AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-8808/164
Division of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Medicine, Larkin Palm Spring Community Hospital, Hialeah, Florida
*Corresponding Author: Sabas Gomez, Division of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Medicine, Larkin Palm Spring Community Hospital, 1475 W 49th Pl, Hialeah, FL 33012
Citation: Hudson Franca, Sergio A. Sanchez, Sahar S. Abdelmoneim, Abelardo Broceta Martinez, Sabas Gomez, et all (2023) Unique Approach to Management of Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy within a Resource-Limited Hospital. J, Clinical Case Reports and Studies, 4(2); DOI:10.31579/2690-8808/164
Copyright: © 2023 Sabas Gomez, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 26 November 2022 | Accepted: 30 December 2022 | Published: 06 February 2023
Keywords: hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy; pure α-agonist; phenylephrine
LVOT obstruction in HCM results from systolic anterior motion (SAM) of the anterior leaflet of the mitral valve and is often a dynamic process (increasing with volume depletion and decreases with volume repletion or afterload augmentation). Hence, understanding the underlying pathophysiological process is crucial in tailoring management decisions.
We herein present a case of a 57-year-old female who presented to the emergency department with complaints of shortness of breath (SOB), cough and borderline blood pressure who further decompensated during hospital course, suffering from acute hypotension related to dynamic LVOT obstruction. The patient was managed with a pure α-agonist, phenylephrine.
This case report highlights the importance of having a high index of suspicion to early recognize such dynamic LVOT obstruction and further highlights the uniqueness of managing symptomatic hypotension in HCM with LVOT obstruction in an under-resourced hospital.
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a genetic cardiomyopathy caused by mutations of the cardiac sarcomere, with respect to the extent, location, and distribution of left ventricle (LV) wall thickening as well as a diverse clinical course including sudden death, heart failure, and stroke (1). Patients with LV outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction may have a harsh crescendo-decrescendo systolic murmur. Symptoms associated with HOCM include dyspnea on exertion, orthopnea, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea, chest pain, palpitations, presyncope/syncope, postural lightheadedness, fatigue, or edema [1].
Challenging management decisions for patients with HCM in general and for specific symptoms are highlighted in the 2020 ACC/AHA guidelines on the Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy [2]. LVOT obstruction in HCM results from systolic anterior motion (SAM) of the anterior leaflet of the mitral valve and is often a dynamic process (increasing with volume depletion and decreases with volume repletion or afterload augmentation). Hence, understanding the underlying pathophysiological process is crucial in tailoring management decisions [1]. Sudden acute symptoms including hypotensive episodes can be catastrophic in HCM patients. The goals of treatment for acute symptoms in HCM is centered on volume replacement, vasoconstrictors, and controlling tachycardia, while long-term treatment focuses on incorporating negative inotropes, negative chronotropes, risk stratifications, and invasive interventions to reduce obstruction [3]. A pure α-agonist such as phenylephrine is shown to be the agent of choice in managing symptomatic hypotension in HCM with LVOT obstruction [2]. We herein present a case of a 57-year-old female who presented to the emergency department with complaints of shortness of breath (SOB), cough and borderline blood pressure who decompensated during the hospital course and suffered from acute hypotension related to dynamic LVOT obstruction. This case report highlights the importance of having a high index of suspicion to recognize such dynamic LVOT obstruction and further highlights the uniqueness of managing symptomatic hypotension in HCM with LVOT obstruction in an under-resourced hospital.
