Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-4861/885
Department of General Surgery, The Affiliated Bozhou Hospital of Anhui Medical University, China.
*Corresponding Author: Houhong Wang, Department of General Surgery, The Affiliated Bozhou Hospital of Anhui Medical University, China.
Citation: Houhong Wang, (2025), The Role of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) in Hepatocellular Carcinoma, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, 29(3); DOI:10.31579/2690-4861/885
Copyright: © 2025, Houhong Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 18 June 2025 | Accepted: 20 August 2025 | Published: 08 September 2025
Keywords: hepatocellular carcinoma; vascular endothelial; growth factor
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a highly vascularized malignancy, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays a pivotal role in its angiogenesis. This retrospective study aimed to comprehensively evaluate the significance of VEGF in HCC. A total of 150 HCC patients who underwent curative - intent resection at our institution between 2015 and 2020 were included. VEGF expression in tumor tissues was assessed by immunohistochemistry. Clinicopathological characteristics, overall survival (OS), and recurrence - free survival (RFS) were analyzed. High VEGF expression was significantly associated with larger tumor size (p = 0.02), advanced TNM stage (p = 0.01), and microvascular invasion (p = 0.003). Multivariate analysis revealed that high VEGF expression was an independent predictor of poor OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.1, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3 - 3.4, p = 0.002) and RFS (HR = 1.8, 95% CI: 1.1 - 2.9, p = 0.02). These findings underscore the crucial role of VEGF in HCC progression and its potential as a prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target.
HCC is one of the most common and lethal malignancies globally, with an increasing incidence in many regions [1, 2]. Angiogenesis is a fundamental process in HCC development and progression, providing tumor cells with essential nutrients and oxygen and facilitating metastasis [3]. VEGF, a key angiogenic factor, has been extensively studied in HCC. It binds to specific receptors on endothelial cells, promoting their proliferation, migration, and survival, thereby stimulating the formation of new blood vessels [4]. Dysregulated VEGF expression has been reported in HCC, but the exact relationship between VEGF and various clinicopathological features, as well as its prognostic value, remains to be fully elucidated. Understanding the role of VEGF in HCC could potentially lead to the development of more effective diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.
2.1 Patient Selection
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent curative - intent surgical resection for HCC at our tertiary - care hospital from January 2015 to December 2020. Inclusion criteria were: (1) histologically confirmed HCC; (2) complete clinical and pathological data available; (3) no prior anti - cancer treatment before surgery. A total of 150 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis.
2.2 Vegf Expression Analysis
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed on formalin - fixed, paraffin - embedded tumor tissue sections to assess VEGF expression. Sections were incubated with a primary antibody against VEGF (abcam, Cambridge, UK). The staining intensity was scored as negative (0), weak (1+), moderate (2+), or strong (3+). High VEGF expression was defined as staining intensity of 2+ or 3+.
2.3 Clinicopathological Data Collection
Clinicopathological data, including patient age, gender, tumor size, tumor number, TNM stage, histological grade, microvascular invasion, and cirrhosis status, were collected from medical records. Follow - up information, including OS and RFS, was also recorded. OS was calculated from the date of surgery to the date of death or last follow - up. RFS was calculated from the date of surgery to the date of tumor recurrence or last follow - up.
2.4 Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software version 25.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Categorical variables were compared using the chi - square test or Fisher's exact test. Continuous variables were compared using the t - test or Mann - Whitney U test as appropriate. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan - Meier method, and differences between groups were compared using the log - rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazards model to identify independent prognostic factors. A p - value < 0>
3.1 Patient Characteristics
The baseline characteristics of the 150 patients are summarized in Table 1. The mean age of the patients was 58.6 ± 10.2 years, and 110 (73.3%) were male. The majority of patients had cirrhosis (80, 53.3%). Tumor size ranged from 1.2 to 12.5 cm (mean = 5.1 ± 2.8 cm), and 60 (40%) patients had multiple tumors. According to the TNM staging system, 30 (20%) patients were in stage I, 50 (33.3%) in stage II, 40 (26.7%) in stage III, and 30 (20%) in stage I
| Characteristics | Number (%) |
| Age (years), mean ± SD | 58.6 ± 10.2 |
| Gender (Male) | 110 (73.3) |
| Cirrhosis (Yes) | 80 (53.3) |
| Tumor size (cm), mean ± SD | 5.1 ± 2.8 |
| Tumor number (Multiple) | 60 (40) |
| TNM stage (I) | 30 (20) |
| TNM stage (II) | 50 (33.3) |
| TNM stage (III) | 40 (26.7) |
| TNM stage (IV) | 30 (20) |
| Histological grade (Well - differentiated) | 25 (16.7) |
| Histological grade (Moderately - differentiated) | 80 (53.3) |
| Histological grade (Poorly - differentiated) | 45 (30) |
| Microvascular invasion (Yes) | 55 (36.7) |
3.2 VEGF Expression and Clinicopathological Features
VEGF expression was detected in 100 (66.7%) of the 150 tumor samples. High VEGF [removed]2+ or 3+) was observed in 60 (40%) samples. As shown in Table 2, high VEGF expression was significantly associated with larger tumor size (p = 0.02), advanced TNM stage (p = 0.01), and microvascular invasion (p = 0.003). There was no significant association between VEGF expression and patient age, gender, tumor number, histological grade, or cirrhosis status.
