AUCTORES
Review Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-8808/104
1 Associate Professor Microbiology, AIIH&PH, Kolkata, India
2 Advisor ( PHS) and Additional Director, Urban Health unit and training centre, Chetla, AIIH&PH, Kolkata.
3 Director Professor, Department of Epidemiology, AIIH&PH, Kolkata.
*Corresponding Author: Dr Sayan Bhattacharyya, Associate Professor Microbiology, AIIH&PH, Kolkata, India
Citation: Sayan Bhattacharyya, (2022) Variants of the Novel Coronavirus Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Studies 3(3); DOI: 10.31579/2690-8808/104
Copyright: © 2022 Sayan Bhattacharyya, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 10 January 2022 | Accepted: 22 January 2022 | Published: 07 March 2022
Keywords: variants; mutants; emergence
The novel coronavirus had emerged in 2019 from the Hubei province in China. Now the world is facing the third and fourth waves of the pandemic caused by this virus. These are due to the new mutants and variants of the virus that have emerged over time due to various reasons. It is important to keep oneself updated about these mutants and variants.
Since March 2020, many new mutants of the novel Coronavirus or SARS CoV2 have emerged. The disease has been recognized as a pandemic in March 2020 by the World Health Organization. The disease is called COVID 19 because it was first recognized in December 2019 in China (1). Right now the third wave is raging across India and the world.
With time, many new mutants and variants of the virus have emerged, which had earlier been given various names and epithets like UK variant, Brazilian Variant and others. They were later replaced by Greek alphabetical letters like Alpha, Beta and Mu. If one or more mutations alters the virus ‘ behaviour in a significant manner, it is called Variant. If number of cases or deaths due to a variant are not that high or are to be fully investigated, it is simply called VOI or Variant of interest. The properties of a VOI are being investigated. If however the number of cases or deaths due to the variant in question is substantial and is of public health concern, it is called a VOC or Variant of concern(2). VOCs have been observed to be more infectious, and also more prone to cause breakthrough or re-infections in those who have been vaccinated or previously infected. These variants are more likely to cause severe disease, evade diagnostic tests, and resist antiviral treatment. Variants under monitoring or VUM are the SARS-CoV-2 variants with genetic changes which are suspected to affect virus characteristics with some indications that it may pose a future risk, but evidence of phenotypic or epidemiological impact is unclear presently. There is another terminology called Variant of high consequence or VOHC , which is a variant for which current vaccines do not offer protection. As of now, there are no SARS-CoV-2 variants of high consequence. The naming of the variants are done by the Technical Advisory Group on Virus Evolution , also called the Virus Evolution Working Group (3).
Mutations occur normally in RNA viruses. SARS CoV2 has an error prone RNA polymerase which frequently leads to change in its genetic code or mutations. Factors like frequent international travel, man and animal conflict, wet animal markets and non compliance to taking vaccines also help in faster evolution and emergence of mutants and variants. Crowded areas and failure to adhere to COVID protocols like hand washing and social distancing are also important factors behind this. Isolation in geographical areas lead to different mutants and variants being evolved.
The Alpha VOC of the SARS CoV2 had several mutations in the S or spike protein, due to which existing PCR methods were unable to detect the spike genes. This was called the ‘ S gene dropout ‘. The Alpha variant (B.1.1.7) is the first identified COVID-19 variant, detected for the first time in the UK and later emerged as a dominant threat in the US, till March 2021. The Alpha variant is rarely encountered now. The Beta variant was discovered in South Africa. It is actually B.1.351 and also has a high number of mutations. It also has the E484K mutation that may make it escape vaccine induced immunity quite well.
The Gamma variant, first identified in Japan is thought to be the most dominantly spreading variant in Brazil, which became a major COVID hotbed since 2020. With mutations P.1, P.1.1, P.1.2, this variant, has also been found to have difficult mutations in its spike protein, which could help it escape neutralizing antibodies.
