AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2692-9562/085
1 Department of Speech Therapy, School of Paramedical Sciences, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
2 Sinuses and Surgical Endoscopic Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
3 Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
*Corresponding Author: Zahra Ghayoumi-Anaraki, Department of Speech Therapy, School of Paramedical Sciences, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Citation: Zahra Ghayoumi-Anaraki, Azadeh Abedinzadeh, Ehsan Khadivi, Negin Moradi (2023), Vocal Rehabilitation after Provox Voice Prosthesis: A Longitudinal Case Report, Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology, 5(4); DOI:10.31579/2692-9562/085
Copyright: © 2023, Zahra Ghayoumi-Anaraki. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
Received: 02 February 2023 | Accepted: 20 March 2023 | Published: 30 March 2023
Keywords: laryngectomy; tracheoesophageal fistula; voice disorders; speech therapy
One of the most obvious consequences of total laryngectomy is the loss of voice. The Provox voice prosthesis is now the most commonly used prosthesis for voice rehabilitation. Nevertheless, few studies have examined voice therapy's conclusions in patients who use Provox.
In this prospective case study, multiple measures (acoustic, aerodynamic, and prosodic measures) were used to assess the changes in vocal function consequent to a voice therapy program. The subject is a seventy-year-old man referred to an ENT specialist because of five months of hoarseness in his voice. Ten days after operation, he still did not have ability of phonation. So, voice therapy was suggested for him. Acoustic, aerodynamic, and prosodic parameters and voice-related quality of life were analyzed in the first, eighth, and follow-up voice therapy sessions.
An improvement is seen in all of the parameters except the jitter. Our results indicate that structured voice rehabilitation following the use of Provox helps laryngectomee to improve their voice.
The prevalence of laryngeal cancer is estimated at 14.33 cases/year per 100,000 people [1, 2]. The use of tobacco, predominantly cigarette smoking, has been classified as the major risk factor for cancer of the glottic regions [3]. Men are affected approximately seven times more often than women, and most cases arise in people aged between 50 and 60 years [4]. In spite of the presentation of organ preservation protocols, total laryngectomy (TL) is one of the most common operations for advanced laryngeal cancers [5]. One of the most obvious consequences of total laryngectomy is the loss of the natural voice [6]. Human communication uses language conveyed through speech as a fundamental characteristic [7]. An altered vocal quality distresses not only the audible vocal sound associated with a person’s individuality but also has influence on the functional and psychological facets of vocal communication that for many patients lead to an unsettled social life [8].
Voice restoration after laryngectomy is a vital and challenging goal for head and neck surgeons and speech pathologists [1]. Three principal possibilities are currently possible for voice restoration after total laryngectomy: esophageal speech (ES), electrolarynx speech, and tracheoesophageal voice prosthesis (TEP) [9]. The use of a voice prosthesis following a tracheoesophageal puncture procedure is the gold standard in voice rehabilitation after laryngectomy [10, 11]. The technique of voice restoration involves creating a puncture connecting the trachea and esophagus, which is called tracheoesophageal puncture [12]. The voice prosthesis as a one-way valve is inserted into this puncture. This prosthesis lets air pushed up from the lungs pass through from the trachea and enter the esophagus. This can cause the esophagus walls (neoglottis) vibrate as a new voice. In tracheoesophageal speech, like in normal speech, the pulmonary air is used for voice production [13].
The Provox voice prosthesis is now the most commonly used prosthesis for voice rehabilitation [14, 15]. Nevertheless, in a system in which an artificial tool (the prosthesis) is substituted for the sphincteric action of the larynx, the adaptive modifications of vocal tract and respiratory function bear the effective rehabilitation and ought to be estimated and addressed predominantly during speech therapy [16]. Tracheoesophageal (TE) speech is considered more adequate and closer to normal in comparison with esophageal speech and electrolarynx speech. However, it often shows low audibility and intelligibility, which makes it a challenge for the patients to communicate [17]. Therefore, to make the voice quality closer to normal, training is needed.
Nevertheless, not many studies have examined the conclusions of voice therapy in tracheoesophageal speech (TE) with voice prosthesis. Terada T et al. in a retrospective study analyzed the effectiveness of the Provox2 voice prosthesis for voice rehabilitation following total laryngectomy. They found that 29 subject out of 32 subjects could restore their voices [18]. Kazi et al., compared perceptual assessment of voice, acoustic parameters and quality of life of ten female and 10 male total laryngectomies to 10 normal female speakers. They concluded that all the acoustic parameters and GRBAS ratings of the female laryngectomy patients were significantly worse as compared with the normal subjects [13].
