Why Haven't We Been Able to Reduce the Prevalence of Obesity?

Letter to Editor | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2692-9759/102

Why Haven't We Been Able to Reduce the Prevalence of Obesity?

  • F. Aguirre Palacios 1*
  • M. Fernanda Aguirre C 2
  • G. Celis 3

1 Kennedy Clinic in Guayaquil, Guayaquil, Guayas, Ecuador.

2 Cardiovascular Surgery Unit | Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain.

3 Clinical Research and Epidemiology. University of the Americas Ecuador.

*Corresponding Author: F. Aguirre Palacios, Kennedy Clinic in Guayaquil, Guayaquil, Guayas, Ecuador.

Citation: F. Aguirre Palacios, M. Fernanda Aguirre C., G. Celis, (2023), Why Haven't We Been Able to Reduce the Prevalence of Obesity? Cardiology Research and Reports. 5(3); DOI:10.31579/2692-9759/102

Copyright: © 2023, F. Aguirre Palacios. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Received: 26 June 2023 | Accepted: 14 July 2023 | Published: 21 July 2023

Keywords:

Abstract

To the Editor

This editorial is dedicated to the doctors, collaborators, and the educational unit Liceo Panamericano de Guayaquil from the IN.PE.TU program, who have trusted in an academic concern that is relevant, significant, and opens possibilities for research, analysis, and resolution with the following questions:

  1. Does Metabolic Syndrome exist in childhood?
  2. What are the parameters that clinically raise suspicion of it in children, and from what age?
  3. How can we quantify its prevalence?
  4. We still need to carry out the external validation of this proposal and understand its distribution by geographical area.

After a critical analysis of this objective, we have conducted a series of cross-sectional studies, allowing us to develop a proposal that aims to be innovative, reproducible, and cost-effective, to study the risk factors that lead to the presentation of metabolic syndrome in children from an early age, from puberty [1], which paves the way for the presence of Diabetes Mellitus in adulthood. This strategy requires: 1. a measuring tape, 2. a blood pressure monitor with a pediatric cuff, 3. a pencil. It is a simple and cost-effective triage that can be applied by paramedical personnel or educators in any geographical area.

It is suggested to screen, at the population level, children over 12 years old who are 1. sedentary for more than 3 hours in front of a computer screen, iPad, TV, or phone, 2. Those whose waist-to-height ratio is higher than 0.50 (in Guayaquil, it's 0.46. Each geographic area will have its cutoff point), and 3. whose brachial blood pressure measurement is above the 90th percentile in 3 consecutive readings. Thanks to Artificial Intelligence, these 3 indicators are mathematically sensitive in detecting Metabolic Syndrome with laboratory parameters. [2]

A prevalence of 33.9% of metabolic syndrome was observed in school children from 6 to 15 years old, with pathological cut-off points of: WHtR > 0.46, weight > 56.1 kg, pure sedentary lifestyle > 3 hours in front of the screen/playing video games, and SBP within the 90th percentile (> 123 mmHg). With these indicators, we can predict a probability of early diagnosis of metabolic syndrome of 97% to 100%. [3]

In conclusion

This proposal presents a feasible, innovative and cost-effective approach that, if validated, will be a promising alternative to determine the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in childhood. With this tool, implementing coordinated nutritional programs with sports might be applicable in early age.  This could change the course of the history of Obesity and promote a healthier and more resilient society.

This proposal requires external validation to confirm it in other populations.

References

Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.

img

Dr Elena Popa

It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Dr Nikolaos Andreas Chrysanthakopoulos

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee

img

Robert W McGee

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D

img

Aibing Rao

I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.

img

Kashani Mehdi

Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,

img

Alla Konstantinovna Politova