AUCTORES
Chat with usReview Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2641-0419/176Copyright
*Corresponding Author: Rodolfo Vega Llamas,
Citation: Rodolfo Vega Llamas (2021) The Role of Influenza Vaccination and its Impact on Cardiology. J. Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, 4(12); Doi:10.31579/2641-0419/176
Copyright: © 2021 Rodolfo Vega Llamas, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 24 May 2021 | Accepted: 15 June 2021 | Published: 21 June 2021
Keywords: influenza; vaccination; prevention; acute myocardial infarction; heart failure
Influenza is a common, but serious illness, which has a burden of disease all over the world. It is estimated that there are about 3 to 5 million severe case of the disease that may require hospital admission, and around 290,000 to 650,000 deaths in each seasonal outbreak. The whole population is at risk of becoming ill due to influenza. However, children and patients with chronic illnesses, such as those with cardiovascular diseases or multiple disorders, have a higher risk of developing complications. The prevention of infection due to influenza through vaccination is well known in the childhood population, but also has an important role in the maintenance of health and prevention of mortality and morbidity in patients with cardiovas- cular disease. This is due to known cardioprotective mechanisms, mainly in the prevention of acute myocardial infarction or heart failure. Nowadays, immunization must be included in the comprehensive secondary prevention in these patients
Influenza is an acute respiratory disease, caused by influenza viruses that infect the respiratory system. There are four types of influenza viruses: influenza A, B, C and D. Influenza viruses C and D are uncommon and the disease they generate in humans tends to be mild, contrary to what happens with influenza A and B viruses because their circulation is very frequent, they have a high burden of disease and are responsible for influenza pandemics or epidemics [1].
Influenza A viruses are classified into sub-types according to the antigenic properties of their two surface glycoproteins, hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA). So far, 16 hemagglutinins and 9 neuraminidases have been isolated in birds (H1-H16 y N1-N9) and additional RNA of two hemagglutinins and neuraminidases, identified in bats (H17 y H18, y N10 y N11). At present, the most commonly circulating influenza A viruses are AH1N1 and AH3N2. As for the influenza B viruses, they are not classified into sub-types but into antigenically distinct lineages, B/Victoria and B/Yamagata, which currently co-circulate in humans [2]. According to the above, the influenza viruses that cause disease and circulate in the world are AH1N1, AH3N2, B/Victoria and B/Yagamata, and their circulation would depend not only on the season, but also on the hemisphere where we are located. Northern hemisphere countries would have their influenza season from October to April or May. Southern hemisphere countries, on the other hand, would enter into their influenza season in the months of May or June, until October, But what happens in tropical countries such as Colombia? Influenza circulates throughout the year, with a higher proportion during the winter seasons, and causes illness during any month of the year.
According to the National Institute of Health's XIII acute respiratory infection event report for 2019, the respiratory viruses identified as responsible for unusually severe acute infection were both the influenza virus A (AH1N1 --- AH3N2) and influenza virus B; the latter having the highest percentage of identified viruses in all age groups, mainly in those aged 40-59 years, with the exception of children under 1 year of age, in whom the respiratory syncytial virus predominates [3].
Common cold or influenza?
It is important to differentiate the common cold from influenza. When reference is made to influenza, we are not talking about the flu or a common cold. Influenza is an illness that can be severe and associated with several complications.
When referring to the common cold or the flu, the main difference is the severity of the symptoms. In the common cold, symptoms are milder and usually do not lead to complications or incapacitation, and this clinical picture is usually caused by viruses different from those that cause influenza. Influenza, on the other hand, is characterized by having a sudden onset accompanied by fever, usually above 38 degrees Centigrade, the chills, dysphagia, headache, myalgias, arthralgias, hyporexia, fatigue and coughing. In children it is frequent that this condition also presents with nausea, vomiting and diarrhea. Influenza disease lasts much longer than a common cold, it can take weeks or even months and the symptoms are so severe that they force the patient to seek medical advice. Among the complications that can result from influenza infection are not only the worsening of chronic diseases, such as heart failure, diabetes or COPD, which will lead the person to require inpatient management, but also complications such as pneumonia, otitis, sinusitis, meningitis, myocarditis, acute myocardial infarction, seizures and Guillain-Barré syndrome. There are several signs and symptoms to consider in adult patients with cardiopathy and influenza, such as dyspnea, constant pain or pressure in the chest or abdomen, persistent dizziness, confusion, difficulty to wake up, seizures, oliguria, myalgia, severe weakness or unsteadiness, fever or cough that improves but recurs or worsens, and a worsening of chronic conditions [4-6].
Influenza is spread from person to person through droplets or aerosols that are produced when people with the disease cough, sneeze or talk. It is also possible to spread through fomites, when a person touches a surface or object contaminated with the influenza virus and puts his or her hand to his or her mouth, nose, or eyes, because influenza viruses can survive on different surfaces for up to 3 days.