In another study by Deore N et al. researchers compared acoustic features of 30 post-laryngectomy patients who were used tracheoesophageal (TE) prosthetic valves. They reported poorer values as well as larger variability for all the voice parameters for the total laryngectomy patients using TE voice compared with those of normal subjects which emphasis on speech therapy programs [10]. In another study, 80% of patients reported good speech after using the prosthesis [19]. In a prospective nonrandomized cross-sectional study, researchers evaluated the outcome of voice rehabilitation in people who were used Provox Prosthesis using GRBAS perceptual assessment. 21 out of 30 subjects have good voice based on GRBAS scale after one month speech therapy sessions [1]. Although there are some studies that were used structural voice rehabilitation after radiotherapy for participants with laryngeal cancer, to the best of our knowledge any of mentioned studies do not report structural program for voice therapy.
In summary, investigations into the effectiveness of structured voice therapy in patients after laryngectomy and tracheoesophageal puncture are rare. So, in this prospective case study, multiple measures (acoustic, aerodynamic, and prosodic measures) were used to assess the changes of vocal function consequent to a structured voice therapy.
Participant
The subject was a seventy-year old man who was referred to an ENT specialist because of five months of hoarseness in his voice. He declared that he had smoked one pack (20 cigarettes) daily for the last fifty years. With stroboscopic assessment of vocal fold and biopsy, the patient was diagnosed with laryngeal cancer. As his laryngeal cancer was in the T4 stage, the otolaryngologist suggested total laryngectomy. In February 2017, the laryngectomy surgery and in July, the tracheoesophageal puncture was performed (secondary TE). Traditionally, a secondary procedure is selected for patients at higher risk of troubles, as it provides more time for enough healing of the laryngostoma before formation of the tracheoesophageal puncture [20]. At the same time, he underwent implantation of a Provox prosthesis.
Ten days after tracheoesophageal puncture and implantation of prosthesis, he still did not have the ability of phonation. So, voice therapy was suggested for him. Patient had good cognitive abilities and was able to complete questionnaires (personal information and voice related quality of life).
Voice therapy program A structured protocol, shown in table 1, was used to conduct the voice rehabilitation at the Imam Reza hospital, Mashhad, Iran. Voice rehabilitation was carried out by trained SLP in the research group. It comprised 8 specified voice rehabilitation sessions of 30 minutes each and consisted of relaxation, respiration, posture, and phonation training.
| Treatment plan | Session number |
Basic exercises: relaxation, posture, and breathing. Emphasis on finding abdominal activity in breathing. Explanation of voice physiology. Beginning phonation with syllables which started with unvoiced fricatives (such as ha). | 1 |
Duplication of the first session, phonation which is expanded to voiced sounds and syllables. | 2 |
Repeat basic exercises, continue phonation exercises with repeated syllables (exe. baba), short words. Beginning of producing short phrases. | 3 |
Repeat and expand exercises in session 3. Intonation exercises and producing stressed syllables start. | 4 |
Phonation is accompanied by physical movements (like hand movement or walking). Longer phrases. | 5 |
Repetition of previous tasks. Put attention on words and phrases with different lengths and emphasize on appropriate resonance. Articulation exercises in order to produce relaxed speech. | 6 |
The use of learned techniques in reading, and conversation. Focusing on suitable pausing, eye contact with listener (pragmatic skills). | 7 |
| Focusing on loudness as well as intelligible speech. | 8 |
Table 1. Descriptions of the Voice Rehabilitation Sessions [8, 21].
Data collection and measurements
All the assessments and analysis were done in the first and eighth sessions of therapy and 2 weeks after discharge (as follow-up session) except acoustic analysis which was performed in the third session of therapy (the time patient is about to be capable of sustaining /a/ vowel for 3 seconds at least) instead of first session.
Acoustic analysis
The record and acoustic voice analyses were carried out using the Praat program [22] at a sampling frequency of 44.1 kHz, and with the use of 3-second samples from the middle of the vowel /a/. The signal record was performed inside a soundproof room with a microphone (Sony ECM - MS907) 10cm away from the mouth.
