AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2692-9422/080
*Corresponding Author: Mahsa Sepahvand, Neurology resident at Iran University of Medical sciences
Citation: Mahsa Sepahvand, (2023), The Neurological Complication of Intradiscal Ozone Injection, A Case Report. J. Brain and Neurological Disorders. 6(6): 10.31579/2642-973X/080
Copyright: © 2023, Mahsa Sepahvand. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 07 August 2023 | Accepted: 21 August 2023 | Published: 30 August 2023
Keywords: ozone therapy; neurological complication; cord infarction; pres syndrome
Ozone therapy is a novel treatment methos using worldwide. Controlling disk herniation pain is one of its usages nowadays. The associated neurological complications are not known yet.Herein, we are going to present two patients, one presenting with cortical blindness and focal to generalized bilateral seizure, and one with acute onset quadriplegia. Posterior reversible encephalopathy and maybe cord infarction are the probable occurred complications. We are going to discuss the likely scenarios that happened and highlight the neurological consideration in the ozone injection.
Ozone therapy (OT) is a novel treatment method based on the mixture of oxygen and ozone (O2 O3) that is used in many indications such as arthrosis, disk herniation, infections, especially in The COVID pandemic, cancer, autoimmune and neurodegenerative disorders.[1-4]
In recent years, one of the main areas of OT application is disk herniation treatment that has not responded to conservative management. There are two approaches for ozone injections: intradiscally (direct) and into the paravertebral muscles (indirect); which probably help to shrink the herniated disc size and have analgesic or anti-inflammatory effects.[1, 5]
Due to the novelty of this treatment method, its neurological complications are not known completely; therefore, we need more studies on the reliability and safety of this medical treatment.[6]
So, we herein report two cases that were complicated by posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) and spinal cord infarction after intradiscal ozone injection.
Case presentation
Case1
A 64-year-old diabetic and hypertensive female was admitted to our hospital emergency room with abrupt onset headache, nausea and vomiting, disorientation and bilateral painless visual loss immediately after 20 ml of an oxygen-ozone mixture (ozone concentration of 20 μg/ml) injection in cervical discs for her neck pain.
On admission, she was drowsy and confused. She was afebrile, with no neck stiffness or respiratory distress and had a blood pressure of 150/90 mmHg, Heart Rate (HR) of 82 beats per minute Detailed neurological examination revealed bilateral blindness with persevered pupillary reflex and pink and sharp optic disks. She had bilaterally extensor plantar reflexes, truncal ataxia with intact muscle forces. She had three episodes of focal to bilateral seizures.
The laboratory investigations were in normal range. Axial view fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery (FLAIR) sequence of the brain MRI (Magnetic resonance imaging) showed high signal intensity in bilateral cerebellar hemispheres (left more than right), cerebellar vermis and bilateral thalamus. The lesions had no restriction or gadolinium (GAD) enhancement (Figure 1.A-C). All findings were compatible with vasogenic edema.
The patient was admitted to intensive care unit and was managed with intravenous antiepileptic, fluids and blood pressure monitoring for 7 days. During admission, clinical neurologic exams improved. MRI showed relative remission of T2/FLAIR sequence lesions in 2 weeks follow up. (Figure 1.D)
According to improved clinical presentation and remission in MRI findings, the diagnosis of PRES (posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome) due to ozone injection was confirmez
Figure 1: MRI findings at the onset (A-C) and follow up (D). (A) FLAIR sequence, shows edema within bilateral thalamus (white arrows) and (B) bilateral cerebellum hemisphere (Left more than right) and vermis, (C) Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) shows vasogenic edema (D) FLAIR MRI sequences showing a near complete resolution of the lesions at the 2weeks follow-up
Case 2
A 72 years-old female who was known case of diabetes mellitus and hypertension admitted to the university hospital neurology ward with hyper acute quadriparesis from 2 weeks prior to the admission. It occurred immediately after 15 ml of an oxygen-ozone mixture (ozone concentration of 15 μg/ml) injection in the third cervical disc. Her symptoms had not changed between the onset of paresis and admission. She suffered from a burn wound in the right side of her abdomen due to loss of temperature sensation. She also complained of urinary retention.
In the examination she was alert and oriented with stable vital signs and normal peripheral pulses. She was areflexic and had quadriparesis (more prominent in lower limbs and left sides), Normal position sense in all limbs along with a sensory deficit at the T2 level and bilateral positive Babinski sign. The cranial nerves examination were intact.
Whole cord Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was done to assess structural insults. It revealed a longitudinal T2/STIR hypersignal lesion of the cervical cord preferentially affecting anterolaterally elongated from C2 to C7 level. (Figure 2.A,B) There was no remarkable finding in brain MRI.
