Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-8808/329
1Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Toulouse University.
2INCOMM team, I2MC Institute, UMR 1297, INSERM, Toulouse. France.
3Institute of Dental Sciences, Siksha’O’ Anusandhan, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
4Laboratory of Physiotherapy, Institute of Medical Sciences, Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan. Odisha, India.
5URU EvolSan, Paul Sabatier University, Toulouse, France.
6BIOETHICS Team, CERPOP Laboratory UMR 1295, INSERM, Toulouse.
*Corresponding Author: Diemer Franck, Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Toulouse University 3, chemin des Maraichers 31062 Toulouse, France.
Citation: Sturaro Emma, Mishra Lora, Minty Matthieu, Georgelin-Gurgel Marie, Diemer Franck., et al, (2026), The Influence of Verbal Suggestion on Postural Stability: A Stabilometric Study in Dental Students, J, Clinical Case Reports and Studies, 7(7); DOI:10.31579/2690-8808/329
Copyright: ©, 2026, Diemer Franck. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 11 June 2026 | Accepted: 26 June 2026 | Published: 03 July 2026
Keywords: stabilometry; suggestion; center of pressure; postural control; balance assessment; clinical assessment
Background/Aim:
Stabilometric recordings are widely regarded as reliable references for assessing postural stability; however, they may be influenced by the measurement environment and external cognitive factors, such as verbal suggestion.
This observational study aimed to evaluate the impact of verbal suggestion on postural balance by comparing stabilometric recordings under neutral and suggestive conditions.
Material and Methods:
A controlled, randomized design was used to compare a test group (n = 126) and a control group (n = 49). Postural stability was assessed using a computerized stabilometric platform. The control group underwent three identical recordings without suggestions, while the test group performed:
Results:
The area of the center of pressure (CoP) displacement significantly increased under instability suggestions and decreased under stability suggestions, compared to baseline (p < 0.05). These findings indicate that verbal suggestion can directly influence postural control. Additionally, a habituation effect was observed, with participants demonstrating increased stability over repeated recordings.
Conclusions:
This study highlights the critical role of a neutral and controlled environment in stabilometric assessments. To ensure reproducible and unbiased results, standardized instructions should be used, and external verbal or environmental influences minimized.
Stabilometry, the analysis of postural sway, is a valuable tool for assessing balance and postural control, with applications in fields ranging from neurophysiology to sports science. Establishing normative data for stabilometric parameters is essential for identifying abnormalities and evaluating therapeutic interventions [1].
Despite extensive research on stabilometry, the potential influence of suggestion on stabilometric recordings remains largely unexplored. Suggestion—the process by which an individual's thoughts, feelings, or behaviors are influenced by external factors—has been shown to impact various physiological and psychological processes [1]. Given that stabilometric assessments are widely used in clinical practice, where human interaction can introduce bias, it is crucial to consider how suggestion might affect these measurements [1,2].
In particular, stabilometric platforms are commonly employed in posturology-related specialties, including dentistry for occlusal analysis and the optimization of oral appliances for elite athletes. During our investigations, we observed that the recording environment might play a significant role in stabilometric measurements, raising questions about the potential impact of suggestion [2]. The literature reveals a lack of studies on how verbal instructions influence postural stability during stabilometric assessments [2]. Moreover, some authors challenge the recommendations of the Société Française de Posturologie, particularly regarding the optimal sampling frequency for recordings [3,4]. However, several studies point out that these measures can be influenced by the test environment and cognitive factors, including verbal suggestions [1,5].
Recent research shows that placebo and nocebo effects can modify postural stability, suggesting that expectations induced by verbal instructions have a measurable impact on postural control [6].
This study aims to assess the impact of verbal suggestion on stabilometric recordings and to emphasize the importance of a neutral testing environment to ensure reproducible results. To this end, we propose a clinical study involving healthy participants to investigate the potential effects of suggestion on stabilometric measurements.
Study Design and Participants
This observational study employed a controlled, randomized design to investigate the influence of verbal suggestions on postural stability. Healthy volunteers from the dental surgery department of Toulouse University (France) were recruited. Participants were screened to exclude those with a history of neuromuscular or vestibular disorders, recent musculoskeletal injuries (e.g., fractures, sprains), or any condition that could affect balance, ensuring a sample with presumptively normal postural control.
After providing informed consent, participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups:
• Control group: Received neutral instructions throughout the experiment.
• Test group: Exposed to verbal suggestions of either instability or stability during specific phases of the experiment.
Experimental Protocol
Stabilometric Assessment [7]
Postural stability was assessed using a computerized stabilometric platform equipped with Win Posturo software. The platform was calibrated before each session to ensure measurement accuracy.
Each participant underwent three consecutive stabilometric recordings, each lasting 51.2 seconds, under different instructional conditions. To standardize the experimental setup, all participants adopted the same posture:
• Eyes closed
• Arms relaxed at the sides
• Unbitted teeth
• Feet together
The study followed current stabilometry recommendations, including a sampling frequency of 40 Hz and minimum recording time [4,7,8].
