AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2768-2757/143
1Department of Pediatric Surgery FSBEI HE DSMU Ministry of Health of Russia, 367000, Makhachkala, Russian Federation.
2Children's Republican Clinical Hospital named after. N.M. Kuraeva, 367027, Makhachkala, Russian Federation.
*Corresponding Author: S. A. Gebekova., Department of Pediatric Surgery FSBEI HE DSMU Ministry of Health of Russia, 367000, Makhachkala, Russian Federation.
Citation: Gebekova S.A., Makhachev B.M., Meylanova F.V., Ashurbekov V.T., Saidmagomedova A.S., (2024), Thoracoscopic Correction of Esophagal Atresia in Dagestan, Journal of Clinical Surgery and Research, 5(8); DOI:10.31579/2768-2757/143
Copyright: © 2024, Cruz García Lirios. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 01 October 2024 | Accepted: 15 October 2024 | Published: 01 November 2024
Keywords: thoracoscopy; esophageal atresia; esophago-esophagoanastomosis
Introduction: The results of our experience in the treatment of children with esophageal atresia with thoracoscopic access are presented.
Materials and methods: From 2020 to 2022, 25 children with EA were operated on at the N.M. Kuraev Medical Center in Makhachkala. Thoracoscopy was performed on 17 children: 13 patients underwent primary anastomosis of the esophagus, 3 had a gastrostomy after TPS ligation, 1 child with a non-esophageal form of AP had internal traction sutures applied to the proximal and distal ends of the esophagus without a gastrostomy. 13 patients with primary anastomosis of the esophagus 3 underwent conversion. 1 child with a non-esophageal form of AP I stage internal traction sutures were applied to the proximal and distal ends of the esophagus without the imposition of gastrostomy. A thoracoscopic anastomosis of the esophagus was applied to 1 child with a non-esophageal form of EA on day 6 after internal traction sutures of stage II. Thus, the analysis was carried out in 10 patients with primary and 1 with delayed anastomosis of the esophagus by thoracoscopic access.
Results: The results of treatment of children with EA after thoracoscopic anastomosis of the esophagus were evaluated.
Discussion: Analyzing the results of thoracoscopic EA correction according to literary sources, a good cosmetic effect is noted in the early and especially in the long-term postoperative period with a low frequency of musculoskeletal deformity. A serious problem for most pediatric surgeons remains the impossibility of creating a primary anastomosis in the newborn period. In our case, the only obstacle was a large diastasis between the segments of the esophagus. Kozlov et al. a new therapeutic approach was reported for two newborns with EA, consisting in the fact that thoracoscopic traction elongation of the esophagus is possible without gastrostomy, followed by esophago-esophagoanastomosis for 5 and 6 days respectively. According to their work, only anastomosis stenosis was observed in both cases, which we also observed in 1 case.
Conclusion. The use of the thoracoscopic method of esophago-esophagoanastomosis provides low trauma, creates a good visualization of the surgical field, achieving a good cosmetic effect, does not form gross scarring and musculoskeletal deformities.
Esophageal atresia (EA) with tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) was first described by Thomas Gibson in 1696, after which there were attempts to treat EA. Only in 1939, Ladd and Leven independently obtained one good result in the treatment of EA with distal TEF. The stages of correction were the application of a gastrostomy, the elimination of TEF, the application of a cervical esophagostomy, followed by the formation of an artificial esophagus. This was the beginning of the development of staged treatment of EA P in children in the most severe condition [1--2]. In 1941, Cameron Haight successfully performed primary esophageal anastomosis for the first time [3--5]. In our country, the first successful primary anastomosis of the esophagus was performed in 1955 by Professor G.A. Bairov [6--7]. The development of endoscopic surgery in recent years has allowed pediatric surgeons to perform EA correction using a thoracoscopic approach. The first thoracoscopic operation was performed by Lobe T. on a child with a fistulaless form of EA in 1999 [8]. In 2000, Rothenberg S.S. reported successful thoracoscopic correction of EA with distal TEF [0]. In Russia, for the first time, reconstruction of an artery through a thoracoscopic approach was performed by Yu.A. Kozlov in 2005 [9]. This method is an alternative to posterolateral thoracotomy and repeats the main steps of the operation developed by Cameron Haight.
The goal is to evaluate the results of thoracoscopic treatment of children with EA.
In the Children's Clinical Hospital named after. N.M. Kuraev, Makhachkala from 2020 to 2022. 25 children with EA were operated on. 17 children underwent thoracoscopy. Of these, there were 13 (76.5%) boys and 4 (23.5%) girls. Gestational age at birth ranged from 32 to 42 weeks, body weight from 1900 to 4400 g. According to the Gross classification, the fistulaless form of EP was observed in 1 (5.9%) child, AP with distal TEF - in 16 (94.1%) children.
33 developmental defects were identified in 12 (70.6%) children (Table 1). VACTER association was observed in 2 (11.8%) children, and heart disease - in 8 (47%).
