AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2692-9392/113
1Kapadokya University, Department of Psychology
2 Erciyes University Faculty of Medicine.
*Corresponding Author: Zekeriya Temircan, Kapadokya University, Department of Psychology.
Citation: Zekeriya Temircan, Türev Demirtaş (2022). The Effects of Perceived Social Support, Psychological Resilience and Coping Strategies on Life Satisfaction in Men Diagnosed with Testicular Cancer. J. Archives of Medical Case Reports and Case Study, 5(4); DOI:10.31579/2692-9392/113
Copyright: © 2022 Zekeriya Temircan, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 14 February 2022 | Accepted: 18 April 2022 | Published: 25 April 2022
Keywords: social support; resilience; coping; testicular cancer
Testicular cancer is one of the most common cancers among young men. The patients diagnosed with testicular cancer may experience psychological disturbances during its diagnosis and treatment process. The present study was examined the effects of perceived social support, psychological resilience and coping strategies on life satisfaction in men diagnosed with testicular cancer. This cross-sectional data was obtained from the participants through different scales. The statistical analysis was included descriptive analysis and multiple logistic regression model for the variables. A total of 174 patients, mean 36, range=20-60 years, were included in the study. Results showed that the variables of HADS depression, HADS anxiety, perceived social support, psychological resilience and coping strategies included in the multiple logistic regression analysis explained the change in life satisfaction variance by 42% (R2 =6.351;
R2 =0.423) determined by p <0.005. The statistical significance was found for HADS depression score (t=-0.31; p=0.000), HADS anxiety (t=-1.07, p=0.002) and psychological resilience (t=-0.23, p=0.001) in terms of life satisfaction levels of patients treated with testicular cancer. There was no statistical significance found among other variables and life satisfaction levels of patients (p>0.005). Testicular cancer, which is common among men, causes negative consequences on the life of individuals. Social support of the patients both during the diagnosis period and during the treatment, it causes changes in life satisfaction and psychological resilience. Therefore, psychological problems such as a decrease in the coping strategies of the patients, depression or anxiety are beginning to be observed.
Testicular cancer is the most common cancer seen in young men. This cancer, which is seen in early ages, affects the family life, career and especially sexual functions of men. With an adequate oncological care, it is most curable cancer with a more than 95% of survival rate [1]. In the studies conducted, psychological disturbances caused by sexual dysfunction and the thought of experiencing infertility problems in the future were found in patients diagnosed with testicular cancer [2]. While high levels of anxiety and depression symptoms were detected in the patients, it was argued that these could have a negative effect on the quality of life of the patients [3]. Testicular cancer and its diagnosis cause some psychological problems in patients. Patients who need psychological support both after the diagnosis and during the treatment process, not knowing the strategies to cope with the problems may cause some negative reactions [4]. The study result demonstrated that erection, ejaculation disorders, fear of infertility and body image problems occur frequently [5]. Testicular cancer is a condition that creates problems with a major life crisis and psychological chronic stress in the diagnosis and medical treatment process among couples. Also, testicular cancer, which is a life crisis for individuals; it reduces the psychological resilience of individuals and partners, forces coping strategies, consumes their energy both physically and psychologically [6]. However, the diagnosis and treatment of testicular cancer also negatively affects the life satisfaction of individuals. For this reason, the diagnosis and treatment process of cancer is a process in which individuals need more social support and want to perceive this support at a high level.
Since the life expectancy of cured testicular patients is long, minimizing the effects on long-term health
and quality of life are important goals [7]. Although it is predicted that patients' psychological resilience and life satisfaction and often psychological symptoms may be observed during the treatment process of testicular cancer, there is no study conducted on this subject.
This study aimed to investigate the effects of perceived social support, psychological resilience and coping strategies on the life satisfaction variable of patients diagnosed with testicular cancer. In addition, it was aimed to reveal the effects of depression, somatization and anxiety that patients have on life satisfaction.
Study Design
The study was a descriptive and cross-sectional study using survey questionnaires to measure the outcome variables. A total of 174 men diagnosed with a testicular cancer at the age of 20-60 were included in the study. The survey method was used to collect data from the participants.
Instruments
Participants’ socio-demographic characteristics such as age, marital status, educational level, income and other clinical characteristics were collected and evaluated.
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale is a commonly use for the participants to measure anxiety and depression levels. Consisting of 14 items, HADS measures both anxiety (HADS-A) and depression (HADS-D) levels with an equal number of questions. Patients rank the question on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 3 and the subscale from 0 to 21. A total score of 8 or above was defined as an optimal cut-off score for comfort for both anxiety and depression.
The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS)
Multidimensional Perceived Social Support Scale was developed to determine the social support elements perceived by individuals. It consists of 12 items in total. It is a 7-point (1-7 points), likert-type scale ranging from "absolutely no" to absolutely yes. The source of perceived social support can be measured in three sub-dimensions: family, friends, and significant others. The lowest score that can be obtained from the subscales is 4 and the highest score is 28. The lowest score to be obtained from the whole scale is 12, and the highest score is 84.
The Coping Attitudes Scale (CAS)
The scale consists of 60 questions and 15 subscales. Each of these scales provides information about a separate coping attitude. As a result, the higher the scores to be obtained from the subscales give the possibility to comment on which coping attitude is used more by the person. Five of these coping
attitudes (active coping, planning, suppressing other occupations, holding back, use of useful social support) are classified as problem-focused. The other five coping attitudes (use of emotional social support, positive reinterpretation and development, acceptance, joking, and religious coping) are classified as emotion-oriented. The other five coping attitudes (focusing on the problem and revealing emotions, behavioral disengagement, substance use, denial and mental disengagement) are classified as the least useful non-functional coping attitude.
The Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWL)
The Satisfaction with Life Scale was prepared by Diener et al. (1985) in order to determine the level of satisfaction with life and to conduct standard studies on this subject. This scale consists of 5 items that include the expressions: "My life is close to my ideals in many aspects, my living conditions are very good, I am satisfied with my life, I have achieved what I wanted so far, and if I were born again, I would hardly change anything in my life." It is a 5-point Likert type self-rating scale. Its scoring is between 5-25. It provides a measure of satisfaction for individuals in all their lives and all aspects of their lives. It gives people the opportunity to evaluate and rate themselves. If the individual gets a low score on the scale, it means that his/her life satisfaction is low and that he/she gets a high score means that his / her life satisfaction is high.
The Resilience Scale for Adults (RSA)
It is a 5-point Likert-type scale that includes a total of 33 items, in order to avoid biased evaluations in choosing the items, in which positive and negative features are on different sides. The dimensions in the scale are named as 'self-perception', 'future perception', 'structural style', 'social competence', 'family adaptation' and 'social resources'. In the assessment, the scoring method was allowed to measure psychological resilience high or low, and it was suggested that existing inverse questions should be evaluated according to this scheme. Friborg et al. (2003) were developed the scale.
Statistical Analyses
The obtain data was analyzed using the SPSS 23 package program. The descriptive analysis including mean, standard deviation, percentage and frequency were calculated. Logistic regression and multiple linear regression analysis were used to examine whether the study has a significant predictive effect on dependent variables. The statistical significance was taken as p <0>
A total of 173 testicular cancer patients were included in this study with a mean age of 36 (SD 12.76). The majority of them (81.1%) were married, had tertiary education (41.9%) and low income (67.8%). The most of them were smoked cigarettes (62.6%) and used alcohol (72.9%). In addition, the majority of them had surgery (64.3%) and had no comorbidities (79.3%)
In Table 2, mean scores, standard deviation and ranges of domains of HADS, MSPSS, CAS, SWL and RSA were presented. The mean HADS-anxiety score was 1.9 (SD = 2.9) while the mean score of HADS- depression was 1.8 (SD = 2.5). The CAS scores ranged from 8.0–63.0 with a mean of 22.9 (SD = 8.7) indicating level of coping attitudes. The SWL scores ranged from 5.0–25.0 with a mean of 12.2 (SD = 4.2) indicating mild level of life satisfaction among the participants. The highest mean score of family was
54.7 (SD = 8.5) among MSPSS subscales, followed by 48.5 (SD = 9.3) for friends and 53.3 (SD = 5.8) for others. The RSA scores ranged from 22.0–62.0 with a highest mean 52.4 (SD = 6.4) of social resources and lowest mean 47.5 (SD = 8.2) of perception of self. Other scores and range of subscales of RSA were distributed between the highest and lowest mean scores along with the ranges.
Table 3 presents multiple logistic regression to determine whether the independent variables had an effect on the result. Analyzes were performed using the enter model in multiple linear regression analysis. The significance and explanation percentage of the model with all variables were calculated. In the regression analysis, the model was created with the stepwise variable selection method. The modeling process was performed with the independent variables of HADS anxiety, HADS depression, MSPSS, CAS,
SWL and RSA. These independent variables were scored with the calculations specified in the scales. Accordingly, the model was found to be significant as a result of the variance analysis of the regression equation obtained as a result of the analysis (F = 6.138; p < 0 xss=removed xss=removed t =-0.31; xss=removed t =-1.07, xss=removed t=-0.23, xss=removed> 0.005).
Testicular cancer is the most common type of cancer in almost 1% of men between the ages of 20 and 40 [8]. The most common problems faced by patients diagnosed with testicular cancer are sexual function problems. However, the most common mental problems among patients were stated as anxiety and depression. Factors such as the diagnosis of cancer, age, family history, smoking, alcohol use and psychological endurance were among the important factors affecting the treatment process of the disease [9]. The ages of the participants in the study ranged from 20 to 60 and the mean age was 36. The education level of patients diagnosed with testicular cancer is very important in terms of treatment process, reproductive and health behaviors. This variable affects the perception of cancer and the level of cancer-related problems [10]. For this reason, those with a high level of education may be more conscious during the treatment process. When the educational status of the participants was evaluated, it was found that most of the participants were tertiary (41.9%). The low education level of individuals; it is thought to lead to a decrease in their quality of life, less awareness of health risks, not knowing about health protective measures, not being able to use coping strategies when they experience health
problems, and a decrease in their psychological resilience. The results from this study show that the majority of men diagnosed with testicular cancer patients report high level of anxiety and depression symptoms. Also, the results of the study indicate an increased occurrence of psychological resilience after a diagnosis of testicular cancer [11]. There was a significant different between the patients who had diagnosed with testicular cancer, levels of depression, anxiety and psychological resilience. Although, there is a gap in the literature regarding this subject and testicular cancer patients, previous studies reported that psychological problems such as high level of anxiety and depression symptoms are related to testicular cancer patients during diagnosis and treatment process [12]. The study results have shown that psychosocial factors such as emotional disorders, spouse problems, lack of social support or social exclusion accompanying patients' increased stress can lead to a decrease in life satisfaction [13]. In addition, other studies reported that the social support perceived by cancer patients from their spouses has positive effects on life satisfaction. Social support directly affects life satisfaction in cancer patients' coping with the disease during the treatment process [14]. It has been reported that the level of psychological resilience due to stress and anxiety decreases in patients diagnosed with testicular cancer and treated [15]. Thus, this has a negative effect on the quality of life. The psychological resilience of the patients is related to different variables in the treatment process and the importance of supporting psychological resilience in coping with the negativities experienced by the individuals and increasing their life satisfaction. In this study, it was found that resilience has a positive effect on life satisfaction.
Although there are no studies on the low relationship between testicular cancer, which is one of the traumatic and negative life events, and life satisfaction, it has been reported in other cancer studies that individuals with more coping strategies have more positive life satisfaction. It has been reported that coping strategies directly contribute to changes in life satisfaction and are likely to change the level of life satisfaction.
Testicular cancer, which is common among men, causes negative consequences on the life of individuals. Social support of the patients both during the diagnosis period and during the treatment, it causes changes in life satisfaction and psychological resilience.
Therefore, psychological problems such as a decrease in the coping strategies of the patients, depression or anxiety are beginning to be observed. Testicular cancer is not only an oncological disorder, but also psychologically, and patients should be given support to cope with psychological disturbances and increase their psychological resilience.
We would like to extend our gratitude and sincere to Prof. Dr. Abdullah Demirtas for his support, guidance and endless motivation to make this research possible
Funding – The study did not receive any fund or financial support
Conflict of Interest – The authors declared that there is no conflict or interest Availability of data and transparency – The data is available upon request Code Availability – N/A
Ethical Approval – The study was obtained ethical approval from Erciyes University Medical School Ethic Committee
Consent to Participate – The consent was obtained from all participants Consent for Publication – The authors give consent for publication Author Contribution – Conception; Zekeriya Temircan Türev Demirtaş,
Design; Zekeriya Temircan Türev Demirtaş, Supervision; Zekeriya Temircan, Materials; Türev Demirtaş, Data Collection; Zekeriya Temircan Türev Demirtaş, Writer; Zekeriya Temircan Türev Demirtaş, Critical Review; Türev Demirtaş, Final Approval; Zekeriya Temircan Türev Demirtaş
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
