AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Chat with us
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2694-0248/062
1 “Frank País” Orthopedic Scientific Complex, Cuba.
2 Center for Longevity, Aging and Health Research "CITED", Cuba.
*Corresponding Author: Horacio Tabares Neyra, Center for Longevity, Aging and Health Research
Citation: Tiemure Wu, and Horacio Tabares Neyra. (2023), Total Hip Arthroplasty by Direct Anterior Approach (Hueter), J Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma Care, 5(3); DOI: 10.31579/2694-0248/062
Copyright: © 2023, Horacio Tabares Neyra. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 07 June 2023 | Accepted: 21 June 2023 | Published: 30 June 2023
Keywords: total hip arthroplasty; direct anterior approach
Introduction: Hip arthroplasty is a successful treatment in orthopedics. The direct anterior approach, through the Hueter interval, avoids dissection of muscle attachments to the bone and causes less disruption of the soft tissues around the hip.
Purpose: To show the results of primary total hip arthroplasties, performed by direct anterior approach.
Methods: Descriptive-prospective study, case series type, with patients operated on for hip osteoarthritis, who underwent primary uncemented total hip arthroplasty through a direct anterior approach between September 2019 and March 2021 and one-year follow-up.
Results: Predominance of the female sex in a ratio of 2 to 1, age groups between 45 and 60 years with no difference in the location of the operated hip. Low body mass index and low anesthetic risk. Surgical time greater than two hours, with little surgical bleeding, the placement of the acetabular and femoral component was adequate and allowed walking in less than three postoperative days with such hospitalization time. Incidence of low and infrequent complications, resolved with adequate treatment. The pain went from a mean of 9 in the preoperative period to a 2 in the postoperative period, the "Harris hip score" varied from a mean of 60 (bad) to one of 87 (good close to excellent).
Conclusions: The use of the direct anterior approach for primary total hip arthroplasties offers very satisfactory results valued as good.
In today's society, with the prolongation of life expectancy, and the aging of the population, the increase in the incidence of accidents that cause avascular necrosis of the femoral head, primary osteoarthritis of the hip joint or fracture of the upper end of the femur, constitute health problems worldwide.
Total hip arthroplasty (TCA), as the main treatment method to eliminate hip pain and restore hip function, is becoming increasingly accepted for patients with hip joint disease. Its successful application brings great benefits to many patients, as it alleviates the pain of the disease, improves the quality of life and recovers the ability to work, achieving excellent effects and thereby reducing the burden on the family and society [1].
Driven by the aging population in the United States, the demand for hip arthroplasties is expected to grow exponentially over the next two decades. Kurtz et al. noted a 50% increase in the prevalence of these arthroplasties from 1990 to 2002 and projected a 174% increase, from a total of 208,600 in 2005 to 572,000 in 2030 [2].
Hip arthroplasty is one of the most successful surgical treatments in orthopedic surgery. Although the surgical procedure has a high satisfaction rate, it does present some complications or adverse events, some of which are related to the surgeon's experience and the approach used to perform it. Among these adverse events are: prosthetic dislocation, residual weakness of the abductor muscles, decreased joint range of motion, and postoperative Trendelenburg claudication. Depending on the implant fixation method, arthroplasty can be divided into two different types: cemented and non-cemented arthroplasty [3].
There are multiple approaches described to perform a hip arthroplasty, each one of them has its advantages and disadvantages, but most provide access to the joint without excessive risk and allow the components to be implanted in the proper position, an essential requirement for the correct function of the patient and adequate implant survival [4].
A basic principle that should be part of the mentality of every orthopedic surgeon with respect to any surgical approach should be that it be as anatomical as possible, which means that it is performed in the internervous and intermuscular spaces to minimize tissue damage. soft. In the hip, the only approaches that meet the requirements for accessing the joint through anatomical spaces are the anterior (Hueter) and the anterolateral (Watson-Jones) [4,5].
The direct anterior approach (“Direct anterior approach, DAA”) was first described by Carl Hueter in 1881 and later popularized by Smith-Peterson when he published his first description in 1917. This approach is performed through the Hueter interval between the tensor fascia lata muscle and the superficial rectus femoris muscle and the sartorius muscle in depth, thus avoiding dissection of muscle attachments to the bone and causing less disruption of the soft tissues around the hip [4,5].
