Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2692-9759/198
1Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
2Director of the Angiocardiology Center - Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. Former Head of the Vascular Surgery Service at the Marcílio Dias Naval Hospital, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
3Head of the Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Service at the Pedro Ernesto University Hospital (HUPE), Rio de Janeiro State University (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
4Eduardo Loureiro de Araújo - Vascular and Endovascular Surgeon at Santa Teresa Hospital -Petrópolis - Rio de Janeiro.
5Rafael de Athayde Soares – Instituto de Assistência Médica ao Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo – IAMSPE
*Corresponding Author: Adalberto Pereira de Araujo, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Director of the Angiocardiology Center - Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. Former Head of the Vascular Surgery Service at the Marcílio Dias Naval Hospital, Rio de
Citation: Adalberto Pereira de Araujo, Cristiane Ferreira de Araujo Gomes, Loureiro de Araujo, Carlos Felipe da Silva Delgado, Monica Rochedo Mayall,et al, (2026), Unconventional Use of the Merit Wrapsody® Cell-Impermeable Endoprosthesis for Complex Iliac Arterial Reconstruction: A Two-Case Series, Cardiology Research and Reports, 8(3); DOI:10.31579/2692-9759/198
Copyright: © 2026, Adalberto Pereira de Araujo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 03 July 2026 | Accepted: 17 July 2026 | Published: 22 July 2026
Keywords: wrapsody; covered stent; iliac artery; peripheral arterial disease; arteriovenous fistula; endovascular; off-label
Background: The Merit Wrapsody® Cell-Impermeable Endoprosthesis (CIE) is a self-expanding nitinol-based covered stent featuring a triple-layer polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) structure, originally designed for hemodialysis access dysfunction. Its combination of flexibility, radial force, and anti-restenotic properties renders it an attractive option for arterial reconstruction in complex anatomical settings. Experience with its use in peripheral arterial disease outside the dialysis context remains limited.
Cases: We report two cases in which the Wrapsody® CIE was employed as an off-label device for complex iliac arterial reconstruction. Case 1 involved a 48-year-old man with chronic occlusion of a 19-year-old Dacron bypass graft and a 7-year-old drug-eluting stent causing disabling claudication, treated with mechanical thrombectomy and dual Wrapsody® covered stent implantation, with follow-up of 3 years and 11 months. Case 2 involved a 56-year-old woman with a longstanding iatrogenic iliac arteriovenous fistula secondary to lumbar spine surgery, definitively excluded using a bifurcated aortic endograft combined with a Wrapsody® covered stent as the contralateral iliac limb.
Results: Both procedures achieved technical success. In Case 1, limb perfusion was fully restored, with an ankle-brachial index of 1.19 at 39-month follow-up. In Case 2, the arteriovenous fistula was completely excluded with rapid clinical improvement. At 10 months of follow-up, the endograft body remained well-positioned with the Wrapsody® limb patent in the right common iliac artery. The left iliac limb subsequently occluded; however, limb perfusion was maintained via collateral circulation, and fistula exclusion was durably achieved.
Conclusion: These cases highlight the versatility of the Wrapsody® CIE as an unconventional endovascular tool for complex iliac pathologies, including chronic graft occlusion and arteriovenous fistula exclusion. Prospective data are required to define its role in peripheral arterial reconstruction.
Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) affecting the aortoiliac segment remains a major source of morbidity worldwide, with manifestations ranging from limiting claudication to critical limb-threatening ischemia. Endovascular intervention — encompassing balloon angioplasty, conventional bare-metal stenting, and covered stent implantation — has largely supplanted open aortofemoral bypass surgery as the primary revascularization strategy for iliac occlusive disease, owing to lower perioperative risk, shorter hospital stay, and acceptable medium-term patency in appropriately selected patients [1,2]. Covered stents, or vascular endoprostheses, offer a theoretical advantage over conventional alternatives by interposing a physical barrier between the arterial lumen and the vessel wall, thereby reducing restenosis driven by neointimal hyperplasia and inflammatory cell proliferation. Several systematic reviews and meta-analyses have confirmed that covered stents provide superior or equivalent patency to bare-metal stents for complex aortoiliac lesions, with particular benefit in TASC II C and D morphologies. Pooled primary patency rates for covered stents in the iliac territory at one and three years approximate 91% and 81%, respectively [3]. Beyond occlusive disease, covered stents have become the preferred endovascular solution for arteriovenous fistulae (AVF), pseudoaneurysms, and vascular perforations, providing immediate hemodynamic correction without open surgery. The Merit Wrapsody® Cell-Impermeable Endoprosthesis (CIE; Merit Medical Systems, South Jordan, UT, USA) is a self-expanding covered stent composed of a nitinol scaffold encased by three distinct PTFE layers: an outer expansile ePTFE layer designed to promote tissue ingrowth and prevent device migration; an intermediate cell-impermeable layer designed to block transmural tissue migration and macrophage accumulation; and an inner luminal layer of a novel "spun" PTFE intended to reduce platelet adhesion and fibrin deposition. The nitinol framework provides substantial radial force and crush resistance, conforming to vessel angulation, with softened, atraumatic ends to minimize wall injury. The device received US FDA approval in December 2024 for the treatment of stenoses in venous, prosthetic, or covered-stent hemodialysis arteriovenous access circuits. In the pivotal randomized WAVE trial, six-month target lesion primary patency reached 89.8% in patients with arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) and 82.0% in those with arteriovenous grafts (AVG) [4,5]. Despite its regulatory indication for dialysis access, the structural characteristics of the Wrapsody® its flexibility, radial strength, availability in diameters from 6 to 16 mm and lengths up to 80 mm, and cell-impermeable anti-restenotic architecture — render it an attractive option for peripheral arterial reconstruction.6 A growing number of case series report its successful use in aortoiliac occlusive disease, popliteal artery aneurysms, subclavian artery pathology, and iatrogenic lesions [7,8,9,10]. Nonetheless, systematic experience in this context remains limited, and published evidence consists predominantly of small, single-center series. Herein we present two technically challenging cases in which the Wrapsody® CIE was employed as a key component of endovascular arterial reconstruction: one involving chronic occlusion of a long-segment Dacron graft with a concomitantly occluded drug-eluting stent in the iliac artery, and another involving definitive exclusion of a complex iatrogenic iliac arteriovenous fistula persisting for more than a decade. Both cases illustrate the device's versatility and the intraoperative decision-making required when standard device options prove anatomically inadequate.
