AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Review Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2641-0419/020
1* Department of Cardiology, Military Hospital “Dr. Carlos Arvelo” Caracas, Venezuela.
*Corresponding Author: Tania T. Muñoz H, Department of Cardiology, Military Hospital “Dr. Carlos Arvelo” Caracas, Venezuela.
Citation: Tania T. Muñoz H. (2019) Vasoreactivity Test to evaluate the Pulmonary Vascular Resistance and Mean Pulmonary Arterial Pressure by Doppler Echocardiography. J.ClinicalCardiologyandCardiovascularInterventions, 2(3); Doi.Org:10.31579/2641-0419/020
Copyright: © 2019 Tania T. Muñoz H. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 09 October 2019 | Accepted: 04 November 2019 | Published: 11 November 2019
Keywords: vasoreactivity test; pulmonary vascular resistance; pulmonary arterial pressure; doppler echocardiography
The pulmonary vascular reactivity test (PVRT) is essential to define patients with pulmonary hypertension(PH) responders to calcium antagonist treatment, this is possible evaluating the changes registered in the 3 hemodynamic variables: pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), mean pulmonary arterial pressure(MPAP) and cardiac output(CO).Cardiac catheterization is unquestionably the gold standard for performing the test, but its application implies high costs, technical boarding limitations, risks and complications minor to serious inherent to the procedure. On the other hand, Doppler echocardiography is harmless and economical, offering in the last 15 years a considerable advance in techniques and practical methods for estimating these variables, being the most analyzed and documented to date, the PVR.
In this study we will review the different echocardiographic equations proposed by different authors to calculate the PVR and MPAP, in all cases, comparing the results obtained with the measurements made by the right heart catheterization (RHC) .The results obtained in them will be briefly mentioned and will give an important reference to the reader of a study done in our research center, where we grant a new use to the non-invasive measurement of MPAP applied in the PVRT.
| ABBREVI A T I ONS | ||
| and ACRONYMS | ||
| PVRT = pulmonary vascular reactivity test | ||
| PH = pulmonary hypertension | ||
| PVR = pulmonary vascular resistance | ||
| MPAP = mean pulmonary arterial | ||
| presssure | ||
| CO = cardiac output | ||
| RHC : right heart catheterization | ||
| TR= tricuspid regurgitantion | ||
| TRV=peak tricuspid regurgitant velocity | ||
| TVIRVOT = right ventricular outflow tract | ||
| time-velocity integral | ||
| ∆PR = transvalvular pressure gradient of | ||
| pulmonary regurgitation | ||
| tSm = systolic velocity of tricuspid | ||
| annulus | ||
| ∆CAP= capillary arterial pressure | ||
| gradient | ||
| PAT= pulmonary acceleration time | ||
| PPE= pre-ejection period | ||
| TT= total ystolic time | ||
| ∆PRi²=gradient derived of initial peak | ||
| velocity of pulmonary regurgitation | ||
| ∆PmRT= mean pressure gradient of | ||
| tircuspid regurgitantion | ||
| RAP= right atrial pressure | ||
| PCP= pulmonary capillary pressure | ||
| PAH= Pulmonary arterial hypertension | ||
| HR= heart rate | ||
| SPAP=systolic pulmonary artery pressure | ||
| RVSP= Right ventricular systolic pressure | ||
| WU= Wood Units | ||
Several echocardiographic methods have been proposed to allow the calculation of the PVR, some incorporate the ratio of peak tricuspid regurgitant velocity (TRV) / right ventricular outflow tract time-velocity integral (TVIRVOT) [1-4](figure 1); other authors used different approaches and / or variables, such as the transvalvular pressure gradient of pulmonary regurgitation(∆PR),[5] systolic velocity of tricuspid annulus (tSm),[6] capillary arterial pressure gradient (∆CAP), [7] the E / E´septal ratio [8] and the ratio (pre-ejection period(PPE)/ pulmonary acceleration time (PAT)) / total systolic time (TT).[9]
MeanPulmonary arterial pressure (MPAP),is an indispensable hemodynamic variable for the diagnosis, classification and prognosis of Pulmonary Hypertension (PH). Its quantification is performed invasively and non-invasively by Doppler echocardiography. Masuyama [10] proposed its measurement by the transvalvular diastolic pulmonary gradient derived from the initial maximum velocity of pulmonary regurgitation (ΔPRi2) corresponding closely to the invasive measurement. Kitabatake et al[11], suggested estimating MPAP through the calculation of PAT, complemented with the study of pulmonary flow morphology. Chemla et al[12], proposed a method derived from the maximum velocity of TR and quantification of SPAP with the modified Bernoulli equation obtaining values close to those obtained invasively. Another equation derived from TR, is based on the estimation of the mean pressure gradient (∆PmTR) and the RAP, enunciated by Aduen et al. [13]
Until now, none of these equations has been recommended by the American and European Cardiology Society guidelines on diagnosis and treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension (PH), [14] leaving its measurement reliably reserved for RHC [14-16]. The same happens to the pulmonary vascular reactivity test where the measurements of these variables are essential to evaluate the diagnostic and therapeutic goal [17-20]. In this work we will review studies that propose echocardiographic measurements of the hemodynamic variables PVR and MPAP involved in the test.