One child with a fistulaless form of anal atresia underwent anterior anorectoplasty before correction of EA on the first day of life.
After preoperative preparation, on days 1–4, all patients were operated on.
In 13 patients with distal TEF, primary anastomosis of the esophagus was performed, in 3 patients a gastrostomy was placed after ligation of the TEF for subsequent delayed esophago-esophagoanastomosis, in 1 child with a fistulaless form of EA P, internal traction sutures were placed on the proximal and distal ends of the esophagus without applying a gastrostomy.
An obstacle to performing primary anastomosis of the esophagus in all cases was a large diastasis between the segments of the esophagus (more than 2 cm).
Of the 13 patients with primary esophageal anastomosis, 3 underwent conversion. The reasons for conversion in 2 cases were hemodynamic disturbances, in 1 case the wall of the azygos vein was damaged, the latter was ligated and crossed.
In 1 child with a fistulaless form of EA (the diastasis between the segments of the esophagus was 48 mm), stage I, internal traction sutures were placed on the proximal and distal ends of the esophagus without applying a gastrostomy. Stage II of the procedure - thoracoscopic anastomosis of the esophagus was performed on the 6th day after the first operation.
Thus, an analysis was carried out in 10 patients with primary and 1 with delayed anastomosis of the esophagus using thoracoscopic access.
Surgical technique
Endotracheal anesthesia was used for thoracoscopic correction of EA. The child was placed on his stomach with his right side elevated 30˚. 3 trocars (1x5 mm and 2x3 mm) were installed in the right pleural cavity. A 5 mm trocar was used to insert a telescope, a 3 mm trocar was used to insert endoinstruments. The 1st trocar (5 mm) was installed in the fifth intercostal space along the posterior axillary line, and the 2nd and 3rd trocars were placed under direct visual control within the boundaries of the triangle formed around the endoscope. CO2 insufflation into the pleural cavity was carried out at a pressure of 5 mm Hg. Art. In the absence of a decrease in the main parameters of ventilation and hemodynamics, surgical intervention was continued. After collapsing the right lung, the distal segment of the esophagus was mobilized to the tracheoesophageal fistula, sutured at the base, ligated and transected. Next, the oral end of the esophagus was mobilized from the trachea and circumferentially to the cervical esophagus. Then the lumen of both ends of the esophagus was opened and the formation of esophago-esophagoanastomosis began. The posterior lip of the anastomosis was formed with interrupted sutures (VICRYL 5/0). After its formation, a nasogastric tube was passed from the oral to the aboral end and then into the stomach. The anterior lip of the anastomosis was also formed with interrupted sutures on the probe. All sutures were placed extracorporeally with the nodes located outside the lumen of the esophagus. In all cases, a safety drain was left in the area of esophago-esophagoanastomosis. The operation was completed by removing CO2 and trocars from the pleural cavity. The wounds on the chest wall from the trocars were sealed using skin sutures.
Method of surgical intervention of the first stage of thoracoscopic treatment of EA with large diastasis without gastrostomy placement
After insertion of trocars and insufflation, both ends of the esophagus were mobilized. Then, between the ends of the esophagus, sutures were placed with sliding knots and clips, firmly fixing the threads at the site where the suture entered the tissue of the esophagus. Next, using sliding sutures, the proximal and distal ends of the esophagus were brought as close as possible. A gastrostomy tube was not placed. Total parenteral nutrition was provided throughout the traction period. At stage II, the technique of thoracoscopic esophago-esophagoanastomosis was carried out.
Postoperative management
In order to reduce the risk of failure of the esophago-esophagoanastomosis, myoplegia was performed for an average of 8 days. Enteral loading through a nasogastric tube began on the 8th postoperative day, through the mouth - on the 26th day. The safety drain was removed on the 6th postoperative day.
The results were assessed according to the following criteria: the course of the postoperative period, postoperative complications and mortality.
The duration of thoracoscopic interventions was 128 minutes (range: 75-180 minutes).
The average duration of mechanical ventilation was 11 days (range: 5-29 days), the average time of stay in the intensive care unit was 30 days (range: 8-78 days), the average time of hospital stay in the postoperative period was 51 days (range: 7 --125 days). There were no intraoperative complications. Postoperative complications occurred in 9 children (81.8%): failure of the esophago-esophagoanastomosis - in 1 (9.1%), narrowing of the anastomosis - in 9 (81.8%), ZhPR - in 2 (18.2%) .
Failure of the esophagoesophagoanastomosis developed on the 4th postoperative day. As a result of copious discharge through the safety drainage and the presence of pneumothorox, rethoracoscopy and suturing of the anastomotic defect were performed.
In 8 children with anastomotic stenosis, the diameter of the esophageal lumen in the anastomosis zone was less than 4 mm during endoscopy. All patients underwent bougienage of the esophagus. In 1 case, the diameter of the lumen of the esophagus in the anastomosis zone was point-like and it was not possible to insert a string to bougienage the esophagus, and therefore laparoscopy and gastrostomy were performed, followed by bougienage of the esophagus using the thread.