Case 1: Chronic Iliac Graft and Drug-Eluting Stent Occlusion
A 48-year-old male physical education teacher was referred with a four-month history of progressive left lower limb claudication, paresthesia, and toe numbness, limiting ambulatory capacity to approximately 30 meters. His vascular history was notable for a left traumatic injury with external iliac artery rupture sustained in a motorcycle accident 19 years prior, treated with an 8-mm Dacron bypass graft from the common iliac artery to the proximal femoral artery. The reconstruction provided durable results for 14 years, after which graft thrombosis was managed with a hybrid approach consisting of mechanical thrombectomy and implantation of an 8 × 100 mm drug-eluting stent. The patient remained asymptomatic for an additional seven years. He had no history of diabetes, hypertension, or tobacco use. Physical examination revealed absent left femoral, popliteal, and pedal pulses. Computed tomographic angiography (CTA) demonstrated complete occlusion of the Dacron graft and drug-eluting stent throughout their entire length, from the distal right common iliac artery to the distal left external iliac artery, with extensive collateral circulation formation (Figure 1).
Figure 1: Computed tomographic angiography demonstrating complete occlusion of the Dacron graft and drug-eluting stent throughout their entire length, from the distal common iliac artery to the distal external iliac artery, with extensive collateral circulation formation.
The native aorta and infrainguinal arterial tree were normal. Preoperative cardiovascular risk stratification indicated low surgical risk. The procedure was performed under general anesthesia in a hybrid operating room using an endovascular approach. Surgical exposure of the proximal superficial femoral artery was obtained through the anterosuperior aspect of the thigh, above the anterior scar. Direct arterial puncture with placement of a 7F sheath and a hydrophilic guidewire following an H1 catheter successfully recanalized the occluded segment along the left iliac axis. After guidewire exchange for a 0.014" × 300 cm guidewire, a Jetstream mechanical thrombectomy device was advanced and six passes were performed (three with closed blades, three with expanded blades), achieving satisfactory thrombus volume reduction. Balloon angioplasty preceded sheath exchange to a 12F delivery system, and calibrated pigtail catheter angiography delineated a treatment segment of 100 mm in length (87 mm on CTA) (Figure 2).
Figure 2: Computed tomographic angiography demonstrating the lenght of the Dacron and the drug eluting stent occlusion
The original strategy had anticipated implantation of a Medtronic Endurant iliac extension endoprosthesis; however, intraoperative angiography revealed that this device would exclude a large collateral network — collaterals deemed critical in connecting the internal iliac artery to the common femoral artery to maintain limb viability in the event of future reocclusion. Open aortofemoral bypass was similarly abandoned in favor of covered stent reconstruction, as a device of appropriate length could be deployed without excluding the aforementioned collateral circulation. Two self-expanding Wrapsody® stents were implanted: a distal 9 × 75 mm stent positioned at the level of the epigastric artery, and a proximal 9 × 50 mm stent extending to the vicinity of the left internal iliac artery (Figure 3), covering the entire diseased segment while preserving the critical collaterals. Post-implantation angioplasty was subsequently performed with 7 × 40 mm and 8 × 40 mm balloons (Figure 3).
Figure 3: Post-implantation angioplasty was subsequently performed with 7 × 40 mm and 8 × 40 mm balloons
Final angiography demonstrated excellent patency of both stents, with normal deep femoral artery patency and no residual obstruction (Figure 4).
Figure 4: Final angiography demonstrated excellent patency of both stents, with normal deep femoral artery patency and no residual obstruction
Arteriorraphy of the superficial femoral artery was performed with 6-0 Prolene suture. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 3. At first follow-up, femoral, popliteal, and posterior tibial pulses were symmetrically palpable. At 14-month follow-up (October 2023), the patient was asymptomatic, had returned to full activities, and the ankle-brachial index (ABI) was 1.19. At 3 years and 11 months, the patient remained asymptomatic with strong pulses to the feet, with ankle-brachial index = 1,09. Doppler ultrasound demonstrated normal stent patency, corroborated by computed tomographic angiography (Figure 5 and 6).