Currently, there has been increased interest in the orthopedic community in using the anterior approach to perform hip arthroplasty due to the belief that the anterior intermuscular approach can result in decreased pain, faster recovery, better stability of the hip and a lower risk of dislocation after surgery compared to the most commonly used, the posterior, where disinsertion of the rotator muscles, muscle laceration and opening of the posterior joint capsule are performed. In addition, since the patient is placed supine on the operating table, the anterior approach allows the use of fluoroscopic image intensification that favors intraoperative evaluation and proper positioning of components, allowing for a more precise final position. Preliminary series of patients who have undergone hip arthroplasty using the anterior approach have suggested decreased narcotic consumption, decreased hospital stay time, earlier independent mobilization, better positioning of components on radiographic images and a higher percentage of medical discharge in less time. However, others suggest that it is not the surgical approach, but factors such as patient selection, patient and family education, accelerated rehabilitation, and improved analgesia protocols that play a critical role in influencing the results of hip arthroplasties [5].
Due to the absence of muscle injury in the direct anterior approach, Bergin et al. report a decrease in the elevation of inflammatory markers, which indicates less muscle damage [6]. Bremer et al. also report a lower lesion observed in the resonance image compared with other approaches [7].
Surgery through the direct anterior (Hueter) approach minimizes muscle damage by using an interneural and intermuscular plane, which may reduce hip pain early in the postoperative period [8-10]. Zhao et al report less pain between on the first and third postoperative day with the use of the Hueter approach compared to the posterolateral approach (“Posterolateral standard approach, PLAe”), which requires more soft tissue dissection and thus more muscle damage [11].
The purpose of this work is to show the results obtained in primary total hip arthroplasties, where the approach used is the direct anterior or Hueter approach.
Methodological design
A descriptive-prospective study, case series type, was carried out with patients treated and operated on for the diagnosis of hip osteoarthritis, who underwent primary uncemented total hip arthroplasty through a direct anterior approach (Hueter) between September 2019 and March 2021 with a one-year follow-up.
The universe consisted of all patients diagnosed with hip osteoarthritis, treated at the Beijing Jishuitang Hospital in the aforementioned period of time.
The sample was made up of patients who met the established criteria:
Inclusion
- Patients who gave their written informed consent to the proposed treatment.
- Patients older than 18 years.
- Diagnosis of primary or secondary coxarthrosis.
Exclusion
- History of previous hip surgery.
- History of epilepsy, mental retardation, hemiplegia or movement disorder.
- Previous infections in the hip to intervene.
Exit
- Patients who decided to abandon the study.
The following variables were collected for the study: Age, sex, affected hip, body mass index, anesthetic risk index (ASA), acetabular anteversion angle, acetabular abduction angle, walking start time, hospital stay, and complications.
The evaluation of the result was carried out through the "Harris Hip Score" and the Visual Analog Pain Scale, determined before surgery and one year after surgery in each patient.
In accordance with what was declared, the sample of this work consisted of 100 patients with a mean age of 51 ± 15 years, with a predominance of females in a ratio close to 2 to 1; 61 women for 39 men. The relationship in terms of the location of the affected hip was very equal with 48 left hips for 52 right hips.
The average found regarding the body mass index was 19.7 Kgs/mt2 ± 3.1, very favorable according to what was found in the bibliography to perform an anterior approach to the hip. Regarding the location in the anesthetic risk classification (ASA), we found 62 patients classified as ASA I risk, 36 at ASA II risk and only two patients with ASA III. All of the above is visible in Table 1 referring to demographic and clinical variables of the patients.
| Sample data |
Total patients 100 Age* 51 ± 15 años Sex Male 39 Female 61 Localización Right 52 Left 48 Body mass index* 19,7 ± 3,1 Kgs/mt2 Anesthetic risk ASA I 62 ASA II 36 ASA III 2 |
* Average values are shown.
Table 1: Demographic and clinical data
The variables related to the surgical act, surgical time, intraoperative bleeding, size of the acetabular component, of the head of the femoral stem and the position angles of the acetabular cup (abduction and anteversion) in an abbreviated manner are located in Table 2. Surgical time with 86.9 ± 30.3 was very long in our opinion and may be related to the experience in performing this direct anterior approach, where reaming for the placement of the femoral component is the greatest difficulty when performing a total arthroplasty.
Hip; however, the intraoperative bleeding volume (145.3 ± 71.1) is closely related to an anatomical approach through intermuscular planes, where tissue damage is minimal.
In Table 2 itself, it is significant that the implantation angles of the acetabular cup are within Lewinnek's safe zone: abduction of 40.1° (range between 37.2°-43.3°) and anteversion of 17, 3°(range 14.9°-21.9°).
| Surgical and imaging parameters |
Surgical time (in minutes)* 86,9 ± 30,3 Operative bleeding (ml)* 145,3 ± 71,1 Acetabular component size (mm)* 52,4 ± 3,2 Femoral head component size (mm)* 34,7 ± 2,2 Acetabular cup* Abduction angle (degrees) 40,1 (37,2-43,3) Anteversion angle (degrees) 17,3 (14,9-21,9) |
* Average values are shown.
Table 2: Surgical and imaging variables
In relation to the complications that occurred in our sample of 100 patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty by direct anterior approach, two cases were detected that showed symptoms of numbness along the anterolateral aspect of the thigh, with a diagnosis of neuropraxia of the thigh lateral femoral cutaneous nerve, both were controlled by conservative treatments, based on B complex vitamins. One patient had a complete resolution of symptoms at six months, another noted a resolution at one year, three infections classified as superficial, the that resolved with antibiotic treatment, one case also suffered hip bursitis and was controlled by conservative treatment. The time to start ambulation was very short, as established for this anatomical surgical approach. The mean hospitalization time of our patients was barely three days, which is visible in Table 3.
| Clinical variables |
Walking time (days)* 2,7 ± 1,9 Hospitalization time (days)* 3,2 ± 0,5 Complications Nerve injury 2 Hip bursitis 1 Superficial infection 3 |
* Average values are shown.
Table 3: Postoperative clinical variables
To determine the results obtained in the patients that make up our sample, who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty by direct anterior or Hueter approach, two gauges were used that constitute the "gold standard" in the assessment of most of the results found. in the bibliography related to hip arthroplasty: The analog scale of pain and the “Harris hip score”.
The importance of determining the variation achieved between what was marked by each patient in the preoperative and postoperative period was considered. In this way, Table 4 shows this change expressed by our patients, who significantly varied from a mean of pain in the pre of 9 to a mean of 2 in the post. It is also important what is reflected in the responses in relation to function, with a change from 60 on average in the pre to 85 on average in the postoperative period. This is displayed in Table 4, which reflects the results obtained.
| Functional results |
Visual analog pain scale* Preoperative 9 ± 1 Postoperative 2 ± 1 Harris hip score* Preoperative 60 ± 12 Postoperative 87 ± 9 |
* Average values are shown.
Table 4: Results according to the applied functional tests (“Harris hip score” and VAS).
A good exposure of the hip favors the implantation of the prosthesis; however, as exposure of the bony structures of the joint increases, damage to the soft tissues around the hip is also aggravated, resulting in excessive intraoperative bleeding, muscle weakness around the joint, increased postoperative complications and decreased prosthetic stability.
The direct anterior approach exposes the hip through the space between the tensor fascia latae and the sartorius muscle, without sacrificing the musculatures around the hip, with little damage to the soft tissues; the structural integrity of the hip abductor muscles is preserved, which improves the stability of the prosthesis and allows the patient to be mobilized early, therefore, it is beneficial for early recovery [12,13]. In addition, the recumbent position supine intraoperative favors the precision of the prosthesis placement, and the incidence of postoperative dislocation of the prosthesis is low, which constitutes a safe, effective and reliable surgical approach [14,15].
Regarding postoperative bleeding, Fransen et al. [16], in their study reported an increase in perioperative bleeding in their group with the direct anterior approach when compared to the standard posterolateral approach group. Chay collaborators17 carry out a meta-analysis, which also concludes that blood loss using the direct anterior approach was the highest. However, Yang et al. [18], conducted a study to compare the results afterwards in patients who underwent simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasties on the same day with identical prostheses by the same surgeon, with an anterior approach on one side and a posterolateral approach on the other hand, and does not observe a significant difference in the amount of perioperative bleeding. The author of this investigation considers that an important cause of this result could be the steep learning curve required for the direct anterior approach, which could lead to increased blood loss. Preoperative and intraoperative hemostatic methods are also very important. Administration of 1.0 g tranexamic acid intravenously prior to total hip arthroplasty can reduce blood loss by 20% [19]. Periarticular injection of tranexamic acid can further reduce bleeding and reduce transfusion rates of blood without increasing the risk of thrombosis [20,21].
Chen et al perform a meta-analysis which includes ten studies (5670 participants) reporting a comparison of the operative time between the posterolateral approach and the direct anterior approach, and the result obtained shows that the operative time of the posterolateral approach is less than that of the anterior approach. direct.22 We consider this phenomenon to be because femoral preparation is a very significant challenge using the anterior approach. This approach requires sufficient release of deep structures such as the posterior capsule and pisiform fossa, especially during femoral elevation.23 With insufficient release of deep structures, the anterior approach runs the risk of complicating a greater trochanteric fracture, albeit with the help of specifically designed tables and retractors [24].
The study by Xu et al. also reported a longer surgical time and a similar amount of bleeding in the group with an anterior approach when compared with the minimally invasive posterolateral approach group; our study coincides with this result [25].
Regarding the position of the prosthesis, several studies show that when comparing the position of the prosthesis between groups operated on using the direct anterior approach and the standard posterolateral approach, no differences are observed in the degree of anteversion of the acetabular and femoral components [11, 25-27].
According to the rate of complications between the direct anterior and standard posterolateral approaches, Aggarwal et al., Woolson et al., and Sun et al. report in their studies a higher complication rate with the use of the direct anterior approach [24,28,29]. Without However, Woolson et al. [29], find a decrease in the complication rate after performing more than 30-50 interventions using this previous approach. This phenomenon is also noted by Moskal et al. [30], and Alexandrov et al. [31], where the complication rates correlate with the surgeon's experience and decrease significantly after the first 40 to 100 cases. Moerenhout et al. [32], report in their study a similar complication rate between both groups. Among all surgical complications, femorocutaneous nerve damage is the most common nerve injury after using the direct anterior approach, with an incidence of neuropraxia ranging from 3.4% to 81.0% [32-36]
Perhaps familiarity with the branching pattern of the femorocutaneous nerve may help reduce such nerve damage. Bartlett et al describe the main branching patterns (classic, late, primary femoral, and trifurcated) and find that the late branch variants present the highest risk of injury due to the perpendicular orientation of the nerve to the incision line. This nerve lesion is treated conservatively and symptomatically, and most are alleviated or recovered without leaving sequelae [26, 37, 38]
There are several studies on the comparison between the anterior approach and the posterolateral approach. Yang et al perform bilateral arthroplasties on the same day with two different approaches, find that the VAS score is significantly lower when the direct anterior approach is used compared to when the posterolateral approach is used on the first, third, and seventh postoperative days. (p < 0>
Barrett et al conclude that patients operated on with the direct anterior approach have less pain at baseline and better function six weeks postoperatively, but all measurable differences between the two groups disappear by six months. In a meta-analysis carried out by Xuedong et al., they also obtain similar results, they show that compared to the posterolateral approach group, the anterior approach group achieves a better "Harry hip score" within six months after the operation, but they do not show significant differences between the two groups after six months. Chen et al. publish in their study that the pain is lighter and relieves faster in the group with direct anterior approach in 24 or 48 h after the operation [22-24].
Bergin et al. [4], analyze the biochemical markers of muscle damage and inflammation in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty using the direct posterolateral and anterior approach to provide objective evidence of local soft tissue injury at the time of arthroplasty. They report that the levels of inflammation markers are slightly reduced in the direct anterior approach group compared to those in the standard posterior approach group. Therefore, as this result is assessed at 12 months, the results of the "Harry hip score" and VAS do not show significant differences (p > 0.05). This evidence may also explain the result that walking time and hospitalization time were significantly shorter in the group with the anterior approach.
In the comprehensive assessment of the "Harry hip score", especially in the sock wear and sitting scores, we consider that because the direct anterior approach penetrates through an anterior intermuscular space and causes less damage to the soft tissues of the hip, especially to the soft tissue of the back, patients may score better on sitting and wearing socks after surgery. In the study carried out by Xu et al, no statistically significant differences were found at six months, in addition, when assessing the sitting function and the use of footwear, a better result was also observed in the group with the direct anterior approach, they conclude that the advantages of total hip arthroplasty through the direct anterior approach lie in less positional limitation in the early postoperative period, as well as faster recovery of hip function [39].
- Our series showed a predominance of female patients in a ratio close to 2 to 1 in relation to males, with age groups between 45 and 60 years with no significant difference in location of the operated hip. The patients had a low body mass index and low anesthetic risk.
The use of the direct anterior approach required a surgical time greater than two hours, although with little operative bleeding, which allowed adequate placement of both the acetabular and femoral components and allowed ambulation in less than three postoperative days with such length of hospitalization. The incidence of complications was very low and not very serious, which were resolved with adequate treatment.
- The scales used to determine the results achieved showed an important change towards the clinical improvement of the patients; the pain went from a high 9 on average in the preoperative period to a 2 on average afterward, the "Harris hip score" also varied from an average of 60 (bad) to one of 87 (good close to excellent). The use of the direct anterior approach to perform primary total hip arthroplasties offers very satisfactory results that can be considered good.
The authors declare that they have no conflicts.
DrC. Horacio Tabares Neyra- He planned the research and wrote the paper.
Dr. Tiemur Wu- He carried out the research and data collection.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