PVR is an essential hemodynamic variable for the management of patients with cardiovascular and pulmonary pathologies. Its measurement can be performed invasively with the Swan Ganz catheter or Judkins catheter from the ratio of the pressure gradient and the transpulmonary flow (MPAP-
PCP/CO). [21-23] This variable is essential to assess the afterload imposed on the right ventricle, especially in patients affected by PH. Figure 2
summarizes the different uses and applications of the PVR. Abbas et al [2], of the Department of Cardiology of the Mayo Clinic; Scottsdale, Arizona, California; in 2003, they proposed a simple Doppler echocardiographic equation PVR = TRV / TVIRVOT 10 + 0.16. According to this author, the TRV could correspond to the measurement of the pressure gradient and TVIRVOT with the cardiac flow, both obtained invasively. He reported in his study a high correlation when comparing both methods (R2 = 0.92). However, this work presented a great limitation by excluding patients with moderate and severe tricuspid regurgitation, representing the sector most in need and probably most benefited with this measurement. Subsequently, publications aimed at validating this work [24-29] discussing its content [4,5,8] or establish different approaches and hemodynamic variables. [6,9]
Prior to this publication, Scapellato et al [9] ,of the Rehabilitation Medical Center, Division of Cardiology, Veruno, Italy (2001); determined an index for the calculation of the PVR =PPE / PAT / TT; demonstrating that a value> 2.6 predicts an pulmonary vascular resistance obtained by catheterization (PVRcath> 2.5 Wood units (WU). Years later, this equation was questioned by Haddad et al [3], since it was not applicable in their work due to low correlation (R2 = 0.30).
Gudurevan et al, [6] of the Division of Cardiology at the University of California, in 2007, stated an inverse relationship between the estimation of systolic velocity of tricuspid annulus (tSm) by tissue doppler and the PVR; determining that a velocity <10> 12.5 WU. They obtained a high correlation with cardiac catheterization (R2 = 0.71). The proposed equation was: PVR = 3698-1227 x ln(tSm).
Vlahos et al [24] (2008), Stanford University and California; Loannina University, Greece; conducted a prospective study in 12 liver transplant candidates and obtained PVRcath. They analyzed the TRV / TVIRVOT and TVR / TVIRVOT index, corrected for the diameter of the RVOT, finding that both correlated well with PVRcath R2 = 0.711 and R2 = 0.731, respectively.
Haddad et al [3] of Stanford University, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine (2009), proposed the index to obtain PVR = systolic pulmonary artery pressure (SPAP) / heart rate (HR) x TVIRVOT in a group of patients with Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). They concluded that a cut-off value of 0.076 provides 86% sensitivity and 82% specificity to determine a pulmonary vascular resistance index (PVRI)cath greater than 15 WU / m2.
Dahiya et al [8] of the School of Medicine, of the University of Queensland, Australia in 2010; They proposed the following echocardiographic equation: PVR = [Right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) - E / E' septal] / TVIRVOT reporting high correlation with the invasive method (R2 = 0.77). In this work, the authors found that when comparing the PVR measurements obtained by the Abbas method with the RHC these were underestimated, recommending their method by not presenting this limitation.
Lindqvist et al [7] of the Department of Cardiology of the University of Umea, Sweden (2011); described a more arithmetic calculation from the PVR = 0.95 × [(MPAP - 10) / cardiac output (CO)] - 0.29; the correlation reported with RHC was R2 = 0.87.
Opotoswky and at [4] of the Children's Hospital of the Department of Cardiology, Boston (2013), published a paper (217 patients) where they validated and then compared 2 equations with the one stated by Abbas et al (2003) (model 1). The derived models were: RVP = 1.2 × SPAP / TVIRVOT (model 2) and PVR = (SPAP / TVIRVOT) +3; if the systolic notch is present (model 3). They found that model 1 systematically underestimated the mesurement PVR by catheterization. Model 3 was better correlated with PVRcath(R2 = 0.80 vs; R2 = 0.73 and R2 = 0.77 for models 1 and 2, respectively). This approach generated discomfort in Abbas et al (Department of Cardiology of the System of Health Beaumont, Royal Oak, Michigan), because precisely in 2013, they published an article that seemed to solve the representative exclusion of patients with high PVR in their first job. To this end, they postulated a new equation: PVR = TRV² / TVIRVOT x 5–0.4, for patients with high PVR values, finding that a TRV / TVIRVOT index ≥ 0.275 defined the cut-off point for PVRcath> 6 UW. Currently his two works have wide recognition and acceptance in the medical community.
Yan et al [29], of the Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Echocardiography of the National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Cardiovascular Institute and Hospital of Fuwai Beijing, China (2015), estimated the PVR = MPAP-PCP / CO. They combined the Doppler echocardiogram to obtain MPAP and pulmonary capillary pressure (PCP) with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) to quantify the CO.
Kaga et al [5] in the year 2017 of the Faculty of Medical Sciences of the University of Kita, Sapporo, Japan; They stated an equation based on the difference in the initial diastolic and final diastolic pressure gradient obtained through pulmonary regurgitation (PR) and cardiac output of the left ventricular outflow tract (COLVOT), . They analyzed the linear correlation between the Abbas equations (2003 and 2013) and the Scapellato equation with catheterization, obtaining correlation coefficients of 0.54. 0.66 and 0.54 respectively. They reported that the best correlation with catheterization was obtained by their equation (R2= 0.81).
II) Mean pulmonary arterial pressure: Mean Pulmonary artery pressure (MPAP) is an indispensable hemodynamic variable for the diagnosis, classification and prognosis of Pulmonary Hypertension (PH). Its quantification is performed invasively by right heart cathererization (RHC) and non-invasively by Doppler echocardiography thanks to different authors have channeled efforts to offer different equations. Kitabatake et al [11] of the First Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka University Medical School, Osaka, Japan in 1983, demonstrated possible its estimation starting of the PAT obtained with pulsed Doppler in the RVOT, with the relationship PAT/ right ventricular ejection time (RVET) and they described different patrons of flow with the midsystolic notching, in cases severs of PH. Dabestani et al [30], from the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Orange, California, USA in 1987, validated the flow velocity patterns and found that in patients with an acceleration time of 120 ms or less, there was a negative linear correlation with MPAP, expressed by the equation: MPAP = 90 - (0.62 X PAT) and a PAT≤100 ms corresponded to high pulmonary arterial pressure(sensitivity 78%, specificity 100%). Chemla et al [12], proposed a method derived from the maximum velocity of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) and quantification of systolic pulmonary artery pressure (PSAP) with the modified Bernoulli: PMAP= 0.61xPSAP+1.95 Another equation derived from TR is based on the estimation of the mean pressure gradient (∆PmTR) and the right atrial pressure(RAP), stated by Aduen et al. [13] from Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA in 2009;. reporter in theirs work superiority in theirs method by finding an average difference of MPAP values with respect to the RHC of -1.6, less than the SPAP traditionally obtained with TR (-3.6) and comparing it with the PR method (-13.9) In a recent retrospective work [31] where they compared the 3 methods analyzed in this study, among others, with invasively obtained measurements, they found superiority with the Aduen equation. Also when this author compared his method, the Chemla equation and the Syyed equation with the measurements obtained invasively, he found a discrete superiority in his method [32]. Table 2 summarizes the echocardiographic equations to calculate the MPAP.