Control Group
Participants in the control group were given neutral instructions for all three recordings (such as “the recording is starting in 3 seconds”, “now the second”. nothing during the the recordings). They were simply asked to stand still on the platform with their feet together, serving as a baseline measure of postural stability without any external cognitive influence.
Test Group
Participants in the test group received verbal suggestions designed to induce either instability or stability. These suggestions were delivered verbally and corresponded to information provided in a participant information sheet, which described a scientifically neutral concept: the reverse photo-proprioceptive reflex. This fictional phenomenon suggested that light stimulation of a tooth could influence balance.
The test group underwent three stabilometric recordings:
• Recording 1 (Neutral Instructions): Identical to the control group, participants were simply asked to stand still on the platform.
• Recording 2 (Instability Suggestions): Participants were given verbal cues designed to induce a sensation of imbalance, such as:
o “As indicated by the inverse photo-proprioceptive reflex, with the stimulation of this canine, you will begin to perceive small movements…”
o “As if you were a tree branch caught in a gust of wind.”
o “As if you were a blade of grass pushed by the wind.”
o “The more you move, the more unstable you are, and the more unstable you are, the more you move.”
o “Completely unstable, completely mobile.”
• Recording 3 (Stability Suggestions): Participants were given verbal cues intended to reinforce a sense of stability, such as:
o “You will be surprised to feel that the stimulation of this canine is going to restabilize you.”
o “As if you were an oak stake firmly anchored in the ground.”
o “Very stable, very immobile.”
o “Completely stable, completely immobile.”
Blinding and Randomization
To minimize bias, participants were blinded to the study’s true hypothesis. They were informed that the study aimed to examine the effects of light dental stimulation on postural stability, without reference to verbal suggestion as a key factor. Randomization ensured an even distribution of participants with potentially different balance capabilities between the control and test groups.
The stabilometric platform recorded multiple postural parameters, but the primary outcome measure was the area of displacement of the center of pressure (CoP), representing the projection of the center of gravity onto the platform. A larger CoP area indicates greater postural instability.
• Descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, variance) were calculated for each group and condition.
• A one-way ANOVA and a Student’s t-test was conducted (after testing the normal distribution of the subjects) to compare mean CoP areas between:
o The control and test groups
o The instability and stability conditions within the test group
• The alpha level was set at 0.05 to determine statistical significance.
Ethical Considerations
This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval was obtained from the local ethics committee prior to participant recruitment (n° 2023TOU33047). All participants provided written informed consent after receiving a detailed explanation of the study's objectives, procedures, potential risks, and benefits.
Descriptive Statistics
A total of 175 participants aged 18 to 45 years, were included in this study out of the 480 students of the dental surgery department. They were divided into two groups:
• Test group (n = 126): Exposed to verbal suggestions of stability and instability during stabilometric recordings.
• Control group (n = 49): Received neutral instructions throughout the experiment.
Demographic Characteristics
• Gender distribution: In the test group, 24% of participants were male and 76% were female, while in the control group, the male-to-female ratio was 30%/70%.
• Age: The mean age of participants was 22.4 years (range: 19–45 years).
• Handedness: 86% of participants were right-handed, while 14% were left-handed, a proportion consistent with general population estimates.
Surface Area of Statokinesigram (Center of Pressure Displacement)
The surface area of the center of pressure (CoP) displacement for both groups across the three recordings is presented in Table 1.
| Group | Observation | Mini | Maxi | Mean | SD | ANOVA | |
| Recording 1 | Test | 126 | 61.6 | 1226.4 | 274.18 | 165.56 | 0.8004 |
| Control | 49 | 61 | 1647.7 | 272.58 | 233.17 | ||
| Recording 2 | Test | 126 | 60.8 | 5922.8 | 454.38 | 789.14 | 0.0480* |
| Control | 49 | 73.1 | 1344.4 | 226.86 | 194.2 | ||
| Recording 3 | Test | 126 | 50.7 | 832 | 217.01 | 125.68 | 0.2191 |
| Control | 49 | 50.5 | 2003.2 | 255.91 | 292.18 |
Table 1: Descriptive Statistics of the Surface Area (mm²) of the Statokinesigram for Both Groups
(Statistically significant differences between groups are indicated with an asterisk)
• In the control group, CoP displacement remained relatively stable across all three recordings, indicating no significant variation in postural stability over time.
• In contrast, the test group, which received different verbal suggestions, exhibited notable variations in CoP displacement:
o Neutral Instructions (Recording 1): Baseline CoP values were comparable to those of the control group.
o Instability Suggestions (Recording 2): A statistically significant increase in CoP displacement (p = 0.008) was observed, suggesting that verbal cues promoting instability induced greater postural sway.
o Stability Suggestions (Recording 3): CoP displacement decreased significantly (p < 0.0001) compared to Recording 2, indicating improved postural stability in response to stability-enhancing suggestions.