The incubation period of influenza can be from 1 to 4 days, after which, the person enters a period of contagion that can last up to 10 days in an immunocompetent person and longer in an immunocompromised person, before he or she presents with symptoms. Once the person reaches this period, symptoms appear (symptomatic period), which can last up to 7 days in a healthy person, but in the case of a chronic patient, he/she would probably end up with a longer-lasting condition and would require inpatient management [7-9].
Who is hospitalized more due to influenza, and who should get vaccinated?
According to the CDC (Center for Disease Control and Prevention) weekly reports on hospitalizations associated with influenza, adults with comorbidities are those who are hospitalized first; in almost 50% of the cases it is adults with cardiovascular disease, followed by those with metabolic disorders (diabetes mellitus) and obesity, and in fourth place by patients with chronic lung diseases [10].
Given that influenza can cause severe illness and it can sometimes lead to death, different international organizations, such as the CDC and the World Health Organization (WHO), recommend annual vaccination against this virus in populations at higher risk of complications, admission into intensive care units, and death11.
Elderly adults over 60 years of age
The impact of influenza on cardiovascular events
Associations between influenza and cardiovascular events have been evident for many years. Regardless of the observational approach, it has been shown that a clinically significant association does exist. Collins found an excess in mortality from all causes during each influenza epidemic, primarily for heart disease in 35 large cities in the United States from 1918 to 1929 [12]. A 2011 observational study found a strong association between influenza and death from acute myocardial infarction in both the United Kingdom (RR 1.051, p < 0.05) and Hong Kong (RR 1.077, p < 0.05), with a 4.7- to 6.4-times higher AMI mortality rate during influenza outbreaks, indicating that 3-6% of AMI deaths were associated with influenza [13].
In a time series analysis of vital statistics records and emergency room visits occurring during the influenza seasons in New York City, for cardiovascular deaths occurring between 2006 and 2012, it obtained as a result that in adults 65 years and older there was an excess of cardiovascular mortality; additionally, it was shown how increased influenza circulation was associated with and a predictor of mortality due to cardiovascular disease in those aged over 65 years of age. The incidence of influenza during the previous 21 days was associated with an increase between 2.3% (CI 95%, 0.7 - 3.9%) and 6.3% (CI 95%, 3.7 - 8.9%) for mortality from cardiovascular disease and between 2.4% (CI 95%, 1.1 - 3.6%) and 6.9% (CI 95%, 4.0 - 9.9%) for mortality from ischemic heart disease among adults aged 65 years and older. The associations were most acute and stronger for mortality due to acute myocardial infarction during the previous 14 days and were associated with increases in mortality of between 5.8% (IC 95%, 2.5 - 9.1%) and 13.1% (IC 95%, 5,3 - 20,9%) [14].
In a self-controlled case series study, it was shown that those diagnosed with influenza have a 5,17 risk of having a myocardial infarction with influenza A and a 10,11 risk with influenza B in the first 7 days of the infection [15].
In a study conducted by Panhwar et al., it was found that influenza infection is associated with increased hospital morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure. It was found in this study that patients with HF and concomitant infection with influenza presented a higher incidence of hospital mortality versus those without concomitant infection, 6,2% vs. 5,4%, respectively (OR: 1,15 CI95%: 1,03 - 1,30; p 0,02), acute respiratory failure 36.9 vs. 23.1%, respectively (OR: 1.95 CI95%: 1.83 - 2.07; p < 0.001), acute respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation 18.2% vs. 11.3%, respectively (OR: 1.75 CI95%: 1.62 - 1.89; p < 0.001), acute kidney injury 30.3 vs. 28.7%, respectively (OR: 1.08 CI95%: 1.02 - 1.15; p 0.01), and dialysis 2.4 vs. 1.8%, respectively (OR: 1.37 CI95%: 1.14 - 1.65; p 0.001) they were hospitalized for longer periods of time [16].
Kytömaa et al., found that influenza activity was temporally associated with an increase in hospitalizations due to heart failure during four influenza seasons between 2010 and 2014. During this time, it was evident how a 5% monthly absolute increase in influenza activity was associated with a 24% increase in heart failure hospitalization rates (incidence rate, 1.24; CI 95%, 1.11 - 1.38; p < 0.001). This model suggests that, in a month with high influenza activity, approximately 19% of hospitalizations for heart failure (CI 95%, 10 - 28%) could be attributable to influenza disease [17].
The role of influenza infection in cardiovascular events
The immune response generated after a respiratory infection can lead to a variety of negative cardiovascular outcomes [18,19].
It is important to keep in mind that these patients are at risk of developing a concomitant bacterial infection, mainly due to pneumonia by Staphylococcus pneumoniae which is one of the most frequent complications of influenza infection and may increase the risk of coronary outcomes due to the prolongation of pro-inflammatory cytokine levels and procoagulant state.
