AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Chat with us
Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2641-0419/303
Department of Cardiology, Arrazi Hospital, Mohammed VI University Hospital, Marrakesh, Morocco
*Corresponding Author: Zakaria Wakrim, Department of Cardiology, Arrazi Hospital, Mohammed VI University Hospital, Marrakesh, Morocco
Citation: Zakaria Wakrim, Mohammed El Jamili, Mustapha El Hattaoui (2023), Unkind Reminder: Never Pretreat Nstemi Patients Until Their Anatomy is Known, J. Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, 6(3); DOI:10.31579/2641-0419/303
Copyright: © 2023 Zakaria Wakrim, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 30 January 2023 | Accepted: 20 March 2023 | Published: 04 April 2023
Keywords: aortic dissection; pretreatment; chest pain; non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome
This case report describes the presentation and management of a 71-year-old male patient with sudden onset of chest pain. Despite an initial diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and pre-treatment with clopidogrel, further evaluation revealed the patient to have acute aortic dissection. The patient's condition rapidly deteriorated and ultimately led to his death.
This case highlights the importance of careful diagnostic consideration when presented with symptoms of chest pain, particularly in high-risk patients, and the potential consequences of routine pre-treatment with P2Y12 inhibitors in such cases.
Acute aortic dissection (AAD) is a rare but life-threatening condition that requires prompt diagnosis and management [1]. The presentation of AAD can be nonspecific, and the differential diagnosis includes other causes of chest pain, such as acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This case report describes the presentation and management of a 71-year-old male patient with hypertension who presented to a community health center with sudden onset of chest pain radiating to the back. The patient was initially diagnosed with AMI but was later found to have AAD, culminating in his death. This case highlights the importance of considering AAD in the differential diagnosis of chest pain and the challenges in managing this condition in the setting of prior antiplatelet therapy.
Case Description
A 71-year-old male tailor presented to a community health center with sudden onset of ‘ripping’ chest pain radiating to the back. The patient had a known history of hypertension, which had not been effectively managed with medication, and no significant past medical history or family history of cardiovascular disease. Vital signs were within normal limits, but an electrocardiogram (ECG) revealed ST-depression and inverted T waves in leads V5, V6, D1, and aVL, and high-sensitivity troponin levels were elevated. The patient was initially diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) without ST segment elevation (NSTEMI) and received a full-loading dose of clopidogrel, aspirin, and heparin. He was then transferred to a tertiary care hospital for further evaluation and management.
On examination in the emergency department, the patient complained of severe pain, sweating, and nausea. Systolic blood pressure asymmetry was observed, with a reading of 90/54 mmHg in the right arm and a pulse deficit compared to a reading of 142/59 mmHg in the left arm. No focal neurologic deficit or signs of heart failure or limb ischemia were noted. Repeat ECG showed no new changes, but transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) revealed an enlarged aorta with an intimal flap that did not affect the origins of the coronary arteries. Additionally, mild aortic regurgitation was observed. The left ventricular function and dimensions were within normal limits, however, a small slide of pericardial effusion was also identified. (Figures A)
In light of these findings, an urgent computed tomography (CT) scan was performed, which definitively confirmed the diagnosis of acute aortic dissection (AAD). It revealed that the dissection was originating beyond the sinuses of Valsalva, ascending to the brachiocephalic artery, and dissecting along the thoracic and abdominal aorta, ultimately reaching the left iliac artery. (Figures B)
The patient was given intravenous beta-blockers, but his condition was too complex for urgent surgical intervention to be performed, especially with the prior administration of clopidogrel. Unfortunately, the patient's condition continued to deteriorate resulting in his demise the following morning.
Discussion
The present case report highlights the potential for diagnostic confusion between acute aortic dissection and acute myocardial infarction and the subsequent administration of P2Y12 inhibitors.
Among patients presenting with acute chest pain in emergency departments, the prevalence of myocardial infarction MI is typically around 30%[2]. Other conditions, such as AAD, myocarditis, and pulmonary embolism, can also cause elevated cardiac troponin levels and should be taken into account as potential diagnoses for patients experiencing acute chest pain[2].
A patient's medical history serves as a crucial foundation for identifying the potential causes of cardiac symptoms. However, underlying causes may manifest differently in each individual, thus additional information beyond the patient's history may be necessary to make a definitive diagnosis. Sudden onset of severe, ‘tearing’ or ‘ripping’ chest pain, particularly in individuals with hypertension or preexisting conditions such as a bicuspid aortic valve or aortic dilatation, should raise suspicion for the presence of an acute aortic syndrome, such as AAD[3].
Despite the activation of blood platelets and the coagulation cascade playing a key role in the initial phase and evolution of NSTE-ACS, there is a lack of large-scale randomized trials supporting an upfront pre-treatment strategy of P2Y12 receptor inhibitors such as clopidogrel in NSTE-ACS patients. The Downstream Versus Upstream Strategy for the Administration of P2Y12 Receptor Blockers In Non-ST Elevated Acute Coronary Syndromes With Initial Invasive Indication [DUBIUS] trial[4] was aborted prematurely because of the unlikelihood of increased efficacy of one strategy over the other.
