short communication | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-8794/030
Energy Systems Engineering Department, Engineering Faculty, Cinarcik Road 5th km, 77200, Yalova, Turkey
*Corresponding Author: Cemil Koyunoğlu, Energy Systems Engineering Department, Engineering Faculty, Cinarcik Road 5th km, 77200, Yalova, Turkey.
Citation: Cemil Koyunoğlu; which is more accurate SARS-CoV + MERS-CoV = SARS-CoV2 or SARS-CoV + MERS-CoV = MERS-CoV2? J, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. 2(4); DOI: 10.31579/2690-8794/030
Copyright: © 2020, Cemil Koyunoğlu: This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Common Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
Received: 23 July 2020 | Accepted: 27 July 2020 | Published: 10 August 2020
Keywords:
The functions of existing proteins are explained based on the proteins of previously known coronaviruses. While the role of most non-structural proteins in viral replication has been defined, the role of some is still not fully explained. Four structural proteins have an essential role in combining virion and being a target for coronavirus infection pathogenesis and drug development.
E protein
This protein activates protein by interacting with other proteins in the cell. The E protein is an important virulence factor that plays a role in bud’s separation from the cell. The assembly of viral parts plays a role in pathogenesis and virus release. Even though its role in pathogenesis is not fully known, the oligomerization of E proteins causes ion channel structure. If there is no E protein in the virus, the viral load in the host was found to be lower [1-23].
S protein
It is in the form of protrusions on the surface of the virus, on the viral envelope, and allows the virus to attach to the host cell by binding to the membrane and receptor fusion. It is an essential viral protein that determines host cell tropism. S protein has S2, and S1 loops, primarily S2 protein is responsible for membrane fusion, and S1 protein is responsible for binding to the host cell receptor. The S2 protein of 2019-nCoV is 93%, similar to bat-SLCoVZXC21 and bat-SL-CoVZC45. In S1 protein, this similarity is approximately 68%. Both the C and N terminal parts of the S1 loop can bind to the host cell receptor. Even though SARS-CoV and 2019-nCoV are among separate tribes, both viruses have 50 protected proteins in the S1 protein. This result; offers that the new coronavirus can use angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE 2) as a receptor as in SARS-CoV [1-23].
N protein
It plays a role in the regulation of transcription and replication of viral RNA. The N protein also acts as an interferon antagonist, thereby preventing the virus from being destroyed by the immune system. Along with M protein, they are envelope proteins that have a critical role in virus release and structure. It includes two domains that can bind the viral genome through various mechanisms. This protein binds to the nsp3 protein to provide contributes to the virion structure and binds the genome to RTK [1-23].
M protein
It plays a vital role in the cry of viral intracellular balance. This protein is essential for the host cell to become susceptible to the virus, enabling the activation of the Interferon-beta (IFN-beta) pathway through the Toll-like receptor-dependent mechanism [1-23].
Along with N protein, they are envelope proteins that have a significant role in virus release and structure. It has three transmembrane shapes virions (Virion = full virus particle), and sections, increases binds to the nucleocapsid, and the membrane curve. It helps the stabilization of the nucleocapsid protein. Hence, it helps the continuation and structure and the nucleocapsid-RNA complex [1-23].
Hemagglutinin Esterase Protein
It is found on the envelope, more privately, a protein located in beta coronaviruses. It permits the virus to link to the receptors, including sialic acid [1-23].
The natural host of coronaviruses are bats, and their growth is shaped in bats. It is confirmed that most coronaviruses in humans are derived from bat reservoirs. Bat belongs to SARS-CoV-2 and subgenus Sarbecovirus by various research groups. The genetic similarity of betacoronavirus has been confirmed. At the same time, MERS-CoV (roughly this degree of similarity with the genomes of 50%) or SARS-CoV (about 79%) was not found (Figure 1-3) [1,2,4,5,9,24-28].
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,