From this recording, the following acoustic measures were completed: mean fundamental frequency (F0), shimmer, jitter, and harmonics-to-noise ratio (HNR):
Aerodynamic analysis
Maximum phonation time (MPT) is expressed as the longest period a person can maintain a vowel in one exhalation and the most commonly used vowel is /a/ [26].
Prosody of speech
The PEPS-C (Profiling Elements of Prosody in Speech-Communication) test is a prosody assessment procedure [27]. The Persian version is provided by Ghorbani, khoddami et al. [28]. In this test, both receptive and expressive abilities are examined in analogous tasks; however, only the expressive component was employed in the current study (table 2).
| PEPS-C Subtest | Prosodic Skill Assessed | Example |
Expressive Affect
| Production of intonation indicating like or dislike at word level (1–2 syllables)
| Provided with a visual cue (e.g., picture of apple and a happy face). Response: Pronounce ‘apple’ with intonation indicating pleasure |
Expressive Contrastive Stress
| Production of intonation indicating emphatic stress at Phrase level (6–7 syllables)
| Auditory cue (e.g., ‘The BLUE sheep has the ball’) presented with a visual cue (e.g., a picture of a red sheep). Response: Participant is required to say “No, the RED sheep has the ball’ |
| Expressive Chunking | Production of prosodic phrasing at phrase level (6–7 syllables)
| Presented with a visual cue (a picture of 3 nouns such as ‘fruit, salad, and cream’). Response: Pronounce the items from the picture in a phrase |
| Expressive Turn-End | Production of intonation indicating a question or statement at word level (1–2 syllables) | Provided with a visual cue (e.g., picture of apple and a question mark). Response: Pronounce ‘apple’ with rising intonation |
Table 2. Expressive Prosodic Skills [29]
Voice related quality of life
The Voice related quality of life (V-RQOL) is a 10-item questionnaire designed for the patient to respond it. It quantifies the magnitude of voice related problems experienced by patients [30]. This questionnaire was created by Hogikyan and Sethuraman [31] and also, adapted in Persian [32].
The participant scores in each of the evaluated parameters present in figures 1-4. Point 1 for acoustic parameters (figure1) is third session, 2 is the eighth session, and 3 is two weeks after discharge (follow-up session). In other figures point is first session, 2 is the eighth session, and 3 is two weeks after discharge (follow-up session).
Figure 1: Analysis of acoustic features (fundamental frequency (Hz), jitter (%), shimmer (db) and harmonic to noise ratio (%)).
Figure 2: Analysis of expressive prosodic features.
Figure 3: Analysis of maximum phonation time.
Figure 4: Analysis of voice related quality of life (V-RQOL).
In this study, we examined one patient with a tracheoesophageal voice prosthesis. The patient’s voice during vowel /a/ phonation was recorded in the first and eighth sessions of voice therapy and two weeks afterwards. Subsequently, F0, jitter, shimmer and HNR were extracted, and the mean values were compared. MPT and V-RQOL scores were recorded before and immediately after termination of the voice therapy and additionally, after two weeks.
Acoustic parameters
In the first part, the mean F0 value was compared before and after treatment. F0 is generally related to the amount of elasticity and stiffness of vocal folds [33].
Arials et al. described that the fundamental frequency of patients who use voice prosthesis was lower than that of people with normal voice (97.59 vs. 120.30) [17]. The F0 value of the studied subject (270Hz) was higher than the mean F0 of people of the same age/sex (127 Hz) [34, 35]. After voice therapy sessions and in the follow-up session, a decreased fundamental frequency was observed which indicates getting closer to the mean of fundamental frequency in people with normal voice.
The second part of this study focused on the turbulence of frequency (jitter) and voice amplitude (shimmer). Shimmer is associated with the amplitude variation of the sound wave and appears to be a fundamental acoustic factor that is perceptually well sensed by listeners [36]. It proliferates with poor and inconstant interaction between the vocal fold edges [37]. In acoustical analysis of tracheoesophageal voice, higher shimmer values were found (38) and in Arias (2000) study, comparison of the group with normal voices and the phonatory prosthesis group, was noteworthy for shimmer [17]. These people use the esophagus for vocalization, and as a result, because the esophagus does not have the same elasticity as vocal folds, it does not make good contact, and as a result, the shimmer is higher than in people who use vocal folds for vocalization.
