The Role of Mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-4861/889

The Role of Mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

  • Houhong Wang

Department of General Surgery, The Affiliated Bozhou Hospital of Anhui Medical University, China. 

*Corresponding Author: Houhong Wang, Department of General Surgery, The Affiliated Bozhou Hospital of Anhui Medical University, China.

Citation: Houhong Wang, (2025), The Role of Mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) in Hepatocellular Carcinoma, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, 29(4); DOI:10.31579/2690-4861/889

Copyright: © 2025, Houhong Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Received: 18 June 2025 | Accepted: 14 August 2025 | Published: 15 September 2025

Keywords: hepatocellular carcinoma; immunohistochemistry; protein kinase

Abstract

The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway is crucial in cell growth, metabolism, and survival, and its dysregulation is closely associated with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) progression. This retrospective study aimed to explore the expression of mTOR in HCC, its correlation with clinicopathological features, and prognostic significance. A total of 240 HCC patients who underwent surgical resection at our institution from 2017 - 2022 were included. mTOR expression in tumor and adjacent non - tumor tissues were detected by immunohistochemistry. High mTOR expression in tumor tissues was significantly associated with larger tumor size (p = 0.005), higher histological grade (p = 0.012), microvascular invasion (p = 0.002), and elevated alpha - fetoprotein (AFP) levels (p = 0.008). Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified high mTOR expression as an independent predictor of poor overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.3, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.5 - 3.6, p < 0.001) and recurrence - free survival (HR = 2.0, 95% CI: 1.3 - 3.1, p = 0.003). These results highlight the critical role of mTOR in HCC development and its potential as a prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target.

1.Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major global health challenge, ranking among the leading causes of cancer - related deaths [1, 2]. Aberrant activation of signaling pathways is a key driver of HCC tumorigenesis and progression [3]. The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), a serine/threonine kinase, functions as a central regulator of the cellular response to nutrients, growth factors, and energy status [4]. It exists in two distinct complexes, mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) and mTOR complex 2 (mTORC2), which regulate diverse cellular processes including protein synthesis, metabolism, and cell growth [5]. Dysregulation of the mTOR pathway, often due to mutations in upstream regulators such as phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) or activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3 - kinase (PI3K)/AKT pathway, has been widely reported in HCC [6]. However, the specific relationship between mTOR expression, clinicopathological features, and patient prognosis in HCC remains to be fully elucidated. This retrospective study aimed to investigate mTOR expression in HCC tissues, analyze its associations with clinical and pathological parameters, and evaluate its prognostic value, providing insights for potential mTOR - targeted therapies.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1 Patient Selection
A total of 240 patients who underwent curative - intent surgical resection for HCC at our tertiary - care hospital between January 2017 and December 2022 were retrospectively enrolled. Inclusion criteria were: (1) histologically confirmed HCC by two independent pathologists; (2) availability of both tumor and matched adjacent non - tumor tissue samples; (3) complete clinical, pathological, and follow - up data. Exclusion criteria included prior anti - cancer treatment (such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or targeted therapy) before surgery, incomplete pathological reports, and loss to follow - up.
2.2 mTOR Expression Analysis
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed on formalin - fixed, paraffin - embedded tissue sections. Sections were deparaffinized, rehydrated, and subjected to antigen retrieval using citrate buffer (pH 6.0). After blocking endogenous peroxidase activity with 3% hydrogen peroxide, sections were incubated with a primary monoclonal antibody against mTOR (ab2732, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) at a dilution of 1:200 overnight at 4°C. Then, sections were incubated with a biotin - labeled secondary antibody and developed using a streptavidin - biotin - peroxidase complex kit. The staining intensity was scored on a 4 - point scale: 0 (negative, no staining), 1+ (weak, faint staining), 2+ (moderate, distinct staining), and 3+ (strong, intense staining). High mTOR expression was defined as a score of 2+ or 3+ in tumor tissues.
2.3 Data Collection
Clinicopathological data, including patient age, gender, tumor size, tumor number, TNM stage (8th edition, American Joint Committee on Cancer), histological grade, microvascular invasion, alpha - fetoprotein (AFP) levels, and cirrhosis status, were collected from medical records. Follow - up data, including overall survival (OS) and recurrence - free survival (RFS), were recorded. OS was calculated from the date of surgery to the date of death or the last follow - up, and RFS was calculated from the date of surgery to the date of tumor recurrence or the last follow - up.
2.4 Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (version 27.0, IBM). Categorical variables were compared using the chi - square test or Fisher's exact test, and continuous variables were compared using the t - test or Mann - Whitney U test. Survival curves were estimated by the Kaplan - Meier method, and differences between groups were compared using the log - rank test. Multivariate Cox proportional - hazards regression analysis was conducted to identify independent prognostic factors. A p - value < 0> 

3. Results

3.1 Patient Characteristics

The baseline characteristics of the 240 patients are shown in Table 1. The mean age of the patients was 56.8 ± 10.5 years, and 180 (75%) were male. Cirrhosis was present in 144 (60%) patients. The median tumor size was 5.3 cm (range: 1.0 - 15.0 cm), and 84 (35%) patients had multiple tumors. According to the TNM staging system, 48 (20%) patients were in stage I, 84 (35%) in stage II, 60 (25%) in stage III, and 48 (20%) in stage IV.

