus to the cytoplasm occurs through the CC layer, the density (and therefore heat conductivity) of which depends on the number of chromosomal Q-HRs in the nucleus. If an individual’s genome has few chromosomal Q-HRs, it is expected that the nuclei of their cells will have trouble getting rid of excess metabolic heat. If the dissipation of excess heat from the nucleus is difficult or impossible due to insufficient CC density, this can lead to thermal death of cells, with all the negative consequences that has for the whole body. Maybe that is why older individuals in the population turned out to be the most vulnerable group, having the lowest BHC. From the same perspective, we can also explain why women made up the majority of older adults who died from heat stress, since their genome lacks the Y chromosome, which contains the largest Q-HR block in the human karyotype.

Acknowledgement.

I apologize to those authors, whose works were not cited, or were cited only through reviews, owing to space limitations. 

Conflicts of Interest.  None. 

Funding. Funding has not been received for the study. 

Statement of Consent/Ethical Approval. Not required. 

References

Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.

img

Dr Elena Popa

It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Dr Nikolaos Andreas Chrysanthakopoulos

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee

img

Robert W McGee

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D

img

Aibing Rao

I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.

img

Kashani Mehdi

Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,

img

Alla Konstantinovna Politova