These findings highlight the influence of verbal suggestion on postural stability.
Statistical Significance Analysis
To evaluate the significance of changes in CoP displacement between recordings, p-values were calculated for both groups (Table 2) after verification of their normal distribution.
| Comparison | Test Group | Control Group |
| Recording 1 vs 2 | 0.008 | 0.042 |
| Recording 1 vs 3 | <0> | 0.001 |
| Recording 2 vs 3 | 0.001 | 0.447 |
Table 2: Statistical Significance (p-values) Between Recordings
• In the test group, significant differences were observed:
o Between Recording 1 (neutral) and Recording 2 (instability): p = 0.008
o Between Recording 1 (neutral) and Recording 3 (stability): p< 0.0001
o Between Recording 2 (instability) and Recording 3 (stability): p = 0.001
• In the control group, although some small variations in CoP displacement were observed, they were not systematically significant, except between Recording 1 and 2 (p=0.042) and Recording 1 and 3 (p = 0.001), suggesting a potential habituation effect rather than an influence of verbal suggestion.
Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
A one-way ANOVA was conducted to compare CoP displacement across conditions. The results indicated:
• A significant difference in CoP displacement during the instability suggestion condition (p = 0.048), confirming that verbal cues inducing instability significantly affect postural stability.
• No significant differences were found in baseline (neutral) or stability suggestion conditions, suggesting that the body naturally returns to stable postural control when verbal instability cues are removed and when verbal stability cues are added.
Impact of Hypnosis Susceptibility on CoP Displacement
To explore the role of individual susceptibility to hypnosis, the test group was further stratified into two subgroups:
• Normo-receptive participants (n = 111): Participants with typical responsiveness to hypnosis.
• Hyper-receptive participants (n = 15): Participants identified as highly susceptible to hypnosis.
The impact of hypnotizability on CoP displacement was analyzed for each recording (Table 3):
| Group | Recording 1 | Recording 2 | Recording 3 | p-value (Rec 1) | p-value (Rec 2) | p-value (Rec 3) |
| Normo-Receptive (n=111) | 270.57 (SD: 135.99) | 292.92 (SD: 264.45) | 210.01 (SD: 113.93) | 0.0657 | <0> | 0.0889 |
| Hyper-Receptive (n=15) | 354.34 (SD: 304.63) | 1649.19 (SD: 1809.57) | 268.85 (SD: 189.16) |
Table 3: Impact of Hypnosis Susceptibility on CoP Displacement
• During the instability condition (Recording 2), hyper-receptive participants exhibited a significantly greater increase in CoP displacement compared to normo-receptive participants (p< 0.0001).
• For the neutral condition (Recording 1) and the stabilization condition (Recording 3), no significant differences were found between the two groups, indicating that heightened susceptibility to hypnosis primarily affects responses to instability-inducing verbal cues.
Summary of Key Findings
• Verbal suggestion significantly influences postural stability. Instability suggestions lead to increased postural sway, while stability suggestions reduce sway, improving balance.
• The effect of verbal suggestion is statistically significant. ANOVA confirmed significant changes in CoP displacement under instability conditions (p = 0.048).
• Hypnosis susceptibility amplifies the effect of verbal suggestion. Hyper-receptive participants showed a much stronger response to instability cues (p <0.0001).
These results support the hypothesis that cognitive processes and verbal suggestions play a crucial role in postural control, opening new perspectives on the psychological regulation of balance.
This study investigated the relationship between verbal suggestion and postural control using a stabilometric platform to objectively measure the effects of verbal cues promoting either stability or instability. These findings highlight the strong influence of verbal suggestion on postural stability, demonstrating that psychological cues alone can alter postural control.
Sample Selection
Participants were recruited from dental surgery students, as this was the most practical way to obtain a sufficient sample size. The test group primarily consisted of third-year dental students, who were the most accessible and available. Only six students from this cohort declined participation. Additionally, volunteers from the second, fourth, fifth, and sixth years, as well as interns, were included.
While our sample is highly representative of the student population at the Toulouse Faculty of Dental Surgery, it is less so of the general population, particularly in terms of age and gender distribution. In the test group, the male-to-female ratio was 24% to 76%, a proportion similar to that reported by Bracco et al. [10] in their study on jaw relations and postural stability. Most stabilometry studies tend to focus on specific populations, such as young, healthy individuals - like in the studies of Amaricai et al. [11] and Tardieu et al. [12], as well as those replicated by Visser et al. [13] and Doyle et al. [14] - or older patients with balance disorders [15].
Regarding handedness, our sample included 86% right-handed and 14% left-handed participants, a proportion consistent with general population estimates (8–15% left-handed individuals) [16] and similar to the distribution reported by Henderson et al. among UK dental students [9]. Importantly, no participant was included in both the test and control groups.