| Clinicopathological Features | Low VEGF [removed]n = 90) | High VEGF [removed]n = 60) | p - value |
| Age (years), mean ± SD | 58.2 ± 10.5 | 59.2 ± 9.8 | 0.56 |
| Gender (Male) | 65 (72.2%) | 45 (75%) | 0.68 |
| Cirrhosis (Yes) | 45 (50%) | 35 (58.3%) | 0.32 |
| Tumor size (cm), mean ± SD | 4.5 ± 2.5 | 6.0 ± 3.0 | 0.02 |
| Tumor number (Multiple) | 30 (33.3%) | 30 (50%) | 0.06 |
| TNM stage (I - II) | 60 (66.7%) | 25 (41.7%) | 0.01 |
| TNM stage (III - IV) | 30 (33.3%) | 35 (58.3%) | 0.01 |
| Histological grade (Well - differentiated) | 15 (16.7%) | 10 (16.7%) | 0.99 |
| Histological grade (Moderately - differentiated) | 45 (50%) | 35 (58.3%) | 0.32 |
| Histological grade (Poorly - differentiated) | 30 (33.3%) | 15 (25%) | 0.24 |
| Microvascular invasion (Yes) | 25 (27.8%) | 30 (50%) | 0.003 |
3.3 Prognostic Significance of VEGF Expression
The Kaplan - Meier survival analysis showed that patients with high VEGF expression had significantly shorter OS (Figure 1A, p < 0 xss=removed xss=removed xss=removed xss=removed>
| Variable | Overall Survival (HR, 95% CI) | p - value | Recurrence - Free Survival (HR, 95% CI) | p - value |
| High VEGF expression | 2.1 (1.3 - 3.4) | 0.002 | 1.8 (1.1 - 2.9) | 0.02 |
| Advanced TNM stage (III - IV vs. I - II) | 2.5 (1.6 - 3.9) | < 0> | 2.2 (1.4 - 3.5) | < 0> |
| Microvascular invasion (Yes vs. No) | 1.9 (1.2 - 3.0) | 0.005 | 1.7 (1.1 - 2.7) | 0.02 |
| Tumor size (> 5 cm vs. ≤ 5 cm) | 1.5 (1.0 - 2.3) | 0.04 | 1.4 (0.9 - 2.1) | 0.12 |
In this retrospective study, we demonstrated that high VEGF expression in HCC tumors is significantly associated with adverse clinicopathological features, such as larger tumor size, advanced TNM stage, and microvascular invasion. Moreover, high VEGF expression was identified as an independent predictor of poor OS and RFS in HCC patients who underwent surgical resection. The relationship between VEGF and HCC angiogenesis has been well - established [4]. VEGF - mediated angiogenesis not only provides the necessary nutrients and oxygen for tumor growth but also promotes tumor cell dissemination through the formation of new blood vessels [5]. Our findings are consistent with previous studies that have reported an association between high VEGF expression and aggressive tumor behavior in HCC [6, 7]. Larger tumors and advanced TNM stages in patients with high VEGF expression suggest that VEGF - driven angiogenesis may contribute to tumor growth and progression. Microvascular invasion, which is a strong predictor of recurrence and poor prognosis in HCC, was also more frequently observed in patients with high VEGF expression, further highlighting the role of VEGF in promoting tumor metastasis. The prognostic significance of VEGF in HCC has been investigated in several studies, but the results have been somewhat inconsistent. Some studies have reported that high VEGF expression is associated with poor survival [8, 9], while others have not found a significant association [10]. The differences in study results may be due to variations in patient populations, methods of VEGF detection, and follow - up periods. In our study, by using a homogeneous patient population who underwent surgical resection and a standardized immunohistochemical method for VEGF detection, we were able to clearly demonstrate the independent prognostic value of VEGF expression in HCC. The identification of VEGF as an important prognostic biomarker in HCC has significant clinical implications. It may help stratify patients at high risk of recurrence and poor survival, allowing for more personalized treatment strategies. In addition, VEGF has been a target for anti - angiogenic therapies in HCC. Drugs such as sorafenib, a multi - kinase inhibitor that targets VEGF receptor tyrosine kinases, have shown survival benefits in patients with advanced HCC [11]. Our findings support the continued development and evaluation of anti - VEGF therapies, especially in patients with high VEGF - expressing tumors. However, our study has several limitations. First, it is a single - center retrospective study, which may be subject to selection bias. Second, we only evaluated VEGF expression in tumor tissues using immunohistochemistry, and other factors related to the VEGF signaling pathway, such as VEGF receptor expression and activation, were not investigated. Future studies with larger sample sizes and more comprehensive molecular analyses are needed to further validate our findings and explore the complex role of VEGF in HCC. In conclusion, our study provides further evidence for the crucial role of VEGF in HCC progression. High VEGF expression is associated with adverse clinicopathological features and poor prognosis in HCC patients. VEGF may serve as a valuable prognostic biomarker and a potential therapeutic target for HCC.
This retrospective analysis of 150 HCC patients revealed that high VEGF expression in tumor tissues is significantly associated with larger tumor size, advanced TNM stage, microvascular invasion, and poor overall and recurrence - free survival. These findings emphasize the importance of VEGF in HCC progression and suggest its potential as a prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target. Further research is warranted to explore the use of VEGF - targeted therapies in HCC and to better understand the complex mechanisms underlying VEGF - mediated angiogenesis in this malignancy.
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,