Right catheterization and PVRT:
At present, right catheterization is still considered as the gold standard for the definitive diagnosis of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and the method of choice to perform PVRT. [14] According to the guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology, this study is indicated for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with group 1: idiopathic PAH, hereditary PAH and associated with drug use [14] Through this procedure it is possible to evaluate the behavior of pulmonary vascular circulation before the stimulation of drugs that they produce acute dilation, making possible the diagnosis of patients who will respond to calcium antagonist treatment [14]. Until some time ago, there were multiple definitions of positivity in the vascular reactivity test which included a decrease of more than 20% of the PVR, without changes in cardiac output or a decrease in both MPAP and PVR greater than 20%. [17-19] An acute positive response defined as a reduction in MPAP> 10 mm Hg was then standardized, reaching an absolute value of MPAP <40>
At the last PH World Symposium held in December 2018, [15] it was agreed to incorporate within the new clinical classification of PH into group 1 of PAH: 1.5 Prolonged response to calcium channel blockers. Backed by the argument that although remodeling of small pulmonary arteries is the main pathological finding in PAH, vasoconstriction also plays an important role in the pathophysiology of PAH, particularly in vasoreactive patients. In a series of 64 patients published in 1992, RICH et al. [33] reported that patients with an acute vasodilator response to calcium channel blockers (CCB) had dramatically improved survival when treated with long-term beta blockers.
The long-term response to CCB was defined by clinical improvement (functional class I or II of the New York Heart Association) and sustained hemodynamics improvement after at least 1 year only in CCB (equal to or better than that obtained in the test Acute and generally to obtain MPAP <30>
The pathophysiology of PAH with vasoreactivity is largely unknown. Recently, Hemnes et al, have shown that PAH with vasoreactivity, was characterized by a specific blood form (lymphocyte microarray) and different genetic variants (complete exome sequencing) compared to PAHI. [35,36]These results suggest a specific entity with a different clinical course, characterized by a significant improvement in prognosis, unique management and different pathophysiology.
Classically, the drugs chosen to evaluate lung reactivity have a relatively selective effect on the pulmonary vasculature, such as inhaled nitric oxide, epoprostenol and adenosine infusion [17,37] although in another context, such as in patients with heart failure, they have been used vasodilators nitroprusside and nitroglycerin type,m [38,39] and even inodilators. [40] These drugs have a systemic effect and therefore greater adverse events, which poses difficulties in carrying out the test; In addition, they should be used in continuous infusion with dose titration, which prolongs the procedure and some of them are expensive. More recently, other options have been evaluated: iloprost, a prostaglandin analogue with a short half-life (20-30 minutes) that is recommended for intravenous or inhaled use. The inhaled route allows its effect to be selective pulmonary, specifically on the adventitial side of the pulmonary arterial wall, and in theory with fewer side effects. [41] It produces a decrease in PVR, MPAP, CO and saturation of mixed arterial and venous oxygen. [42] Studies have been conducted evaluating its usefulness in the PVRT with encouraging results, [43-48] so It has been suggested as an option in some PAH consensuses. [48] When the inhalation route is chosen, iloprost is used in ampoules of 1 ml of aqueous solution with 10 mcg for complete administration over a period of 30 minutes of fogging. Until de present, there are no reports of studies comparing simultaneous measurements of PVR and MPAP with the invasive method and echocardiographic doppler in PVRT. [49]
.We conducted in our University Military Hospital in Caracas Venezuela in 2019,[50] a research work where invasive and non-invasive measurements of MPAP were compared during the vasoreactivity test in all its stages; finding very high correlation in all, shown in the study the times t0, t30 and tR; (R2 = 0.87,0.99 and 0.98, respectively).Based on the encouraging results of this work, we recommend developing studies with a larger population of patients who estimate MPAP and other variables involved through echocardiography and RHC.
Discussion: MPAP and PVR are hemodynamic variables that have common applications, the most relevant are: distinguish the hemodynamic class of PH[15], quantify arterial elastance (Ea) from Ventricle Arterial Coupling[51] and define the response acute vasodilation in the PVRT[14,17]. Both variables, have been analyzed echocardiographically by different authors from different locations in the world, in a variety of patients with different clinical conditions and degrees of severity of PH, always comparing the measurements with those obtained by RHC to be able to validate their methods. In the case of the PVR, some of the studies analyzed in this review included an interesting comparison of their equations with those of other authors, showing in all cases, the superiority of the method of each research group, given by the highest correlation with the RHC[3-5] (see figure 3).This was also the goal established among the echocardiographic methods to obtain the MPAP through TR, representing the most recent proposals and shown as the most effective. [13, 31, 32] (Figure 4). However, despite all this extensive work carried out over three long decades, these echocardiographic assessments remain lagging behind and forgotten like a “Cinderella”. It isn’t the object of this review to question the use of RHC as the gold standard to perform these measurements, if instead, try to open a humble door to consider echocardiography as an excellent evaluation alternative in those patients who cannot perform the RHC due to high costs, the complications inherent in the procedure or the refusal of the patient or his relatives to perform it. It´s also important to keep echocardiography in mind as a valuable follow-up resource for patients who deserve repeated assessments of PVR and MPAP.
Figure legend 3:
Opotoswky et al reported the best correlation with PVRcath when applying model 3 corresponding to the presence of mesosistolic notch in the pulmonary flow. Haddad et al: For all methods, the highest correlation was observed for the lowest RVP values (values in brackets); the highest correlation with RHC was with his method and reported that the Scapellato method didn´t apply for study. Kaga et al compared their method with the two Abbas equations that make up their algorithm. They found a better correlation with the enunciated in 2013. The highest correlation reported was obtained with their method followed by the PVR Lindqvist.
In the case of PVRT, an excellent opportunity was found to analyze the applicability of Doppler echocardiography by measuring these two hemodynamic variables by simply recording the TRV and the TVIRVOT. In this sense, a research work was carried out in our center comparing the invasive and non-invasive measurements of the MPAP finding very high correlation between the methods. In the case of the PVR estimates, high correlation was also obtained by applying the Abbas algorithm in the 6 stages of the test.
It’s necessary to point out that the invasive and non-invasive methods are dependent operators, in both cases the observer must carefully analyze the set of data obtained for each patient, integrate them as a hemodynamic whole and never automatically take it as a single isolated value. This will allow us in all cases to narrow the margin of errors and possibly facilitate opening a window for the era of non-invasive measurements.
Figure legend 4:
Aduen et al 2009, reported in their work superiority to find an average difference of MPAP values with respect to the RHC of -1.6, less than the SPAP traditionally obtained with RT (-3.6) and comparing it with the PR method. Aduen et al 2011: The mean ± SD of the differences between invasive MPAP and the three echocardiographic methods were −1.6 ± 7.7 mm Hg for the mean gradient method, −3.7 ± 7.4 mm Hg for the Chemla formula, and −3.2 ± 7.6 mm Hg for the Syyed formula. Median absolute differences were 5.5 mm Hg (mean gradient), 5.7 mm Hg (Chemla; P = .45 vs mean gradient), and 6.0 mm Hg (Syyed; P = .23 vs mean gradient). Accuracy (calculated MPAP within 10 mm Hg of RHC-measured MPAP) was 81% (mean gradient), 77% (Chemla), and 76% (Syyed).* In a work published recently in 2017 (Hellenkamp K et al [36]), the authors recorded the highest correlation with the Aduen equation and the lowest with the Dabestani equation (PAT), when compared with PVRcath.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