Figure 5: CT-SCAN after 3 years and 11 months follow-up demonstrating Wrapsody patency
Figure 6: CT-SCAN after 3 years and 11 months follow-up demonstrating Wrapsody patency confirming durable perfusion and Wrapsody® stent patency.
Case 2: Chronic Iatrogenic Iliac Arteriovenous Fistula with Complex Aortic Anatomy
A 56-year-old woman presented with a longstanding iatrogenic arteriovenous fistula (AVF) of the left common iliac artery, resulting from inadvertent vascular injury during lumbar spinal prosthesis implantation performed in June 2012. The initial injury caused both arterial and venous perforation, leading to a three-month hospitalization and the subsequent development of massive left lower limb edema and severe venous hypertension, progressing to a variant of phlegmasia coerulea dolens. In 2013, the fistula was treated with an 8 × 39 mm Advanta covered stent in the left common iliac artery, with initial clinical improvement and AVF exclusion (Figure 7).
Figure 7: In 2013, the fistula was treated with an 8 × 39 mm Advanta covered stent in the left common iliac artery, with initial clinical improvement and AVF exclusion.
The patient recovered satisfactorily, with resolution of pain, edema, and cyanosis; she was discharged three days later, with improvement of dyspnea, normalization of systemic arterial pressure, and heart rate. Computed tomographic angiography performed on September 26, 2018 demonstrated 5 mm distal migration of the Advanta stent below the aortic bifurcation, with a persistent fistulous tract and exacerbated venous collateral circulation, further aggravated by occlusion of the proximal segment of the left common iliac vein. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the patient was lost to follow-up and returned to consultation on November 4, 2021, presenting with marked right-sided lower limb edema. Serial CTA showed stent patency but persistence of a high-flow AVF at the ostium of the left common iliac artery, with chronic venous occlusion and extensive pelvic venous collateral circulation. Imaging also revealed exclusion of the left internal iliac artery by the previously implanted stent, an extremely short infrarenal aorta (76 mm), an aortic diameter of 16 mm, and a short right common iliac artery (30 mm), which precluded conventional sizing of bifurcated endografts. An extensive pre-procedural planning strategy was established, including contingency plans for conversion to an aorto-monoiliac configuration with crossover femorofemoral bypass. The procedure was performed on May 28, 2025 under general anesthesia in a hybrid operating room. Bilateral percutaneous common femoral artery access was obtained using a pre-closure technique. Intraoperative calibrated angiography confirmed the fistula location (Figure 8).
Figure 8: Intraoperative calibrated angiography confirmed the fistula loation.
And aortic measurements. Through an 18F introducer sheath, the shortest available Medtronic Endurant bifurcated endograft (23 × 70 mm) was implanted with a left iliac extension limb extending to the external iliac artery (Figure 9). A 14 × 50 mm Wrapsody® covered stent was implanted as the contralateral limb into the right common iliac artery, extending to the level of the right hypogastric artery (Figure 10). Molding was performed with a Reliant compliant balloon. Completion angiography demonstrated a stenosis in the left endograft limb, resolved with angioplasty using a 10 × 40 mm semicompliant balloon, and confirmed complete AVF exclusion, restoration of arterial flow (Figure 09).
Figure 9: Medtronic Endurant bifurcated endograft (23 × 70 mm) was implanted with a left iliac extension limb extending to the external iliac artery.
And preservation of pelvic circulation through the contralateral hypogastric artery. Bilateral percutaneous closure devices were deployed. The patient was extubated immediately and transferred to the intensive care unit. Within hours, the patient and her family noted marked reduction in venous congestion, improvement in limb coloration, disappearance of the suprapubic bruit, and visible skin wrinkling on the dorsum of the foot, indicating rapid venous decompression. She was transferred to the ward on postoperative day 2. At two-week follow-up, abdominal wall varices had disappeared, operative wounds were healed, no bruit was detectable, and lower limb pulses were palpable. Anticoagulation with rivaroxaban and clopidogrel was maintained. CTA at 6 months demonstrated patent endoprostheses (Figure 10).
Figure 10: A 14 × 50 mm Wrapsody® covered stent was implanted as the contralateral limb into the right common iliac artery, extending to the level of the right hypogastric artery.
At 13-month follow-up (November 2025), CTA demonstrated occlusion of the left endograft limb; however, the Wrapsody® stent maintained patency of the endograft body and right iliac axis (Figures 11 and 12).
Figure 11: At 6 months, angio-CT showed full patency of the endoprostheses.
Figure 12: At 11-month follow-up (March 2026), CTA demonstrated occlusion of the left endograft limb; however, the Wrapsody® stent maintained patency of the endograft body and right iliac axis demonstrated in both CTA and Duplex ultrasound.
Although the left iliac limb occluded, definitive AVF exclusion was preserved. Perfusion of the left lower extremity was maintained via collateral vessels supplying the left femoral territory through the Wrapsody®-perfused internal iliac artery. Lower limb edema and venous congestion resolved. The patient reports non-disabling left calf claudication and loss of the left femoral pulse, without recurrence of venous hypertension. Conservative management with physiotherapy and antiplatelet therapy was recommended, with femorofemoral crossover bypass reserved for incapacitating symptoms.