The participants were in good health, which helps to avoid adding complexity to the interpretation of the results. However, other types of population could be used. As Older adults with Alzheimer’s disease [23] or in the study of Jouira et al. [24] were they investigated the effect of verbal encouragement (VE) on static and dynamic balance in individuals with intellectual disabilities (IDs). Verbal encouragement significantly reduced center of pressure mean velocity values for mild IDs in firm bipedal closed Eyes conditions. The mild IDs group exhibited improved Y Balance Test scores and enhanced Expanded Time Up and Go Test performances for both groups under verbal encouragement. Incorporating verbal encouragement as a motivational strategy in balance training interventions can positively impact static and dynamic balance in individuals with mild IDs, especially in challenging conditions like unipedal stances on firm surfaces [24].
Stabilometric Settings
The recommended minimum recording frequency for stabilometry is 5 Hz, as per standard guidelines (1985); however, this threshold has been criticized by several authors. A higher sampling rate of 40 Hz is now recommended for greater precision [4,7,8]. In our study, we adhered to this higher standard to ensure optimal data reliability.
The Powerful Influence of Suggestion on Balance
Our results clearly demonstrate the significant impact of verbal suggestion on balance control. Participants exposed to verbal cues suggesting instability exhibited a statistically significant increase in their sway area compared to their baseline measurements. This finding suggests that verbal cues, even in the absence of physical manipulation, can create a perception of instability that translates into measurable alterations in postural stability. These results highlight the strong interplay between cognitive processes and physiological responses, reinforcing the notion that seemingly automatic bodily functions can be influenced by psychological factors.
Habituation: A Methodological Consideration and a Potential Area of Inquiry
Our study also revealed a significant habituation effect, with participants in both the control and test groups exhibiting a reduction in sway area over repeated recordings. This finding underscores the importance of accounting for habituation in studies employing stabilometric platforms while also opening new avenues for further research.
For the test group, it remains to be determined what proportion of the reduction in sway area is attributable to suggestion versus habituation. The literature confirms this habituation phenomenon [8, 19]. Ruhe et al. suggest that averaging 3–5 recordings is necessary for reliable data [19]. Their study recommends conducting at least three recordings of 30 seconds each under identical conditions, with the third measurement considered the most stable. Our results align with these findings.
While habituation likely plays a role, future studies should investigate whether the observed decrease in sway area is also influenced by the type of suggestion provided (stability vs. instability), further illuminating the interaction between psychological factors and postural control.
Hypnotizability and Suggestion Susceptibility
Our investigation into the relationship between hypnotizability and susceptibility to suggestion yielded clear findings. Participants identified as "highly receptive" to hypnosis exhibited a more pronounced response to verbal suggestions, particularly those emphasizing instability. Hypnotizability was assessed subjectively by an experienced investigator during hypnosis training sessions. While more standardized methods, such as the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale (SHSS:C) or the Elkins Hypnotizability Scale (EHS), could have been used, these tools are time-consuming (approximately 30 minutes for EHS and 45–60 minutes for SHSS:C per participant) [17,18].
This observation raises interesting questions about the underlying mechanisms governing responses to external cues. It is possible that individuals with higher hypnotizability have a more permeable boundary between conscious and subconscious processing, making them more susceptible to suggestion-induced alterations in both cognitive and physiological domains. Further research, including neurophysiological investigations, could help elucidate the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon.
Although this study provides valuable insights into the interplay between suggestion and balance, it has several limitations or methodological biases. The relatively short recording duration may not fully capture the temporal dynamics of suggestion-induced effects on postural control. Additionally, the lack of multiple testing sessions limits our ability to assess inter-session variability. Future studies could address these limitations by incorporating longer recording times and repeated measurements over extended periods. A novel unconstrained protocol, proposed by Haworth et al., named volitional Limits of Stability (vLOS), shows high test-retest-reliability. They tested if verbal encouragement impacts this protocol and they show that Significant, large increases in sway area with verbal encouragement indicate that top-down mechanisms should be considered in theories of postural control. As well, clinical utilization of novel vLOS should be careful with word selection and delivery of protocol instructions [22]
Beyond the laboratory setting, our findings have potential clinical applications. A better understanding of the interaction between psychological factors and postural control could contribute to the development of novel therapeutic approaches for balance-related disorders, such as vestibular dysfunctions and neurodegenerative diseases [20,21]. Additionally, the methodology employed in this study could be extended to investigate the influence of other sensory inputs, cognitive processes, or emotional states on postural stability.
While exploring personalized interventions was beyond the scope of this study, our findings suggest that verbal suggestions promoting stability could potentially enhance postural control. This opens the door to the use of suggestion as a complementary approach in balance training, particularly for individuals with postural impairments [20]. However, further research is needed to determine the feasibility, efficacy, and optimal application of suggestion-based interventions in clinical settings.