A 57-year-old female with a past medical history of essential hypertension and peripheral neuropathy and a strong family history of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM), and one sudden cardiac death in her family. The patient presented to the emergency department (ED) with complaints of shortness of breath (SOB) and cough. She had experienced shortness of breath and cough intermittently for 8 years and was evaluated by various specialties without an identifiable cause found. Her symptoms then progressively worsened over a two-week period. She became short of breath walking short distances within her own home and by tying her shoes (indicating Bendopnea). She stated that the chronic cough has been associated with SOB made worse when lying down. She sleeps using 3 pillows (indicating orthopnea). She denied paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea. The patient denied any sputum associated with cough, recent infection, fever, chills, chest pain, palpitations, headache, blurring of vision, loss of consciousness. Her home medications included Lisinopril 10 mg orally once daily and as needed Albuterol inhaler (as needed which provides temporary SOB symptomatic relief). Vitals in the ED were sinus tachycardia (119 bpm), Temperature (100.4 F), respiratory rate 22/min, Saturation 98% on room air, and blood pressure (106/81 mm Hg). On physical examination, the patient was in Non-Acute Distress (NAD), Alert and oriented times three. Bilateral lower limb edema +2 and raised Jugular Venous Pressure (JVP) were noted. Chest and heart examination revealed bilateral diminished basilar breath sounds and a grade 3/6 systolic murmur best at the apex and left lower sternal border on auscultation. Remainder of the examination was unremarkable. Labs on admission showed: Hematology: WBC 4.7 (reference 4-11 103/uL); RBC 2.06 (reference 3.8-5.20 106/uL); Hgb 11.4 g/dL (references 12-15 g/dL); hematocrit 35.8% (reference 35-45%); MCV 65 (reference 80-100L); RDW 14.7%. Complete metabolic panel included Na 138, (reference 135-147 mmol/L0; Chloride 101 (reference 98-107 mmol/L); Potassium 3.4 (reference 3.5-5.1 mmol/L); calcium 8.5 mg/dL(reference 8.4 -10.2 mg/Dl); anion gap 8.0 mmol/L (reference 4-13 mmol/L) ; serum osmolarity 271 mOsm/kg (reference: 285-305 mOsm/kg); creatinine 0.65 (reference 0.52-1.04 mg/dL); BUN 17 (reference 7-17 mg/dL); glomerular filtration rate (GFR) 73ml/min/1.732, Liver function tests were consistent with hepatocellular injury as follows: alkaline phosphatase (ALKP): 126 U/L (reference: 38-126 U/L); elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT): 133 U/L (reference 0-35 U/L). Elevated aspartate aminotransferase (AST): 105 U/L (reference 15-46 U/L). Total bilirubin: 0.7 mg/dL (reference: 0.2-1.3 mg/dL), albumin: 4.2 (reference: 3.5-5.0 g/dL). Total protein: 7.9 g/dL (reference: 6.3-8.2 g/dL). Globulin: 3.7g/dL (reference: 2.3-3.5 g/dL). AG ratio: 1.1 (low) and BNP 1310 pg/ml (reference 0-98 pg/ml). Coagulation profile included PT 11.1 (reference 9.4- 11.6 seconds); INR 1.03 (reference 0.8-1.2); and aPTT 32 sec (reference 23-35 seconds). Baseline troponin was unremarkable. COVID-19 test, Influenza A & B tests were negative. Blood gas on admission showed acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Chest X-ray (Figure 1) showed enlarged cardiac silhouette and bibasilar opacities which may represent infectious/inflammatory process and/or pulmonary edema. ECG (Figure 2) demonstrated sinus tachycardia with ST Depression in leads I, II, III, aVF, V4, V5, V6. On this ECG The Sokolow-Lyon Criteria was not fulfilled for left ventricular hypertrophy (which is the sum of the S-wave in V1 plus the R wave in V5 or V6 is not greater than 35 mm). Chest CT scan was performed without intravenous contrast and demonstrated relatively extensive left lower lung predominant tree-in-bud and ground-glass opacities representing small airways infectious process and enlarged main pulmonary trunk (measuring 3.1 cm). Patient was admitted to the Cardiology unit for further management with provisional diagnosis of community acquired pneumonia and acute exacerbation of heart failure. Mycoplasma and strep pneumoniae antigen levels were