These two cases illustrate the value of the Wrapsody® CIE as a versatile endovascular tool beyond its approved indication for dialysis access. The device's unique triple-layer PTFE architecture — combining an outer anti-migratory ePTFE layer, an intermediate cell-impermeable barrier, and an inner anti-thrombotic spun PTFE luminal surface — addresses failure mechanisms affecting conventional covered stents, particularly neointimal hyperplasia driven by transmural cellular migration. These properties are directly relevant to arterial reconstruction, where in-stent restenosis and thrombosis remain the primary determinants of long-term patency.
Case 1: Recurrent Iliac Occlusion and the Role of Covered Stents
Recurrent occlusion of a pre-existing iliac stent — whether covered or bare — represents a technically and anatomically challenging reconstructive problem. The accumulation of thrombotic material within an aged scaffold, compounded by chronic inflammation and neointimal proliferation, creates a hostile environment for plain balloon angioplasty or uncovered re-stenting. The case reported here was particularly complex due to the composite nature of the target lesion: a 19-year-old Dacron graft in series with a 7-year-old drug-eluting stent, completely occluded over a length requiring approximately 100 mm of coverage. Endovascular management with mechanical thrombectomy and covered stent reconstruction is well supported in the literature for complex iliac occlusive disease. Squizzato et al., in a multicenter study of 93 patients treated with self-expanding covered stents for external iliac artery obstructive disease, reported 100% technical success and favorable mid-term patency rates. A 2024 meta-analysis by Bontinis et al.,2 published in the European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, confirmed that covered stents outperform bare-metal stents for complex aortoiliac lesions in terms of patency and freedom from target lesion revascularization. A systematic review and meta-analysis including 1,983 patients across 25 studies reported pooled primary patency rates of 91% at 12 months and 81% at 36 months for covered stents. The intraoperative decision to abandon the originally planned Endurant iliac extension in favor of Wrapsody® stents warrants particular attention. The identification of a critical internal iliac-to-femoral collateral network — recognizable on calibrated angiography precisely because of the intraoperative imaging capabilities inherent to hybrid procedures — exemplifies how surgical judgment must adapt in real time to anatomical findings that preoperative imaging may not fully characterize. Preservation of these collaterals was deemed essential to maintain limb viability in the event of future reocclusion. The flexible, self-expanding profile of the Wrapsody®, available in a 9-mm diameter matching the target vessel, permitted precise segmental coverage without excluding collateral ostia. The ABI of 1.19, Doppler imaging, and CTA at 39-month follow-up confirm the restoration of hemodynamically significant perfusion. The cell-impermeable design of the Wrapsody® is mechanically relevant in this context. Prior publications on its off-label use in the aortoiliac territory by Bortoluzzi et al.8 and colleagues in Brazil documented satisfactory patency across a variety of aortoiliac conditions, attributing part of the benefit to the PTFE barrier against macrophage-mediated intimal hyperplasia. In an ovine external iliac artery model, Dolmatch et al.7 demonstrated that the outer ePTFE layer promotes organized tissue ingrowth to anchor the device without transmural cellular migration — a finding particularly relevant in the iliac segment, where radial forces and vessel motion challenge long-term stent integrity.
Case 2: Chronic Iatrogenic Arteriovenous Fistula — A Decade-Long Challenge
Iatrogenic vascular injury during lumbar spine surgery, although uncommon, is a potentially devastating complication. Perforation of the major iliac vessels may result in massive hemorrhage, arteriovenous fistula formation, or both. When the arteriovenous communication persists, progressive venous hypertension, venous claudication, lower limb edema, and eventually high-output cardiac failure may develop.11 The clinical evolution from phlegmasia alba dolens to the cerulean variant described in this patient illustrates the hemodynamic severity that a sustained high-flow AVF can impose on the peripheral venous system. Endovascular exclusion with covered stents has become the treatment of choice for iliac AVFs, offering lower morbidity than open surgical repair in what is frequently a highly fibrotic operative field, particularly following prior spinal intervention. Tang et al.[11] reported successful exclusion of an iatrogenic iliac AVF with a single stent after lumbar discectomy, with complete symptom resolution. Ji et al.,12 in a 10-year single-center experience with iliac AVF management, confirmed the efficacy of endovascular approaches across multiple etiologies. In the present case, the additional challenge was anatomical: an infrarenal aorta of only 76 mm in length with a diameter of 16 mm necessitated selection of the shortest available bifurcated endograft, while the short right common iliac artery imposed significant constraints on maintaining right internal iliac artery patency, particularly given that the left internal iliac artery had been excluded during the first intervention. The use of a 14 × 50 mm Wrapsody® stent as the contralateral limb into the right common iliac artery was motivated by the need for a flexible, conformable device capable of adapting to the short right common iliac artery anatomy while providing reliable sealing against the persistent fistulous communication. The cell-impermeable architecture offered additional security against recurrence via any transmural route. The rapid and dramatic post-procedural improvement — immediate disappearance of the bruit, limb color normalization, and visible venous decompression evidenced by skin wrinkling of the dorsum of the foot within hours — confirms complete hemodynamic correction of the AVF. [13]
The subsequent occlusion of the left endograft limb at 10 months, while representing a patency failure, did not result in recurrence of venous hypertension or AVF, underscoring that the primary objective of the reconstruction — fistula exclusion — was durably achieved. Occlusion of the left iliac axis in the context of chronic collateral circulation established by a long-standing AVF is often better tolerated with respect to limb ischemia, given well-developed pelvic and femoral collateral networks, as evidenced by the maintenance of limb viability in this patient with only intermittent claudication. The late occlusion of the left endograft limb may reflect the anatomical challenges posed by a previously implanted stent, the narrow aortic bifurcation, the pre-existing hemodynamic disturbance induced by venous hypertension, or an inadequate anticoagulation response — factors that collectively emphasize the importance of rigorous surveillance and the availability of secondary interventions such as crossover femorofemoral bypass.
