AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2637-8892/017
*Corresponding Author: Uma Rani. G., Deportment of Pharmaceutics, RBVRRwomen's college of pharmacy,Hyderabad, India.
Citation: The perceptual organization of space is preserved even if based on a different (quantity of) visual input. . J Psychology and Mental Health. 1(3); DOI: 10.31579/2637-8892/017
Copyright: © 2017 Uma Rani. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 04 October 2019 | Accepted: 18 October 2017 | Published: 31 October 2017
Keywords: distance perception, visual impairment, real distance judgment, magnitude estimation, perceptual rehabilitation, clinical psychophysics
Purpose: We investigate the ability of adults with and without visual impairment estimate distances between stimuli in real environment.
Methods: We evaluated 12 subjects aged between 20 and 40 years in which 6 subjects with normal vision (mean age=31.0, SD=6.5), and 6 subjects with visual impairment (mean age=27.7, SD=7.8). Two styrofoam balls of 10cm in diameter were used, painted in black and a line of white velcro of 3.5 meters was fixed in the floor of a hallway without lateral references. Psychophysical scaling was evaluated by magnitude estimation and the exponent of the Stevens' law was calculated.
Results: The calculated exponent for the controls was 1.13 for near judgment and 1.11 for far distances. The low vision group showed exponent values of 1.01 for near and 0.96 for far distances judgment. There was a statistical difference for 120cm of distance between balls for near (F10=88.21, p<0.001) and a tendency to difference for 200cm (F10=3.81, p=0.079) between groups.
Conclusions: Our scaling procedure shows that despite the reduction in the distance judged by the low vision subjects, their internal representation of space is preserved. Similar exponent values indicates that their suprathreshold impression of the distance follow the same rules of the normal subject.
Our vision is guided by the egocentric references in which we have a better accuracy in distance judgment than for exocentric vision [1]. Although our locomotion in space is based on the ability to estimate distances between objects in our visual space, few studies directly address this issue. Thus they also used the measurement of stereoscopic depth perception that is not closely related with long distances judgments [2-5]. The effectiveness of egocentric distance estimation improves due to the binocular disparity using the angle of convergence of the two eyes over distances of two to six meters [6,7]. Constant feedbacks of small displacements of the retina image are using to continually, adjust the distance between things when we move in space. [7,8].
Surfaces are also important cues in judging distances. Subjects can estimate surface properties using measurements such as textures, the average brightness, and contrast between light and shadow parts of the image [9].
In our daily life, the perceived size of objects plays an important role in helping people to move in the natural environment through ongoing evaluation of the sizes of objects and spaces [10]. When an object is presented in a visual angle of about 2° or less we tend to overestimate the size of objects at angles greater than 2° we have a slight tendency to underestimate the size. According to those authors, subjects with low vision have increased wrong judgments on the estimated size than people with normal vision. The chromaticity is a factor that also affects the estimated sizes, in which the more saturated the color, the closer it seems while more neutral colors seem more distant [10].
Another interesting point related to our topic is the fact of our perceptual distances is not linearly related to the physical (objective) distances. So, the space judgment during mobility is a learning function [11]. In this line, other studies report that the error in our spatial judgments increase as the distance increases [12-14].
Considering distance judgment in subjects with visual impairment, even fewer studies were performed. Correlation between a self-report questionnaires regarding spatial location suggest that some subjects with visual impairment have difficulty with real-world spatial tasks [15]. These difficulties could be predicted by their Vernier acuity results. Another important study is the one of Leat and Lovie-Kitchin [16]. These authors measured visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and visual field attention and compared then with the real-life mobility quality. Their results shown a low to moderate correlation (r=0.38) between mobility performance and contrast sensitivity. The authors concluded that attention and the presence of distractors are important factors in mobility performance.
Thus, the purpose of this study is to investigate how adults subjects with and without visual impairment estimate spatial distances between simple stimuli on a real environment, addressing the ego-exocentric judgments in searching of possible impacts of visual impairment in that spatial function.
We evaluated 12 adult subjects aged between 20 and 40 years in which 6 subjects with normal vision (mean age=31.0, SD=6.5), and 6 subjects with visual impairment (mean age=27.7, SD=7.8). Exclusion criteria were systemic pathologies associated with the visual impairment and the using of central nervous system effect drugs. Demographic data are presented in (Table 1).
Table 1 : Demographic data of the Control and Low Vision Subjects.
The experiment was performed at the Department of Low Vision and Visual Rehabilitation of Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), Brazil.
This is a cross and experimental study and was carried out in the period from June to October after the approval of the Ethics and Research of UNIFESP (#04.023-061), and follows the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. All subjects signed the consent form.
Materials and procedure
Two styrofoam balls of 10cm in diameter each, painted in black, were the stimuli used to calculate the distance judgment. A line of white velcro (3M Dual Lock Reclosable Fasteners, St. Paul, MN, USA) of 3.5 meters that was fixed in the floor of a hallway without lateral references was used to fixate the balls.
These balls were fixed on the velcro (velvet) in such manner that one ball was positioned in front of the other. The distances between the balls varied in 10cm steps considering two experimental conditions: 1. for exocentric judgment of distances–a reference ball was fixed at 1 meter from the subjects while the other ball varied; 2. for egocentric judgment of distances–the reference ball remains fixed at 3 meters from the subject while the target ball varied. The position of the target ball was randomly chosen between 30cm to 200cm from the reference ball.
Each participant was instructed by the researcher about the procedure and guidelines of the experiment, but was not informed about the white velcro line length and no information was gave about the step size of the distances. Subjects were positioned on a yellow line reference on the front line of velcro.
Participants had their eyes closed in those moments when the ball was changing in distance. The task consisted of as soon as (s)he opened their eyes, they have to look at the ball and immediately judge the estimated distance.
Since we are using a ratio procedure, subjective scaling was evaluated by the magnitude estimation procedure and the exponent of the Stevens' Power Law was calculated according to the following equation:
S=kIn (equation 1)
where, S is the judged (subjective) magnitude, k is a constant regarding to the condition, I is the physical intensity – in our case, the spatial distance between the balls and n is the exponent that characterizes those relations.
Statistical analysis
A full descriptive statistical analysis was performed using the Statistica (Statsoft v12, Tulsa, USA). Comparison between the groups was performed using One-Way ANOVA considering group and distance. Differences were calculated by Tukey post hoc test. Paired Student T-test was used to compute differences within groups. Wilk's lambda that measures the unique contribution of a respective variable to the discrimination between groups was also calculated.
The distances were successfully obtained for all subjects of both groups. The control group showed an exponent of 1.13 (with a Pearson correlation coefficient of r=0.992) for the exocentric judgment and an exponent of 1.11 (r=0.996) for the egocentric judgment of distance. Similarly, the low vision group had an exponent of 1.01 (r=0.991) for the exocentric judgment and an exponent of 0.96 (r=0.984) for the egocentric judgment.
The difference found between the controls and the low vision subjects for exocentric (0.12) and for egocentric judgments (0.15) suggest a compressive perceptual distortion in distance judgments, respectively, of 3.2 and 4.1 times for low vision subjects.
Comparing the amplitude of the subjective estimation performed by the low vision group with the control group, there was a statistical difference for 120cm of distance between balls (F10=88.21, p<0 F10=3.81, p=0.079) W=0.06 Chi-Sqr=18.38; p=0.004) F=29.63; p=0.002.>
We also compared the distances judgment to egocentric and exocentric conditions within groups. Controls showed similar subjective estimations for both conditions. Low vision subjects had similar subjective estimations to egocentric (40cm) and exocentric (200cm) conditions, with a statistical worse judgment for egocentric compared to exocentric conditions at middle distance –120cm (T=-3.97, p=0.011).
We found very impressive and meaningful results showing impairment in distance judgment in a small group of low vision adults. The first main result was a measurable reduction of the exponent of the Stevens´ law judgment [17,18] in the low vision subjects, meaning an underestimation of the perceived distances between the reference and the target ball. This is a new interesting finding since the spatial distance judgment was different comparing with normal subjects. When we look to the values judged by the low vision subject there was a significant distortion in their perception. However, the small reduction in the exponent of the psychophysical scaling strongly suggests that their internal representation of space is preserved. The similar exponent values indicates that their suprathreshold impression of the distance follow the same perceptual rules than the normal subject. Fundamentally, this is extremely relevant information about the perceptual construction in visual impairment subjects. Even with the reduction in their function for visual discrimination of spatial elements measured by visual acuity their perceptual organization of space was not proportionally affected by the disturbed input.
