Venetoclax-Associated Leukocytoclastic Vasculitis: A Rare Case

Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-4861/1087

Venetoclax-Associated Leukocytoclastic Vasculitis: A Rare Case

  • Atakan Tekinalp 1*
  • Talha Fatih Karabekmez 2
  • Naile Kökbudak 3
  • Mustafa Merter 1
  • Sinan Demircioğlu 1

1Necmettin Erbakan Univercity Faculty of Medicine, Division of Internal Medicine, Department of Hematology, Konya, Turkey.

2Necmettin Erbakan Univercity Faculty of Medicine, Division of Internal Medicine, Konya, Turkey.

3Necmettin Erbakan Univercity Faculty of Medicine, Division of Pathology, Konya, Turkey.

*Corresponding Author: Atakan Tekinalp, Yunus Emre Neighborhood, Beyşehir Street, Necmettin Erbakan Univercity Faculty of Medicine Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine Division of Hematology, Konya, Turkey.

Citation: Atakan Tekinalp, Talha F. Karabekmez, Naile Kökbudak, Mustafa Merter, Sinan Demircioğlu, (2026), Venetoclax-Associated Leukocytoclastic Vasculitis: A Rare Case, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, 35(4); DOI:10.31579/2690-4861/1087

Copyright: © 2026, Atakan Tekinalp. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Received: 02 April 2026 | Accepted: 28 April 2026 | Published: 04 May 2026

Keywords: venetoclax; vasculitis; acute myeloid leukemia

Abstract

Venetoclax, a selective BCL-2 inhibitor, is widely used in combination with hypomethylating agents as first-line therapy for elderly or unfit patients with AML. Although its safety profile is generally well established, rare immune-mediated adverse events have been scarcely reported. Herein, we present a 62-year-old male patient with AML who developed LCV shortly after initiation of venetoclax in combination with azacitidine. On the fourth day of treatment, the patient developed non-blanching, raised hyperemic skin lesions predominantly in the pretibial region. Following discontinuation of venetoclax and initiation of systemic corticosteroid therapy, the lesions regressed completely. The patient was subsequently treated with azacitidine monotherapy without recurrence of vasculitic manifestations and achieved hematologic remission. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of venetoclax-associated leukocytoclastic vasculitis. This case highlights the importance of considering vasculitis in the differential diagnosis of early-onset cutaneous lesions during venetoclax therapy.

Introduction

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most common acute leukemia in adults, accounting for approximately 1% of all adult malignancies and nearly 2% of cancer-related mortality. The median age at diagnosis is approximately 68 years, with a marked increase in incidence with advancing age [1]. In elderly patients or in those who are unfit for conventional intensive chemotherapy regimens containing cytarabine, the combination of the hypomethylating agent azacitidine and the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax has emerged as an effective treatment option and has become one of the standard first-line therapeutic approaches in this patient population[2]. Venetoclax selectively binds to the antiapoptotic BCL-2 protein, leading to the release of proapoptotic proteins and thereby reactivating apoptosis in tumor cells through the intrinsic apoptotic pathway. Due to the associated risk of tumor lysis syndrome, venetoclax is administered using a dose ramp-up protocol [3,4]. During venetoclax treatment, non-specific adverse effects such as diarrhea, nausea, and fatigue are relatively uncommon, whereas the most frequently reported adverse events—both with monotherapy and in combination with hypomethylating agents or cytarabine—are cytopenias (particularly neutropenia and thrombocytopenia) and infections [5]. Herein, we report an AML case complicated by leukocytoclastic vasculitis (LCV), a rare adverse event potentially associated with venetoclax treatment, and review the possible etiopathogenetic mechanisms in light of the literature

Case Presentation

A 62-year-old male patient presented with complaints of dyspnea, fatigue, and fever. His general condition was fair, and vital signs were as follows: arterial blood pressure 110/70 mmHg, heart rate 92 beats/min, and body temperature 38.1 °C. Physical examination revealed no pathological findings other than conjunctival pallor. Laboratory evaluation demonstrated pancytopenia on complete blood count (WBC: 1,450/µL, neutrophils: 350/µL, hemoglobin: 7.7 g/dL, platelets: 62,000/µL). Serum biochemistry showed elevated C-reactive protein (195.3 mg/L) and procalcitonin (14.7 ng/mL) levels. Electrolyte levels, renal function tests, transaminases, and basic coagulation parameters were within normal limits. Peripheral blood smear revealed hypolobulated neutrophils, anisocytosis and hypochromia in erythrocytes, and approximately 6–7 platelets per high-power field. The patient was hospitalized with a preliminary diagnosis of febrile neutropenia for etiological evaluation. After obtaining blood cultures, empiric piperacillin/tazobactam therapy (4 × 4.5 g) was initiated. As no recurrent fever was observed during follow-up, blood cultures remained negative, and no infectious focus was identified on clinical evaluation, antibiotic therapy was discontinued on day 10. Due to persistent cytopenias, bone marrow aspiration and biopsy were performed. The bone marrow was hypercellular with a blast percentage of 18%, accompanied by dysmegakaryopoiesis (>10%) and dyserythropoiesis (>10%). Molecular analysis using next-generation sequencing (NGS) revealed mutations in TP53SF3B1, and EZH2 genes, with allele fractions of 70%, 37%, and 32%, respectively. Based on these findings, the patient was diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia. Considering the patient’s age (>60 years) and history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, he was deemed unfit for conventional intensive chemotherapy, and combination therapy with azacitidine (75 mg/m², days 1–7, every 28 days) and venetoclax (400 mg/day) was planned. On the fourth day of treatment, hyperemic skin lesions that were raised, non-blanching, and showed a tendency to coalesce developed, being widespread in the pretibial area and milder on the back, with progression over several days (Figure 1A). Suspecting a drug-related reaction, treatment was discontinued. Following punch biopsy, methylprednisolone (1 mg/kg/day) was initiated. On day 10 of steroid therapy, marked regression and fading of the skin lesions were observed (Figure 1B). 