The Wrapsody® CIE as an Off-Label Arterial Device
The regulatory approval of the Wrapsody® is currently restricted to hemodialysis access circuits. Its use in peripheral arterial disease constitutes off-label practice. Nevertheless, a growing body of evidence — encompassing aortoiliac occlusive disease, popliteal artery aneurysmal disease, subclavian artery pathology, iatrogenic lesions, and aortic pathology — demonstrates its technical feasibility and short- to medium-term safety across a spectrum of conditions. Mansano et al.[10] and de Athayde Soares et al.9 published series demonstrating successful application of the device in the aortoiliac territory with satisfactory early patency, while our group has contributed experience with popliteal artery aneurysms. The Wrapsody® Iliac Artery Trial (NCT03994185) was conceived as the first dedicated safety and efficacy study in the iliac artery, although enrollment ultimately did not proceed — leaving an evidence gap that current off-label registries and case series are beginning to address. The device's profile compares favorably with established covered stents for arterial reconstruction. Relative to the GORE Viabahn — the most extensively studied self-expanding covered stent in the peripheral arterial literature, with documented primary patency rates of approximately 73% to 86% at one year in the external iliac artery — the Wrapsody® differs primarily in its triple-layer PTFE structure and the addition of the cell-impermeable anti-proliferative barrier, a design feature not present in conventional ePTFE-only covered stents [14,15,16]. Whether these differences translate into superior long-term patency in the peripheral arterial setting requires direct comparative evidence. Clinicians considering off-label use of the Wrapsody® for arterial reconstruction should be aware of several device-specific considerations. Available diameters (6–16 mm) and lengths (up to 80 mm in some configurations) encompass common and external iliac targets but may require tandem implantation for longer lesions, as in Case 1. The self-expanding nitinol framework requires precise sizing prior to implantation, as oversizing beyond 10–20% may compromise radial force and conformability. Delivery through a 12F sheath is compatible with most percutaneous femoral access systems. Finally, the device's inner spun PTFE surface, while anti-thrombogenic, does not eliminate the need for periprocedural anticoagulation and long-term antiplatelet therapy [16,17].
The two cases reported herein expand the evidence base for off-label use of the Merit Wrapsody® Cell-Impermeable Endoprosthesis in complex peripheral arterial reconstruction. In a patient with chronic composite iliac graft and drug-eluting stent occlusion, dual Wrapsody® implantation following mechanical thrombectomy achieved durable limb perfusion with an ABI of 1.19 at 39 months. In a patient with a decade-long iatrogenic iliac arteriovenous fistula complicated by an extremely short and narrow-caliber aorta, the Wrapsody® served as a key component of a hybrid aortoiliac reconstruction that definitively excluded the fistula with dramatic and sustained clinical improvement. Both cases underscore the importance of intraoperative flexibility and the value of a covered stent with a distinct anti-restenotic architecture in scenarios where standard devices are anatomically inadequate or potentially harmful. The cell-impermeable design of the Wrapsody® offers a theoretically meaningful advantage over conventional covered stents in preventing neointimal hyperplasia; however, prospective comparative data and longer follow-up are required to confirm this benefit in the peripheral arterial context. Registries and prospective studies specifically designed to evaluate the Wrapsody® in peripheral arterial indications are warranted. Until such data are available, carefully selected off-label use — guided by sound anatomical assessment, multidisciplinary discussion, and thorough patient counseling — represents a reasonable approach in cases where conventional options are limited or inadequate.
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,
Dear Maria Emerson, Editorial Coordinator of International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, What distinguishes International Journal of Clinical Case Report and Review is not only the scientific rigor of its publications, but the intellectual climate in which research is evaluated. The submission process is refreshingly free of unnecessary formal barriers and bureaucratic rituals that often complicate academic publishing without adding real value. The peer-review system is demanding yet constructive, guided by genuine scientific dialogue rather than hierarchical or authoritarian attitudes. Reviewers act as collaborators in improving the manuscript, not as gatekeepers imposing arbitrary standards. This journal offers a rare balance: high methodological standards combined with a respectful, transparent, and supportive editorial approach. In an era where publishing can feel more burdensome than research itself, this platform restores the original purpose of peer review — to refine ideas, not to obstruct them Prof. Perlat Kapisyzi, FCCP PULMONOLOGIST AND THORACIC IMAGING.
Dear Reader: We have published several articles in the Auctores Publishing, LLC, journal, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports in recent years (CMRR). This is an ‘open access’ journal and the following are our observations. From the initial invitation to submit an article, to the final edits of galley proofs, we have found CMRR personnel to be professional, responsive, rapid and thorough. This entire process begins with Catherine Mitchell, Editorial Coordinator. She is simply outstanding, and, I believe, unparalleled in her capacity. I cannot imagine a more responsive and dedicated Editorial Coordinator. As I read the dates and timing of her correspondence with us, it seems that she never sleeps. I hope Auctores Publishing, LLC, appreciates her efforts as much as these authors do. Thank you to Auctores Publishing, LLC, to the Editorial Staff/Board, and to Catherine Mitchell from a grateful author(s).
Dear Maria Emerson, Editorial Coordinator of - Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. ''I am pleased to provide this testimonial following the publication of our recent case report in this journal. The peer review process was rigorous, constructive, thorough, and conducted in a timely manner. The reviewers’ comments were thoughtful, detailed, and highly constructive, contributing substantially to the refinement, clarity, and scientific robustness of our manuscript. The process was conducted with professionalism and academic integrity throughout. The support provided by the editorial office was exemplary. Communication was consistently prompt, clear, and courteous at all stages of the submission and publication process. The editorial team demonstrated a high level of organization and responsiveness, ensuring that all queries were addressed efficiently and that the process remained transparent and well-coordinated. The overall quality of the journal is reflected in its strong editorial standards, commitment to scientific excellence, and dedication to publishing clinically meaningful research. It has been a privilege to publish our work in this journal, and we would welcome the opportunity to contribute further in the future.'' Best wishes from, Dr. Efstratios Trogkanis, Cardiologist.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of the journal IJCCR, I had a very positive experience with Auctores - Journal throughout the publication process. The Editorial Team was highly responsive, professional, and supportive at every stage. I would like to extend my sincere thanks to the Editor: Grace Pierce, for her guidance and assistance. The peer-review process was smooth and constructive, helping improve the quality of my work. I would gladly recommend Auctores Journal to fellow researchers and authors. Dr. SABITA SINHA, Medical Oncologist, MD (Electro Homeopathy).
Dear Mayra Duenas, Editorial Coordinator of the journal IJCCR, I write here a little on my experience as an author submitting to the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews (IJCCR). This was my first submission to IJCCR and my manuscript was inherently an outsider’s effort. It attempted to broadly identify and then make some sense of life’s under-appreciated mysteries. I initially had responded to a request for possible submissions. I then contacted IJCCR with a tentative topic for a manuscript. They quickly got back with an approval for the submission, but with a particular requirement that it be medically relevant. I then put together a manuscript and submitted it. After the usual back-and-forth over forms and formality, the manuscript was sent off for reviews. Within 2 weeks I got back 4 reviews which were both helpful and also surprising. Surprising in that the topic was somewhat foreign to medical literature. My subsequent updates in response to the reviewer comments went smoothly and in short order I had a series of proofs to evaluate. All in all, the whole publication process seemed outstanding. It was both helpful in terms of the paper’s content and also in terms of its efficient and friendly communications. Thank you all very much. Sincerely, Ted Christopher, Rochester, NY.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is a high quality journal that has a clear and concise submission process. The peer review process was comprehensive and constructive. Support from the editorial office was excellent, since the administrative staff were responsive. The journal provides a fast and timely publication timeline.
Dear Cecilia Lilly, Editorial Coordinator, Endocrinology and Disorders, Thank you so much for your quick response regarding reviewing and all process till publishing our manuscript entitled: Prevalence of Pre-Diabetes and its Associated Risk Factors Among Nile College Students, Sudan. Best regards, Dr Mamoun Magzoub.
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions. I am really grateful for the peers review; their feedback gave me the opportunity to reflect on the message and impact of my work and to ameliorate the article. The editors did a great job in addition by encouraging me to continue with the process of publishing.
Dear Mayra Duenas, Editorial Coordinator of ‘International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews Herewith I confirm an optimal peer review process and a great support of the editorial office of the present journal
Dear Maria Emerson, Editorial Coordinator of ‘International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews’, I appreciate the opportunity to publish my article with your journal. The editorial office provided clear communication during the submission and review process, and I found the overall experience professional and constructive. Best regards, Elena Salvatore.
Dear Editorial Team, Journal-Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, “Publishing my article with Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions has been a highly positive experience. The peer-review process was rigorous yet supportive, offering valuable feedback that strengthened my work. The editorial team demonstrated exceptional professionalism, prompt communication, and a genuine commitment to maintaining the highest scientific standards. I am very pleased with the publication quality and proud to be associated with such a reputable journal.” Warm regards, Dr. Mahmoud Kamal Moustafa Ahmed
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions. It was truly a rewarding experience to work with the journal “Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions”. The peer review process was insightful and encouraging, helping us refine our work to a higher standard. The editorial office offered exceptional support with prompt and thoughtful communication. I highly value the journal’s role in promoting scientific advancement and am honored to be part of it. Best regards, Meng-Jou Lee, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, National Taiwan University Hospital.