The second main result came from the comparison of perceived distances considering the distance from the subject of the reference ball. We aiming explore if those different distances of the reference could be related with possible differences in perceived distance of the target ball. Our results showed a significant reduction in distance judgment for the low vision group for middle distances–120cm–and only for the egocentric condition. No differences were found for very near or for distant conditions and for all the exocentric judgment. Considering these two results we argue that subjects with low vision had impairment in distance judgment reducing their subjective perception in comparison with normal subjects and it could be reflecting some developmental damages due to the visual disability. A similar result was obtained in a study evaluating the self-reported difficulties experienced by visually impaired subjects in real-world tasks requiring distance judgments [15]. A spatial localization questioner was applied by those authors to visual impairment subjects and their result suggests that subjects with visual impairment had difficulties in distance judgment and it was correlated with the Vernier acuity. Our results showing differences in distance perception are in line with that study since both found impairments in hyperacuities (Vernier and distance judgment).
Clinical relevance of our results could be though in means of rehabilitation programs. All of those previous studies failed in correlate mobility performance with basic visual functions as visual acuity or spatial contrast sensitivity for luminance [15,16]. Based in our findings we suggest that the clinical measurements should include more perceptual (high level) functions as contour integration and real distance perception than those classical visual tasks as visual acuity and contrast sensitivity.
Our data also shows that the egocentric judgment was more impaired than the exocentric judgments which are also in line with the developmental damages of visual impairment. According to some studies, many different functions exhibit ego-exocentric asymmetry. Both visual perception of elevation and verticality show a strong egocentric bias [19]. Similar bias to egocentric judgments have been reported in spatially distributed targets [20] and for large field distances measurements [21].
New insights about the distance perception could be obtained from our data. Although there were differences in the distance judged by low vision subjects the similar exponent measured by power law means that they lost the visual ability to quantify precisely the distance between themselves and the objects but they maintain the internal magnitude for those perceived distances.
Low vision could be affecting more intermediary distances since we were not able to find differences in near and far distances to egocentric judgment. For near distances, additional cues could be helping the distance between features in the ambient. For far distances, our ability to judge is normally impaired and the visual impairment could not be so relevant. Additionally, we found a tendency to a deficit in judgment for far distances to egocentric judgment. The number of subjects in our study not allows us to considerate that tendency supportive.
In both groups subjects had a trend to underestimate the far distances and overestimate the near distances between the two balls. The group of normal vision was more accurate than the group with low vision, however, the estimation were not accurate. Sharrack et al., [22] shown that even doctors and patients of a hospital are fairly imprecise to estimate distance between spaces in the hospital. In our study, we observed that for small distances between the two balls there was an expansion judgment in the estimations and for large distances there was the oppose effect, a compression.
Analyzing what we named "internal coherence" for control and low-vision patient judgments, we found a similar result even in those cases that the estimations magnitudes showed quantifiable imprecisions. Contrary results were found by Lappe et al., [23] in which subjects were asked to estimate the distance traveled in a virtual environment. In that study, the subjects were sat inside a cube which was designed at the front an image of a virtual corridor and they had to press a button when they felt that the distance perceived was agree with the criteria distance. Dynamic events also do not help subjects to improve their distance judgment. Subjects in a virtual environment performing a walk task showed that the perception of walked distances were not correlated with their previously distance judged [24]. These authors also found an underestimation of distance to egocentric judgment, a result that is in line with ours.
Visually impaired subjects have more difficulty in quantify distances comparing to subjects with normal vision. In real life conditions, those distortions in distance estimation could generate accidents during their daily activities as walking between furniture and other obstacles. We also found that despite their low visual function, the "internal coherence" regarding the spatial environment was not significantly affected. This is a valuable information since it suggests that the perceptual organization of space is preserved even if based on a different (quantity of ) visual input. Rehabilitation programs for subjects with low vision must take into account this "internal coherence" of spatial relationships, suggesting that the mobility and locomotion training should be focused on this property preserved visual perception. Our hypothesis is that since the subject can learn to correct the quantifiable perceived distances, internal coherence preserved must accompany this change, making the rehabilitation process more effective.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