The ACCOAST[5] trial compared the use of prasugrel as a pretreatment at the time of diagnosis in patients with NSTE-ACS to administering it selectively after angiography in patients undergoing PCI. 4033 patients were included, with those in the pretreatment group receiving a loading dose of prasugrel before angiography and additional 30 mg at the time of PCI, while the control group received 60 mg of prasugrel at the time of PCI. Results showed that pretreatment with prasugrel did not reduce the rate of major ischemic events but increased the rate of major bleeding complications[5,6].
The utilization of P2Y12 receptor inhibitors as a routine pre-treatment strategy for patients presenting with chest pain and meeting the criteria for non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE ACS) may be detrimental for a considerable proportion of individuals who are subsequently diagnosed with conditions other than type 1 myocardial infarction, such as aortic dissection, tension-pneumothorax, or stroke. The administration of these inhibitors may increase the risk of bleeding complications or delay surgical procedures for patients scheduled for surgery[2]. However, the recommended standard therapy with potent P2Y12 receptor inhibitors has a rapid onset of action and allows for administration of LD after diagnostic coronary angiography and directly before PCI. Therefore, as per the guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology[2], echocardiography is recommended as a means of evaluating left ventricular function and ruling out differential diagnoses (COR: I; LOE: C) and routine pre-treatment with a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor in patients with NSTE ACS whose coronary anatomy is unknown and for whom early invasive management is planned is not recommended because of the lack of established benefit (COR: III, LOE: A).
Acute aortic syndromes (AAS) are a group of life-threatening conditions characterized by a breach in the integrity of the aortic wall, which can lead to rupture if left untreated. The most common forms of AAS include aortic dissection, intramural hematoma, and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer [1].
Aortic dissection specifically is defined as a disruption of the media layer of the aorta caused by intramural bleeding [7], resulting in the separation of the layers of the aortic wall and the formation of a dissection flap that divides the true lumen from a newly formed false lumen [1]. The incidence of AD is higher in men than in women and increases with age[8]. Historically, “acute” aortic dissection (AAD) has been defined as occurring within the first two weeks of symptom onset. The most common risk factor associated with AAD is hypertension, present in 65-75% of individuals[9], often poorly controlled like in the case of this patient. Other risk factors for AAD include preexisting aortic or aortic valve disease, a family history of aortic disease, a history of cardiac surgery, smoking, direct chest trauma, and connective tissue disease. Drug use, particularly cocaine, can cause dissection even in the absence of other risk factors[3].
Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is a non-invasive imaging technique that can be utilized to differentiate the various causes of acute chest pain, including acute aortic dissection [3]. Computed tomography (CT) is the most commonly used imaging technique for the evaluation of AAS[9,10]. The diagnostic accuracy of CT in detecting AAD involving the thoracic aorta is exceptional; the 2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease recommends CT as the initial diagnostic imaging tool in patients with suspected AAS, due to its high availability, accuracy, and speed, as well as the level of anatomic detail it provides (COR :1; LOE: C-LD)[1].
The failure to promptly diagnose acute aortic dissection, in this case, may have been due to several potential contributing factors. One of which is the lack of measurement of blood pressure in both arms during the initial presentation, which could have led to an underestimation of the patient's clinical condition. Additionally, it is possible that the community healthcare staff may have been inadequately informed about the signs and symptoms of AAD or the differences in pre-treatment of STEMI and NSTEMI with P2Y12 inhibitors. Furthermore, the examination may have been normal upon admission, and the AAD may have been evolving and ascending, making it challenging to diagnose.
Prompt surgery is the treatment of choice for acute aortic dissection [1,7]. According to the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection, mortality in patients with surgical treatment delayed beyond 24 hours was 17.1%[11]. Untreated acute aortic dissection of the ascending aorta is associated with a high mortality rate, particularly in the early stages of symptoms, with a mortality rate of 1-2% per hour after symptom onset.[12]. It should be noted that this rate is likely to be even greater in patients who have extensive aortic dissection and are already receiving a loading dose of anticoagulant and dual antiplatelet therapy.
Despite the possibility of performing cardiothoracic surgery while under the effect of clopidogrel, the heart team in this case felt that their technical expertise and resources were not adequate to handle such a complicated procedure. Additionally, there is currently no available way to reverse the effects of clopidogrel. Due to the patient's extensive acute aortic dissection and the fact that he was not in hemodynamic distress, a more cautious approach was taken. However, this approach proved to be ineffective.
The current case report underscores the necessity for a comprehensive evaluation of diagnostic possibilities in patients presenting with chest pain, as well as the potential hazards of utilizing P2Y12 inhibitors as a pre-treatment option in patients with NSTE-ACS whose coronary anatomy remains undetermined. Additionally, it serves as a reminder of the importance of maintaining an appropriate level of training and resources to efficiently manage complex cases in the future.
Conclusion:
Acute aortic dissection is a rare but life-threatening condition that can mimic symptoms of myocardial infarction. This case illustrates the importance of considering alternative diagnoses in patients presenting with chest pain, particularly in those with known hypertension and a history of smoking. It also highlights the potential consequences of routine pre-treating patients with NSTEMI with P2Y12 inhibitors without a definitive diagnosis of type 1-MI. The prompt recognition of AAD is crucial for the appropriate management and to improve the chances of survival.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
