Why did not Poikilothermic Animals become Homeothermic?

Editorial | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-4861/713

Why did not Poikilothermic Animals become Homeothermic?

  • Abyt Ibraimov

International Higher School of Medicine, Intergelpo Str, 1F, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan.

*Corresponding Author: Abyt Ibraimov, International Higher School of Medicine, Intergelpo Str, 1F, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan.

Citation: Abyt Ibraimov, (2025), Why did not Poikilothermic Animals become Homeothermic?, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, 23(5); DOI:10.31579/2690-4861/713

Copyright: © 2025, Abyt Ibraimov. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Received: 07 February 2025 | Accepted: 18 February 2025 | Published: 25 February 2025

Keywords: .

Abstract

.,

Some animals maintain temperature homeostasis in the body due to external sources of energy (poikilothermy), others due to the energy of food consumption (homeothermy). Homeothermy (“warm bloodedness”) is maintained endothermically, i.e., by-product of metabolic heat. In poikilothermic animals (“cold bloodiness”), in contrast to homeothermic animals, body temperature passively follows the change of the environment temperature. It is known that homeothermy takes place when living beings has a high level of cellular metabolism. However, the cause of this high metabolic rate remains a source of controversy [Ruben 1995; Boldrinia et al., 2018]. Why did not poikilothermic animals become homeothermic? Because poikilothermic animals are unable to maintain high levels of cellular metabolism, the main source of heat energy, in the body. The problem is not due to a lack of cellular metabolism in poikilothermic organisms. The reason is the relatively low physical density of the layer of condensed chromatin around the nucleus, which, because of its low thermal conductivity, is not able to dissipate heat energy well into the cytoplasm and thus efficiently eliminate the temperature difference between them (cell thermoregulation) [Ibraimov 2003; 2020a,b]. Homeothermic animals can constantly maintain a relatively high body temperature (36 ⁰C - 42 ⁰C) for an indefinitely long time, and this is not related to the perfection of their cellular metabolism. They owe this peculiarity to the layer of condensed chromatin, possessing, in comparison with poikilotherms, high physical density (respectively, high thermal conductivity), which is able to effectively remove excessive heat from the nucleus. By excessive heat, we mean the state when the heat level exceeds the permissible level for a given animal species to such an extent that the normal molecular activity of the nucleus is disturbed [Ibraimov 2003; 2022]. Why is efficient and timely dissipation of excess heat from the nucleus so important? Because for the production of products necessary for cellular metabolism (ribosomes, RNA etc.) and normal implementation of complex molecular-genetic processes (repair, recombination, rearrangement, modification, restriction, replication, transcription, packaging, organized movement) in the nucleus, it is necessary to maintain an optimal temperature level here.  When the temperature increases in the nucleus, serious disturbances of these processes and their coordination as a whole occur, which can lead to severe consequences. In other words, the poikilotherms did not become homeotherms not because they are unable to produce much heat due to the imperfection of their cellular metabolism (metabolic heat production), but because their nuclei cease to function normally due to overheating, since excess heat is not dissipated from there efficiently [Ibraimov 2019; 2020b,c]. Why is the density of condensed chromatin layer around the nucleus lower in poikilothermic animals than in homeothermic animals? This circumstance is related to the peculiarities of chromosomal heterochromatin regions (HRs) in these organisms. The point is that the layer of condensed chromatin around the cell nucleus consists of chromosomal HRs (C- and Q-HRs) and chromosomal bands (C+, G+ and Q+ bands), which are very different in poikilothermic and homeothermic animals. In poikilothermic animals, with the exception of C-heterochromatin, chromosomal G+ and Q+ bands are either weakly expressed or absent. Whereas in homeothermic animals all chromosomal HRs and bands known to science are well manifested. And in the genome of humans and two other higher primates (chimpanzees and gorillas) besides C-heterochromatin there is also Q-heterochromatin, which corresponds to reality: humans have the most perfect thermoregulation system, then primates and other mammals [Ibraimov 2019; 2020c; 2022]. Thus, poikilothermic organisms did not become homeothermic not because their cellular metabolism is not perfect, but because they have not developed cell thermoregulation due to the low density of the layer of condensed chromatin around the nucleus not able to efficiently eliminate temperature differences between the nucleus and cytoplasm.

Acknowledgement.

I apologize to those authors, whose works were not cited, or were cited only through reviews, owing to space limitations. 

Conflicts of Interest.

None. 

Funding.

Funding has not been received for the study. 

Statement of Consent/Ethical Approval.

Not required.

References

Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.

img

Dr Elena Popa

It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Dr Nikolaos Andreas Chrysanthakopoulos

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee

img

Robert W McGee

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D

img

Aibing Rao

I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.

img

Kashani Mehdi

Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,

img

Alla Konstantinovna Politova