Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-4861/404
1University of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Ave North, Worcester, MA 01655
2UMass Memorial Health, 55 Lake Ave North, Worcester, MA 01655
*Corresponding Author: Mason Winkie, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Ave North, Worcester, MA 01655
Citation: Mason Winkie, Katherine M. Cooper, Joseph Daniel, Jeeva Subramanian, Prashanth Rau, (2024), Vancomycin Resistant Enterococcus in Infected Walled Off Necrosis: Possible Causation & Management, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, 17(3); DOI:10.31579/2690-4861/404
Copyright: © 2024, Mason Winkie. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 20 February 2024 | Accepted: 13 May 2024 | Published: 27 May 2024
Keywords: Acute pancreatitis; acute necrotic collections; walled-off necrosis; necrotizing pancreatitis
Peri-pancreatic fluid collections are frequently encountered by clinicians caring for patients who recover from acute or chronic pancreatitis. Although these fluid collections are common, the type of collection and resulting complications can significantly affect patient mortality. We present a 29-year-old female who originally presented with acetaminophen toxicity secondary to pain management for interstitial edematous pancreatitis (IEP) complicated by renal failure. The patient later developed intermittent fevers with concern for an underlying infection and was ultimately found to have walled-off necrosis (WON) infected by an uncommon hepaPeri-pancreatic fluid collections are frequently encountered by clinicians caring for patients who recover from acute or chronic pancreatitis. Although these fluid collections are common, the type of collection and resulting complications can significantly affect patient mortality. We present a 29-year-old female who originally presented with acetaminophen toxicity secondary to pain management for interstitial edematous pancreatitis (IEP) complicated by renal failure. The patient later developed intermittent fevers with concern for an underlying infection and was ultimately found to have walled-off necrosis (WON) infected by an uncommon hepatobiliary pathogen previously isolated in a urine culture despite asymptomatic bacteriuria.
Background:
Acute pancreatitis (AP) is divided into two categories: IEP and necrotizing pancreatitis (NP). Fluid collections are a common sequala for both subtypes. In IEP, fluid collections include acute peripancreatic fluid collections (APFCs) and pseudocysts (PC). Fluid collections in NP include acute necrotic collections (ANCs) and walled-off necrosis (WON) (1). All associated AP fluid collections carry an increased risk for infection, but speed and degree of management varies depending on the collection type (2).
Objective:
To report a case of AP complicated by a miscategorized fluid collection later determined to be WON with superimposed vancomycin resistant enterococcus (VRE) and discuss a unique approach to anti-microbial therapy selection.atobiliary pathogen previously isolated in a urine culture despite asymptomatic bacteriuria.
A 29-year-old female with a medical history of alcohol use disorder, recent ED admission for IEP, andmesenteric vein thrombosis (on anticoagulation) presented to the hospital for severe abdominal discomfort with excessive acetaminophen usage. Basic laboratory evaluation revealed aspartate aminotransferase > 15,000 and acute kidney injury (AKI) inciting concern for acetaminophen toxicity. The patient was admitted to the ICU for multi-system organ failure secondary to unintentional overdose versus severe pancreatitis. She was managed with a N-acetylcysteine drip, fluid resuscitation, and renal replacement therapy (RRT). After 1 week in the ICU, her renal function, abdominal pain, and overall clinical status improved allowing transfer to the floor hospitalmedicine service.
On hospital day 15, the patient experienced recurrent abdominal pain, intermittent fevers, and increasing leukocytosis. Intravenous vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam were started pending infectious work- up. Urinalysis revealed 1+ leukocyte esterase and 31 leukocytes. VRE (<50>.

Figure 1: Non-Contrast CT after Hospital Day 15
Newly identified 4.6 x 9.4 x 9.1 cm fluid within the lesser sac not present at time of admission. Additionally, a heterogeneously dense area was identified within the pancreas that was concerning for necrosis although indeterminant without contrast.
An endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) (Figure 2) was performed one week later and showed a fluid collectionthought to be consistent with a peri-gastric PC. Needle aspiration of the cyst revealed turbid and purulent fluid, which was sent for culture. A cystogastrostomy was created using a lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) with subsequent drainageof purulent fluid. After drainage was complete, necrotic tissue was identified with diagnosis of NP and WON. Despite drainage and antibiotic coverage for typical intra- abdominal infections, the patient continued to experience low grade fevers, pain, and persistent leukocytosis. Ultimately, the culture from the WON isolated VRE and antibiotics were transitioned to IV Daptomycin based on the susceptibility profile from the previously isolated urine culture. In time, the VRE of the WON demonstrated the same sensitivity profile as the VRE from the urine culture. An endoscopic guided necrosectomy was performed five days after the cystogastrostomy creation at which time the LAMS stent was removed. After the single necrosectomy and daptomycin treatment, the patient subsequently experienced improvement in all symptoms and was deemed safe for discharge.
While there are case reports of pancreatitis complicated by VRE enteritis, pancreatitis with VRE infected necrosis is not discussed in the literature [3, 4]. To our knowledge, this is the first case report demonstrating successful treatment of VRE infected WON, a rare complication in a young patient with acute necrotizing pancreatitis.
The decision to start antibiotics in patients with pancreatitis is complicated as systemic inflammatory response occurs even without infection. As such, professional guidelines recommend against the routine use of antibiotics for AP [5]. Our patient had a complicated hospitalization for presumed acetaminophen toxicity in the setting of recurrent pancreatitis and was initially improving prior to the onset of new fever. The timing of her fever raised concern for an infected peripancreatic fluid collection, originally thought to be an APFC or early PC in the setting of the patient’s previously identified IEP and inadequate imaging. Conversely to AP, antibiotictherapy is always recommended for proven infectedand necrotic pancreatitis, though first line treatment is endoscopic drainage and debridement. However, it is recommended to wait ≥ 4 weeks for these procedures to allow for the fluid collection to mature. Given the high mortality rate associated with infected necrotic pancreatitis (upwards of 30%), necessitates antimicrobial coverage prior to culture data [6]. In these cases, broad spectrum antibiotics that penetrate pancreatic tissue are recommended for use including carbapenems, quinolones, ureidopenicillins, and metronidazole [7]. The overall prognosis appeared poor when the patient did not improve despite standard of care with cyst drainage and antibiotics. However, transitioning to IV daptomycin based on susceptibilities of urine VRE resulted in successful control of her infection.
Here, we would like to highlight that the clinical relevance of the patent’s previous urine culture. Prior to full speciation of the enterococcus from the pancreatic culture, IV daptomycin was chosen based on antimicrobial sensitivities from the urine VRE. It is generally accepted that culture positive bacteremia is not a pre-requisite for distant seeded infections (e.g., septic arthritis after dental work). In these cases, transient bacteremia results in invasion of closed spaces or vulnerable tissue. In our patient, it is highly likely that transient bacteremia occurred due to VRE translocation from the urinary tract and led to infection of the WON. This rationale was used when initiating daptomycin prior to full susceptibility information being available from the speciated WON aspirate, which proved to be a successful strategy resulting in the patient’s rapid clinical improvement.
Our case is the first to suggest patients with VRE asymptomatic bacteriuria and infected peri-pancreatic fluid collections may benefit from expanded antibiotic consideration especially when diagnostic modalities are limited. Through this case, we want to emphasize two points. Firstly, daptomycin was demonstrated to have pancreatic fluid penetration and could be considered for patients with infected pancreatitis in the appropriate clinical context. Next, asymptomatic bacteriuria, considered unnecessary to treat, can still cause transient bacteremia and translocation [8]. This possibility proposes that urine cultures may provide predictive value for infections in suspected peri-pancreatic fluid collections and can be used to guide therapy (eg. similar to how nasal testing for staphylococcus aureus is used to guide antibiotics in skin and softtissue infections) even before procedural intervention is undertaken.
This work was not supported by any funding source. The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,