Impact of the influenza vaccine on cardiovascular events
It is considered that vaccination against influenza can prevent the adverse impact of infection in the cardiac patient, since, by preventing infection, it avoids the main trigger for the generation of inflammation, hypervolemia, oxidative stress, arrhythmias, fibrosis and myocardial damage, which frequently lead to infarction or heart failure.
A retrospective cohort study including 29,763,704 patients showed that patients vaccinated against influenza had a lower prevalence of acute myocardial infarction compared to those who were not vaccinated (3.4% vs. 4.4%), with an adjusted OR for AMI of 0.91 (CI 95%: 0.87-0.96) in vaccinated patients compared to unvaccinated patients [20]. Another cohort study conducted by Modin et al. with 134,048 patients diagnosed with heart failure, found that receiving one or more vaccines was associated with an 18% reduced risk of death (all causes): HR 0.82; CI 95% 0.81 - 0.84; p < 0.001; cardiovascular causes: HR 0.82; CI 95%, 0.81 - 0.84; p < 0.001). Annual vaccination and higher cumulative number of vaccinations were associated with greater reductions in the risk of death compared to intermittent vaccination or non-vaccination [21]. A systematic review that included 42 studies in the analysis demonstrated the protective impact of vaccination against influenza on the reduction of acute myocardial infarction or death from a cardiovascular event with intervention, case-control, and cohort studies [22].
In a meta-analysis of case-control studies, it was evidenced that vaccination against influenza was associated with a protective effect for AMI with an OR: 0,71, CI 95% (1,47 - 2,76) [23]. In a review of the impact of influenza vaccination in patients with heart failure, a randomized controlled trial found a significant benefit in those vaccinated for all causes of death and hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome, heart failure, or infarction.
In another study included in this review, a 19% reduction in hospitalization for cardiovascular causes was demonstrated in vaccinated vs. unvaccinated patients, which demonstrated a significant prevention of hospitalization due to heart failure by preventing any respiratory condition. The ''HF-Paradigm'' study demonstrates a significant association between vaccination against influenza and all-cause mortality reduction in patients with a decreased fraction of ventricular ejection [18].
Several observational studies and clinical trials demonstrate that the influenza vaccine protects against acute myocardial infarction. The estimates of the efficacy of the influenza vaccine in preventing infarction range from 15 to 45%. This is a similar range of efficacy in comparison with accepted routine secondary coronary prevention such as a cessation of smoking (32 - 43%), use of statins (19 - 30%), and antihypertensive therapy (17 - 25%), so it is considered that vaccination against influenza should be part of the integral treatment in patients with cardiovascular disease [24].
Proposed possible cardioprotective mechanisms of vaccination
The influenza vaccine can protect against cardiovascular events via multifactorial mechanisms. Prevention of infections prevents disruptions in homeostasis and, on the other hand, the immune response to the vaccine may generate cardiovascular benefits.Two possible mechanisms have been proposed, a nonspecific effect associated with the elimination of infections that may destabilize chronic atherosclerotic inflammation of the arterial wall by sudden activation of an inflammatory cascade, inhibiting atherogenesis, vascular damage, alteration in contractility, and activating hemodynamic stabilization by activation of the bradykinin 2 receptor. The specific mechanism proposes an ''antigenic mimic'' between the influenza virus and atherosclerotic plaque antigens [18,25].
Why does one need to be vaccinated every year?
There are two main reasons why annual vaccination against influenza is recommended. The first is because the antibodies produced in response to the previous influenza vaccine decline over time, around 12 months after administration. And the second, due to the normal evolutionary process of the influenza virus, which includes a series of minor antigenic variations involving a difference in a small number of amino acids in the hemagglutinin and neuraminidase proteins is why the vaccine must be updated year after year as per the WHO, since the circulating influenza virus strains will be different from those of previous years. The virus circulates all year round in Colombia, but there are two peaks, between April and June, and between September and December. Therefore, it is recommended that people get vaccinated in the first half of the year to cover the two crucial times of the year [26].
Vaccination in patients with cardiovascular disease
Various health authorities, international bodies and medical societies recommend vaccination against influenza for patients with cardiovascular disease.