CharacteristicsNumber (%)
Age (years), mean ± SD56.8 ± 10.5
Gender (Male)180 (75)
Cirrhosis (Yes)144 (60)
Tumor size (cm), median (range)5.3 (1.0 - 15.0)
Tumor number (Multiple)84 (35)
TNM stage (I)48 (20)
TNM stage (II)84 (35)
TNM stage (III)60 (25)
TNM stage (IV)48 (20)
Histological grade (Well - differentiated)36 (15)
Histological grade (Moderately - differentiated)120 (50)
Histological grade (Poorly - differentiated)84 (35)
Microvascular invasion (Yes)96 (40)
AFP levels (ng/mL), median (range)230 (5 - 15000)

3.2 mTOR Expression and Clinicopathological Features
mTOR expression was detected in 168 (70%) of the 240 tumor samples, with high expression observed in 84 (35%) samples. High mTOR expression in tumor tissues was significantly associated with larger tumor size (p = 0.005), higher histological grade (p = 0.012), microvascular invasion (p = 0.002), and elevated AFP levels (p = 0.008). There was no significant association with patient age, gender, tumor number, or cirrhosis status (Table 2).
 

Clinicopathological FeaturesLow mTOR [removed]n = 156)High mTOR [removed]n = 84)p - value
Age (years), mean ± SD57.2 ± 10.256.3 ± 10.80.48
Gender (Male)117 (75%)63 (75%)1.00
Cirrhosis (Yes)90 (57.7%)54 (64.3%)0.37
Tumor size (cm), median (range)4.8 (1.0 - 12.0)6.2 (2.0 - 15.0)0.005
Tumor number (Multiple)28 (17.9%)56 (66.7%)0.001
TNM stage (I - II)108 (69.2%)36 (42.9%)0.001
TNM stage (III - IV)48 (30.8%)48 (57.1%)0.001
Histological grade (Well - differentiated)24 (15.4%)12 (14.3%)0.89
Histological grade (Moderately - differentiated)78 (50%)42 (50%)1.00
Histological grade (Poorly - differentiated)54 (34.6%)30 (35.7%)0.92
Microvascular invasion (Yes)24 (15.4%)72 (85.7%)0.002
AFP levels (ng/mL), median (range)180 (5 - 10000)400 (30 - 15000)0.008

3.3 Prognostic Significance of mTOR Expression
The Kaplan - Meier analysis showed that patients with high mTOR expression in tumor tissues had significantly shorter OS (Figure 1A, p < 0 xss=removed xss=removed xss=removed> 

VariableOverall Survival (HR, 95% CI)p - valueRecurrence - Free Survival (HR, 95% CI)p - value
High mTOR expression2.3 (1.5 - 3.6)< 0>2.0 (1.3 - 3.1)0.003
Advanced TNM stage (III - IV vs. I - II)2.6 (1.7 - 4.0)< 0>2.3 (1.5 - 3.6)< 0>
Microvascular invasion (Yes vs. No)2.2 (1.4 - 3.4)0.0012.0 (1.3 - 3.1)0.003
Tumor size (> 5 cm vs. ≤ 5 cm)1.8 (1.2 - 2.7)0.0051.7 (1.1 - 2.6)0.02

4. Discussion

In this retrospective study, we demonstrated that high mTOR expression in HCC tumor tissues is significantly associated with adverse clinicopathological features and serves as an independent predictor of poor prognosis.

The mTOR pathway plays a pivotal role in regulating cell growth, metabolism, and survival, and its dysregulation is a common event in HCC [6, 7]. Our findings are consistent with previous research indicating that activation of the mTOR pathway promotes HCC cell proliferation, invasion, and angiogenesis [8 - 10]. The association between high mTOR expression and larger tumor size may be due to its ability to enhance protein synthesis and cell growth, facilitating tumor expansion [11]. The link with higher histological grade and microvascular invasion suggests that mTOR - mediated signaling can drive tumor cell dedifferentiation and enhance their migratory and invasive capabilities, enabling the spread of cancer cells to surrounding tissues and blood vessels [12]. The positive correlation with elevated AFP levels may imply that mTOR activation is involved in the same oncogenic processes that lead to increased AFP production, which is often associated with more aggressive HCC [13]. Several pre - clinical and clinical studies have explored the therapeutic potential of mTOR inhibitors in HCC. Rapamycin and its analogs (rapalogs), such as everolimus and temsirolimus, have shown anti - tumor activity by inhibiting mTORC1 [14]. However, the clinical efficacy of these agents has been limited, mainly due to the development of resistance, activation of compensatory signaling pathways, and toxicity [15]. Our study provides additional clinical evidence supporting the importance of the mTOR pathway in HCC progression, suggesting that more targeted and effective mTOR - based therapeutic strategies are needed. This may involve combining mTOR inhibitors with other drugs, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors or other pathway - targeted agents, to overcome resistance and enhance anti - tumor effects [16].

This study has several limitations. First, it is a single - center retrospective study, which may introduce selection bias and limit the generalizability of the results. Second, we only evaluated mTOR expression at the protein level, and did not explore the activation status of mTOR complexes or the expression of downstream target proteins. Third, the complex interactions between the mTOR pathway and other signaling pathways in HCC, as well as the role of mTOR in the tumor microenvironment, were not fully investigated. In conclusion, our study highlights the critical role of mTOR in HCC progression and prognosis. mTOR may serve as a valuable prognostic biomarker and an important therapeutic target for HCC. Future research should focus on developing more effective mTOR - targeted therapies, understanding the mechanisms of resistance, and exploring combination treatment strategies to improve the outcomes of HCC patients.

5. Conclusion

This retrospective analysis of 240 HCC patients revealed that high mTOR expression in tumor tissues is associated with adverse clinicopathological features and poor prognosis. mTOR represents a potential prognostic biomarker and a promising therapeutic target in HCC. Further multi - center studies, combined with in - depth molecular investigations, are required to translate these findings into clinical benefits for patients with HCC.

References

Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.

img

Dr Elena Popa

It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Dr Nikolaos Andreas Chrysanthakopoulos

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee

img

Robert W McGee

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D

img

Aibing Rao

I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.

img

Kashani Mehdi

Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,

img

Alla Konstantinovna Politova