This study investigated the influence of verbal suggestion on postural stability, recording the postural sway of dental students on a stabilometric platform under either neutral or suggestive conditions. Our results demonstrate that the 126 students in the test group exhibited significant variations in their stabilometric recordings depending on the nature of the verbal suggestion, while the control group showed consistent postural recordings across all three measurements. These findings provide strong evidence that psychological factors, particularly verbal suggestion, can modulate postural control, irrespective of individual hypnotic susceptibility.
These results reinforce the idea that stabilometric recordings should not be considered as mere biomechanical measurements, but that they are sensitive to psychological and environmental influences. They underscore the importance of controlling environmental and verbal conditions when conducting stabilometric assessments. The presence of verbal suggestion - whether intentional or inadvertent - can introduce a significant bias in postural measurements. Therefore, to enhance the reliability and reproducibility of stabilometric recordings, we recommend that future studies and clinical assessments adhere to standardized testing conditions, including:
• A neutral, white, passage-free room to minimize external visual or spatial cues.
• A quiet environment where only essential instructions are provided to the participant.
• Standardized verbal instructions, free of suggestive language that could influence postural control.
• Calibrated visual anchoring with eyes open, ensuring uniform testing conditions across participants.
To further explore the robustness and generalizability of these findings, future studies could:
• Repeat the experiment over time to assess the stability and persistence of suggestion-induced postural changes.
• Introduce a randomized order of suggestions to eliminate potential sequence effects.
• Investigate neurophysiological correlates of suggestion-induced postural modulation, using neuroimaging or electrophysiological techniques.
Finally, by demonstrating the strong interplay between cognitive factors and postural control, this study highlights the need to carefully consider environmental and psychological influences in stabilometric assessments. The findings open new perspectives on the role of cognition in motor function and suggest that verbal suggestion could be a relevant factor in balance training or rehabilitation protocols. Further research is needed to explore the long-term effects of suggestion on postural stability and its potential applications in clinical practice.
Acknowledgments: The authors would like to thank all the students from their university for taking part in this study.
Declaration of Interest statement: all the authors deny any conflicts of interest.
Funding: The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.
Author contribution:
Emma STURARO: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Project administration, Visualization, Writing – original draft
Lora MISHRA: Writing – review & editing
Matthieu MINTY: Writing – review & editing
Marie GEORGELIN-GURGEL: Writing – review & editing
Vincent BLASCO-BAQUÉ: Writing – review & editing
Florent DESTRUHAUT: Resources, Methodology, Writing – review & editing
Franck DIEMER: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Project administration, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – original draft
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,
Dear Maria Emerson, Editorial Coordinator of International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, What distinguishes International Journal of Clinical Case Report and Review is not only the scientific rigor of its publications, but the intellectual climate in which research is evaluated. The submission process is refreshingly free of unnecessary formal barriers and bureaucratic rituals that often complicate academic publishing without adding real value. The peer-review system is demanding yet constructive, guided by genuine scientific dialogue rather than hierarchical or authoritarian attitudes. Reviewers act as collaborators in improving the manuscript, not as gatekeepers imposing arbitrary standards. This journal offers a rare balance: high methodological standards combined with a respectful, transparent, and supportive editorial approach. In an era where publishing can feel more burdensome than research itself, this platform restores the original purpose of peer review — to refine ideas, not to obstruct them Prof. Perlat Kapisyzi, FCCP PULMONOLOGIST AND THORACIC IMAGING.
Dear Reader: We have published several articles in the Auctores Publishing, LLC, journal, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports in recent years (CMRR). This is an ‘open access’ journal and the following are our observations. From the initial invitation to submit an article, to the final edits of galley proofs, we have found CMRR personnel to be professional, responsive, rapid and thorough. This entire process begins with Catherine Mitchell, Editorial Coordinator. She is simply outstanding, and, I believe, unparalleled in her capacity. I cannot imagine a more responsive and dedicated Editorial Coordinator. As I read the dates and timing of her correspondence with us, it seems that she never sleeps. I hope Auctores Publishing, LLC, appreciates her efforts as much as these authors do. Thank you to Auctores Publishing, LLC, to the Editorial Staff/Board, and to Catherine Mitchell from a grateful author(s).
