case report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2642-9756/053
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, 170 Jomaru-ro, J Wonmi-gu, Bucheon 14584, Republic of Korea
*Corresponding Author: Tae-Hee Kim, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, 170 Jomaru-ro, J Wonmi-gu, Bucheon 14584, Republic of Korea
Citation: Jae Hong Sang,Tae-Hee Kim (2021) Unclassified Mullerian Anomaly: Retroperitoneal Uterus J. Women Health Care and Issues; 4(3); DOI: 10.31579/2642-9756/053
Copyright: © 2021 Tae-Hee Kim, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits
unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 10 April 2021 | Accepted: 16 April 2021 | Published: 23 April 2021
Keywords: retroperitoneal space; uterine retro flexion; uterine retroversion ; uterus
Anomalies of uterus might be encountered at Caesarean Section or routine investigation. In this article, we present a rare case of double horns of uterus completely separated. One of them is situated retroperitoneally. Therefore, MRI or CT scans is recommend for unclassified Mullerian anomalies, to confirm pelvic or other anomalies and to reduce the likelihood of complications arising during the operation or delivery.
Classification of Mullerian duct anomalies is described according to a fusion pattern. Unclassified Mullerian duct anomalies or uncommon complications were discovered incidentally. We have also added our data pertaining to OHVIRA syndrome [1], with vaginal calcified masses such as stones, to the report by Živkovic et al. [2]. Unclassified Mullerian anomalies should be considered for classification to reduce complications during delivery or operation.
We have encountered, albeit very infrequently, unclassified Mullerian anomalies, such as a retroperitoneal uterus, which was misdiagnosed as unicornuate uterus with a double cervix. We searched the PubMed and EM-DAT databases, but uncovered no additional data pertaining to this case.
Case History
A 29 year-old female, at 39 gestational weeks, was transferred to our institution with a unicornuate uterus with double cervix, and complete longitudinal vaginal septum. The woman with a gravid uterus underwent cesarean section for a breech presentation. The patient had undergone no previous surgeries and had a normal medical history. Following delivery of a 2,830 g female infant, the patient’s uterus was checked. A right unicornuate uterus, right ovary and right cervix were observed, but there was no left uterus in the cul-de-sac or other pelvic cavity. Following the operation, we checked the right and left cervixes for vaginal septum. We were unable to dilate the left cervix or left uterine cavity, but detected a hard mass at the upper site of the left cervix. At the 4-month follow-up, we recommend MRI to confirm any unclassified Mullerian anomalies i.e., unicornuate uterus or double cervix. MRI findings revealed that both uterine horns were widely separated (i.e., the angle between the endometrial canals was > 180 degrees). We found that another uterine body was located in retroperitoneal space: MRI revealed a widely-separated uterus, and no other uterus was found in the pelvic cavity during cesarean section (Figure1).We did not uncover any similar cases in our literature search, but unclassified Mullerian anomalies have been reported previously, including double cervix and double vagina with a normal uterus. Mullerian anomalies were classified according to morphologic pattern rather than the location of the anomaly site.





These rare cases should be pooled and classified with other anatomically-unusual variants. However, Hegazy [3] stated that this case matches a congenital anomaly called uterus didelphys where there are 2 uterine horns, 2 cervices and septate vagina. It could result from imperfect fusion of the parts of 2 Mullerian ducts forming uterus. These embryonic ducts give rise to the 2 Fallopian tubes and unite together to form the uterus and upper portion of vagina. The ducts originate in the intrauterine life behind the coelomic epithelium; then invaginate ventrally and caudally to join in their middle and lower parts forming what is called uterovaginal canal that differentiates into uterus and upper portion of vagina. In the current case, one Mullerian duct fails to invaginate ventrally and remains separated from the other that reached the abdominal cavity.
We recommend MRI or CT scans for unclassified Mullerian anomalies, to confirm pelvic or other anomalies and to reduce the likelihood of complications arising during the operation or delivery. Our case report of Mullerian anomalies should prove informative for obstetricians.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethical Issues
Informed consent was obtained from the patient.
Funding information
This work was supported in part by the Soonchunhyang University Research Fund.
Acknowledgement
This work was supported in part by the Soonchunhyang University Research Fund.
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,