Dear Maria Emerson, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. Thank you for publishing our case report: "Clinical Case of Effective Fetal Stem Cells Treatment in a Patient with Autism Spectrum Disorder" within the "Journal of Clinical Research and Reports" being submitted by the team of EmCell doctors from Kyiv, Ukraine. We much appreciate a professional and transparent peer-review process from Auctores. All research Doctors are so grateful to your Editorial Office and Auctores Publishing support! I amiably wish our article publication maintained a top quality of your International Scientific Journal. My best wishes for a prosperity of the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. Hope our scientific relationship and cooperation will remain long lasting. Thank you very much indeed. Kind regards, Dr. Andriy Sinelnyk Cell Therapy Center EmCell
I recommend without hesitation submitting relevant papers on medical decision making to the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I am very grateful to the editorial staff. Maria Emerson was a pleasure to communicate with. The time from submission to publication was an extremely short 3 weeks. The editorial staff submitted the paper to three reviewers. Two of the reviewers commented positively on the value of publishing the paper. The editorial staff quickly recognized the third reviewer’s comments as an unjust attempt to reject the paper. I revised the paper as recommended by the first two reviewers.
Dear Chrystine Mejia, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Neurodegeneration and Neurorehabilitation. “The peer review process was efficient and constructive, and the editorial office provided excellent communication and support throughout. The journal ensures scientific rigor and high editorial standards, while also offering a smooth and timely publication process. We sincerely appreciate the work of the editorial team in facilitating the dissemination of innovative approaches such as the Bonori Method.” Best regards, Dr. Matteo Bonori.
Dear Maria Emerson, Editorial Coordinator, we have deeply appreciated the professionalism demonstrated by the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. The reviewers have extensive knowledge of our field and have been very efficient and fast in supporting the process. I am really looking forward to further collaboration. Thanks. Best regards, Dr. Claudio Ligresti
Dear Ms. Mayra Duenas, Editorial Coordinator, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. “The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews represented the “ideal house” to share with the research community a first experience with the use of the Simeox device for speech rehabilitation. High scientific reputation and attractive website communication were first determinants for the selection of this Journal, and the following submission process exceeded expectations: fast but highly professional peer review, great support by the editorial office, elegant graphic layout. Exactly what a dynamic research team - also composed by allied professionals - needs!" From, Chiara Beccaluva, PT - Italy.
Dear Clarissa Eric, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Studies, Auctores Publishing LLC, USA Office: +1-(302)-520-2644. I would like to express my sincere appreciation for the efficient and professional handling of my case report by the ‘Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Studies’. The peer review process was not only fast but also highly constructive—the reviewers’ comments were clear, relevant, and greatly helped me improve the quality and clarity of my manuscript. I also received excellent support from the editorial office throughout the process. Communication was smooth and timely, and I felt well guided at every stage, from submission to publication. The overall quality and rigor of the journal are truly commendable. I am pleased to have published my work with Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Studies, and I look forward to future opportunities for collaboration. Sincerely, Aline Tollet, UCLouvain.
Dear Chrystine Mejia, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Neurodegeneration and Neurorehabilitation, Auctores Publishing LLC, We would like to thank the editorial team for the smooth and high-quality communication leading up to the publication of our article in the Journal of Neurodegeneration and Neurorehabilitation. The reviewers have extensive knowledge in the field, and their relevant questions helped to add value to our publication. Kind regards, Dr. Ravi Shrivastava.
Dear Clarissa Eric, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Studies, I would like to express my deep admiration for the exceptional professionalism demonstrated by your journal. I am thoroughly impressed by the speed of the editorial process, the substantive and insightful reviews, and the meticulous preparation of the manuscript for publication. Additionally, I greatly appreciate the courteous and immediate responses from your editorial office to all my inquiries. Best Regards, Dariusz Ziora
Dear Ashley Rosa, Editorial Coordinator, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, Auctores Publishing LLC. Thank you for publishing our article, Exploring Clozapine's Efficacy in Managing Aggression: A Multiple Single-Case Study in Forensic Psychiatry in the international journal of clinical case reports and reviews. We found the peer review process very professional and efficient. The comments were constructive, and the whole process was efficient. On behalf of the co-authors, I would like to thank you for publishing this article. With regards, Dr. Jelle R. Lettinga.
Dear Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator, Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, Auctores Publishing LLC. The peer review process of the journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions was excellent and fast, as was the support of the editorial office and the quality of the journal. Kind regards Walter F. Riesen Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Walter F. Riesen.
Dear Erin Aust, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of General Medicine and Clinical Practice. We are pleased to share our experience with the “Journal of General Medicine and Clinical Practice”, following the successful publication of our article. The peer review process was thorough and constructive, helping to improve the clarity and quality of the manuscript. We are especially thankful to Ms. Erin Aust, the Editorial Coordinator, for her prompt communication and continuous support throughout the process. Her professionalism ensured a smooth and efficient publication experience. The journal upholds high editorial standards, and we highly recommend it to fellow researchers seeking a credible platform for their work. Best wishes By, Dr. Rakhi Mishra.
Dr Hala Al Shaikh This is to acknowledge that the peer review process for the article ’ A Novel Gnrh1 Gene Mutation in Four Omani Male Siblings, Presentation and Management ’ sent to the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was quick and smooth. The editorial office was prompt with easy communication.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The entire process including article submission, review, revision, and publication was extremely easy. The journal editor was prompt and helpful, and the reviewers contributed to the quality of the paper. Thank you so much! Eric Nussbaum, MD
Dear Ashley Rosa, Editorial Coordinator, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. Many thanks for publishing this manuscript after I lost confidence the editors were most helpful, more than other journals Best wishes from, Susan Anne Smith, PhD. Australian Breastfeeding Association.