Dear Maria Emerson, Editorial Coordinator of - Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. ''I am pleased to provide this testimonial following the publication of our recent case report in this journal. The peer review process was rigorous, constructive, thorough, and conducted in a timely manner. The reviewers’ comments were thoughtful, detailed, and highly constructive, contributing substantially to the refinement, clarity, and scientific robustness of our manuscript. The process was conducted with professionalism and academic integrity throughout. The support provided by the editorial office was exemplary. Communication was consistently prompt, clear, and courteous at all stages of the submission and publication process. The editorial team demonstrated a high level of organization and responsiveness, ensuring that all queries were addressed efficiently and that the process remained transparent and well-coordinated. The overall quality of the journal is reflected in its strong editorial standards, commitment to scientific excellence, and dedication to publishing clinically meaningful research. It has been a privilege to publish our work in this journal, and we would welcome the opportunity to contribute further in the future.'' Best wishes from, Dr. Efstratios Trogkanis, Cardiologist.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of the journal IJCCR, I had a very positive experience with Auctores - Journal throughout the publication process. The Editorial Team was highly responsive, professional, and supportive at every stage. I would like to extend my sincere thanks to the Editor: Grace Pierce, for her guidance and assistance. The peer-review process was smooth and constructive, helping improve the quality of my work. I would gladly recommend Auctores Journal to fellow researchers and authors. Dr. SABITA SINHA, Medical Oncologist, MD (Electro Homeopathy).
Dear Mayra Duenas, Editorial Coordinator of the journal IJCCR, I write here a little on my experience as an author submitting to the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews (IJCCR). This was my first submission to IJCCR and my manuscript was inherently an outsider’s effort. It attempted to broadly identify and then make some sense of life’s under-appreciated mysteries. I initially had responded to a request for possible submissions. I then contacted IJCCR with a tentative topic for a manuscript. They quickly got back with an approval for the submission, but with a particular requirement that it be medically relevant. I then put together a manuscript and submitted it. After the usual back-and-forth over forms and formality, the manuscript was sent off for reviews. Within 2 weeks I got back 4 reviews which were both helpful and also surprising. Surprising in that the topic was somewhat foreign to medical literature. My subsequent updates in response to the reviewer comments went smoothly and in short order I had a series of proofs to evaluate. All in all, the whole publication process seemed outstanding. It was both helpful in terms of the paper’s content and also in terms of its efficient and friendly communications. Thank you all very much. Sincerely, Ted Christopher, Rochester, NY.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is a high quality journal that has a clear and concise submission process. The peer review process was comprehensive and constructive. Support from the editorial office was excellent, since the administrative staff were responsive. The journal provides a fast and timely publication timeline.
Dear Cecilia Lilly, Editorial Coordinator, Endocrinology and Disorders, Thank you so much for your quick response regarding reviewing and all process till publishing our manuscript entitled: Prevalence of Pre-Diabetes and its Associated Risk Factors Among Nile College Students, Sudan. Best regards, Dr Mamoun Magzoub.
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions. I am really grateful for the peers review; their feedback gave me the opportunity to reflect on the message and impact of my work and to ameliorate the article. The editors did a great job in addition by encouraging me to continue with the process of publishing.
Dear Mayra Duenas, Editorial Coordinator of ‘International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews Herewith I confirm an optimal peer review process and a great support of the editorial office of the present journal
Dear Maria Emerson, Editorial Coordinator of ‘International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews’, I appreciate the opportunity to publish my article with your journal. The editorial office provided clear communication during the submission and review process, and I found the overall experience professional and constructive. Best regards, Elena Salvatore.
Dear Editorial Team, Journal-Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, “Publishing my article with Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions has been a highly positive experience. The peer-review process was rigorous yet supportive, offering valuable feedback that strengthened my work. The editorial team demonstrated exceptional professionalism, prompt communication, and a genuine commitment to maintaining the highest scientific standards. I am very pleased with the publication quality and proud to be associated with such a reputable journal.” Warm regards, Dr. Mahmoud Kamal Moustafa Ahmed
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions. It was truly a rewarding experience to work with the journal “Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions”. The peer review process was insightful and encouraging, helping us refine our work to a higher standard. The editorial office offered exceptional support with prompt and thoughtful communication. I highly value the journal’s role in promoting scientific advancement and am honored to be part of it. Best regards, Meng-Jou Lee, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, National Taiwan University Hospital.
Dear Maria Emerson, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. Thank you for publishing our case report: "Clinical Case of Effective Fetal Stem Cells Treatment in a Patient with Autism Spectrum Disorder" within the "Journal of Clinical Research and Reports" being submitted by the team of EmCell doctors from Kyiv, Ukraine. We much appreciate a professional and transparent peer-review process from Auctores. All research Doctors are so grateful to your Editorial Office and Auctores Publishing support! I amiably wish our article publication maintained a top quality of your International Scientific Journal. My best wishes for a prosperity of the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. Hope our scientific relationship and cooperation will remain long lasting. Thank you very much indeed. Kind regards, Dr. Andriy Sinelnyk Cell Therapy Center EmCell
I recommend without hesitation submitting relevant papers on medical decision making to the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I am very grateful to the editorial staff. Maria Emerson was a pleasure to communicate with. The time from submission to publication was an extremely short 3 weeks. The editorial staff submitted the paper to three reviewers. Two of the reviewers commented positively on the value of publishing the paper. The editorial staff quickly recognized the third reviewer’s comments as an unjust attempt to reject the paper. I revised the paper as recommended by the first two reviewers.
