The smoking economic burden by morbidity

Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-8794/051

The smoking economic burden by morbidity

  • Fé Fernández Hernández 1*
  • Efraín Sánchez González 2
  • 1* Auxiliary Professor, Cuba.
  • 2 Assistant Professor, Cuba.

*Corresponding Author: Fé Fernández Hernández, Auxiliary Professor, Cuba.

Citation: Fé F. Hernández, Efraín S. González (2020) The smoking economic burden by morbidity; J, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. 2(9); DOI:10.31579/2690-8794/051

Copyright: © ndez, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: 22 November 2020 | Accepted: 26 November 2020 | Published: 10 December 2020

Keywords: smoking; economic burden; trainer course

Abstract

Background: The research and analysis from smoking must be from several points of view. Nevertheless the smoking economic burden by morbidity must be strongly researched since the Health Economy. The usefulness from postgraduate course about this subject offer the opportunity to generalize the whole knowledge obtained. Thus more health professional will be better capacitated to make better measures from the smoking economic impact over the Public Health.

Objective: To design a postgraduate trainer course about the measurement from the smoking economic burden by morbidity.

Materials and methods: Were used the inductive – deductive and the comparative as theoretical methods. As empiric method was used the bibliographic research.

Results: The suggested course has the particularity of be contextualized agree to general learning needs from health professionals related to the smoking economic control. The course has the characteristic that each subject is supported by the previous.

Conclusion: Was designed a postgraduate trainer course for health professionals related with the smoking economic control. The course is agreed to general learning needs from health professionals related to the smoking economic control.

Background

Much economic policies for the smoking control are supported on the smoking economic burden as main rate [1-3]. Particularly the smoking economic burden by morbidity had been used largely because shows the smoking impact over the Public Health budget [4].

The research and analysis from smoking must be from several points of view. Nevertheless the smoking economic burden by morbidity must be strongly researched since the Health Economy [5, 6].

Health professionals related with smoking economic control need understand mainly

  1. what´s the tendency from smoking impact over the Public Health budget,
  2. the morbidity attributable to smoking behavior´s
  3. the main ways to estimate the smoking economic impact over the Public Health budget´s,
  4. the conception from the economic burden as epidemiologic rate,
  5. how to estimate the smoking economic burden by morbidity and,
  6. which useful tool use to make that estimation.

In this context the postgraduate education may play a significant role. The usefulness from postgraduate course about this subject offer the opportunity to generalize the whole knowledge obtained. Thus more health professional will be better capacitated to make better measures from the smoking economic impact over the Public Health [7].

Objective

To design a postgraduate trainer course about the measurement from the smoking economic burden by morbidity.

Materials and Methods

Were used the inductive – deductive and the comparative as theorical methods. As empiric method was used the bibliographic research. 

Results

The postgraduate trainer course: “The smoking economic burden by morbidity” was designed for health professionals related with the smoking economic control. This course is focused in the six elements identified previously. 

The whole course is formed by six subjects as show the following table.

Table 1.

The first subject was included to describe the tendency from smoking impact over the Public Health budget. In this subject the professor will use statistic information from statistic yearbook to select the adequate variables. A suggestion should be using the tobacco minor sales, the morbidity or mortality related to smoking and the Public Health budget in a large period [8].  

The second subject is to describe the morbidity attributable to smoking agree to main variables as the tobacco intensity consumption, for example. In this subject is important that professor differentiates between the social morbidity related with smoking and the real morbidity attributable to smoking [9]. 

The third subject introduces a discussion from the main ways used to measure the health cost because of smoking by morbidity. In this case the professor must appoint advances and limitations from all ways identified [10]. 

The fourth subject focuses the attention in the conception from the economic burden as epidemiologic rate. In this subject the professor must differentiate between the illness burden and the economic burden from a risk factor by morbidity as epidemiologic rates [11]. 

The fifth subject is very important. In this case the course introduce a new formula and concepts supporting it to measure the smoking economic burden by morbidity in active and passive smokers [12]. 

The sixth and last subject is appointing to elaborate a useful tool to measure the smoking economic burden by morbidity in active and passive smokers. In this case is suggestible the use of an algorithm designed with that objective as example [13]. 

The suggested course has the particularity of be contextualized agree to general learning needs from health professionals related to the smoking economic control. The course has the characteristic that each subject is supported by the previous. Thus the course carries by a logic sequence to straight the learning process. 

Conclusion

Was designed a postgraduate trainer course for health professionals related with the smoking economic control. The course is agreed to general learning needs from health professionals related to the smoking economic control.

References

Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.

img

Dr Elena Popa

It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Dr Nikolaos Andreas Chrysanthakopoulos

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee

img

Robert W McGee

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D

img

Aibing Rao

I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.

img

Kashani Mehdi

Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,

img

Alla Konstantinovna Politova