The Delta VOC and Delta plus are the dominant strains in most countries now. Delta variant emerged and was first detected in India. The Delta VOC caused the second wave of infections in India. It can be neutralized by vaccine induced immunity. The Delta plus VOC emerged later and has led to infections in vaccinated individuals also.
The Mu variant of the novel Coronavirus evolved in 2021 and was first reported from Colombia. It had many mutations and could theoretically evade host immunity, but it did not remain for a long time in circulation as the Delta variant was much more transmissible(4). However it is still abundant in countries like Ecuador and Colombia.
Since November 2021 a new variant of concern has emerged, called the Omicron variant. It was first identified in Botswana and South Africa in November 2021. The Omicron variant belongs to the pangolin lineage of Coronaviruses. It has possibly emerged via mixing of human and deer coronaviruses. Omicron variant causes clinical features that are different from the parent strain or other strains of the SARS CoV2, like mild fever, bodyache, cough with phlegm, nausea and others. Nausea,found in early part of the illness along with lower back pain which also occurs early, are now pathognomonic features of Omicron variant infection. This variant is about twice more transmissible than the Delta variant but causes milder symptoms and has still not been reported to cause pneumonia. Only few deaths have so far been reported worldwide due to the Omicron variant. It also has the S gene dropout in PCR like the Alpha variant, due to so many mutations in the spike gene. It also has the E484K mutation that may make it prone to escape vaccine induced immunity (5). Now Omicron is spreading very rapidly and fast becoming the dominant strain in all countries due to it’s high transmissibility. It is now responsible for the chunk of the third wave of infections in India and other countries.
There is also a subset of the Omicron variant that does not have so many mutations in the spike gene. It is called BA2 subset or subclass. The original Omicron variant is called BA1 subset.
The new IHU variant of the SARS CoV2 has been identified in a university in France (Instituts hospitalo-universitaires ) and hence called IHU variant. It may already have spread to many countries. It is also called B.1.640.2 and has been detected in 12 patients near Marseille in France recently (6). The first of these 12 patients had returned from The Cameroons. Till now this variant has been also seen in Germany, UK, Congo and India.
It reportedly has even more mutations in the spike region than the Omicron variant. In fact, it has 46 mutations and 37 deletions in its genetic code. There are many mutations in the spike region of this variant. However as of now it does not seem to be spreading so rapidly. However one case of IHU variant has been detected in India.
A new variant of SARS CoV2 has emerged in Nigeria in December 2021. Although it is said to have emerged from the UK variant, it is different from both the UK and South African lineages of SARS CoV2(7). More information is awaited about this variant.
Simple adherence to COVID appropriate behaviour like proper physical distancing, hand washing and wearing masks properly whenever going out, can go a long way to prevent emergence of new variants. This is also highlighted in Figure 1 below. N95 masks are better than cloth masks in preventing transmission, especially of the highly contagious Omicron variant. People should also be administered available vaccines whenever possible (8). Efforts should also be made to devise newer vaccines targeting the new variants. Also with time, milder but more contagious variants of the virus are set to emerge that may still put the already strained healthcare system into more trouble.
More and more information is now coming up with respect to the mutants and variants of the novel coronavirus. Newly emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants need to be carefully and continuously monitored for their potentially increased transmission rate, altered pathogenicity, and resistance to vaccine induced or disease induced immunity(9). Epidemiological surveillance is therefore very important. Genomic surveillance is needed to track the paths of the new variants and mutants in the wake of emergence of new variants like IHU(10). Whenever needed, home isolation and home quarantine should be advised for the ill and the exposed, respectively so that the spread of infection is checked. Also important are booster doses of the available vaccines for the frontline warriors and the highly susceptible population in order to mitigate disease severity.
Public health measures should be spruced up to prevent emergence of new variants and mutants of the SARS CoV2. Emergence of the mutants and variants should be monitored and studied well. COVID appropriate behaviour is also very important in this aspect to prevent health emergencies.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.