Dear Chrystine Mejia, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Neurodegeneration and Neurorehabilitation. “The peer review process was efficient and constructive, and the editorial office provided excellent communication and support throughout. The journal ensures scientific rigor and high editorial standards, while also offering a smooth and timely publication process. We sincerely appreciate the work of the editorial team in facilitating the dissemination of innovative approaches such as the Bonori Method.” Best regards, Dr. Matteo Bonori.
Dear Maria Emerson, Editorial Coordinator, we have deeply appreciated the professionalism demonstrated by the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. The reviewers have extensive knowledge of our field and have been very efficient and fast in supporting the process. I am really looking forward to further collaboration. Thanks. Best regards, Dr. Claudio Ligresti
Dear Ms. Mayra Duenas, Editorial Coordinator, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. “The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews represented the “ideal house” to share with the research community a first experience with the use of the Simeox device for speech rehabilitation. High scientific reputation and attractive website communication were first determinants for the selection of this Journal, and the following submission process exceeded expectations: fast but highly professional peer review, great support by the editorial office, elegant graphic layout. Exactly what a dynamic research team - also composed by allied professionals - needs!" From, Chiara Beccaluva, PT - Italy.
Dear Clarissa Eric, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Studies, Auctores Publishing LLC, USA Office: +1-(302)-520-2644. I would like to express my sincere appreciation for the efficient and professional handling of my case report by the ‘Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Studies’. The peer review process was not only fast but also highly constructive—the reviewers’ comments were clear, relevant, and greatly helped me improve the quality and clarity of my manuscript. I also received excellent support from the editorial office throughout the process. Communication was smooth and timely, and I felt well guided at every stage, from submission to publication. The overall quality and rigor of the journal are truly commendable. I am pleased to have published my work with Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Studies, and I look forward to future opportunities for collaboration. Sincerely, Aline Tollet, UCLouvain.
Dear Chrystine Mejia, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Neurodegeneration and Neurorehabilitation, Auctores Publishing LLC, We would like to thank the editorial team for the smooth and high-quality communication leading up to the publication of our article in the Journal of Neurodegeneration and Neurorehabilitation. The reviewers have extensive knowledge in the field, and their relevant questions helped to add value to our publication. Kind regards, Dr. Ravi Shrivastava.
Dear Clarissa Eric, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Studies, I would like to express my deep admiration for the exceptional professionalism demonstrated by your journal. I am thoroughly impressed by the speed of the editorial process, the substantive and insightful reviews, and the meticulous preparation of the manuscript for publication. Additionally, I greatly appreciate the courteous and immediate responses from your editorial office to all my inquiries. Best Regards, Dariusz Ziora
Dear Ashley Rosa, Editorial Coordinator, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, Auctores Publishing LLC. Thank you for publishing our article, Exploring Clozapine's Efficacy in Managing Aggression: A Multiple Single-Case Study in Forensic Psychiatry in the international journal of clinical case reports and reviews. We found the peer review process very professional and efficient. The comments were constructive, and the whole process was efficient. On behalf of the co-authors, I would like to thank you for publishing this article. With regards, Dr. Jelle R. Lettinga.
Dear Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator, Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, Auctores Publishing LLC. The peer review process of the journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions was excellent and fast, as was the support of the editorial office and the quality of the journal. Kind regards Walter F. Riesen Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Walter F. Riesen.
Dear Erin Aust, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of General Medicine and Clinical Practice. We are pleased to share our experience with the “Journal of General Medicine and Clinical Practice”, following the successful publication of our article. The peer review process was thorough and constructive, helping to improve the clarity and quality of the manuscript. We are especially thankful to Ms. Erin Aust, the Editorial Coordinator, for her prompt communication and continuous support throughout the process. Her professionalism ensured a smooth and efficient publication experience. The journal upholds high editorial standards, and we highly recommend it to fellow researchers seeking a credible platform for their work. Best wishes By, Dr. Rakhi Mishra.
Dr Hala Al Shaikh This is to acknowledge that the peer review process for the article ’ A Novel Gnrh1 Gene Mutation in Four Omani Male Siblings, Presentation and Management ’ sent to the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was quick and smooth. The editorial office was prompt with easy communication.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The entire process including article submission, review, revision, and publication was extremely easy. The journal editor was prompt and helpful, and the reviewers contributed to the quality of the paper. Thank you so much! Eric Nussbaum, MD
Dear Ashley Rosa, Editorial Coordinator, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. Many thanks for publishing this manuscript after I lost confidence the editors were most helpful, more than other journals Best wishes from, Susan Anne Smith, PhD. Australian Breastfeeding Association.
Dear Maria Emerson, Editorial Coordinator, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, Auctores Publishing LLC. I am delighted to have published our manuscript, "Acute Colonic Pseudo-Obstruction (ACPO): A rare but serious complication following caesarean section." I want to thank the editorial team, especially Maria Emerson, for their prompt review of the manuscript, quick responses to queries, and overall support. Yours sincerely Dr. Victor Olagundoye.