The importance of influenza B co-circulation and the evolution of vaccines
The influenza A (H1N1), A (H3N2), and influenza B viruses are responsible for a significant burden of disease in humans during seasonal epidemics. In the past, it was believed that influenza B viruses caused milder disease than influenza A, but several studies have recently shown that influenza A and B infections are clinically indistinguishable and can cause severe complications in both children and adults. The influenza B viruses originally represented a homogeneous group, but since the late 1980s, they have evolved into two antigenically and genetically distinct lineages, defined by the reference strains B/Yamagata/16/88 (Yamagata lineage) and B/Victoria/2/87 (Victoria lineage). In the 1990s, Yamagata predominated worldwide, while the Victoria lineage was mainly restricted to East Asia. However, during the 2000/2001 and 2001/2002 seasons, viruses of the Victoria lineage re-emerged in North America and Europe and spread across the globe. Since then, the two B lineages have circulated worldwide, with variability in terms of geographic distribution and genomic evolution [31]. As with the influenza virus, vaccines have evolved over the years, adjusting to the needs in terms of prevention and protection of the population. The monovalent and bivalent vaccines against influenza that once existed were replaced by trivalent vaccines, and today by tetravalent vaccines against influenza. What does this last change correspond to? Before 2002, there was a circulation of a lineage of influenza type B (Yamagata or Victoria) in each season of influenza regardless of the hemisphere (north, south, tropical) which changed from year to year, further to two sub-types of A (H1N1 and H3N2), so the recommended vaccine against influenza was the trivalent vaccine which contained the two sub-types of A and a lineage of B recommended for the composition of the vaccine by the WHO. However, since 2002 there has been evidence of co-circulation of the two B lineages during the same season. This was documented in Europe, Australia, the United States, and years later the co-circulation of the two influenza B lineages was also confirmed in Colombia [32,33].
A subtyping of influenza B was performed in Colombia in 2014, which allowed the confirmation of the co-circulation of the two lineages of B in the same season, with 63% of the circulation of B corresponding to B/Victoria and 37% to B/Yamagata in our country. Once again, in 2018, the subtyping for B showed that, despite the fact that AH1N1 circulated the most, there were cases of both B/Yamagata and B/Victoria. It is important to clarify that information on co-circulation is limited since the subtyping of B is not routinely performed in the country due to costs. Therefore, the report is mainly to identify influenza B and/or subtyping for one of the two lineages for the other years. The confirmation of cocirculation between lineages of influenza B allows the evidencing of a major problem; that of mismatching. This refers to what is present in the vaccine does not correspond to what is circulating, and this was observed for influenza type B with trivalent vaccines. Thus, even if the population is vaccinated, a percentage of the population will be at risk of influenza disease due to that lineage of influenza B which is not included in the trivalent vaccine [32,33].
Following this, the WHO in 2012 published a Position Paper recommending the change from trivalent (TIV) to tetravalent (QIV) influenza vaccine, and in 2013 the first tetravalent vaccines against influenza appeared, in accordance with the needs and recommendations of the WHO, thus including two sub-types of influenza A and the two lineages of influenza B (B/Victoria and B/Yamagata). The use of the tetravalent vaccine is currently recommended by different international organizations; it is not only recommended for at risk groups, such as pregnant women, children under 5 years of age, adults over 60 years of age, chronic diseases, travelers and health care personnel; but it is also recommended for all people from 6 months of age for annual vaccination [33].In Colombia, the 2016 update document on the Guidelines for Adolescent and Adult Immunization by the Colombian Association of Infectious Diseases (ASCIN) regarding vaccination against influenza, establishes that the tetravalent vaccine should ideally be administered to avoid possible mismatches between vaccine strains and circulating wild-type strains [34].
Two vaccines against influenza are currently available in Colombia: the trivalent vaccines, used by the expanded program on immunization and indicated for a certain group of patients at risk, such as those with cardiovascular disease according to the 2020 guidelines, congenital, rheumatic, and ischemic heart disease, and the tetravalent vaccines [35].
Influenza is one of the leading causes of respiratory infection responsible for an increase in both morbidity and mortality among the chronic population worldwide, and there is increasing evidence of the association between influenza and negative cardiovascular outcomes, such as acute myocardial infarction and heart failure. Pathological mechanisms responsible for these events have been identified, such as the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, increased sympathetic activity, hypoxia, disruption of atherosclerotic plaque, and hypercoagulability. Likewise, the cardioprotective mechanisms of vaccination by preventing infection and thus disruptions in homeostasis and cardiovascular benefits have been proposed. Different types of studies have evaluated the efficacy of vaccination against influenza in the chronic population with cardiovascular disease and they have demonstrated the impact of this intervention versus non-vaccination among this population. Therefore, it is considered that it should be included among the routinely employed coronary prevention activities which are accepted worldwide, along with cessation of smoking, antihypertensive therapy, and the use of statins. Despite the fact that several international bodies and scientific societies recommend annual vaccination in patients with cardiovascular disease, vaccination rates in risk groups continue to be suboptimal. A paradigm shift is needed in clinical practice, and in the management of these patients with regard to the prevention of immunopreventable diseases and their secondary complications. The recommendation of vaccination should be given by the treating physician, and it should be included as a tool in the prevention of cardiovascular diseases.
Conflict of Interest
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner