AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-4861/366
1 Associate Professor Department of Anesthesia & Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
2 Adjunct Assistant Professor Department of Surgical Neurophysiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
3 Assistant Professor Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA.
4 Cardiac Anesthesiologist CASE Anesthesia Group, Sacramento, CA.
5 Professor Department of Anesthesia & Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
*Corresponding Author: Andrew E. Schober, MD 521 Parnassus Avenue #4310 UCSF Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care San Francisco, California, USA.
Citation: Andrew E. Schober, John P. Clark, Amy Chen, Steven Hur, Jeremy A. Lieberman (2024), The Effects of High-Dose Ketamine on Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring in Patients with Myelopathy: A Case Series, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, 16(2); DOI:10.31579/2690-4861/366
Copyright: © 2024, Andrew E. Schober. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 12 December 2023 | Accepted: 15 January 2024 | Published: 26 January 2024
Keywords: ketamine; neuromonitoring; evoked potentials; meps; myelopathy; case series
Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) allow for real-time monitoring of the corticospinal tracts during spine surgery. MEPs can be difficult to obtain in patients with cervicothoracic myelopathy. We describe 5 myelopathic patients undergoing spine surgery with insufficient MEPs on a standard propofol-based anesthetic. Conversion to high-dose ketamine (20 mcg/kg/min) with other minimally suppressive agents resulted in signal enhancement in a majority (36 of 63) of muscle groups with adequate anesthesia and minimal adverse effects, although with considerable variability in the durability of this effect. High-dose ketamine appears to be a safe and viable option to attempt to augment poor baseline MEP signals.
ALIF: anterior lumbar interbody fusion
IONM: intraoperative neuromonitoring
IRB: institutional review board
MEP: motor evoked potential
POD: post-operative day
PSF: posterior spinal fusion
SSEP: somatosensory evoked potential
UCSF: University of California San Francisco
Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) is utilized during spine surgery to monitor the functional integrity of the spinal cord and nerve roots. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) allow for real-time assessment of corticospinal pathways at risk for injury [1]. Anesthetic agents are chosen to maintain conduction along these pathways and optimize MEPs in order to detect evolving neural injury. Hypnotic agents, like propofol, and volatile agents tend to depress evoked potentials, with MEPs being particularly sensitive to suppression compared to somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) [2, 3]. Other anesthetics, including benzodiazepines, lidocaine, and opiates, appear to have negligible effects on evoked potential responses [4]. Ketamine is a short-acting intravenous anesthetic agent which is increasingly being utilized as an adjunct in complex spine surgery due to its opiate-sparing and anti-hyperalgesic effects [5-7]. However, the reported effects of ketamine on MEPs are inconsistent [8-11].
Cervicothoracic myelopathy is a disease of the spinal cord that impairs motor and sensory function, which is reflected in the MEP and SSEP responses [12]. While measuring MEPs is more difficult in these patients, monitoring the integrity of the corticospinal tracts remains critical to avoid further injury, since the incidence of adverse neurologic outcomes following surgery is proportional to disease severity [12, 13]. Several case reports in pediatric patients with pre-existing myelopathy describe improvement in IONM with a ketamine-based anesthetic [14-16]. Low-dose ketamine (1-5 mcg/kg/min) appears to augment, or at least not depress, MEP amplitudes[8, 9]. However, high-dose ketamine may reduce MEP amplitudes in some situations [10, 11]. To our knowledge, no one has described the efficacy of a high-dose (> 10 mcg/kg/min) ketamine-based anesthetic to augment IONM in adult spine surgery patients with myelopathy.
We present a series of five patients with cervicothoracic myelopathy undergoing spine surgery where high-dose ketamine, in conjunction with other minimally suppressive anesthetics, was used to augment poor baseline MEPs. Waiver of written consent for this retrospective review was granted by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at UCSF.
Five patients presented for spine surgery at the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) Medical Center due to cervicothoracic myelopathy. Pertinent medical history and surgical details for each patient are described in Table 1. In each case, initial MEP signals were determined to be unmonitorable on a standard propofol-based total intravenous anesthetic (TIVA) by the intraoperative neurophysiologist due to a lack of reproducible signals below the level of the lesion. An intraoperative wake-up test in the prone position was performed in Patients #1 and #3 to confirm intact gross motor function before proceeding.
