AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Chat with us
Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-1897/062
1 University of Health Sciences, Keçiören Health Practice and Research Center Orthopaedics and Traumatology Department Ankara, Turkey
*Corresponding Author: Yüksel Uğur Yaradılmış. University of Health Sciences, Keçiören Health Practice and Research Center Orthopaedics and Traumatology Department Ankara, Turkey
Citation: Yüksel U Yaradılmış, Karaduman M, Albayrak S, Altay M (2021) Vascular injury following revision knee arthroplasthy: A case report. J, Surg Case Rep and Imag 4(7); DOI: 10.31579/2690-1897/062
Copyright: © 2021, Yüksel Uğur Yaradılmış, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 06 February 2021 | Accepted: 15 March 2021 | Published: 07 October 2021
Keywords: Knee arthroplasty, revision surgery, acute arterial oclusion, vascular injury
Acute arterial occlusions are uncommon complications in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This complication is seen more in TKA revision surgery, and when appropriate treatment cannot be made, amputation may be necessary. The present case is here presented of a patient applied with TKA revision because of instability following a simple fall one year after primary TKA, and popliteal artery occlusion developed in the early postoperative period. The patient was a 70-year old female not actively working. In the patient history there was deep vein thrombosis in the ipsilateral lower extremity after primary TKA and associated with that, pulmonary embolism. The diagnosis of popliteal artery occlusion, which formed after the revision surgery, was diagnosed with advanced tests in the 3rd hour postoperatively, and in the 4th hour, exploration was made. No arterial active bleeding had been observed intraoperatively. Popliteal thrombectomy were applied of popliteal artery trombosis. Acute arterial occlusion is a rarely encountered complication, but it requires emergency intervention. To prevent the development of acute occlusive disease in revision knee surgery, preoperative evaluation of arterial status is recommended, especially in patients with a history of surgery.
Vascular complications are rarely seen in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and injuries are classified as (i) iatrogenic vascular injury, (ii) artery occlusion, and (iii) pseudoaneurysm [1]. While there is a low risk of popliteal artery penetrating injuries, iatrogenic vascular injury is seen at the rate of 0.003% [2,3]. Although popliteal artery occlusion following TKA is seen more often than iatrogenic injuries, the rate has been shown to be 0.03%-0.2% [4,5] and the rate of chronic vascular insufficiency after TKA is estimated to be 2% [6]. Although vascular injuries are seen at a low frequency, a vascular injury seen during prosthesis surgery is a nightmare situation for orthopaedic surgeons, and the condition seen may cause amputation and even mortality [7]. As TKA is now used at younger ages and because of longer life expectancy, there has been seen to be an increase in the need for revision surgery over the years [8]. Due to the more extensive debridement in revision knee arthroplasty (RKA) and because of large defects, there is more contact with soft tissue. Therefore, in major surgery such as RKA, it is natural that vascular injuries can be seen more often [8]. However, there are few case reports of RKA vascular injuries, or they have been presented within studies that have examined TKA [1,9].
When there arterial occlusions are diagnosed late, the surgical interventions become more complex and the rates of failure increase. Conservative treatments are very limited in the treatment procedures and surgical intervention includes thrombectomy and bypass grafting [10]. The patient presented in this paper was applied with revision surgery because of aseptic loosening following primary TKA, acute popliteal arterial occlusion developed, the decision for surgery was taken early, thrombectomy was performed and successful results were obtained.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient’s parent. A 70-year old female presented on 02.11.2018 with the complaints of pain and not feeling confident in the right knee, which had been ongoing for one month. Three years previously the patient had undergone TKA in another centre for a diagnosis of gonarthrosis. There was a history of a simple fall 11 months after the TKA operation, after which the complaints started and gradually increased. RKA surgery was planned because of instability and the patient was admitted to our clinic.
The patient had height of 154cm, weight 70kg, and body mass index (BMI) was calculated as 29.5 kg/m2. There was a 25-year history of hypertension and 3 years previously the patient had undergone coronary angiography. There was a stent and minimal tricuspid valve insufficiency. The patient had no history of smoking or alcohol consumption. There were no findings of cerebrovascular disease or peripheral vascular dysfunction. In the physical examination, movement of the right knee was painful and there was instability in the coronal plane. No increase in temperature, redness or swelling were observed.
In the preoperative laboratory tests, blood values including platelet count, PT, and aPTT, were within the normal range. Sedimentation and CRP values were normal. On the basis of the physical examination and the laboratory tests, aseptic loosening was considered. RKA surgery was planned for the patient because of aseptic loosening and instability and the patient was admitted to our clinic.
The revision surgery was performed on 19.11.2018. The patient was positioned supine, and under spinal anaesthesia, the tournquet pressure was raised to 280 mmHG. The total tourniquet duration was 70 mins. In the intraoperative evaluation an AORI 3 defect was observed (Figure 1).
