Validation of the Method of Analysis of Hylicobacter Pylori by the Respiratory Test at 13c Urea

Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2641-5194/052

Validation of the Method of Analysis of Hylicobacter Pylori by the Respiratory Test at 13c Urea

  • Khalid Laarej 1
  • Mohammed Jbilou 1
  • Rachid Alami 1*

Research and Medical Analysis Laboratory of the Fraternelle of the Royal Gendarmerie, Rabat, Morocco.2 Especialista I Grado en Cirugía General  Profesor Asistente , Jordan.

*Corresponding Author: Rachid Alami, Research and Medical Analysis Laboratory of the Fraternelle of the Royal Gendarmerie, Rabat, Morocco.

Citation: Laarej K., Jbilou M. and Alami R. (2022) Validation of the Method of Analysis of Hylicobacter Pylori by the Respiratory Test at 13c Urea. J. Gastroenterology Pancreatology and Hepatobilary Disorders 6(1) DOI:10.31579/2641-5194/052

Copyright: © 2022 Rachid Alami, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: 27 September 2021 | Accepted: 10 December 2021 | Published: 05 January 2022

Keywords: h. pylori; tru; validation

Abstract

The detection and monitoring of H. pylori colonization of the gastric mucosa has become a usual analysis by the 13C-labeled urea breath test (TRU) because it is non-invasive and now available in almost total medical analysis laboratories. The objective of this work is the validation of the TRU to verify and confirm the analytical results frequent in our laboratory. Samples were taken using the Taukit Isomed Pharma kit and analyzes were performed by infrared isotope ratio spectrometry. The results obtained show that the TRU is efficient, faithful, accurate and robust and we can apply it daily on patients with great confidence.

I-Introduction

The H. pylori is mostly acquired during childhood and is usually asymptomatic [1]. This infection can lead to various disorders such as inflammation of the stomach (gastritis), peptic ulcer (10% to 20% of cases), adenocarcinoma of the distal stomach (1% to 2% of cases) and lymphoma of the lymphoid tissue associated with the mucous membranes of the stomach [2]. The prevalence of H. pylori infection in Canada is estimated at 7.1% in children aged 5 to 18 years and at 30% in adults according to the World Gastroenterology Organization [3], in Morocco this prevalence is of the order of 36

II- Material and method

II.1- Instrumentation

 The analyzes of H. Pylori by the 13C urea breath test were carried out by an Isotope Ratio Infrared Spectrometer (SIRI), IR-force (IR 3000) on samples of air exhaled by the patient in air samples 10 ml dry tubes [7]. 

II.2- Sampling 

According to the information provided by the applicant, TRU 13C is performed using the Taukit kit from Isomed Pharma. First, the patient on an empty stomach (for at least 3 hours) should drink a citric acid drink and then blow, through a straw, into two tubes. Then he should drink another citric acid drink in which the 13C urea has been dissolved, then wait 30 minutes. Finally, he must blow again, with a straw, in two other tubes. In addition to fasting, the patient should prepare by following guidelines for the consumption of certain medications. The collection should be done with the tubes of the kit, which, afterwards, must be hermetically sealed and then stored and transported at room temperature. Thus, the samples will be analyzed by SIRI (IR-force). These samples are indeed stable for long periods (5 weeks) [8]. 

II.3- Experimental protocol 

The IR-force analyzer designed for the determination of 13C labeled CO2 in exhaled air. The analysis focuses on the measurement and determination of the 12CO2 / 13CO2 quotient in the air exhaled by the patient. 

II.3.1- Instrument calibration 

We blow into the exhaled air sampling bag, which we place in the device's adapter before launching the automatic calibration of the device which is necessary to exclude any impact of the 12CO2 concentration on the value. delta during measurement. 

II.3.2- Analysis of samples 

The analysis is carried out on the 2 sampling tubes (T0 and T30) which are placed on the adapter of the device. Before starting the analysis, the patient identification must be entered on the list of samples to be analyzed, launch the test, after a few minutes the device displays the result of the analysis of each sample which is the delta (∆), expressed in part per thousand (‰), which represents the relative difference between the isotope ratio of the sample and that of a reference substance. The difference between the deltas of the samples (T = 30 and T = 0) from the same patient represents the delta over base-line (DOB). The final test result is generally considered positive when the BOD is greater than 5 ‰ [9]. 

II.4- Validation parameters 

The 13C urea breath test is considered semi-quantitative therefore the validation parameters that we have verified are; repeatability, intermediate precision, inter-operator variability, uncertainties and comparison of methods.

III- Results and Discussion

The analysis of H. pylori by infrared spectrometry with isotopic relation gives results in delta of difference of isotopic rations between T30 and T0 expressed in part per thousand of the same sample. 

T30 -T0 in delta / 1000:                <3>

                                          3 ≤ R ≤5: Undetermined result.

                                                 > 5: Positive result [10]. 

III.4.1- Repeatability 

The repeatability of this test was determined on 2 levels of controls (6 Negative and 6 Positive). The coefficients of variation (CVr) calculated are lower than the limits retained by the Laboratory [11], see table 1.

Table 1: Result of the repeatability study 

II.4.2- Intermediate reliability 

Reproducibility was evaluated at 2 control levels (6 Negative and 6 Positive). The calculated coefficients of variation (CVR) are lower than the limits retained by the Laboratory [11], see table 2.

Table 2: Result of the reproducibility

II.4.3- Inter-operator variability 

Each control was run 8 times by all operators with the same lot of reagent and the same instrument. The results of this inter-operator correlation are consistent (Table 3). 

Table 3: Results of the inter-operator correlation II.4.4- Uncertainty       

2 levels of controls (7 Negative and 7 Positive) were analyzed internally at our Laboratory (CIQ) and externally in a foreign laboratory (CEQ) (Table 4 and 5). 

Table 4 : Results of the uncertainty calculation (Control Negatif) 
Table 5: Results of the uncertainty calculation (Positive Control) 

II.4.5- Method comparison 

A volume of 13 control samples were analyzed by the IR-force machine and by The HeliFANplus machine (table 6). The results found are consistent with the comparison interval (CI). 

Table 6: Result of the method comparison 

Conclusion

The non-invasive analysis of H. pylori by the 13C urea breath test is efficient compared to other serological or even classical bacteriological techniques for diagnosing infection, faithful, accurate and robust. It is applied directly to samples of patient exhaled air without any pre-treatment and is also used to confirm post-treatment eradication of H. pylori.

References

Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.

img

Dr Elena Popa

It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Dr Nikolaos Andreas Chrysanthakopoulos

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee

img

Robert W McGee

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D

img

Aibing Rao

I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.

img

Kashani Mehdi

Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,

img

Alla Konstantinovna Politova