Table 2 describes key characteristics of the intraoperative anesthetic and the effect of the high-dose ketamine (20 mcg/kg/min) anesthetic intervention on the MEPs for each patient. Conversion to a high-dose ketamine and opiate anesthetic allowed for substantial reduction in propofol in all cases. Since this reduction in propofol was not protocolized, the minimum propofol infusion rates varied (20-60 mcg/kg/min). In addition, the opiate adjunct varied at the discretion of the anesthesiologist. In all cases except one (Patient #4), ketamine infusions were initiated with a bolus. We further titrated the anesthetic to ensure the absence of burst suppression in the raw electroencephalogram (EEG) and based on clinical parameters to balance optimization of MEP signals with an adequate depth of anesthesia.
Given the severity of myelopathy, signals were generally of low amplitude and poor quality, making quantitative assessment of amplitude change challenging. Thus, MEP signals for each muscle group monitored were categorized as enhanced, unchanged, or worsened by qualitative comparison of the peak-to-peak amplitude before and after changing to a high-dose ketamine anesthetic. Of the 73 myotomes in which monitoring was attempted, technical issues (over-amplification and electrical interference) prevented accurate comparison in 10 myotomes.
After conversion to a high-dose ketamine anesthetic, all patients had some MEPs that were deemed monitorable below the level of the lesion by the neurophysiologist. Figure 1 displays an example of enhancement of MEPs from a single muscle group over time in Patient #3. The increase in peak-to-peak amplitude correlates with the initiation of ketamine and reduction of propofol. This augmentation degraded over time, which is typical of prolonged exposure to anesthesia.
Figure 1: An example of anesthetic and motor evoked potential (MEP) data from the left tibialis anterior of patient #3. A. The dose of propofol and ketamine infusions (top) as well as peak-to-peak voltage measurements of the MEPs (below) are plotted over a 24-hour clock base (~17:00-23:00). B. Sample MEP tracings from the left tibialis anterior at various timepoints over the course of the surgical period (time bar: 100 mV, 20 ms). Both show enhancement during the change from standard total intravenous anesthetic (TIVA) to a high-dose ketamine anesthetic with reduction of propofol.
Despite the presence of some monitorable signal in each patient, the effects of this anesthetic change on individual MEP responses varied. In the 63 myotomes monitored over all 5 cases, 33 showed enhancement, 15 were unchanged, and 15 worsened after conversion to a high-ketamine anesthetic. In 3 patients (Patients #1, 3, and 4), MEPs showed enhancement in most recordings (22/32 muscles), while a minority were unchanged (10/32 muscles), and none worsened. In the remaining 2 patients (Patients #2 and #5), a minority of myotomes were enhanced (11/31 muscles), while the majority were either unchanged (5/31 muscles) or worsened (15/31 muscles). Of the 33 myotomes that enhanced, only 15 (45%) were sustained for the remainder of the monitoring period.
Adverse effects were minimal. 3 of 5 patients were extubated in the operating room. Two patients remained intubated for airway protection. Patient #1 initially failed a cuff leak test but was extubated uneventfully on post-operative day (POD) #2 once facial edema and the cuff leak improved. Patient #5 remained intubated for airway concerns, given the extent of the fusion to the occiput, but was extubated uneventfully on POD#1 once airway patency was confirmed by CT scan and fiberoptic laryngoscopy / bronchoscopy. Both patients had a monitorable neurologic exam post-operatively while intubated. One patient experienced mild, transient hallucinations. None of the patients reported intraoperative recall and none suffered from significant delirium.
Effective IONM in the anesthetized myelopathic patient can be challenging. Standard anesthetic techniques may be incompatible with obtaining adequate MEP responses. In the cases presented, high-dose ketamine, in conjunction with an opiate and a lower-dose propofol anesthetic, was used as an alternative to more typical anesthetic regimens for severely myelopathic patients when MEP amplitudes were otherwise unmonitorable. This case series shows that using high-dose ketamine as part of a balanced anesthetic is safe and well-tolerated but also may be effective in myelopathic patients undergoing spine surgery.