Figure 1: (A) Non-blanching, raised hyperemic pretibial skin lesions observed on day 4 of treatment, (B) On day 10 of steroid therapy.Figure 1: (A) Non-blanching, raised hyperemic pretibial skin lesions observed on day 4 of treatment, (B) On day 10 of steroid therapy.

Skin biopsy revealed dense neutrophilic infiltrates surrounding vascular structures in the dermis, consistent with leukocytoclastic vasculitis (Figure 2). 

Figure 2: Perivascular mononuclear inflammatory infiltrate with neutrophils (blue arrow) and endothelial swelling of the vessels (yellow arrows). (A) Hematoxylen&Eosin, 200x, (B) PAS, 200x

During etiological evaluation, antinuclear antibody (ANA), antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA), cryoglobulin, and viral serological tests were all negative. After achieving clinical improvement, steroid therapy was gradually tapered and discontinued over four weeks. Treatment was continued with azacitidine monotherapy. Given the risk of recurrence, venetoclax was not reintroduced in subsequent cycles, and no vasculitis-like skin lesions developed during follow-up. The patient is currently in the sixth month of azacitidine therapy and is being followed in hematologic remission.

Discussion

LCV may occur in the setting of hematologic malignancies either through paraneoplastic mechanisms related to the underlying disease itself or secondary to chemotherapeutic and targeted agents [6,7]. The absence of distinctive findings in clinical features as well as coagulation, viral, and serological tests allowed the exclusion of conditions that may cause similar skin lesions, such as infection, autoimmune diseases, and thrombotic microangiopathy. The diagnosis of LCV was further confirmed by pathological examination. Given the rapid onset of vasculitic findings shortly after the initiation of venetoclax, the clinical picture was considered to be associated with venetoclax therapy. The regression of lesions following discontinuation of venetoclax and initiation of steroid treatment, along with the absence of recurrence under azacitidine monotherapy, further supports this association. Although LCV typically develops within 7–10 days following drug exposure, earlier or delayed onset has been reported in chemotherapy-related cases. Rajer et al. described a case that developed on day 22 of carboplatin treatment, whereas Lunge reported an AML patient who developed LCV presenting with erythematous plaques on the second day of azacitidine cure 8,9. In our case, vasculitis developed relatively early, on the fourth day of venetoclax treatment. In studies demonstrating the efficacy of venetoclax in AML, the most frequently reported adverse events, apart from hematologic abnormalities and febrile neutropenia, are non-specific gastrointestinal side effects such as decreased appetite, nausea, vomiting, and constipation. In addition, hypokalemia, peripheral edema, and atrial fibrillation have also been reported [2,5]. Most of these adverse events are of grade 1–2 severity. A review of the literature revealed no previously reported cases of vasculitis associated with venetoclax. In this regard, our case represents a unique and noteworthy contribution to the existing literature Venetoclax is a potent targeted agent that induces cellular apoptosis through BCL-2 inhibition [3]. It may be hypothesized that increased apoptosis and antigen release contribute to an increase in circulating immune complexes, thereby triggering vasculitic processes through a type III hypersensitivity mechanism. In addition, apoptosis of endothelial cells and alterations in cytokine release may predispose to the development of microvascular inflammation [6]. However, these mechanisms have not yet been clearly elucidated in clinical studies.  In conclusion, early-onset cutaneous lesions in AML patients receiving venetoclax therapy should not be attributed solely to infection or thrombocytopenia-related bleeding but should also be carefully evaluated for leukocytoclastic vasculitis. Early recognition and appropriate management are essential to prevent unnecessary treatment interruptions and to avoid potential systemic involvement.

Conflict of Interest

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding 

Funding Statement The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study, as well as the related materials and software applications, are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. All data comply with field standards.

Declaration of Helsinki

This study was performed in line with the principles of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Declaration of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the manuscript preparation process

During the preparation of this manuscript, the authors used ChatGPT (OpenAI) for language editing and improvement of readability. After using this tool, the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full responsibility for the content of the published article.

Acknowledgments:

The authors thank the Necmettin Erbakan University Medicine Faculty department of Hematology Clinic for assistance in patient care and follow-up. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images.

References

Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.

img

Dr Elena Popa

It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Dr Nikolaos Andreas Chrysanthakopoulos

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee

img

Robert W McGee

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D

img

Aibing Rao

I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.

img

Kashani Mehdi

Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,

img

Alla Konstantinovna Politova