ordered. Empiric treatment with antibiotics (Azithromycin 500 MG IV Q24H, and ceftriaxone 1 GM 1000 MG IV Q24H) were initiated, along with oxygen orders (2 L NC) to maintain a goal of saturation above 92%. Given the extensive cardiac history, the patient underwent Two-dimensional echocardiography (Figure 3) which was significant for the findings of severe basal septal hypertrophy (1.79 cm end-diastolic interventricular septum thickness ), decreased LV cavity size, preserved LV ejection fraction (LVEF of 60-65 %), no LV segmental wall motion abnormalities , impaired diastolic function (grade 1-2) , normal right ventricular (RV) size and function, severe chordal SAM with severe Mitral Regurgitation (MR). The resting gradient of the LVOT was elevated to ≥50 mmHg at rest during systole. Tricuspid valve was normal in structure and mild tricuspid regurgitation, with no evidence of severe pulmonary hypertension (calculated RV systolic pressure from tricuspid valve regurgitation to be 17 mmHg) were noted. The inferior vena cava size was normal with > 50% collapsibility (i. e. estimated right atrial pressure of five mmHg). Echo findings consistent with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. During the hospital's first day of admission, the patient developed SOB and hypotension with vitals BP 95/65 mmHg, pulse 118/minutes. STAT CTA was performed showing no CT angiographic evidence of acute pulmonary embolism, aortic aneurysm, or aortic dissection but grossly unchanged ground-glass nodular /tree-in-bud opacity in the left lower lung suggestive of small airway infectious process. Management was directed at resuscitation Intravenous fluid NS 0.900ccbolus. However, into the second fluid bag, the patient became SOB, tachypneic, and had an increasing cough with hemoptysis. Symptoms further worsened with reverse Trendelenburg positioning, and the patient remained hypotensive despite fluid administration. Hence, fluid was discontinued, BIPAP (EPAP13/ IPAP 6/ rate 23/FiO2 30%) was started, and the patient was transferred to the Intensive Care Unit with vitals HR 132, BP 97/53, SAT 94%on BIPAP. In the ICU, Vasopressors phenylephrine 40 MG IV titrated per ICU unit protocol was started, and the patient was closely monitored to maintain mean arterial pressure > 70 mmHg for adequate cerebral perfusion, and strict Ins and outs were documented. Additionally, antimicrobials were continued, verapamil 120 mg Q 8 hours was added to avoid tachycardia, oxygen was maintained on BIPAP as tolerated (with follow up arterial blood gas: PH -7.43, PCO2- 37, PO2- 124, HCO3- 23.9), nebulizers levalbuterol inhalers 0.63 MG/3 ML 0.63 mg Q 6 Hrs therapy as tolerated, dexamethasone 10 MG IV daily, and benzonatate 200 mg orally TID. The mycoplasma serology Negative, and two sets of blood culture were negative at 48 hours. CBC and CMP during hospital admission did not significantly change. Repeat echocardiogram with and without the phenylephrine showed reduced LVOT gradient and MR with phenylephrine and SBP of 130 mmHg, while LVOT gradient and MR increased off the phenylephrine with SBP <100>
Figure 1: Chest X-ray showing enlarged cardiac silhouette and bibasilar opacities which may represent infectious/inflammatory process and/or pulmonary edema.
Figure 2. ECG on Admission showing Sinus Tachycardia. The Sokolow-Lyon Criteria is not fulfilled for left ventricular hypertrophy (which is the sum of the S-wave in V1 plus the R wave in V5 or V6 is not greater than 35 mm).
Figure 3. Two Dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) showing A) Parasternal Long Axis view (LAX) in end diastolic frame (Mitral Valve open) showing marked left ventricular hypertrophy in the septum; B) Parasternal LAX view showing Systolic in systolic frame (Mitral Valve closed) anterior motion of the mitral valve (SAM) with dependent significant eccentric and posteriorly directed mitral regurgitation (MR) on Color Doppler (mosaic patterns) with color acceleration; C) Continuous Wave Doppler showing MR with peak Gradient of 138 mmHg; Continuous-wave Doppler signals showing a dynamic gradient with late-systolic peaking and a maximum velocity of 3.7 m/second (maximum pressure gradient 56.46 mmHg), not shown here.