Conversion to a high-dose ketamine anesthetic enhanced MEPs in a subset of myotomes that otherwise could not be monitored (33 of 63 myotomes). The most likely explanation is that the use of ketamine enabled a reduction in anesthetic agents that suppress MEPs, such as propofol [2]. While propofol may be less suppressive than volatile agents [3, 17], in patients with significant spinal cord compromise, consistently amnestic doses of propofol may be incompatible with obtaining reliable MEPs[12]. The use of alternative agents, in this case ketamine, may allow for adequate anesthesia so that propofol can be reduced or eliminated[18]. This is supported indirectly by the observation that the patient (#2) with the highest minimum propofol infusion rate compared to the other patients (60 mcg/kg/min vs. 20-50 mcg/kg/min) had the least improvement in MEPs. Alternatively, ketamine may augment MEPs by increasing cortical excitability through NMDA receptor antagonism and disinhibition of excitatory cortical neurons. This may allow for sufficient corticospinal tract signaling through the myelopathic spinal cord segment to produce MEPs, manifesting as decreased MEP thresholds [19].
While a subset of MEPs were deemed sufficient to proceed with surgery after initiation of high-dose ketamine (20 mcg/kg/min), the effect on individual myotomes was inconsistent. Different myotomes in the same patient showed considerable variability in the response to ketamine and the durability of this effect over time. Since high-dose ketamine was initiated as part of a complex, balanced anesthetic to rescue extremely poor baseline MEPs, the type and dose of the opiate infusion and other non-opiate analgesic medications were not controlled. In addition, the myotomes monitored and titration of evoked potential stimuli were not standardized, making it difficult to compare signal amplitude between patients and even over time within the same patient. Future controlled studies assessing the effects of ketamine on MEPs should aim to reduce the variability reported here and in other studies [10,11,20] by protocolizing anesthetic titration as well as standardizing evoked potential stimuli and waveform analysis.
Higher doses of ketamine are often avoided due to the perceived risk of psychomimetic effects, including hallucinations, dysphoria, and emergence delirium [21, 22]. In this series, there were minimal adverse effects attributable to the anesthetic aside from mild visual hallucinations experienced by Patient #5, which were transient and not distressing. This is consistent with work showing a lower incidence of adverse psychomimetic effects associated with ketamine when used in conjunction with low-dose propofol, as was done in this study [23]. While reliable amnesia may be a concern when propofol is substantially reduced, no patient experienced recall, despite performing a wake-up test in 2 patients. There did not appear to be a substantial increase in anesthetic duration or need for post-operative intubation. Both patients who remained intubated were able to participate in a neurologic exam in the immediate post-operative period. Thus, the balanced anesthetic combination described was generally well tolerated.
Based on our experience, high-dose ketamine should be considered in patients with cervicothoracic myelopathy undergoing complex spine surgery where there is high concern for injury to the corticospinal tracts and when MEPs are insufficient using traditional propofol-based regimens. Due to the increased potential for delirium and negative psychomimetic side effects, it would be premature to recommend this technique in the general spine surgery population without further prospective, controlled studies. Instead, it is the opinion of the authors that the potential negative effects must be weighed against the risk of neurologic injury undertaken by proceeding in the absence of adequate monitoring of MEPs. In the end, if there is some concern regarding the adequacy of IONM signals, a wake-up test should be considered. This is generally well tolerated, even in the prone position, and often without post-operative recall. Further study is needed to see if this anesthetic regimen is useful for other case types or patient populations, as the effect of high-dose ketamine may be different in patients without myelopathy.
In a small subset of patients with cervicothoracic myelopathy undergoing complex spine surgery, MEPs are unmonitorable using a standard propofol-based anesthetic. In this limited series, use of a high-dose ketamine-based anesthetic allowed monitoring of MEPs and enhanced MEP amplitude from a majority of muscle groups measured. Prospective, controlled studies are needed to further clarify the effects of high-dose ketamine on evoked potentials.
There are no additional supplementary materials included with this case series aside from the Table 1, Table 2, and Figure 1.
The authors declare no conflicts of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
All authors had access to the data and a role in writing this manuscript.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