Dear Maria Emerson, Editorial Coordinator, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, Auctores Publishing LLC. I am delighted to have published our manuscript, "Acute Colonic Pseudo-Obstruction (ACPO): A rare but serious complication following caesarean section." I want to thank the editorial team, especially Maria Emerson, for their prompt review of the manuscript, quick responses to queries, and overall support. Yours sincerely Dr. Victor Olagundoye.
Dear Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator, Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, Auctores Publishing LLC. I appreciate the journal (JCCI) editorial office support, the entire team leads were always ready to help, not only on technical front but also on thorough process. Also, I should thank dear reviewers’ attention to detail and creative approach to teach me and bring new insights by their comments. Surely, more discussions and introduction of other hemodynamic devices would provide better prevention and management of shock states. Your efforts and dedication in presenting educational materials in this journal are commendable. Best wishes from, Farahnaz Fallahian.
Dear Ashley Rosa, Editorial Coordinator of the journal - Psychology and Mental Health Care. " The process of obtaining publication of my article in the Psychology and Mental Health Journal was positive in all areas. The peer review process resulted in a number of valuable comments, the editorial process was collaborative and timely, and the quality of this journal has been quickly noticed, resulting in alternative journals contacting me to publish with them." Warm regards, Susan Anne Smith, PhD. Australian Breastfeeding Association.
Dear Jessica, and the super professional team of the ‘Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions’ I am sincerely grateful to the coordinated work of the journal team for the no problem with the submission of my manuscript: “Cardiometabolic Disorders in A Pregnant Woman with Severe Preeclampsia on the Background of Morbid Obesity (Case Report).” The review process by 5 experts was fast, and the comments were professional, which made it more specific and academic, and the process of publication and presentation of the article was excellent. I recommend that my colleagues publish articles in this journal, and I am interested in further scientific cooperation. Sincerely and best wishes, Dr. Oleg Golyanovskiy.
To Dear Erin Aust – Editorial Coordinator of Journal of General Medicine and Clinical Practice! I declare that I am absolutely satisfied with your work carried out with great competence in following the manuscript during the various stages from its receipt, during the revision process to the final acceptance for publication. Thank Prof. Elvira Farina
My article, titled 'No Way Out of the Smartphone Epidemic Without Considering the Insights of Brain Research,' has been republished in the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. The review process was seamless and professional, with the editors being both friendly and supportive. I am deeply grateful for their efforts.
We found the peer review process quick and positive in its input. The support from the editorial officer has been very agile, always with the intention of improving the article and taking into account our subsequent corrections.
Dear Jessica Magne, with gratitude for the joint work. Fast process of receiving and processing the submitted scientific materials in “Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions”. High level of competence of the editors with clear and correct recommendations and ideas for enriching the article.
I thank the ‘Journal of Clinical Research and Reports’ for accepting this article for publication. This is a rigorously peer reviewed journal which is on all major global scientific data bases. I note the review process was prompt, thorough and professionally critical. It gave us an insight into a number of important scientific/statistical issues. The review prompted us to review the relevant literature again and look at the limitations of the study. The peer reviewers were open, clear in the instructions and the editorial team was very prompt in their communication. This journal certainly publishes quality research articles. I would recommend the journal for any future publications.
"I am grateful for the opportunity of contributing to [International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews] and for the rigorous review process that enhances the quality of research published in your esteemed journal. I sincerely appreciate the time and effort of your team who have dedicatedly helped me in improvising changes and modifying my manuscript. The insightful comments and constructive feedback provided have been invaluable in refining and strengthening my work".
To Dear Erin Aust, I would like to express my heartfelt appreciation for the opportunity to have my work published in this esteemed journal. The entire publication process was smooth and well-organized, and I am extremely satisfied with the final result. The Editorial Team demonstrated the utmost professionalism, providing prompt and insightful feedback throughout the review process. Their clear communication and constructive suggestions were invaluable in enhancing my manuscript, and their meticulous attention to detail and dedication to quality are truly commendable. Additionally, the support from the Editorial Office was exceptional. From the initial submission to the final publication, I was guided through every step of the process with great care and professionalism. The team's responsiveness and assistance made the entire experience both easy and stress-free. I am also deeply impressed by the quality and reputation of the journal. It is an honor to have my research featured in such a respected publication, and I am confident that it will make a meaningful contribution to the field.
I would like to express my sincere gratitude for the support and efficiency provided by the editorial office throughout the publication process of my article, “Delayed Vulvar Metastases from Rectal Carcinoma: A Case Report.” I greatly appreciate the assistance and guidance I received from your team, which made the entire process smooth and efficient. The peer review process was thorough and constructive, contributing to the overall quality of the final article. I am very grateful for the high level of professionalism and commitment shown by the editorial staff, and I look forward to maintaining a long-term collaboration with the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
Dear Agrippa Hilda- Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, "The peer review process was very quick and of high quality, which can also be seen in the articles in the journal. The collaboration with the editorial office was very good."
I would like to offer my testimony in the support. I have received through the peer review process and support the editorial office where they are to support young authors like me, encourage them to publish their work in your esteemed journals, and globalize and share knowledge globally. I really appreciate your journal, peer review, and editorial office.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