All children with gastrointestinal tract received conservative therapy (drug therapy, diet, giving the child an upright position after eating to improve the passage of food masses through the stomach under the influence of gravity).
Mortality was observed in 1 (9.1%) case. Deceased child: a girl with a birth weight of 2340 g with VACTER association, agenesis of the right kidney, pelvic dystopia of the left kidney, ASD, ODA, perinatal hypoxic damage to the central nervous system, 2nd degree CI, acute kidney damage. The postoperative period was complicated by the development of pneumothorax on the right. The further course of the postoperative period was extremely difficult, due to cardiopulmonary and renal failure. She died from multiple organ failure.
After the operation of primary anastomosis of the esophagus, 2 (18.2%) children were re-operated on the 23rd and 41st days, respectively, after correction of EA with pyloric stenosis. All patients underwent pyloromyotomy.
We monitored the long-term (from 3 months to 2 years) results of treatment of patients with EA using thoracoscopic access. All children were repeatedly hospitalized for follow-up examinations in our department.
All parents surveyed indicate that their children accept any food.
All children with esophageal stenosis continued esophageal dilation on an outpatient basis. A good result was obtained in 5 children, and none required resection of the stenotic esophagus and repeated anastomosis. 3 children operated on in 2021 continue to undergo surgery. In 1 child, after staged thoracoscopic treatment of EA, during bougienage of the esophagus using a thread, perforation of the esophagus occurred with a large defect, and therefore extirpation of the esophagus was performed.
In the long-term period, post-intubation tracheal stenosis was detected in 2 cases, and bougienage of the trachea was performed using Hegar bougiens. There were no cases of deaths in the long-term period.
Treatment of children with EA is one of the most difficult tasks in neonatal surgery. To date, significant advances have been made in the treatment of EA thanks to the improvement of medical technologies, the development of endosurgery, advances in neonatology, pediatric surgery, intensive care and anesthesiology of newborns, intraoperative monitoring, parenteral nutrition, antibiotic therapy, and treatment of complications of concomitant pathology [10-14]. According to the literature, mortality in EA has recently decreased by 50 times, respectively, from 100 to 2% with thoracotomy treatment [15] and to 2.8% with thoracoscopic treatment [16]. In our case, mortality was observed in 1 child.
The development of endoscopic surgery has led to the fact that EA correction also began to be performed thoracoscopically. Analyzing the results of thoracoscopic correction of EA according to the literature, a good cosmetic effect is noted both in the early and especially in the late postoperative period with a low incidence of musculoskeletal deformity [17–18].
Despite advances in the treatment of EA, a serious problem for most pediatric surgeons is still the impossibility of creating a primary anastomosis in the neonatal period. According to many authors, large diastasis between segments of the esophagus, concomitant anomalies and very low birth weight were the reasons for refusal of primary anastomosis [6, 19–28]. In our case, the only obstacle to performing the primary anastomosis was a large diastasis between the segments of the esophagus (more than 2 cm), 1 of which was a fistulaless form of EA. If it is impossible to perform a primary anastomosis, delayed anastomosis or plastic surgery of the esophagus with intestines or stomach is indicated. Also in the literature, various approaches are described for bringing the ends of the esophagus together, allowing delayed esophago-esophageal anastomosis to be performed using lengthening plastic surgery on the esophagus or various elongation methods [13-14, 29-45]. There are no precise indications in the literature on the optimal timing for performing delayed esophageal anastomosis. Some authors note that delayed esophageal anastomosis can be performed at the age of 3 months [14, 28-29, 38, 46–48]. Yu.A. Kozlov et al reported a new treatment approach in two newborns with EA with a large diastasis between the segments, consisting in the fact that thoracoscopic tractional elongation of the esophagus is possible without gastrostomy, followed by esophagoesophageal anastomosis on the 5th and 6th days, respectively. According to their work, in both cases only anastomotic stenosis was observed [49], which we also observed in 1 case.
Comparing our data with the literature, we can focus on a meta-analysis of complications and long-term results of 44 articles, performed in 2012 by Friedmacher F. and Puri P. According to their work, the incidence of anastomotic leakage was 22.9-35.3%, narrowing of the anastomosis -- 50.9--62.9%, fatalities -- 41.8--53.9%, deaths -- 7.3--14.1% [50]. In our case, there was a high level of anastomotic narrowing (81.8%). The following factors were observed in the development of anastomotic stenosis: anastomosis with tension, leakage of anastomotic sutures and gastroesophageal reflux. All patients underwent bougienage of the esophagus. Simultaneously with bougienage, all children received antireflux therapy.
The use of the thoracoscopic method of esophago-esophagoanastomosis ensures minimal trauma, creates good visualization of the surgical field, helps to achieve a good cosmetic effect, and does not form gross scar changes and musculoskeletal deformities.
The authors declare no conflict of interest
The study had no sponsorship.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