Acute hypotension is a common problem in HCM patients with dynamic LVOT related to SAM of the MV. We herein present a case of a 57-year-old female who presented to the emergency department with complaints of SOB, cough and borderline blood pressure who decompensated and suffered from acute hypotension related to dynamic LVOT obstruction. A pure α-agonist such as phenylephrine is shown to be the agent of choice in managing symptomatic hypotension in HCM with LVOT [2]. Indeed, our patient responded to phenylephrine and was stabilized as a bridge until alcohol septal ablation is arranged (i.e bridge to intervention). This case report highlights the importance of having a high index of suspicion to early recognize such dynamic LVOT obstruction and further highlights the uniqueness of managing HCM patients in an under-resourced hospital utilizing pure α-agonists in managing symptomatic hypotension in HCM with LVOT obstruction.
The hemodynamic goals in patients with HCM relies on the pharmacologic therapies to control symptoms and exercise limitations through reduction of the dynamic LVOT obstruction [3]. Hence, short goal treatment is centered on volume replacement, vasoconstrictors, and controlling tachycardia, while long-term treatment focuses on incorporating negative inotropes, negative chronotropes, risk stratifications for sudden cardiac death (SCD) [4], and invasive interventions to reduce LVOT obstruction [2]. Hypovolemia, tachycardia, systemic vasodilation, and increased contractility all exacerbate the obstruction. Our patient did not improve on aggressive fluid management in an attempt to maintain preload and her symptoms of heart failure worsened.
The use of pure α-adrenergic receptor agonists was the preferred vasoconstrictor agent in this case of HCM with acute hypotension related to dynamic LVOT obstruction [2]. Pure α-adrenergic receptor agonists do not cause tachycardia (i.e., increased oxygen demand), and thus the diastolic filling time is maintained and hence coronary perfusion pressure, and in that regard they are the drug of choice in these cases with acute hypotension refractory to intravenous fluid boluses [5]. Worth mentioning, that in an undifferentiated shock not responding to fluid resuscitation, norepinephrine (an inotrope and a vasopressor) should be the first line vasopressor to use. The increased cardiac contractility is the sole action of Inotropes, which in turn improves cardiac output, facilitating the maintenance of mean arterial pressure (MAP) and perfusion to the body. However, in cases with known or suspected HCM with LVOT obstruction with acute hypotension, the utilization of inotropes should be avoided due to the resultant increase of LVOT gradient, hence the judicious use of vasoconstrictive agents should be considered [2]. The role of phenylephrine in HCM with dynamic LVOT obstruction has been highlighted in a study by Moreno and colleagues, in which utilizing the phenylephrine dynamic drug suppression test (phenylephrine provocation procedure [PPP]) was helpful to guide septal reduction planning in patients with HCM on perioperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) [7]. The authors reported [7] that Phenylephrine administration resulted in a change from average baseline MR severity grade of 4.60±0.12 (moderate/severe) to 2.06±0.17 (mild/moderate) with a concomitant increase in SBP of 43±3 mm Hg. Similarly in our patient, the repeat TTE with phenylephrine showed reduced LVOT gradient and mitral regurgitation (MR) grade to mild with an increase in SBP of 130 mmHg, while without phenylephrine, the LVOT gradient increased and MR gradient increased to moderate-severe while SBP was <100>
This case highlights a clinical scenario in which utilizing a pure α-adrenergic receptor agonist in an under-resourced hospital can bridge treatment in the management of patients with Acute refractory hypotension secondary to HCM with dynamic LVOT obstruction. It also further illustrates the key role of comprehensive echocardiography as indispensable modality for the diagnosis, clinical risk stratification, hemodynamic assessment, and the interventional management of patients of HCM.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