Considering hyper acute myelitis, we did number of paraclinical tests. The electrocardiogram (ECG) showed sinus rhythm with no abnormality. Trans-thoracic echocardiography (TTE) and trans-esophageal echocardiography (TEE) were done, no patent foramen oval (PFO) was seen.
Beside the post renal acute kidney injury, routine lab test including cell count, biochemistry studies were normal. Lumbar puncture was unremarkable and one oligoclonal band was detected. (WBC: 0-1, RBC: 190, Glucose: 68, Pro: 28). CSF Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) checked for HCV and CMV.
Due to normal lab tests, hyper acute onset of symptoms, cervical MRI findings, and no clinical improvement in one month follow up assessments, Ozone injection induced ischemic myelitis was the most probable diagnosis.
Figure 2: spinal cord infarct in the central territory of the anterior spinal artery. T2/STIR sequence (A) sagittal view, high intense longitudinally extensive lesion from C2-C7. (B) axial view, hyperintense signal at the center of cord, sparing posterior cord (white arrow).
In our first case, initially posterior circulation acute ischemic stroke , was considered in the context of air gas emboli following ozone-oxygen intradiscal injection. The evolution of case 1 symptoms and the absence of infarction and the pattern of vasogenic edema distribution in the primary brain imaging ruled out the infarction and highlighted the “PRES central variant” diagnosis. There were two interesting findings in our case presentation. She experienced serial focal onset seizure with impaired awareness in the absence of cortical/subcortical gross pathology. So, there may be supratentorial microscopic abnormalities in central variant of PRES that needs quantitative MRI DWI sequence for detection.[7] our patient complaint of sudden painless bilateral vision loss with preserved pupillary response in favor of cortical blindness despite intact occipital lobe in brain imaging. We explain this phenomenon with role of lateral geniculate nucleus of the thalamus in relaying visual data from the retina to the primary visual cortex. Bilateral thalamic involvement explains her blindness.
cerebral autoregulation failure leading to hyper perfusion or an excessive vascular reactivity is the pathological explanation for all the
disorders that cause PRES. Regardless of the underlying cause, most common neurological deficit include cortical blindness, confusion, headache, nausea and vomiting, seizure and focal neurological deficit. In brain MRI, vasogenic edema is seen as white matter T2/FLAIR sequence hyperintensity mostly in occipitoparietal lobe; however, it can be superimposed with infarction. Atypical regional involvement may include thalamus, brainstem, deep gray matter and cerebellum which is called “central variant”. The interesting phenomena of the central variant is that there is less cytotoxic insult and the DWI sequence may show no restriction as it was, in our patient. [8] A hallmark of the PRES syndrome is the improvement of clinical and radiological findings with the treatment of underlying cause.[9] there are a variety of underlying etiologies for PRES but ozone therapy role is a novel finding.
The probable explanation is the effect of the ozone on the vascular permeability via Nitrous Oxide(NO) production which leads to vasogenic edema. [10] Another possible mechanism may be the theory of “ozone-induced oxidative stress”.[11] Free radical mediated oxidation of arachidonic acid, produce 8-Iso-prostaglandin (PG)E2 and 8-iso-PGF2α which are both potent vasoconstrictors.[12] In a study conducted on 2013, the urine level of 8-iso-PGF2α was significantly higher in patients with reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) and correlated with the severity of vasoconstrictions. [13] RCVS mimicking PRES radiologically, makes the differentiation even more challenging. [14]
Ischemic infarction of the spinal cord is rare and presenting about 1% of all strokes. It mostly involves the ventral two- third due to anterior spinal artery infarction. Infarction commonly result from systemic hypotension in the most vulnerable site, the thoracic region.[15]
Ozone-oxygen intradiscal injection has been reported to causes anterior spinal artery infarction in the presence of patent foramen oval (PFO) and paradoxical gas embolism, as the result of right to left shunt.[16] despite, the through workup conducted, there was no evidence of PFO in our patient. This was the interesting finding of our patient.
Spinal arteriovenous shunt normally present between arteries and veins in the epidural space.[17] If the injected ozone-oxygen could gain access to the spinal venous system, it may have retrograde travel in the venous route due to the increased intrathoracic pressure as the result of the patient Valsalva maneuver or injection pain.[18] Then, it can inter the spinal arterial system (probably anteriorly because of its dominancy) directly from arteriovenous shunt without crossing the pulmonary system. Another theory is the misplacement of the injection site. If the needle placed in the anterosuperior part of the foramen it may insult the radicular artery and cause cord infarction.[19]
By these 2 mechanisms, we explained that maybe local gas emboli has caused anterior spinal cord infarction. However; the exact mechanism is not clear.
ozone therapy has been utilized widely as medical treatment in the recent years. it is assumed as a safe method to ameliorate disk herniation pain. Our study highlights the detrimental neurological consequence of intradiscal ozone injection that may be irreversible. Further study is needed to prove its safety and clarify the associated complications.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
