Unrestrained Automaticity- A Peculiar Case of “Thevetia Peruviana (Yellow Oleander)” Poisoning

Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-4861/588

Unrestrained Automaticity- A Peculiar Case of “Thevetia Peruviana (Yellow Oleander)” Poisoning

  • De Vas Goonewardane *
  • Gunathilake
  • N Wickeremasinghe

Department of Cardiology, Teaching hospital, Polonnaruwa.

*Corresponding Author: De Vas Goonewardane. Pediatric Surgery Department, IRCCS, Istituto Giannina Gaslini, 16147 Genoa, Italy.

Citation: De Vas Goonewardane, Gunathilake, N Wickeremasinghe, (2025), Unrestrained Automaticity- A Peculiar Case of “Thevetia Peruviana (Yellow Oleander)” Poisoning, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, 27(1); DOI:10.31579/2690-4861/588

Copyright: © 2025, De Vas Goonewardane. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Received: 05 June 2025 | Accepted: 18 June 2025 | Published: 25 June 2025

Keywords: kaneru; yellow oleander; plant poisoning in sri lanka; digitalis toxicity

Abstract

Yellow Oleander/Kaneru (Thevetia peruviana) is a tropical poisonous plant with multitude of toxic effects, out of which cardiac toxicity is very challenging to manage. 23 year old boy was transferred to our unit for further management of symptomatic bradycardia following ingestion of four Kaneru seeds. Soon after admission his bradycardia worsens and advanced heart blocks develop. While planning on a temporary pacemaker (TPM) he swings towards tachyarrhythmias. Despite standard treatment according to available anecdotal evidence and multiple cardioversion attempts he progress in to a ventricular tachycardic storm and succumb at ICU while being intubated. Cardiac toxicity due to Kaneru (Yellow Oleander) can be both tachy and Brady arrhythmias. This means the available tool box for cardiologist is significantly limited. High dependency unit observation, TPM facilities and specific antidote (Digitab) is of paramount importance in reducing mortality.

Introduction

Yellow Oleander is shrub in the Dogbane family “Apocynaceae”. Poisoning due to deliberate self-harm (DSH) results in significant mortality in South Asia. In Sri Lanka most of the cases are reported in north central, eastern and northern districts (1). It was observed in threatening proportion around 2005-2010 where there was a wave of DSH attempts. Thanks to proactive preventive work of health officials and local administration which even included a significant reduction in number of plants the patient numbers has plummeted down during last few years. 

The Plant contain highly toxic cardiac glycosides including thevetin A, B and neriifolin (2) which works directly on sodium/potassium ion channel (NaK) in sarcolemma. Ingestion causes a variety of cardiac, neurological and gastrointestinal effects (3) . Ingestion of seeds causes predominantly cardiovascular effects such as bradycardia, varying degrees of heart blocks, atrial or ventricular ectopic and ventricular tachyarrhythmia’s (4) . It is peculiar in that toxins can cause both Brady/tachy arrhythmias. Hyperkalaemia is a life-threatening squeal which is an indication for treatment with digoxin immune fab [Digibind]. Unfortunately this specific antidote is currently out of stock in Sri Lanka.

Case Report

A 23-year-old was transferred from a regional hospital, 6 hours after ingestion of four kernels of Kaneru along with jaggery. They have already performed one cycle of activated charcoal. The indication for transfer was for observation of sinus bradycardia (45/min) with stable vitals. On admission to us patient was complaining of nausea and abdominal cramps occasionally. GCS was 15/15, non-agitated and no seizures were documented. Blood pressure was 124/88mmHg.

After admission to coronary care unit (CCU) in about two three hours he developed advanced AV (atrioventricular node) blocks including second degree and intermittent complete heart block. Potassium turned out to be 3.0mmol/l. We started him on another MDAC charcoal regime and slow Hartmann’s infusion. Initially two atropine boluses were given but only resulting in transient improvement of heart rate. Rate was around 35bpm with blood pressure dropping to 90/50mmHg. 

                                                                                                         Figure 1: High degree AV block

While he was taken to cath lab for temporary pacing he developed fast atrial fibrillation (AF) with V rates over 130/min. As tachy-brady was alternating we implanted a TPM and kept it at a backup of 50/min. With the TPM, haemodynamics improved.

The boy next developed two GTC seizure attacks which were managed successfully with IV diazepam. Now he was persistently in tachy zone and reverberated between fast AF and bidirectional VT. 

Most of the time when VT came in, we had to use multiple shocks in larger joule amount due to relative refractoriness. We loaded him with intravenous Lidocaine as it is preferred over Amiodarone in digitalis toxicity. By this time, he has become a bit delirious so to settle sympathetic drive we electively intubated. Despite our best efforts he went into refractory VT storm and shock state. Finally, the rhythm was a non-shockable PEA and ALS CPR was in vain at the end of 30 minutes.

</><><>                                                                                                 >>

Discussion

Cardiac effects of Kaneru poisoning could be very tricky to manage. Treatment involves a fine dynamic balance of brady-tachy treatment and high dependency/ICU care. Clinicians need to “think on their feet” on most occasions.

Due to long half-life and slow absorption of digitalis toxins, multiple dose activated charcoal (MDAC) has a very important place in initial management (5). Gastric lavage is recommended in the initial four hours of ingestion but most cases of DSH present later, attenuating its potential as a treatment modality. But activated charcoal can be even used up to 48 hours with proven benefits. It is the only treatment which reduces absolute amount of toxin ingested [5, 6]

Initial 72 hours is the critical period for cardiac complications. It is recommended that after ingestion of significant number of seeds (usually >3) patient’s should be kept on ECG monitoring. There is a wide spectrum of presentations and patient can deteriorate in minutes to hours. 

Due to this necessity most patients with sinus bradycardia following ingestion are transferred to tertiary centres with temporary pacemaker capacity. It is rather advisable because of abrupt nature of complications and long transfer delays in aforesaid areas with high prevalence.

With regards to bradycardia management some authors recommend using atropine boluses (4) as when needed stating that it has a very short half-life. There is a general consensus that intravenous isoprenaline and chronotrophic agents are detrimental because they trigger refractory ventricular tachycardia. 

In our practice we observe these patients in high dependency setup and if there is persistent high degree AV blocks or decompensating sinus bradycardia we always insert a temporary pacemaker and program it to a low base rate, to enhance “on demand” function. TPM can be removed within 3 days in majority of cases.

When patient enters tachy zone the management is always challenging. If there is alternating tachy-brady as in our patient TPM is always helpful. Otherwise the VT/VF is usually resistant to cardio version. One can use intravenous Lidocaine as first line (1) and amiodarone is better avoided. Sympathetic block, paralysis with ventilation and IV Esmolol are all secondary options without proven benefits in larger trials.

 

References

Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.

img

Dr Elena Popa

It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Dr Nikolaos Andreas Chrysanthakopoulos

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee

img

Robert W McGee

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D

img

Aibing Rao

I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.

img

Kashani Mehdi

Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,

img

Alla Konstantinovna Politova