In our studied subject, shimmer was high (24dB) in the third session of therapy, but after the eighth session it lessened to 21.55dB. Although it shows the usefulness of the voice therapy process on tracheoesophageal prosthetic voice, it is higher than normal which is reported as 0.31 dB- 0.47dB [8]. But in the follow-up session, it increased expressing the need for more voice therapy sessions. Our study is in line with other research that reported a significant difference between shimmer in normal voice and voices of people who use prosthesis [10, 13]. For instance, Deore N et al reported shimmer of 6.77% in TEP patients compared to 0.95% in people with normal voice [10].
Jitter is concurrent with roughness [39]. The jitter in our participant was 4.9% in third session of voice therapy. After 8th session of voice therapy and also in follow-up sessions, the jitter was 6.21 and 6.47, respectively. Nevertheless, Arias (2000) reported jitter values of 3.96 percent in patients that received total laryngectomy who had a phonatory fistuloplasty with a Herrmann voice prosthesis [31]. Kazi et al and Deore et al reported this value as 5.9% and 2.18%, respectively. All these reports of jitter are higher than normal that is reported by Tuomi L, Björkner E, Finizia C [8].
The jitter is affected primarily by the lack of control of vocal folds’ vibration [23] Using esophasial instead of vocal folds can be an interpretation of higher jitter in people who use prosthesis to phonate. Also, considering the correspondence of jitter with roughness, which can be due to the efforts of the subject for phonation, we can determine the need for continuing voice therapy sessions to reduce or eliminate roughness, and gain more control over phonation.
HNR is used to assess the ratio between periodic and non-periodic components comprising a division of voiced speech [25]. In our study, the mean HNR for our patient was 1.4, 1.55, and 1.28 in the third, eighth, and follow-up sessions, respectively. In a similar study in which the average age of participants was 61.3 years, the authors found that the average HNR of tracheoesophageal speech is 4.28±3.83 [16]. In tracheoesophageal voice, there are more noisy components than in harmonic tones. As these patients don’t phonate with their larynx, it seems HNR is the main challenge for them.
Aerodynamic parameter
MPT has been used to objectify the degree of rigorousness of dysphonia and to designate the consequences of voice therapy [40]. laryngeal speakers have a longer MPT than patients with a Provox voice prosthesis [15]. Our studied participant sustained /a/ vowel just 1 sec in the third voice therapy session, which increased to 6 and 10 seconds in eighth and follow-up sessions respectively. Siric et al. reported mean MPT of 6.92±5.44 sec for the TE speakers [14]. Also, MPT was reported to be higher than 7s [1], 6.86s [10] and 8-28s [18] in TE speakers, which is in line with results of the current study. This can be explained by the fact that TE speakers have reduced breath support due to varying amounts of air leakage at the stoma occlusion. [10].
Prosodic features
As is reported in the literature, the quality of alaryngeal speech is low, with a loss of prosodic features [38, 41]. Also, Haderlein et al. reported that the prosodic features of tracheoesophageal speakers and laryngeal speakers were significantly different [42]. We examined Expressive Turn-End, Expressive Affect, Expressive Chunking and Expressive Contrastive Stress as part of expressive prosody using PEPS-C software. The results showed that these items improved after treatment and patient sustained this improvement in the follow-up session.
Voice related quality of life
V-RQOL is an eminent self-reported questionnaire which measures the effects of voice disorders on patients’ quality of life [30].
Decreasing the scores of V-RQOL in the first, the eighth and the follow-up sessions was an indicator of efficiency of voice therapy on improving the quality of life for patients with Provox prosthesis. In line with present study, Kazi et al reported a significant to severe voice handicap in 40% of female laryngectomy patients when compared with only 20% of male patients [13]. Van Gogh also reported an improvement on the Voice Handicap Index (VHI) in patients receiving voice therapy [40].
Conclusion
Our results indicate that structured voice rehabilitation following using Provox helps patients improve their communication abilities, especially in prosodic features, MPT, and quality of life. Therefore, treatment by structured voice therapy can be part of the voice rehabilitation program of people who have undergone a laryngectomy and use vocal prosthesis, similar to some other voice disorders in which this type of programs is being followed [8].
There is also potential for further investigations into structured voice rehabilitation for individuals who have had their larynx removed, as well as active participation and diligent efforts on the part of the surgeon, speech pathologist, and patients and their families.
Acknowledgment
This work was supported by Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (MUMS) [grant NO. 951193]. MUMS had no further role in study design, collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, writing of the report, and in the decision to submit the paper for publication.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