Intraoperative frozen material was sent for examination, and was evaluated as acute inflammation. Following the appropriate cuts for bone implantation, treatment was made with a CCK design implant (NexGen RH Knee, Zimmer, Warsaw, IN, USA). After closure of the joint, the tourniquet was deflated. A total of 400cc fluid was collected in the drain in the first 30 mins. Passive pressure was obtained and followed up.
In the postoperative 2nd hour, pain, paresthesia and paleness developed in the right foot of the patient. In the physical examination, the dorsalis pedis pulse was felt to be filiform. In the tests applied, the hemogram was determined as 8.6mg/dl. As 900cc total fluid was in the drain in the 3rd hour, advanced tests were planned. On the CT angiography, there was seen to be no blood flow in the anterior tibialis artery and at the level of the popliteal artery trifurcation and at 2cm proximal of the popliteal trifurcation, and filling of the posterior popliteal artery 3cm distal of the popliteal artery trifurcation could not be explained radiologically (Figure 2).
Emergency exploration was planned as a result of the severe clinical and radiological findings. In the postoperative 4th hour, the patient was re-admitted for surgery for exploration together with a microsurgery specialist.
Surgical procedure
The patient was positioned prone. The posterior of the knee was opened with a lazy-S incision. No active arterial bleeding was observed in the exploration. The popliteal artery was then evaluated in detail. Occlusion was seen 4cm proximal of the popliteal artery bifurcation, and arterial dilatation proximal of the occlusion. Thrombus was observed in the popliteal artery (Figure 3).
Thrombus was considered, and open thrombectomy was applied proximal of the stasis with the Fogarty catheter. The vascular damage was evaluated again after the thrombectomy. Peripheral pulses were palpated. After confirming blood flow with Doppler, the surgery was terminated.
The patient was followed up first in the Intensive Care Unit for 2 days. When the vital signs and hemogram were observed to be stable, the patient was transferred to the orthopaedics and traumatology ward, where follow up continued for 7 days. A total of 3 units of blood were transfused: 1 unit preoperatively, 2 units postoperatively. A control radiograph was taken on postoperative day 1 (Figure 4).
On the 4th day of follow up, the patient was mobilised. With a CPM device, joint range of motion reached 90° on the 6th day. The patient was discharged on the 7th day. At the final follow-up examination, the WOMAC score was 84 and joint range of motion was 100°. Currently, at approximately 1.5 years since the operation, minimal paresthesia persists in the right foot. The patient can now walk without any assistive device, can go up and down stairs and describes the knee as pain-free.
Although arterial occlusion is rarely seen, in a study of 31 patients who developed acute arterial occlusion after TKA, it was reported that amputation was necessary in 11 cases (35.5%) [11]. Patients must be routinely examined in the early period, and in the postoperative period, severe pain and paresthesia in the ipsilateral extremity should be warnings in respect of vascular injury, and when there is paleness, coldness, and no pulse, advanced tests are necessary [3].
A total of 3018 TKA and 225 RKA patients treated in our clinic since 2012 were examined and there was a single knee arthroplasty patient observed with vascular injury, giving a frequency of 0.03% of all knee arthroplasties and 0.4% of RKA. In a similar study, Rand et al examined 9022 patients, and reported that acute artery occlusion developed in 3 patients after TKA (0.033%) [4]. In another study by Calligaro et al of 4097 TKA patients, 7 cases (0.17%) of acute arterial occlusion were reported [5].
Arterial occlusions often occur with the formation of thrombosis as the result of a traumatised calcified vessel. The presence of peripheral vascular disease, the use of a tourniquet in calcified femoral and popliteal arteries, and manual reduction of flexion contractures [12,13] constitute a risk for plaque rupture and embolisation. Other risks include the presence of cancer, a history of arterial aneurysm, and revision surgery [14].
Emergency thrombectomy is the first option in treatment, but if removal of the thrombus is not possible, surgical bypass is an alternative approach. In a study by Green and Allen, of revascularisations applied 8 hours after popliteal artery blood flow ceased, amputation was reported to be necessary in 86% [15]. This demonstrates the necessity for rapid revascularisation in treatment.
In the current case, acute arterial occlusion was observed with the serious symptoms of pain at rest and paresthesia. Emergency thrombectomy was selected as treatment. The decision for surgery in the current case was made at approximately the 4th hour. When revascularisation is delayed, amputation may be required, but in the current case there was no need for amputation. With appropriate physiotherapy, the current patient obtained a high WOMAC score.
Acute arterial occlusion is a rarely encountered complication, but it requires emergency intervention. The risk of developing arterial complication increases when there is a history of various operations and especially revision TKA.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