Dear Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator, Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, Auctores Publishing LLC. I appreciate the journal (JCCI) editorial office support, the entire team leads were always ready to help, not only on technical front but also on thorough process. Also, I should thank dear reviewers’ attention to detail and creative approach to teach me and bring new insights by their comments. Surely, more discussions and introduction of other hemodynamic devices would provide better prevention and management of shock states. Your efforts and dedication in presenting educational materials in this journal are commendable. Best wishes from, Farahnaz Fallahian.
Dear Ashley Rosa, Editorial Coordinator of the journal - Psychology and Mental Health Care. " The process of obtaining publication of my article in the Psychology and Mental Health Journal was positive in all areas. The peer review process resulted in a number of valuable comments, the editorial process was collaborative and timely, and the quality of this journal has been quickly noticed, resulting in alternative journals contacting me to publish with them." Warm regards, Susan Anne Smith, PhD. Australian Breastfeeding Association.
Dear Jessica, and the super professional team of the ‘Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions’ I am sincerely grateful to the coordinated work of the journal team for the no problem with the submission of my manuscript: “Cardiometabolic Disorders in A Pregnant Woman with Severe Preeclampsia on the Background of Morbid Obesity (Case Report).” The review process by 5 experts was fast, and the comments were professional, which made it more specific and academic, and the process of publication and presentation of the article was excellent. I recommend that my colleagues publish articles in this journal, and I am interested in further scientific cooperation. Sincerely and best wishes, Dr. Oleg Golyanovskiy.
To Dear Erin Aust – Editorial Coordinator of Journal of General Medicine and Clinical Practice! I declare that I am absolutely satisfied with your work carried out with great competence in following the manuscript during the various stages from its receipt, during the revision process to the final acceptance for publication. Thank Prof. Elvira Farina
My article, titled 'No Way Out of the Smartphone Epidemic Without Considering the Insights of Brain Research,' has been republished in the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. The review process was seamless and professional, with the editors being both friendly and supportive. I am deeply grateful for their efforts.
We found the peer review process quick and positive in its input. The support from the editorial officer has been very agile, always with the intention of improving the article and taking into account our subsequent corrections.
Dear Jessica Magne, with gratitude for the joint work. Fast process of receiving and processing the submitted scientific materials in “Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions”. High level of competence of the editors with clear and correct recommendations and ideas for enriching the article.
I thank the ‘Journal of Clinical Research and Reports’ for accepting this article for publication. This is a rigorously peer reviewed journal which is on all major global scientific data bases. I note the review process was prompt, thorough and professionally critical. It gave us an insight into a number of important scientific/statistical issues. The review prompted us to review the relevant literature again and look at the limitations of the study. The peer reviewers were open, clear in the instructions and the editorial team was very prompt in their communication. This journal certainly publishes quality research articles. I would recommend the journal for any future publications.
"I am grateful for the opportunity of contributing to [International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews] and for the rigorous review process that enhances the quality of research published in your esteemed journal. I sincerely appreciate the time and effort of your team who have dedicatedly helped me in improvising changes and modifying my manuscript. The insightful comments and constructive feedback provided have been invaluable in refining and strengthening my work".
To Dear Erin Aust, I would like to express my heartfelt appreciation for the opportunity to have my work published in this esteemed journal. The entire publication process was smooth and well-organized, and I am extremely satisfied with the final result. The Editorial Team demonstrated the utmost professionalism, providing prompt and insightful feedback throughout the review process. Their clear communication and constructive suggestions were invaluable in enhancing my manuscript, and their meticulous attention to detail and dedication to quality are truly commendable. Additionally, the support from the Editorial Office was exceptional. From the initial submission to the final publication, I was guided through every step of the process with great care and professionalism. The team's responsiveness and assistance made the entire experience both easy and stress-free. I am also deeply impressed by the quality and reputation of the journal. It is an honor to have my research featured in such a respected publication, and I am confident that it will make a meaningful contribution to the field.
I would like to express my sincere gratitude for the support and efficiency provided by the editorial office throughout the publication process of my article, “Delayed Vulvar Metastases from Rectal Carcinoma: A Case Report.” I greatly appreciate the assistance and guidance I received from your team, which made the entire process smooth and efficient. The peer review process was thorough and constructive, contributing to the overall quality of the final article. I am very grateful for the high level of professionalism and commitment shown by the editorial staff, and I look forward to maintaining a long-term collaboration with the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
Dear Agrippa Hilda- Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, "The peer review process was very quick and of high quality, which can also be seen in the articles in the journal. The collaboration with the editorial office was very good."
I would like to offer my testimony in the support. I have received through the peer review process and support the editorial office where they are to support young authors like me, encourage them to publish their work in your esteemed journals, and globalize and share knowledge globally. I really appreciate your journal, peer review, and editorial office.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
